[Bug 2090992] Re: [SRU] alembic database migrations missing from package

2025-05-27 Thread Alan Baghumian
I also confirm using the jammy-proposed package fixed the DB migration issues when upgrading from Bobcat to Caracal. ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 2090992] Re: [SRU] alembic database migrations missing from package

2025-05-26 Thread Alan Baghumian
Related to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron-dynamic- routing/+bug/2069814 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2090992 Title: [SRU] alembic database migrations missing fro

[Bug 2069814] Re: alembic.script.revision.ResolutionError: No such revision or branch 'f399fa0f5f25'

2025-05-26 Thread Alan Baghumian
There is an SRU in progress to fix this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron-dynamic- routing/+bug/2090992 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069814 Title: alembic.script.

[Bug 2069814] Re: alembic.script.revision.ResolutionError: No such revision or branch 'f399fa0f5f25'

2025-05-26 Thread Alan Baghumian
We are also hitting the same error upgrading from Bobcat to Caracal: juju/unit-neutron-api-1.log-2025-05-26 06:14:29 WARNING unit.neutron-api/1.config-changed logger.go:60 File "/usr/bin/neutron-db-manage", line 10, in juju/unit-neutron-api-1.log-2025-05-26 06:14:29 WARNING unit.neutron-api/

[Bug 2107977] Re: Make performance governor the default on AMD based systems.

2025-04-22 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hi Kim, Thank you for opening this request. Others please feel free to chime in but I am pretty confident the short answer will be No. This is not going to happen. Picking the performance as the default governor is outright wrong. Ubuntu lives on many different hardware types including Desktops,

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-04-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Sunil, Please try the preseed file using in-target mode: #cloud-config debconf_selections: maas: | {{for line in str(curtin_preseed).splitlines()}} {{line}} {{endfor}} late_commands: maas: [wget, '--no-proxy', {{node_disable_pxe_url|escape.json}}, '--post-data', {{node_disable_px

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-04-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
@Rrizun If you are using bonds, this is the issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106671 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-04-08 Thread Alan Baghumian
My pleasure @Rrizun In your deployments, do you happen to use OpenVSwitch bridges with your deployments? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-04-04 Thread Alan Baghumian
For the time being until we figure out what is going on you can override / downgrade cloud-init during deployments using the following preseed file: #cloud-config debconf_selections: maas: | {{for line in str(curtin_preseed).splitlines()}} {{line}} {{endfor}} late_commands: maas: [wget, '

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
@James I'm testing that as we speak - I'll report back shortly -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update To manage notifications abo

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
My Noble Results are in (Snippet from the build process): cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Preparing to unpack .../cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~24.04.2_all.deb ... cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Unpacking cloud-init (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~24.04.2) over (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~24.04.1) ... cloudimg.image.qemu.cloud

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
OK! Third time's a charm! Built a new image (Note the snippet from build): cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Preparing to unpack .../cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.2_all.deb ... cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Unpacking cloud-init (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.2) over (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1) ... cloudim

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
You are right! The .2 deb is missing: [ ] cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1.debian.tar.xz2025-02-17 19:23103K [TXT] cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1.dsc 2025-02-17 19:232.1K [ ] cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1_all.deb 2025-02-17 19:25 556K [

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
I spoke too soon about Focal. It seems like the patch does not contain a full fix. Even though the deployment is successful, you can not SSH to the machine and the host name also does not correctly set. I reverted the tag and attaching the cloud-init logs as well as the journals. Please let me k

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Deployment Screenshot ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2025-03-15 20-26-37.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2100963/+attachment/5865063/+files/Screenshot%20from%202025-03-15%2020-26-37.png ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tag

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Timo, I went ahead and built a Custom MAAS image using Focal (packer- maas/ubuntu). This build was modified to pull the new cloud-init package from focal-proposed: ==> cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: + apt-get install -y --allow-downgrades cloud-init=24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 grub-efi-amd64-b

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Focal Tag has been updated to verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Timo! Thank you so much for the quick turnaround on this issue. I also tested building a fresh Jammy image with the new package and it deploys fine w/o any issues now. Output snippet from the build log: cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/m

