[Bug 1257435] Re: Chef does not run with all install types

2014-09-10 Thread BK Box
** Also affects: cloud-init Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257435 Title: Chef does not run with all install types

[Bug 1257435] Re: Chef does not run with all install types

2014-09-10 Thread BK Box
** Also affects: cloud-init Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257435 Title: Chef does not run with all install types To manage

[Bug 1257435] Re: Chef does not run with all install types

2014-08-04 Thread BK Box
Sorry I missed the update to this issue. In these listed cases, it would be 2C that does not run chef-client. By default, the omnibus installer is simply there to install and setup chef, not to execute it. It's still up to the user to do an initial execution once everything has been configured

[Bug 1257435] Re: Chef does not run with all install types

2014-08-04 Thread BK Box
Sorry I missed the update to this issue. In these listed cases, it would be 2C that does not run chef-client. By default, the omnibus installer is simply there to install and setup chef, not to execute it. It's still up to the user to do an initial execution once everything has been configured

[Bug 1257435] [NEW] Chef does not run with all install types

2013-12-03 Thread BK Box
Public bug reported: When using #cloud-config and a chef directive, the initial `chef-client` run only happens when install_type is set to gems. Expected behavior: No matter the install_type, an initial `chef-client` run will execute. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package:

[Bug 1257435] [NEW] Chef does not run with all install types

2013-12-03 Thread BK Box
Public bug reported: When using #cloud-config and a chef directive, the initial `chef-client` run only happens when install_type is set to gems. Expected behavior: No matter the install_type, an initial `chef-client` run will execute. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package:

[Bug 897400] Re: Plugins not loading correctly in Ubuntu 11.10

2011-11-29 Thread BK Box
Is there a way to cobble together a workaround after installing the package until a fix is released? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897400 Title: Plugins not loading correctly in

[Bug 897400] [NEW] Plugins not loading correctly in Ubuntu 11.10

2011-11-28 Thread BK Box
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric) was recently added to the auto build system on opensuse, but the packages built are not executing correctly after install. When running a simple 'holland bk', no plugins load correctly, so backups fail: # dpkg -i holland-common_1.0.6-2_all.deb

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-09-21 Thread BK Box
Without the quota modules, a server cannot have data quotas per user on the filesystem. This effects all versions up to Oneiric. When a person uses any kind of quota restriction whether it's manual, or via an application such as Plesk or CPanel, it will not work since these modules are missing.

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-09-20 Thread BK Box
This is still the case in oneiric: $ wget http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-3.0.0-11-virtual_3.0.0-11.18_amd64.deb $ dpkg -x linux-image-3.0.0-11-virtual_3.0.0-11.18_amd64.deb . $ ls -l lib/modules/3.0.0-11-virtual/kernel/fs/quota/ total 0 ** Changed in: linux

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-09-20 Thread BK Box
If there is going to be a new package to handle this going forward, what is going to be the SRU process for older releases, specifically LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected natty ** Description changed: Binary package hint: linux-virtual In linux-virtual, the /boot/config file states that the quota format modules have been compiled as such, but the files are not provided by the package: # grep QFMT

[Bug 761809] CurrentDmesg.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428613/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 761809] ProcCpuinfo_.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo_.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428615/+files/ProcCpuinfo_.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 761809] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428614/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 761809] ProcInterrupts.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428616/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 761809] ProcModules.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428617/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 761809] UdevDb.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428618/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809 Title: Quota

[Bug 761809] WifiSyslog.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428620/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 761809] UdevLog.txt

2011-09-19 Thread BK Box
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2428619/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809 Title:

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-04-15 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: apt-cachepolicy.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809/+attachment/2041267/+files/apt-cachepolicy.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809 Title: Quota

[Bug 761809] [NEW] Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-04-15 Thread BK Box
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-virtual In linux-virtual, the /boot/config file states that the quota format modules have been compiled as such, but the files are not provided by the package: # grep QFMT /boot/config-2.6.35-24-virtual CONFIG_QFMT_V1=m CONFIG_QFMT_V2=m # ls -l

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-04-15 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: uname-a.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/761809/+attachment/2041282/+files/uname-a.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-04-15 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: dmesg.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/761809/+attachment/2041276/+files/dmesg.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809 Title:

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-04-15 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: lsb_release-rd.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/761809/+attachment/2041281/+files/lsb_release-rd.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 761809] Re: Quota modules are missing from the package

2011-04-15 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: version.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/761809/+attachment/2041284/+files/version.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761809

[Bug 699967] Re: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters

2011-02-10 Thread BK Box
Installed from -proposed and works great for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699967 Title: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase

[Bug 699967] Re: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters

2011-02-10 Thread BK Box
Installed from -proposed and works great for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699967 Title: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters --

[Bug 699967] Re: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters

2011-02-08 Thread BK Box
SRU: minimal patch for Maverick has been submitted in bzr Nominating for SRU, fulfills: (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical infrastructure packages The fix is from upstream and has been verified in Natty. ** Description changed: Binary package

[Bug 699967] Re: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters

2011-02-08 Thread BK Box
SRU: minimal patch for Maverick has been submitted in bzr Nominating for SRU, fulfills: (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical infrastructure packages The fix is from upstream and has been verified in Natty. ** Description changed: Binary package

[Bug 699967] Re: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters

2011-02-07 Thread BK Box
Was this only pushed to Natty? This issue is also present in Maverick, can we get it pushed out there as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699967 Title: Empty

[Bug 699967] Re: Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters

2011-02-07 Thread BK Box
Was this only pushed to Natty? This issue is also present in Maverick, can we get it pushed out there as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699967 Title: Empty list of

[Bug 707099] Re: Hostname case mismatch

2011-01-25 Thread BK Box
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 699967 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699967 Weird, the bug list was completely empty yesterday when I reported this. Sorry for the dup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 707099] [NEW] Hostname case mismatch

2011-01-24 Thread BK Box
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: munin apport bug attached. When using the hostname for munin-node, a mismatch will occur when trying to find plugins to match. This happens when the hostname contains uppercase characters. The code does a lc() on the initial hostname, but not on the

[Bug 707099] Re: Hostname case mismatch

2011-01-24 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: munin-node.apport.rtf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707099/+attachment/1805062/+files/munin-node.apport.rtf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.

[Bug 707099] [NEW] Hostname case mismatch

2011-01-24 Thread BK Box
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: munin apport bug attached. When using the hostname for munin-node, a mismatch will occur when trying to find plugins to match. This happens when the hostname contains uppercase characters. The code does a lc() on the initial hostname, but not on the

[Bug 707099] Re: Hostname case mismatch

2011-01-24 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: munin-node.apport.rtf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707099/+attachment/1805062/+files/munin-node.apport.rtf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707099 Title:

[Bug 530541] Re: desktopcouch-service crashed with RuntimeError in run_couchdb()

2010-03-18 Thread BK Box
Here is the log of desktopcouchdb in ~/.cache/desktop-couch/desktop- couch.log. This can be duplicated very easily. I use Testdrive and start up a new LiveCD and start gwibber. ** Attachment added: desktop-couchdb.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41228790/desktop-couchdb.log --

[Bug 451615] [NEW] Implement IDLE in the IMAP protocol

2009-10-14 Thread BK Box
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution I realize there is a bug already entered at gnome.org, but I was wondering if possibly Ubuntu members could help out in getting IDLE implemented with the IMAP protocol in Evolution. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233428 Most major

[Bug 451615] Re: Implement IDLE in the IMAP protocol

2009-10-14 Thread BK Box
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33677302/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33677303/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33677304/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment