I believe I can confirm this. Unless I'm thinking entirely wrong there
is no way that code after log_end_msg 1 will be executed.
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Strange or obsolete code in mysql initscript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359177
You
Yeah, those files might have helped :) Just not sure if the archive was
gzip'd...
Don't think this is a generic problem. I installed squid on a fresh
8.10, did a do-release-upgrade to Jaunty, and Squid was still working.
Of course, that was with only the default configuration.
Looking in your
Are there any /var/log/daemon.log entries from that time regarding
mysql?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
sal all
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Are there any /var/log/daemon.log entries from that time regarding
mysql?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package mysql-server-5.0 None [modified:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.0.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script
I can see this as a potential problem. While I'm not sure if it
qualifies as a bug I at least think it might be added as a Wishlist.
Might also be relevant regarding some database servers.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
dist-upgrade stops slapd
Are there any /var/log/daemon.log entries from that time regarding
mysql? Have you had a version of mysql-server installed before? Perhaps
mysql-server-5.0?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.31-1ubuntu2 failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
I'll be marking this as a duplicate of bug #349469, since it takes a
more general approach on the config.dat is locked issue.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 349469
debconf: DbDriver
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ content? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package postfix 2.5.5-1.1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349743
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
This seems to be the critical point.
debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another
process: Resource temporarily unavailable
dpkg: error processing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
Looks like we have the culprint here
debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another
process: Resource temporarily unavailable
dpkg: error processing
Strange
Running Psi, and using its OpenPGP support, worked flawlessly for me in
both Hardy and Intrepid. Installing Jaunty on my computers suddenly
gives me pretty much the exact same symptoms as being mentioned in the
original bug report. I'm using the same OpenPGP key and the same
(private)
Almost forgot to mention involved versions
an...@pc13267:~$ apt-cache policy psi
psi:
Installerad: 0.12-2ubuntu1
Kandidat: 0.12-2ubuntu1
Versionstabell:
*** 0.12-2ubuntu1 0
500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
an...@pc13267:~$
** Summary changed:
- [Hardy] Psi 0.11 connects in an infinite manner without success after
enabling OpenPGP
+ [Hardy] Psi 0.11 connects in an infinite manner without success after
enabling OpenPGP (also Psi 0.12 in Jaunty)
--
[Hardy] Psi 0.11 connects in an infinite manner without success
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25996364/Dependencies.txt
--
unreliable Psi interface in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367317
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: psi
Having installed Psi (0.12-2) in Jaunty I've experienced all kinds of
strange behavior from it's interface. Usually it doesn't work to toggle
View - Show ___ contacts while being connected. Sometimes when I double
click on name on the contact list, I
During the install of phpmyadmin you should have been asked a few
question. I take it you opted to use dbconfig-common to configure your
database settings? Do you remember the answers you gave and the
responses you got?
Also, the last respons I can see in the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt
looks
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ contents? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package squid 2.7.STABLE3-4.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367157
You received this bug
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ contents? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
hg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ contents? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
MySQL upgrade failed when updating to 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366044
You received this bug notification because
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ contents? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package slapd 2.4.15-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365915
You received this bug notification
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ contents? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package postfix 2.5.5-1.1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365718
You received this bug notification
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ contents? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package postfix 2.5.5-1.1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363275
You received this bug notification
I'm wondering if this might be a duplicate of bug #251160. While the
versions differs, the symptoms does look a lot alike...
--
Failed to start MySQL database server mysqld on install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Are there any /var/log/daemon.log entries from that time regarding
mysql?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
couldnt install mysql
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I believe I can confirm this. Unless I'm thinking entirely wrong there
is no way that code after log_end_msg 1 will be executed.
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Strange or obsolete code in mysql initscript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359177
You
Yeah, those files might have helped :) Just not sure if the archive was
gzip'd...
Don't think this is a generic problem. I installed squid on a fresh
8.10, did a do-release-upgrade to Jaunty, and Squid was still working.
Of course, that was with only the default configuration.
Looking in your
Are there any /var/log/daemon.log entries from that time regarding
mysql?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
sal all
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct
Are there any /var/log/daemon.log entries from that time regarding
mysql?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package mysql-server-5.0 None [modified:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.0.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script
I can see this as a potential problem. While I'm not sure if it
qualifies as a bug I at least think it might be added as a Wishlist.