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
I hit this exact same issue while building and deploying Ubuntu images using packer-maas. The solution as suggested above was to use the older version of cloud- init during the image build process: apt-get install -y --allow-downgrades cloud-init=23.1.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 This is concerning, as I

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble verification-needed-oracular ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble verification-done-oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Noble Verification Screenshot - SSH" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843437/+files/lp2077382-noble-verification-cli.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Jammy Verification Screenshot - SSH" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843436/+files/lp2077382-jammy-verification-cli.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Oracular Verification Screenshot - SSH" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843438/+files/lp2077382-oracular-verification-cli.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hi Mauricio, as discussed, also adding the verification screenshots taken from SSH as described in the original test plan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077382 Title: [SRU] support

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Jammy Verification Screenshot - MAAS UI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843174/+files/lp2077382-jammy-verification-maas-ui.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Mauricio! Sure thing. I just did a manual verification following these steps: 1) Used the script to deploy machines using python3-libmass in mod-new 2) Prevented the script from releasing them to validate and take a screen shot from the MAAS UI Adding the screenshots. -- You received th

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Oracular Verification Screenshot - MAAS UI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843176/+files/lp2077382-oracular-verification-maas-ui.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Noble Verification Screenshot - MAAS UI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843175/+files/lp2077382-noble-verification-maas-ui.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble verification-needed-oracular ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble verification-done-oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
And the last one! Oraculat verification has been also completed successfully. ** Attachment added: "Oracular Verification Screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5842633/+files/lp2077382-oracular-verification.png -- You received th

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello Again @Timo Noble verification has been also completed successfully. ** Attachment added: "Noble verification Screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5842632/+files/lp2077382-noble-verification.png -- You received this bug no

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Timo I modified the verification python script attached above after enabling jammy-proposed and completed the verification for Jammy. def install_python_libmaas_modified(): print_colored("Installing Modified version of python3-libmaas=0.6.8-0ubuntu0.22.04.2", "yellow") subprocess.

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Debdiff for Plucky ** Patch added: "Debdiff for Plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831503/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Refreshed debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "Refreshed debdiff for Jammy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831500/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-24 Thread Alan Baghumian
^^ I removed the patch flag from debdiffs to satisfy this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077382 Title: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy() To manage notifications about

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-24 Thread Alan Baghumian
Debdiff for Oracular ** Patch added: "Debdiff for Oracular" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831502/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-24 Thread Alan Baghumian
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "Debdiff for Noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831501/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just a quick update, our client completed the PPA testing process on their end. They were able to use the PPA packages to perform deployments using the newly added parameters. Best, Alan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Please make sure to update the following variables before using: maas_endpoint = "/MAAS/api/2.0/" maas_apikey = "" test_system_id = "" ** Attachment removed: "SRU Automated Test Script" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5821222/+files/maas-pytho

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
Attaching an automated deployment test script. Please update the following variables before using: maas_endpoint = "/MAAS/api/2.0/" maas_apikey = "" test_system_id = "" ** Attachment added: "SRU Automated Test Script" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+att

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Description changed: [ Impact ] * This SRU is not addressing an existing problem but adds support for two additional optional parameters being ephemeral_deploy and enable_hw_sync on deploy(). For more details please see (1). + + + [ Test Plan ] + + * Pre-Requisits: A MAAS controll

[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature

2024-09-20 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @James I just tested the Focal Proposed packages on my Sapphire Rapids Compute Node: $ juju config nova-compute-focal cpu-mode custom $ juju config nova-compute-focal cpu-model Cascadelake-Server-noTSX $ juju config nova-compute-focal cpu-model-extra-flags -mpx Before Upgrade: ubuntu@no

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Patch added: "Jammy Debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5808702/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Description changed: - This is a SRU bug report for this feature that has already been merged - upstream (1). + [Impact] - This implements support for ephemeral_deploy as well as enable_hw_sync - on deploy(). + * This SRU is not addressing an existing problem but adds support for + two addit

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Also affects: python-libmaas (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-libmaas (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-libmaas (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: High Assignee: Alan Baghumian (alanbach

[Bug 2077382] [NEW] [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-19 Thread Alan Baghumian
) Importance: High Assignee: Alan Baghumian (alanbach) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: python-libmaas (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alan Baghumian (alanbach) ** Changed in: python-libmaas (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: python-libmaas (

[Bug 2013390] Re: CPU Lockup related to xhci/DMA

2024-07-04 Thread Alan Baghumian
I am experiencing a very similar issue on a new AMD Ryzen 7 machine running Jammy + 6.5 HWE kernel, when USB Ethernet adapter is under heavy load: Jul 4 13:09:21 kvm-09 kernel: [ 2383.690610] [ cut here ] Jul 4 13:09:21 kvm-09 kernel: [ 2383.690615] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enxe

[Bug 2062177] Re: Remmina crashes after RDP connection

2024-04-26 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just rebuilt and installed fresh packages on Noble using the supplied patch above and all good now! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062177 Title: Remmina crashes after RDP connectio

[Bug 1573447] Re: large jpeg file crashes Eye of Gnome

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested the above image with eog 3.36.3-0ubuntu1 (Focal) and it crashed (Virtual Machine with 2 CPU cores and 4GB RAM). Tested with eog 42.0-1 (Jammy) and it worked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1774081] Re: /etc/gdm3/Init/Default not evaluated

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with gdm3 3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 (Focal) and this is still happening. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774081 Title: /etc/gdm3/Init/Default not evaluated To manage notifi

[Bug 1769372] Re: Prompt the user when the power button is pressed on a VM

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is also affecting Virsh (KVM/QEMU) based virtual machines. Just tested with The latest Focal update (gnome-settings-daemon 3.36.1-0ubuntu1.1) and the machine was turned off without any notifications. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 551432] Re: virt-manager create disk image with LVM hangs for ever

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is no longer reproducible. I always create volumes this way and it works. The latest version tested with Jammy Jellyfish: 1:4.0.0-1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551432 Title: v

[Bug 337763] Re: virt-manager reboot action is non-functional

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is no longer reproducible. I use this function all the time and it just works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337763 Title: virt-manager reboot action is non-functional To manag

[Bug 1879169] Re: Thumbs never updated after renaming a bunch of image files

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and this does not happen. Followed the same scenario and renamed 2 out of 4 sample files: 1) Using Nautilus itself. 2) Closed Nautilus and renamed the files in terminal. In both cases Nautilus automatically regenerated the thumbnails.

[Bug 1576252] Re: Launching nautilus from the command line fails to bring window to front if open already

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and was not able to reproduce this issue. Should be fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576252 Title: Launching nautilus

[Bug 1444210] Re: Previewed files are not deleted

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just tested this with Bionic and it seems to be fixed. Previewed files ~/.cache/.fr- no longer exist after closing file-roller. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444210 Title: Preview

[Bug 1904580] Re: Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

2022-03-29 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just did a test myself and the bug is still present. Simply re-install your nova-common package and there goes the SSH key permissions. As others mentioned, it is indeed this line in the postinst script: find /var/lib/nova -type f -exec chmod 0644 "{}" + -o -type d -exec chmod 0755 "{}" + -- Y

[Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed with zfs encryption

2022-02-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Thank you all for investigating and fixing this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 Title: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed with zfs encryption To manage no

[Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
I confirmed this is happening. Here are two ways to reproduce: 1) Grabbed jammy-desktop-amd64.iso nightly build (Feb 2). Installing a system using this ISO, while choosing Encryption + ZFS lands you on this error. 2) Installed Impish using an ISO from October 12, choosing Encryption + ZFS. The sy

[Bug 1960974] Re: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1959085 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 I performed some tests last night and confirm this is indeed unrelated to Ubiquity and related to #1959085. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1959085 Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs --

[Bug 1960974] Re: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
This seems to be related to #1959085, going to try it later to confirm that Ubiquity is not the culprit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960974 Title: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted

[Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just found this, I encountered this exact same issue with Jammy Desktop installer last night and filed a bug here : #1960974 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 Title: Ubuntu 21.

[Bug 1960974] [NEW] Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Public bug reported: 1) Booted Ubuntu Jammy Desktop ISO made using UNetbootin 2) Started installer 3) Picked Erase Disk + ZFS + Encryption 4) Installation completed successfully and the machine reboots 5) After asking decryption password, the system drops in a busybox shell, with permission denie

[Bug 1960974] Re: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Decryption password prompt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1960974/+attachment/5561119/+files/PXL_20220216_001903736.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la