in net/s2io.c.
* Patch from Kyle McMartin's tree to add a stub asm-parisc/vga.h file.
Hmm. It just occured to me that I removed the dependancy on
gcc-3.4-hppa64 instead of changing it to gcc-4.1-hppa64. I don't have
time right now to respin the patch, though, sorry.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
What we need is the log of the compiling rather than the source code. The
problem should be immediately obvious from the invocation of the command,
the error message, and the few surrounding lines.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On 27/06/07, Ryan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot reproduce using
Bailey
On 27/06/07, Ryan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
textview.cpp:930: undefined reference to
`std::allocatorchar::allocator()'
but when i add -lstdc++ to our .pro file, it compiles and these errors go
away.
--
g++ does not automatically include -lstdc++
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Can you paste an actual error message where you think this should work?
Otherwise, as you noted, a hello world application works fine and I can
only say works for me =)
--
g++ does not automatically include -lstdc++
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122334
You received this bug notification
I'm installing Feisty on my work laptop and this confused me. Also,
answers on ubuntuforums.org were not convincing and went both ways as to
if this referred to the size of the new partition --New Partition
Size-- or the new size of the existing partition --New Partition
Size--.
Too bad it's
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22
This is a regression from 2.6.22-1-powerpc64-smp to
2.6.22-3-powerpc64-smp
On bootup, the various snd-aoa modules are no longer auto-loaded, and so
alsa reports no soundcards.
Doing:
modprobe snd_aoa
modprobe snd_aoa_soundbus
** Attachment added: lsmod-2.6.22-1-powerpc64-smp.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7712481/lsmod-2.6.22-1-powerpc64-smp.txt
--
snd-aoa no longer automatically loaded on ppc g5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115596
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Note that the lsmod here is from 2.6.22-4, although I observed the
problem in 2.6.22-3 initially. I didn't try 2.6.22-2 at all on this
system.
** Attachment added: lsmod-2.6.22-4-powerpc64-smp.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7712482/lsmod-2.6.22-4-powerpc64-smp.txt
--
snd-aoa no longer
** Attachment added: lspci.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7712486/lspci.txt
--
snd-aoa no longer automatically loaded on ppc g5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115596
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: lspci.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7712508/lspci.txt
--
Using sound causes badness on ppc64-smp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115597
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Confirmed that it still occurs with -5 kernel.
Message at startup:
[ 85.449934] [ cut here ]
[ 85.449943] Badness at
/build/buildd/linux-source-2.6.22-2.6.22/include/linux/slub_def.h:77
[ 85.449946] Call Trace:
[ 85.449949] [c00175f1b5f0] [c000ff14]
Confirmed that this still occurs in 2.6.22-5-powerpc64-smp (fetched from
launchpad, it's not on archive.ubuntu.com yet)
--
snd-aoa no longer automatically loaded on ppc g5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115596
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
-essential.
You're not required to load it, because the C compiler works fine for
compiling kernels and kernel modules, for which no libc is required.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
gcc fails to compile a minimal C program
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87793
You received this bug notification because you
With the symlink, if it even works, you still wont be able to boot from it
because there will be no raid45 or raid456 symlink in the initramfs.
Don't do the raid456 symlink since the version of dmraid release for feisty it
expecting raid45. Create that symlink instead and see if it works.
--
This appears to be fixed in g++4-.1, feisty but still occurs in g++-4.0,
feisty.
** Changed in: gcc-4.0 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gcc-4.1 = gcc-4.0
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
** Also affects: gcc-4.1 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
g++ 4.0 and 4.1
From the susv3 manual:
char *strtok(char *restrict s1, const char *restrict s2);
The first call in the sequence searches the string pointed to by s1 for
the first byte that is not contained in the current separator string
pointed to by s2. If no such byte is found, then there are no tokens in
The raid45 or raid456 is another problem already reported here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/102973
--
dmraid 4th disk problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103770
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106825 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106825
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 106825
on a JMB363, dmraid package install hangs
--
on a JMB363, dmraid does not show partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106829
You received this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106825 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106825
Your both bugs are related to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058
--
on a JMB363, dmraid does not show partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106829
You received this bug
This bug is know upstream. dmraid does not yet support the JMicron
controller.
