[Bug 1966780] [NEW] transmission-qt crashes when UI element is destroyed before RPC call gets to update it

2022-03-28 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Currently Transmission (Qt client) crashes really often when you just use it against a distant server. This is because the RPC callback tries to update an UI element that is often destroyed. Please backport this patch to Ubuntu releases as soon as possible as this crash is

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2022-03-25 Thread Avamander
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 Title: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales To manage notifications

[Bug 1965535] Re: Stop recommending snap

2022-03-18 Thread Avamander
It's also worth pointing out how snap does not offer feature parity. VA- API and native-component extensions are broken to this day with Chromium snap, for four years now. The latter meaning that entire countries can not use chromium snap if they wish to use their national authentication and

[Bug 1960307] Re: No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for Bluetooth devices

2022-02-22 Thread Avamander
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #991597 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991597 ** Also affects: pulseaudio via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991597 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1960307] Re: No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for Bluetooth devices

2022-02-20 Thread Avamander
** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960307 Title: No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2022-02-08 Thread Avamander
@dimitri-papadopoulos If there's a high likelihood that ceph will be used on a desktop distribution then its choice of snapshot directory has been incorrect in two ways. The way forward would be to not ignore conventions designed to avoid such issues :) -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1960307] [NEW] No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for Bluetooth devices

2022-02-08 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: After the announcements of PulseAudio 15 and Gstreamer 1.20, which both advertised LDAC and AptX (HD) support, I expected that jammy (22.04) would support those codecs. Though in reality it seems that something is missing, gstreamer reports that those codecs are supported

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2021-03-01 Thread Avamander
The upgrade was done on a totally pristine Kubuntu 18.04 install that didn't have anything out-of-standard installed. So it's a package in the default repositories. I think I'm not the only one who has noticed these anomalies either (an AskUbuntu thread that's 2mo old):

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2021-03-01 Thread Avamander
I ran an upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 and it generated these locales: ``` Generating locales (this might take a while)... en_AG.UTF-8... done en_AU.UTF-8... done en_BW.UTF-8... done en_CA.UTF-8... done en_DK.UTF-8... done en_GB.UTF-8... done en_HK.UTF-8... done en_IE.UTF-8... done

[Bug 1914918] Re: The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-03-01 Thread Avamander
> I've seen no problems for last 5 days, while before, I had to restart browser every couple hours. Similar experience here with refresh-app-awareness + no robust-mount- namespace-updates. One problem I did see was related to audio output breaking. Restart fixed it. Might just be a Chromium

[Bug 1914918] Re: The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-02-09 Thread Avamander
Ran it, will report back how it affects behaviour, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914918 Title: The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to

[Bug 1914918] Re: The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-02-09 Thread Avamander
There are no good workarounds either, it observably causes anomalies in apps. Some PWAs lose their state after a restart and it's infuriating. Canonical should dogfood their own known breaking changes. ** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received

[Bug 1914918] [NEW] The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-02-07 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: The last few background updates of chromium have made some old tabs suddenly crash with SIGTRAP and it also makes it impossible to open new tabs, those die instantly with a SIGTRAP as well. This is incredibly destructive to whatever might be the dying tabs' unsaved state and

[Bug 1913609] Re: Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify files it shouldn't

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1908928 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 Even if we ignore all that, the very least it should prompt the user if the file should be replaced with the maintainer version or be kept as is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1913609] Re: Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify files it shouldn't

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1908928 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 Not really blindly, there are other situations where configuration files might be locked. Plus technically an update shouldn't demand write access unless its actually needed. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1913609] Re: Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify files it shouldn't

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1908928 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 @gunnarhj Ideally the post-installation script didn't fail if it can't modify the file, irrelevant of the reason why it's not writable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
# dpkg -l | grep -E 'language-pack-\w+-base' # -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 Title: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
At that point, no permissions were changed because no such issue had occured. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 Title: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales To manage

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
locale.gen was last modified in 11-03-2019 before these updates were applied. Some package amongst those decided to enable 25 new locales. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 Title:

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
@gunnarhj > I meant to ask which package updates result in generation of new locales. One of these, but locale/libc is the only one really related to this functionality: dpkg.log.2.gz:2020-12-21 18:41:36 startup archives unpack dpkg.log.2.gz:2020-12-21 18:41:38 upgrade libc6-i386:amd64

[Bug 1913609] Re: Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify files it shouldn't

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
I answered under the issue about unwanted locales being enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913609 Title: Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify

[Bug 1913609] Re: Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify files it shouldn't

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
> Exactly which updates are you talking about? That is listed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1908928 This issue is about the postinstallation script failing ungracefully if it can't sed the configuration files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
That configuration was already done. Package upgrade changed it. ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908928 Title: locales

[Bug 1913609] Re: Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify files it shouldn't

2021-02-01 Thread Avamander
That configuration is already done. ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913609 Title: Ungraceful failure when locale

[Bug 1913609] [NEW] Ungraceful failure when locale postinstallation script can't modify files it shouldn't

2021-01-28 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: When the files /etc/locale.gen, /etc/default/locale and /var/lib/locales/supported.d/en are locked down to avoid any unnecessary modifications done to them, the post-installation script of locales fails ungracefully when trying to sed (due to write permission denial). Those

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] Apparmor audit messages for calls to sched_setaffinity

2021-01-26 Thread Avamander
Ubuntu 20.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679 Title: [snap] Apparmor audit messages for calls to sched_setaffinity To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-25 Thread Avamander
I see sched_setaffinity also used in base/cpu_affinity_posix.cc, so I doubt it's only beneficial on ARM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679 Title: [snap] chromium spams dmesg To

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-25 Thread Avamander
> @avamander, do you have a reproducer for this? I'm just using it on a Ryzen 9 3900x and Radeon R7 360. I have GPU acceleration enabled to the extent it is possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2021-01-24 Thread Avamander
@~malakai1197 You're out of luck really, switch distributions that don't use half- baked snaps. Maintainers think that this usability regression is an "opinion" and that tells really more than enough. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-23 Thread Avamander
[pid 1278591] sched_setaffinity(1278591, 128, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63,

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-23 Thread Avamander
[pid 1278569] sched_setaffinity(1278640, 128, [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23] [pid 1278569] <... sched_setaffinity resumed>) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-16 Thread Avamander
> Can someone who is experiencing this bug run an strace to determine what argument chromium is trying to use with sched_setaffinity ? I'm not sure how its possible to strace a snap container ran under a specific user. Could you provide the command? -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-16 Thread Avamander
It doesn't break it visibly. I would prefer if it were allowed to set its affinity, but if that can't be done, silencing is a must. This is incredibly spammy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-12 Thread Avamander
The rulesets still don't explicitly forbid this syscall and it still gets massively logged into dmesg, making it totally unusable. ``` audit: type=1326 audit(1610482813.754:1835962): auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4 pid=2201984 comm="chrome"

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2020-12-21 Thread Avamander
> Are you claiming that Ubuntu somehow uncommented those locales in /etc/locale.gen without your knowledge? Yes, the first thing I do on new installs is only leave the two previously mentioned locales uncommented. Always. I get annoyed waiting for unused locales to be generated. On this specific

[Bug 1908928] Re: locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2020-12-21 Thread Avamander
# grep -vE '^(#|$)' /etc/locale.gen > bg_BG CP1251 > bg_BG.UTF-8 UTF-8 > cs_CZ ISO-8859-2 > cs_CZ.UTF-8 UTF-8 > de_DE ISO-8859-1 > de_DE.UTF-8 UTF-8 > en_US ISO-8859-1 > en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8 > es_ES ISO-8859-1 > es_ES.UTF-8 UTF-8 > et_EE.UTF-8 UTF-8 > fr_FR ISO-8859-1 > fr_FR.UTF-8 UTF-8 > it_IT

[Bug 1908928] [NEW] locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales

2020-12-21 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: The installation of locales 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 enabled random locales. This is annoying. apt output: ``` Generating locales (this might take a while)... bg_BG.CP1251... done bg_BG.UTF-8... done cs_CZ.ISO-8859-2... done cs_CZ.UTF-8... done de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done

[Bug 1900679] Re: snap chromium spams dmesg

2020-10-22 Thread Avamander
Your rulesets are bad, it's not apparmor's fault. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679 Title: snap chromium

[Bug 1900679] [NEW] snap chromium spams dmesg

2020-10-20 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: [T okt 20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5 [T okt 20

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2020-08-21 Thread Avamander
> Not in your preferred timeline, unfortunately, but we have many more issues and voices to pay attention to. How do you have "many more" voices to pay attention to? 1018 people have marked this issue as it affects them, if anything, you have *many fewer* voices to listen to elsewhere. > waiting

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2020-08-21 Thread Avamander
So are we now shaming people because that they are personally affected by a bug for years, that decided to participate in the community? I suspect the reaction would be a lot milder without all this thinly- veiled condescension constantly thrown at people here. I'm personally appalled. -- You

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2020-08-20 Thread Avamander
> In addition the ~/snap directory is very explicitly, and non-trivially baked into apparmor profiles that are currently global to the system. And whose fault is that? Should've thought about it sooner. > Lastly .config and .local and .cache are just top-level directories with absolutely no

[Bug 1892093] Re: mem_encrypt=on makes radeon driver crash during startup

2020-08-18 Thread Avamander
Dmesg output of encountering non-working graphics ** Attachment added: "dmesg2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1892093/+attachment/5402600/+files/dmesg2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1892093] [NEW] mem_encrypt=on makes radeon driver crash during startup

2020-08-18 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: lspci output: 08:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Bonaire XTX [Radeon R7 260X/360] [1002:6658] dmesg error output: [drm:cik_ring_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: ring 0 test failed (scratch(0x3010C)=0xCAFEDEAD) radeon

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-31 Thread Avamander
> Bug reports should stick to fact, using wording like 'Snap-mangled' I'm sorry, that's factually what happened. Should I have worded it Snap- disfigured, Snap-distorted, Snap-impaired or Snap-wrecked instead? > isn't appropriate and not a basis for any discussion. I have **never** had any

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Avamander
Just to be sure you didn't miss a few facts here as you really like to rub it under people's noses: * Snap mangles Chromium's configuration directory * Snap-mangled Chromium configuration directory is not backupable * Snap-mangled Chromium configuration directory is not compliant with the de

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Avamander
> Anything else has little objective value. That's just your opinion. > That's not an assumption, it's a fact: https://snapcraft.io/docs /installing-snapd. It's an assumption, there are a lot of distributions that stay away from snap. > Most (average) users don't care about packaging formats

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Avamander
> I don't think the specification¹ mandates how folders should be structured under $XDG_DATA_HOME and $XDG_CONFIG_HOME. `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/$SOFTWARE_NAME` is the de facto way, snap ignores it. Technically, yes, you're absolutely free to use hashes instead of your software's name when you store

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-29 Thread Avamander
> How so? The actual software of which the configuration belongs to is chromium (or "notes"), not snap, snap is "just there" in the middle. Say I want to wipe snap's configuration, I should be able to wipe `$XDG_DATA_HOME/snap` without losing my n+1 snap application's data. Very simply put,

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-29 Thread Avamander
> Therefore snap packages should base the value of SNAP_USER_DATA on the value of XDG_DATA_HOME (or its specified default). For the "notes" snap, this would be "$HOME/.local/share/snap/notes/1". That's still incorrect. > As to comment #6, can you elaborate on how you copied the existing profile?

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
Oh and I didn't confirm my own bug, that was done by the janitor because someone else felt that this affects them, I just restored the previous status. ** Also affects: chromium-browser Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
I also have to repeat that currently, copying over the folder contents you mentioned did NOT result in a working instance of Chromium. All of my extensions broke, databases failed to open, the common folder is just incomplete and needs attention. Please do try it yourself. That absolutely 100%

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
Upstream bug report that would resolve a half of this issue: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1106754 Just to summarize what's left broken by this specific Ubuntu package: * Config and cache are not in the folders defined by the base directory specification * Current

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
> You're right, it does contain cache data. That would be an upstream bug, can you please file it at https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/entry ? I will > I just found bug #1575053 which looks very similar to your issue, so I'm going to mark it as duplicate, and I encourage you to read

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
> this now seems to be a priority bug which will be fixed fairly soon Indicated by the status "Wishlist"? > Nobody "wants to piss off" anyone, that is silly. Oh it absolutely is. But two years, people have their limits when assuming good faith. > Most of us here are not paying customers,

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
> The chromium snap is strictly confined, and that means that it cannot read/write to hidden directories inside the user's home folder (such as $HOME/.config or $HOME/.cache). Change the folder it's confined to. > That one is stored in $HOME/chromium/common/.cache/ No, not really. The profile

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
The very least make it hidden. It's simply horrible in my neat home folder, there's really no arguing against that. The resistance to fix it baffles me the most. Add a dot to the damn path and make the snapd package install script `mv` the folder if it exists before the upgrade. It's not that

[Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
This issue is related to it and probably both could be fixed at the same time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616650 Title: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

[Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1887804 to address the fact that chromium-browser-snap is not following XDG base directory specification and that breaks backing up the snap's configuration and wiping it's cache properly. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1887804] [NEW] chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory specification which means that the cache and configuration folder aren't properly used. This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and

[Bug 1857639] Re: DNS server capability detection is broken and has fatal consequences to resolving when DNSSEC is enabled

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
** Summary changed: - DNS server capability detection is broken and has critical consequences when DNSSEC is enabled + DNS server capability detection is broken and has fatal consequences to resolving when DNSSEC is enabled -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1887717] [NEW] mpv falls back to XDG base directory incompliant behaviour

2020-07-15 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Due to this commit: https://github.com/mpv- player/mpv/commit/269f0e743e5634691f0c9d5b1b8a4bb68eedbbd0 mpv will fall back on incorrect XDG base directory speficiation incompliant behaviour by default. In order to avoid that, Ubuntu should during installation create the

[Bug 307152] Re: Get rid of .hplip folder and follow fd.o specifications

2020-07-10 Thread Avamander
Unfortunately this is still a minor problem. It would be nice to not have hplip clutter people's home directories. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307152 Title: Get rid of .hplip

[Bug 1886084] [NEW] certbot service file is incomplete and has bad defaults

2020-07-02 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: For some reason, the certbot.service hasn't been marked with `After=network.target`, which can cause it to be triggered when there isn't network yet. If people use things `nginx` as their web server and proxy certbot, it also doesn't respect that dependency, it would be a

[Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-06-13 Thread Avamander
This is still an issue. The notification is a nice rub of salt in the wound, but doesn't fix the issue. Absolutely inane, I hope whoever decided to turn chromium-browser gets a kernel panic when they're updating their system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1879831] Re: Raspberry Pi 3/4 camera configuration options are missing/undocumented on the generic RPi server image

2020-06-13 Thread Avamander
** Also affects: rpi-packages Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879831 Title: Raspberry Pi 3/4 camera configuration options are

[Bug 1883398] [NEW] USB serial device passtrough causes qemu to segfault and kill the VM

2020-06-13 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: What happens: When I pass trough my CH340G (very common USB-TTL serial module) with high-baud data coming in to my Windows 10 VM. qemu segfaults and dirtily shuts down my VM at some random point. The higher the baudrate, the more likely it is to happen. 921600 means the

[Bug 1879421] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.133ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-05-18 Thread Avamander
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879421/+attachment/5373805/+files/Dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879421

[Bug 1879421] [NEW] package initramfs-tools 0.133ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-05-18 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Low disk space in /var/tmp mount causes post-installation script to fail. It should probably detect it. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10 Package: initramfs-tools 0.133ubuntu10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-1023.25-raspi2 5.3.18 Uname: Linux

[Bug 1868189] Re: Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read-only

2020-05-17 Thread Avamander
I'm still encountering this once a month or so. It's really awful. How do I make sure that the kernel **always** has enough memory for buffers and drivers? It is absolutely inane that a chrome tab can ever cause filesystem corruption. ** Also affects: linux Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1868189] Re: Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read-only

2020-05-17 Thread Avamander
Last occurance happened with 5.4.0-29-generic on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868189 Title: Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read-

[Bug 1877430] Re: AppArmor policy blocks the usage of PPS devices

2020-05-07 Thread Avamander
Upstream bug: https://gitlab.com/gpsd/gpsd/-/issues/73 Describes how I found a fix for this specific issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877430 Title: AppArmor policy blocks the

[Bug 1877430] [NEW] AppArmor policy blocks the usage of PPS devices

2020-05-07 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu 20.04 with latest gpsd (and everything else) When one adds a pps device to be used by gpsd then gpsd is denied permission to modify that pps device, that breaks the pps functionality. It is solved by adding capability sys_time to the AppArmor profile. **

[Bug 1876182] [NEW] Running do-release-upgrade displays text two-decades out-of-date

2020-04-30 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: When one runs `do-release-upgrade` it calculates download speeds based on 56k dial-up modem as one of the examples and there's no estimate for even 10Mbps. It really deserves an update. Example: ``` You have to download a total of 2 704 M. This download will take about 5

[Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-04-09 Thread Avamander
@osomon No, as already said, refresh-app-awareness doesn't work as a solution. I still get unannounced data loss. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616650 Title: snap refresh while

[Bug 1870861] Re: chromium-browser is unable to open downloads

2020-04-07 Thread Avamander
> Also please include any additional information, if any, on how to reproduce this problem. To reproduce I just have to download something and try to open it, that's it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1870861] Re: chromium-browser is unable to open downloads

2020-04-07 Thread Avamander
> The invalid opcode error seems odd, are you running on an uncommon > architecture/cpu? > Could you provide more information about the hardware you're running on such > as the /proc/cpuinfo output? I have a Ryzen 9 3900x, I don't think it's uncommon. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1857639] Re: DNS server capability detection is broken and has critical consequences when DNSSEC is enabled

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857639 Title: DNS server capability detection is broken and has critical

[Bug 1870861] [NEW] chromium-browser is unable to open downloads

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Current outcome: Clicking a completed download does nothing. Expected outcome: The file opens using the specified file format handler as asked. dmesg log when rapidly clicking on a downloaded file: ``` [ 1297.615318] kauditd_printk_skb: 39 callbacks suppressed [

[Bug 1868189] Re: Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read-only

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
** Description changed: Instead of killing something with a high niceness low memory situations seem to hang something super-ultra-so-very vital, writes fail and the root partition is remounted read-only. After that systemd-journald starts stupidly spamming and earlier logs are rendered

[Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
Enabled the "refresh-app-awareness", still, without warning Chromium suddenly stops recording history, keeping state and sessions. Incredibly annoying and causes unavoidable data loss. It's is frankly inane to roll out new snaps when it has been known for FOUR. YEARS. that there's a major bug

[Bug 1741074] Re: [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host connector

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
** Also affects: kdeconnect (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: goopg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 543767] Re: ssh logins doesn't show the MOTD when connecting with public key authorisation

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
** Changed in: server-papercuts Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543767 Title: ssh logins doesn't show the MOTD when connecting with public key

[Bug 1870829] [NEW] AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Current situation: When one connects a Bluetooth audio device, at best one can choose between "Headset Head Unit (HSP/HFP)" and "High Fidelity Playback (A2DP Sink)". That is sad when the audio device supports AptX or AptX HD. Expected situation: One can select AptX or

[Bug 1868189] Re: Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read-only

2020-03-25 Thread Avamander
I can't run this command because permanent logging stops and temporary logging is flooded by systemd. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1868189] Re: Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read-only

2020-03-25 Thread Avamander
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868189 Title: Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read- only To manage

[Bug 1868189] [NEW] Low memory situations result in root partition being remounted read-only

2020-03-19 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: Instead of killing something with a high niceness low memory situations seem to hang something super-ultra-so-very vital, writes fail and the root partition is remounted read-only. After that systemd-journald starts stupidly spamming and earlier logs are rendered unusable.