Might also be relevant regarding some database servers.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
dist-upgrade stops slapd
Are there any /var/log/daemon.log entries from that time regarding
mysql? Have you had a version of mysql-server installed before? Perhaps
mysql-server-5.0?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.31-1ubuntu2 failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
I'll be marking this as a duplicate of bug #349469, since it takes a
more general approach on the config.dat is locked issue.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 349469
debconf: DbDriver
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
I'm setting this report as a duplicate of bug #349469. While that report
technically is newer, there are currently more information and
discussion gathered it in. Feel free to add comments to it.
** This bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
This seems to be the critical point.
debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another
process: Resource temporarily unavailable
dpkg: error processing
Could you repost the /var/log/dist-upgrade/ content? It apparently got
truncated to 40bytes...
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package postfix 2.5.5-1.1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349743
You received this bug notification
I've had problems on both i386 and amd64. Haven't compared enough to
actually say in what regards it matter.
Anyhow, based on our combined experiences, as well as that upstream
forum post I'd say we have enough information to mark this bug as
confirmed. Will you do the honours? :) Wouldn't
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469
Looks like we have the culprint here
debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another
process: Resource temporarily unavailable
dpkg: error processing
Are there any entries in /var/log/daemon.log regarding mysql?
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Failed to start MySQL database server mysqld on install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Have you had samba(-common) installed before? Do you remember manually
deleting /etc/samba/smb.conf?
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
package samba-common 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: underprocess
post-installation script gav felkod 1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #524423
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524423
** Also affects: openssh (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524423
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
force-command unable to pass arguments
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #524423
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524423
** Also affects: openssh (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524423
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
force-command unable to pass arguments
Do you use encrypted home directories on the server?
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Public key ssh auth doesn't work in Jauny
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Okej, sorry, I guess I didn't read the logs as carefully as I should
have.
Anyhow, I'm rather sure your encrypted home directory is the reason why
you can't use public key ssh auth. Considering that encryptfs decrypts
your home directory, using your login password, at login time. Hence,
when
I'm setting this bug as confirmed based on upstream report, as well on
some quick testing of my own.
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #1527
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1527
** Also affects: openssh
@Carsten: By the way, thanks for supplying the modified patch.
Right now Jaunty is in FinalFreeze, but after Release I'll take a look
at it and see if I can create a debdiff to be upload. Just not sure if
it will be important enough for a SRU, or if it will have to wait for
Karmic.
@Carsten: You'r probably right about it not being important enough for a
SRU. Unless somehow disagree and actually makes it happen, feel free to
ping this bug when the Karmic development has started.
Might also be a good idea to report this bug to the Debian BTS. Do you
want to do it, or shall I?
Do you use encrypted home directories on the server?
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Public key ssh auth doesn't work in Jauny
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Okej, sorry, I guess I didn't read the logs as carefully as I should
have.
Anyhow, I'm rather sure your encrypted home directory is the reason why
you can't use public key ssh auth. Considering that encryptfs decrypts
your home directory, using your login password, at login time. Hence,
when
I'm setting this bug as confirmed based on upstream report, as well on
some quick testing of my own.
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #1527
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1527
** Also affects: openssh
@Carsten: By the way, thanks for supplying the modified patch.
Right now Jaunty is in FinalFreeze, but after Release I'll take a look
at it and see if I can create a debdiff to be upload. Just not sure if
it will be important enough for a SRU, or if it will have to wait for
Karmic.
@Carsten: You'r probably right about it not being important enough for a
SRU. Unless somehow disagree and actually makes it happen, feel free to
ping this bug when the Karmic development has started.
Might also be a good idea to report this bug to the Debian BTS. Do you
want to do it, or shall I?
I can confirm this behavior in a default configured amavisd-new
1:2.6.2-2ubuntu1.
That said I'm not sure if I agree on this being a bug. There are plenty
of legitimate cases where people might send an attachment of the
forbidden type. Simply throwing them away without letting anyone know
might
Well, not sure what the proper solution is for current/old version of
Ubuntu
But since Jaunty includes a rdiff-backup version from its stable branch
(now 1.2.x) I'd say the strategy for the near future should be to make
sure we don't yet again take in versions from the development branch
(now
@Alan: Well, perhaps this PPA (which I maintain) can be of some use, as
a workaround?
https://launchpad.net/~rdiff-backup-pkgs/+archive/ppa
--
minorest revision number change breaks network protocol
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128242
You received this bug notification because you are a
I can confirm this behavior in a default configured amavisd-new
1:2.6.2-2ubuntu1.
That said I'm not sure if I agree on this being a bug. There are plenty
of legitimate cases where people might send an attachment of the
forbidden type. Simply throwing them away without letting anyone know
might
I can confirm that krb5-config 1.19-0ubuntu0.1, from intrepid-proposed,
install just fine even if dnsdomainname returns an error. It was on a
configuration where krb5-config 1.19 failed similar to the original bug
report.
--
kerberos-configs fails to configure if dnsdomainname fails
I can confirm that krb5-config 1.19-0ubuntu0.1, from intrepid-proposed,
install just fine even if dnsdomainname returns an error. It was on a
configuration where krb5-config 1.19 failed similar to the original bug
report.
--
kerberos-configs fails to configure if dnsdomainname fails
I can confirm that tasksel 2.73ubuntu11.1 (intrepid-proposed) and
tasksel 2.70ubuntu6 (hardy-proposed) does the trick. In Intrepid I can
now remove virt-host without it removing openssh-server and in Hardy I
can now remove print-server without mail-server getting removed.
I've also verified it
It seems as if both gvfs 0.2.5-0ubuntu4 (hardy-proposed) and gvfs
1.0.2-0ubuntu3 (intrepid-proposed) does the trick. I can now connect to
a https webdav share going thru Places - Connect to Server.. - Secure
WebDAV (HTTPS). I've verified this in both Hardy and Intrepid.
@nh2 Mark: I'm familiar
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 314044 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314044
Well, now when I take another look at this bug I see that it is/was
actually a duplicate of the already triaged bug #314044. Hence I'm
marking it as such.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug
@nh2 Mark: Well, actually bug #314044 is probably the relevant one.
--
Option to connect to secure webdav network locations missing in nautilus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222532
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I can confirm that mailgraph 1.12-1ubuntu0.1 (dapper-proposed) fixes the
RRD Tools link and image.
--
homepage for mailgraph has moved
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 296719 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296719
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 296719, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 296719 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296719
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 296719, so it is being marked as such. Please look
@Colin: better?
** Attachment added: nagios3_3.0.6-2ubuntu2.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24932456/nagios3_3.0.6-2ubuntu2.debdiff
--
*** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but the
script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf.
@Colin: better?
** Attachment added: nagios3_3.0.6-2ubuntu2.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24932456/nagios3_3.0.6-2ubuntu2.debdiff
--
*** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but the
script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf.
Have you had the bind9 package previously installed on that system?
If that is the case, is it possible that you that time manually removed
the files /etc/bind/named.conf and /etc/bind/named.conf.local and you
have removed the bind9 packages?
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
I can confirm this behavior.
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
*** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but the
script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355800
You received this bug notification because
Reported this upstream. Couldn't find any way to get Launchpad to link
against ntop using Also affects project.
http://www.ntop.org/trac/ticket/75
** Bug watch added: www.ntop.org/trac/ #75
http://www.ntop.org/trac/ticket/75
--
access.log is owned by root and has write permissions to anyone
** Also affects: ntop via
http://www.ntop.org/trac/ticket/75
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
access.log is owned by root and has write permissions to anyone
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Have you had the bind9 package previously installed on that system?
If that is the case, is it possible that you that time manually removed
the files /etc/bind/named.conf and /etc/bind/named.conf.local and you
have removed the bind9 packages?
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
I can confirm this behavior.
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
*** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but the
script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355800
You received this bug notification because
Uploading a debdiff which adds --debconf-ok to the packages ucf
commands.
** Attachment added: nagios3_3.0.6-2ubuntu2.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24843734/nagios3_3.0.6-2ubuntu2.debdiff
--
*** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but the
script did not
What were you trying to install/upgrade when this happened? Did you have
an actual kerberos configuration beforehand? What was the last thing
which happened before the install/upgrade failed? Were you prompted for
any questions regarding your kerberos realm?
--
suarez
This is by the way still true in the Jaunty version (ntop 3.3-11ubuntu1)
--
access.log is owned by root and has write permissions to anyone
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Yes, deleting /etc/logrotate.d/ntop will solve a problem like this. A
more clean solution is probably to have that file indirectly deleted by
purging the remains of you ntop installation. (dpkg --purge ntop)
That said, it's not necessarily the right packaging solution to have
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntop
For ntop to run it needs to have its admin user configured. This is not
something which is prompted for during the install.
(Compare to the installation of mysql-server for example.)
Hence when /etc/init.d/ntop is automaticaly started, it fails,
** Changed in: kerberos-configs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
suarez
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355151
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
What were you trying to install/upgrade when this happened? Did you have
an actual kerberos configuration beforehand? What was the last thing
which happened before the install/upgrade failed? Were you prompted for
any questions regarding your kerberos realm?
--
suarez
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #490561
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490561
** Also affects: ntop (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490561
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
access.log is owned by root and has write permissions to
Fedora seems to fix this by setting a hard coded umask into the source
code. Is this an approach we want to take?
It looks as if ntop only insists on creating global writable logs if the
option -d (--daemon) is used. Runnong non-daemonized it obeys umask
settings just fine.
I experienced the
Actually, the default value of ::1 might just depend on whatever you use
Ubiquity or the Debian Installer.
First of all I downloaded a fresh ubuntu-8.10-server-i386.iso, and followed the
Default install instructions from
http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/ServerWhole. That gave me a
Actually, the default value of ::1 might just depend on whatever you use
Ubiquity or the Debian Installer.
First of all I downloaded a fresh ubuntu-8.10-server-i386.iso, and followed the
Default install instructions from
http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/ServerWhole. That gave me a
Do you experience the same problem in a none-Gnome environment? If you
use verbose flags, are the results similar to those in bug #348126?
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
ubuntu 9.04 beta: ssh-agent doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353759
You
@rancor: Bug #353759 was marked as being a duplicate of this (your) bug.
--
ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348126
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #522278
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522278
** Also affects: rdiff-backup (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522278
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
jaunty rdiff-backup can't use
Do you experience the same problem in a none-Gnome environment? If you
use verbose flags, are the results similar to those in bug #348126?
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
ubuntu 9.04 beta: ssh-agent doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353759
You
@rancor: Bug #353759 was marked as being a duplicate of this (your) bug.
--
ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348126
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
@Nick: The status Fix commited was set by Andrew Ferguson, in regard
to the actual rdiff-backup CVS.
@Andrew: The status of rdiff-backup (Ubuntu) is meant to describe the
status of rdiff-backup in Ubuntu specifically. If possible, this kind of
bug tracking works best if there are separate lines
@Andrew: thanks!
@Nick: I'll see what I can do.
--
jaunty rdiff-backup can't use --test-server with a rdiff-backup --server
--restrict command-locked remote side
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Can't seem to get it right. I've used these two patches, taken from the
provided commit message.
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/rdiff-backup/rdiff_backup/Main.py?r1=1.127.2.2r2=1.127.2.3pathrev=r1-2root=rdiff-backupview=patch
The patch works much better without the typo :-)
I'm uploading a debdiff which uses dpatch to apply the patch in
question. Also, I'm subscribing ubuntu-universe-sponsors.
** Attachment added: rdiff-backup_1.2.7-1ubuntu2.debdiff
Forgot to mention dpatch in the changelog. Uploads a new version of the
debdiff, which does.
** Attachment added: rdiff-backup_1.2.7-1ubuntu2.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24651036/rdiff-backup_1.2.7-1ubuntu2.debdiff
--
jaunty rdiff-backup can't use --test-server with a rdiff-backup
Strange
From what I can see my Intrepid system has 3.0.2-1ubuntu1.1 as its
current Nagios3 version. That version depends on libperl5.10 (= 5.10.0)
and installs just fine.
Please return the output from the command
apt-cache policy nagios3
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
I can confirm this problem between two Jaunty system, both running
1.2.7-1ubuntu1.
** Changed in: rdiff-backup (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
jaunty rdiff-backup can't use --test-server with a rdiff-backup --server
--restrict command-locked remote side
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python2.6
The new Python 2.6 in Jaunty (2.6.1-1ubuntu5.1) seems to be missing
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages from the default sys.path. This
does seem as a regression from the Intrepid Python 2.5 which does
include
Strange
From what I can see my Intrepid system has 3.0.2-1ubuntu1.1 as its
current Nagios3 version. That version depends on libperl5.10 (= 5.10.0)
and installs just fine.
Please return the output from the command
apt-cache policy nagios3
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
I can confirm this in Jaunty (postfix 2.5.5-1.1)
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Deinstallation doesn't delete all files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
I'm providing a debdiff which makes postfix remove /var/lib/postfix on
purge.
** Attachment added: postfix_2.5.5-1.1ubuntu1.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24366796/postfix_2.5.5-1.1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
Deinstallation doesn't delete all files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348990
You
Also, on a normal removal (non-purge), the postfix user is left
behind. Hence no future confusion regarding file ownership.
--
Deinstallation doesn't delete all files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
I can confirm this in Jaunty (postfix 2.5.5-1.1)
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Deinstallation doesn't delete all files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
801 - 900 of 1161 matches
Mail list logo