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #219058
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058
** Also affects: dmraid (upstream) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058
** Also affects: dmraid (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
on a JMB363, dmraid package install hangs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
For large disks/partitions fdisk cannot work with the entire available
size. I cannot find what the limit is right now. What tool did you use
to see that the raid array only has 749GB capacity? For large
partitions/disks you should use parted instead of fdisk and may have to
change the partition
** Tags added: dmraid
--
gparted does not like /dev/mapper devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22474
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If this will make upgrades to feisty possible for dmraid users, should it make
it in before feisty is released?
Or should more testing and work go into this and it not be rushed?
--
make dmraid play nice with udev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177
You received this bug notification because
You are referring to your first patch where your call dmraid -ay when a
block device is detected?
--
make dmraid play nice with udev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Ready for upload, would like this to get in before feisty since it
breaks upgrades from edgy for those that have / on FakeRAID.
--
dmraid not starting on system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93810
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
If all that is required is a linking then link use raid45.ko as the
symlink and use the published dmraid package, not the one I've uploaded
to this bug report.
Since ubuntu's kernel does not yet have the raid456.ko module I'm not
going to commit the changes I did to the dmraid package (which was
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: dmraid
This packaged version of dmraid, for RAID setups other than 0 or 1, is
still looking for kernel module raid45, when I believe the kernel has
been using module raid456 since kernel 2.6.18.
+
+ This depends on bug 97655
--
dmraid
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: inetutils-inetd
As of 2:1.5.dfsg , it shows up under an aptitude debtags view as role -
prorgram instead of program
** Affects: inetutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
debtags typo - prorgam - program
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
nscd should notice system changes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23707
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
Amd64 glibc performance patch.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22924
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
resolver breaks several apps with all-numeric hostnames
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
libc6's printf and fprintf don't return -1 on closed stdout/stderr.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20775
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
Athlon doesn't get optimized bswap_32 implementation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18017
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
issue warning for old locale data files rather than silently failing?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16739
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
LinuxTestProject test suite 2005-04-05 fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16075
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
ld.so.conf prevents libc6 from upgrading in a 32-bit chroot on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12815
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber
** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
Please debconfify timezone questions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30815
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
and subscribing to
both this and the one you indicated at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Richard Bailey = (unassigned)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
** Changed in: nautilus-python (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
Expects to find libpython2.4.so, should look for libpython2.4.so.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44704
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
ld.so.preload not multilib safe
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: at (Ubuntu Breezy)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
** Changed in: at (Ubuntu Hoary)
Assignee: Jeff Bailey = (unassigned)
--
at: atd misbehaves for usernames with 8+ characters (fix included)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30498
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
[needs packaging] Simple Invoices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Reported upstream:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/ataraid-list/2007-April/msg0.html
--
dmraid 4th disk problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103770
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Hello nox216, what architecture are you using? I would like you to test an
updated package before I submit the patch.
Time is of the essence since Feisty is only 2 weeks away.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug
Please test this package to see if it works. This will work on the i386
architecture. If you used x86_64 let me know.
** Attachment added: dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_i386_rmjb.deb
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7180622/dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_i386_rmjb.deb
--
dmraid looking for raid45
Public bug reported:
Simple Invoices is a simple web based invoicing solution for personal
/home-office/small business needs. Simple Invoices offers the basic
option to enable people to create and manage invoicing.
URL: http://www.simpleinvoices.org/
License: GPL
** Affects: Ubuntu
Chad, you can test with this package.
** Attachment added: dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_amd64_rmjb.deb
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193021/dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_amd64_rmjb.deb
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: restricted-manager
Running on Averatec 2150 with xorg 'radeon' driver in 1280x800 x 24bit
w/ 128M RAM enabled in BIOS, just went to add/remove applications and
checked ATI binary driver and OK, it finished and exited silently, so
went to restricted
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7153930/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7153931/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7153932/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachment
I do not have access to a feisty installation at hand but can someone
check what order dmraid is run relative to udev? You can check this is
/etc/rcS. dmraid should be initialised *after* udev for this same
reason. There was a bug about this in debian that was fixed, I opened a
bug here but that
cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
DEVICE partitions
cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 hda6[0] hdd1[2] hdc1[1]
390700544 blocks level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 0 [3/3] [UUU]
unused devices: none
cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# file
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7127439/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7127440/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7127441/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachment
Ouch, another comment here to say that blacklisting this broke a
perfectly working ipv6 system. I can see doing this for new installs,
but I don't think it's a good idea to break existing ones.
--
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug
I did it this way because debian has both udev and dmraid at different
points in rcS, dmraid's point (what I'm trying to set to 11) is
dependent on ubuntu's place in rcS.d. This way, when dmraid needs to be
sync'd/merged again from debian, it will still remove a non S11 link if
it exists.
--
No I don't object, my concern right now it to get this update in before
the freeze on Thursday.
--
dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
This scenario is also happening to me, for me the wait can be over 10 minutes.
I also use evms and have lvm2 on md in a raid 5.
I have the updated mdadm package from edgy-updates installed.
If there's any info that I can provide to help debug this issue please
let me know.
--
mdadm causes boot
Can one of you, Steve or Michael check this new diff and if it's good
release it? I want to get this in before feisty since I think it's
already affecting people.
--
dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: updated debdiff with test before call to update-rc.d -f
remove
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7100087/dmraid.debdiff
--
dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Reverted to in progress to iron out updating symlink in rcS.d
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
--
dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The update-rc.d -f remove is in preparation to run:
dh_installinit -p dmraid -- start 11 S . start 51 0 6 .
later on in the rules.
It used to be:
dh_installinit -p dmraid -- start 04 S . start 51 0 6 .
Without that dmraid gets two entries in rcS.d... I've tested it
** Changed in: dmraid
Will this make it into ubuntu before Feisty?
--
syslog-ng causes ubuntu-minimal to be removed.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/42555
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I'm a green packager so I'll take any advice you give, but I was
working on the premise that the call to dh_installinit always exists in
the rules so in subsequent upgrades the update-rc.d -f remove will get
called and dh_installinit will put back the file.
--
dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
** Attachment added: debdiff for update
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7052432/dmraid.debdiff
--
dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Ready for upload
--
dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dmraid
dmraid should be initialised after udev. It's currently at S04 while
udev is at S10.
See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367796
** Affects: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Richard Bailey
I tested this on stock feisty beta and iriverter launches and works
properly. Can you test again? Some dependent packages were probably
updated.
--
java library not found
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91237
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I just checked and yes, dmraid is initializing before udev in rcS.d.
What this means is that dmraid sets up the devices in /dev/mapper, then
udev is run and it completely rebuilds /dev, throwing out what dmraid
did. Currently udev is initialized at S10 and dmraid at S04, it should
be changed to
Can someone who is currently experiencing this error test with this new deb?
It's the same upstream version, the only difference is that dmraid is
initialised at S11 instead of S04, i.e. after udev.
I appended my username to the end of the file in case others want to try to
build a deb and
** Attachment added: debdiff to move dmraid to S11 in rcS.d
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6988744/dmraid.debdiff
--
dmraid not starting on system boot
https://launchpad.net/bugs/93810
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: updated debdiff with new maintainer dmraid init move
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6988898/dmraid.debdiff
--
dmraid not starting on system boot
https://launchpad.net/bugs/93810
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #421853
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421853
** Also affects: gthumb (upstream) via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421853
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Delete imported images from the camera doesn't
I got that impression from reading my camera's manual. It did not
explicitly say that you can't delete over PTP, but it did say to use PTP
only for printing (PictBridge) and use USB for PC. And since I got this
error it just fit to me. In the USB mode things work as expected.
I also used gThumb
** Summary changed:
- ANts P2P
+ [needs-packaging] ANts P2P
--
[needs-packaging] ANts P2P
https://launchpad.net/bugs/94722
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Summary changed:
- Package request for ripole
+ [needs-packaging] ripole
--
[needs-packaging] ripole
https://launchpad.net/bugs/93905
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hi, it's been quite some time since I experienced this bug, however
since then I realised that this option only applies when the camera is
in USB Mass Storage Mode and not PTP Mode, which is what I was in when I
got this error.
From my limited understanding of how things are supposed to work I
Public bug reported:
Description: 3D space combat simulator
URL: http://reaper3d.sourceforge.net/
GPL Licence
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
Package request for reaper3d
https://launchpad.net/bugs/93890
--
Public bug reported:
Description: Simple but powerful cli tool for mass renaming files (using
regular expressions)
URL: http://rename.berlios.de/
GPL Software
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
Package request for
Public bug reported:
Description: OLE2 file stream extractor used by amavis to detect viruses
URL: http://www.pldaniels.com/ripole/
BSD License
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
Package request for ripole
Backport request here:
https://launchpad.net/edgy-backports/+bug/93544
** Changed in: devede (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Richard Bailey = (unassigned)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Devede needs vcdimager software
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73537
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
dependencies are not corrent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hello, what version of the iriverter package were you using when this
error occurred? iriverter was recently updated to 0.16-0ubuntu2
Also any more details about your installation that might help, such as
the version of java-gcj-compat and libswt3.2-gtk-java that you have
installed.
** Changed
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Committed
--
dependencies are not corrent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey
--
dependencies are not corrent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: debdiff for update
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6608728/iriverter.diff
--
dependencies are not corrent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Ready for upload
--
dependencies are not corrent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: iriverter
iriverter depends on java-gcj-compat or sun-java5-bin, but if sun-
java5-bin is installed iriverter does not work. It should not depend on
sun-java5-bin at all.
** Affects: iriverter (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
Hi Conrad, again when I test I don't get the error you're getting. I
installed the sun-java6* packages you had listed and then installed
iriverter and running it from the command line worked, it did not bring
up any error.
Can you try again? It may have been a dependency issue in feisty at the
You need to install build-essential in order to compile C programs.
Rejecting - Not a bug.
** Changed in: gcc-4.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
gcc fails to compile a minimal C program
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87793
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
iriverter doesn't recognize Java on my system
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78065
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
Conrad, can you give some more details as to what related packages you
have installed? In my testing iriverter always works on feisty once
java-gcj-compat is installed.
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Needs Info
--
iriverter doesn't recognize Java on my system
There may be a bug with dmraid on ICH7 hardware. The author is aware and
working on it:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/ataraid-list/2007-February/msg0.html
--
[apport] dmraid crashed with SIGSEGV in ddf1_cvt_config_record()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82809
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hello Scott, can we get some details about your hardware? What SATA-RAID
controller are you using?
--
[apport] dmraid crashed with SIGSEGV in ddf1_cvt_config_record()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82809
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi! Do you have an error message with the failure that we can look at?
--
vpnc in edgy works with older version of libc6 package!
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82169
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
You guys rock! The latest builds work flawlessly on my X800 where before
they'd fail miserably. I don't know if this issue is related but usplash
also works properly now off the desktop CD.
--
X fails to start in dapper, edgy with ati X600/X700/X800 (control not delegated
to radeon driver, ati
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 28925 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 28925
X fails to start in dapper, edgy with ati X600/X700/X800 (control not
delegated to radeon driver, ati complains about Mach64).
--
Does not work on my ATi X800
https://launchpad.net/bugs/76087
is
considered by the recipient to be SPAM.
This email account is protected by:
Active Spam Killer (ASK) V2.5.3 - (C) 2001-2004 by Marco Paganini
For more information visit http://www.paganini.net/ask
--- Original Message Follows ---
From: Richard Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Jan
It's hard to tell without the code in hand, but my best guess is that
the oracle library is handing in a bad pointer to some function.
I'm a bit surprised to see a call right from kpummfpg into
_dl_make_stack_executable. Does it segfault reasonably quickly, or does
it have to run for a while?
I'm not a developer, but you can try posting to the ubuntu-motu list or
ubuntu-devel-discuss.
--
missing dmraid support needed to access SATA raids
https://launchpad.net/bugs/22107
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
301 - 400 of 622 matches
Mail list logo