[Bug 1856539] Re: wireguard package doesn't work on ubuntu eon

2020-02-18 Thread Avamander
This is what I see in `/var/crash/wireguard-dkms.0.crash`: ``` ProblemType: Package DKMSBuildLog: DKMS make.log for wireguard-0.0.20190913 for kernel 5.3.0-1018-raspi2 (aarch64) Tue Feb 18 20:52:38 UTC 2020 make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-5.3.0-1018-raspi2' CC [M]

[Bug 1856539] Re: wireguard package doesn't work on ubuntu eon

2020-02-18 Thread Avamander
This issue is marked as a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1858807 so I'm commenting here. Unlink and move comments if they're not actually duplicates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1856539] Re: wireguard package doesn't work on ubuntu eon

2020-02-18 Thread Avamander
Mine says `wireguard, 0.0.20190913: added`, but updating failed and I suspect it's going to stop working after a reboot. I'd upload logs with apport but it doesn't let me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1858807] Re: Wireguard install fails on 19.10

2020-02-18 Thread Avamander
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1856539 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856539 I just encountered this too -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858807 Title: Wireguard

[Bug 1860137] Re: Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

2020-01-30 Thread Avamander
I enabled the flag, still encountered this issue. This time when I restarted Chromium my tabs were lost and restoring previous session just did nothing. Thankfully the extension "Tab Suspender" allowed me to recover my tabs but a few services logged me off. I guess the flag improves situation,

[Bug 1741074] Re: [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host connector

2020-01-22 Thread Avamander
KDE Connect is also affected by this. I'm wondering though, unable to find the answer online, why was the transition to snap-based chromium made? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741074

[Bug 1860137] Re: Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

2020-01-20 Thread Avamander
I enabled the flag, will report back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860137 Title: Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1833793] Re: Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

2020-01-18 Thread Avamander
@rphair Please try the package @hui.wang posted and upload the asked alsa- info.txt, that way it can be possibly fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833793 Title: Updating to

[Bug 1860137] [NEW] Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

2020-01-17 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 19.10, latest Chromium(-browser) installed. The issue is that after the switch to snap-based Chromium it started forgetting my logged in sessions very very often. This is not isolated to one online service, I have to log back in to everything I use,

[Bug 1833880] Re: KDE freezes randomly

2020-01-17 Thread Avamander
** Changed in: kinit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** No longer affects: kinit (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: xorg-server -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833880 Title:

[Bug 1857639] Re: DNS server capability detection is broken and has critical consequences when DNSSEC is enabled

2020-01-16 Thread Avamander
``` systemd[1]: Starting Network Name Resolution... systemd-resolved[1392]: Positive Trust Anchors: systemd-resolved[1392]: . IN DS 19036 8 2 49aac11d7b6f6446702e54a1607371607a1a41855200fd2ce1cdde32f24e8fb5 systemd-resolved[1392]: . IN DS 20326 8 2

[Bug 1857639] Re: DNS server capability detection is broken and has critical consequences when DNSSEC is enabled

2020-01-07 Thread Avamander
I will need to wait for the bug to trigger again, logs have rotated since the last time I had `yes` in the config. Also, those "single line"s are actually what I did see repeatedly until I had to stop and reconfigure resolved because it made internet usage impossible. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1857639] Re: DNS server capability detection is broken and has critical consequences when DNSSEC is enabled

2020-01-07 Thread Avamander
> HOW do you have DNSSEC configured. Not a yes/no question. Actually it's exactly a "yes" in the configuration file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857639 Title: DNS server

  1   2   >