[Bug 700452] Re: banshee not working with LIRC

2011-05-02 Thread Alfredo Pironti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773686 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773686 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 668639 banshee lirc extension doesn't work ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773686 banshee-extension-lirc depends on wrong liblircclient library

[Bug 668639] Re: banshee lirc extension doesn't work

2011-05-02 Thread Alfredo Pironti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773686 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773686 Yes, installing the liblircclient-dev package solves the problem. Marking this bug as duplicate. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773686 banshee-extension-lirc depends on wrong liblircclient

[Bug 668639] Re: banshee lirc extension doesn't work

2011-05-01 Thread Alfredo Pironti
I can confirm this bug is still present in natty 11.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668639 Title: banshee lirc extension doesn't work -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 700452] Re: banshee not working with LIRC

2011-05-01 Thread Alfredo Pironti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 668639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 668639 banshee lirc extension doesn't work * You can subscribe to bug 668639 by following this link:

[Bug 120538] Re: id3 tag version differences result in confusing behaviour (e.g. rhythmbox, easytag)

2010-09-04 Thread Alfredo Pironti
I confirm the bug is still present with easytag 2.1.6. A file edited with easytag shows the previous id3 tags in rhythmbox. Any procedure to delete/reset *all* tags in a file, and to write them just once? ** Changed in: easytag (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- id3 tag

[Bug 580882] Re: favorite status message feature is not documented

2010-06-13 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Referring to comment #2, a sentence could be added to the documentation, and/or the tool-tip could be updated. -- favorite status message feature is not documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580882 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 580882] Re: favorite status message feature is not documented

2010-06-13 Thread Alfredo Pironti
By documentation, I refer to the content shown by the Help program that opens when I click the Help -- Contents menu in Empathy. Sure, this whishlist item could be reported upstream. -- favorite status message feature is not documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580882 You received this

[Bug 580882] Re: favorite status message feature is not documented

2010-05-19 Thread Alfredo Pironti
** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- favorite status message feature is not documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580882 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 580882] [NEW] favorite status message feature is not documented

2010-05-15 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy Use case: I am a user with some knowledge of IM, but facing empathy for the first time, and I don't know what a favorite status is for. (How can I use it? are my favourite statuses stored somewhere? Will other people see my favorite statuses in a

[Bug 580882] Re: favorite status message feature is not documented

2010-05-15 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Sorry for being incomplete. When I choose a custom status, a greyed-out star appears close to it. A tool-tip says Click to make this status a favorite. By experimenting (clicking on the star) I discovered that a starred custom status gets put among the selectable statuses. If I un- start that

[Bug 367169] Re: GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; durring ssh X11 forwarding

2010-04-20 Thread Alfredo Pironti
I was affected by this bug, and I can confirm that on the remote machine the ~/.dbus directory was owned by root. By changing the owner to myself the problem is solved. For some reason some people got the ~/.dbus ownership unwillingly changed, can't tell in which package, but this is certainly a

[Bug 497299] Re: upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing)

2010-02-08 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Please, even though I, myself started complaining about this bug being marked as invalid, I encourage everyone to respect the developer's effort. He proved himself to be active in solving the bug, and willing to cooperate. I still do not agree with the current status, and I believe there is a

[Bug 497299] Re: upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing)

2010-01-31 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Maybe there's something I'm missing now. Why is the bug closed? On systems with different configurations than having `lo' in /etc/network/interfaces the bug is still present. If such different configurations are wrong, then some policy should avoid the user making such changes to the file (e.g.

[Bug 196811] Re: hal does not detect Quickcam Express as v4l-device

2010-01-31 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Same here on Karmic Linux 2.6.31-17-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 10 17:01:44 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsusb Bus 002 Device 003: ID 046d:0870 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Express $ hal-find-by-capability --capability video4linux.video_capture

[Bug 196811] Re: hal does not detect Quickcam Express as v4l-device

2010-01-30 Thread Alfredo Pironti
What data are missing to let this bug be solved? I happen to have such a webcam, and I can try to help if needed. -- hal does not detect Quickcam Express as v4l-device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196811 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 445953] Re: shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in

2010-01-26 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Hi all, as I am still experiencing this (annoying but not critical) bug, is there any update about the patch being accepted upstream, and thus the bug being fixed in Ubuntu? Thank you. Regards, Alfredo -- shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in

[Bug 497299] Re: upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing)

2010-01-22 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Some thoughts about this issue. 1) When no /etc/network/interfaces is available, It seems that upstart is waiting for lo to be brought up before starting services; however network manager, responsible for bringing up lo is not started by upstart; creating the circular dependency. 2) When

[Bug 497299] Re: upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing)

2010-01-22 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Does your /etc/network/interfaces file contain the following lines? auto lo iface lo inet loopback I have two machines where this workaround is actually working. (But your experience may tell that my hints are in the wrong direction) Anyway, I agree this bug is in fact critical, and my

[Bug 497299] Re: upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing)

2010-01-15 Thread Alfredo Pironti
I managed to have access to a machine where the bug does not show up. That machine has a /etc/network/interfaces file containing exactly the auto lo \\ iface lo inet loopback lines. So this seems to be a relevant clue to bug hunting. In which way this file interferes with localhost being brought

[Bug 497299] Re: upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing)

2010-01-14 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Please increase the importance of the bug, since it is really critical for remotely administrated server systems! If for any reason the server is rebooted, it cannot be administrated remotely (sshd does not start), nor other services (e.g. web servers, sql servers etc) are started, making the

[Bug 497299] Re: upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing)

2010-01-14 Thread Alfredo Pironti
I added the auto lo iface lo inet loopback lines to /etc/network/interfaces file to one of the two server machines (still no access to the other one, one day downtime now...): now the services are starting up normally at boot -- but network manager disappeared from the control panel (NM service

[Bug 486229] Re: CUPS not start automatically

2010-01-07 Thread Alfredo Pironti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 497299 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497299 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 497299 upstart not starting init-scripts (event net-device-up IFACE=lo missing) -- CUPS not start automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486229 You

[Bug 410407] Re: Flash does not work correctly [READ DESCRIPTION]

2009-12-17 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Please, when this bug is fixed, also provide a way to revert the user made workarounds. For example, when fixing the bug, a pop-up window may say: If you disabled compiz because of the flash bug, you can now safely re-enable it. Or, for workaround 3, the package installer may silently modify the

[Bug 410407] Re: Flash does not work correctly [READ DESCRIPTION]

2009-12-17 Thread Alfredo Pironti
I buy your point. Nevertheless, at least the users should be notified when the problem will be solved (not only by marking this bug as solved), so that they can revert their workarounds. Otherwise it is very likely that the fix will go unnoticed and many workarounds will remain in place

[Bug 348934] Re: MythTV doesn't go full screen without desktop visual effects off

2009-11-16 Thread Alfredo Pironti
So, it seems to me that this is an upstream bug (because they should switch to the new fullscreen mode). Has this bug already be reported to upstream? -- MythTV doesn't go full screen without desktop visual effects off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348934 You received this bug notification

[Bug 162352] Re: Open in terminal should have a keyboard shortcut

2009-11-10 Thread Alfredo Pironti
Just to be more precise, you don't need to click and hold left button over the menu. The steps you need to do are (from https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577139): 1. set /desktop/gnome/interface/can_change_accels true (gconf editor); or go to System - Preferences - Appearance, switch to