[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2015-02-17 Thread Ben Erickson
Clarification: I tested 9.0.1 FP3 IF1 on a pre-fixed kernel: 3.13.0-43 and SMTP binds properly with the new bindsock binary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 Title: A new instan

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2015-02-17 Thread Ben Erickson
SPR YXYX9RA56Z "HTTP server can't be started with "Error - Unable to Bind port 443 or 80" on SUSE12" has been resolved in 9.01 FP3 IF1 which includes a fixed bindock! Just tested on Ubuntu with 3.13 kernel, SMTP is binding and working properly there as well (unofficially, of course.) ;-) -- You r

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2015-01-16 Thread Ben Erickson
I pushed a little harder with IBM and found out that an SPR (Software Problem Report) has been opened for the issue on SUSE 12, which also exhibits the same behavior: SPR # YXYX9RA56Z "Error - Unable to Bind port 443 or 80" on SUSE12. My representative quoted one of the developers as saying: "Th

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2015-01-06 Thread Ben Erickson
Ok, the PMR with IBM went about as expected. "Unfortunately our level 3 support team will not pursue this issue seeing how it is not seen on current supported platforms of Unix." So much for bindsock itself getting fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-27 Thread Ben Erickson
I'm working with IBM on this, trying to convince them to debug their bindsock binary. The initial hurdle, which I may or may not be able to overcome, is the boilerplate "Ubuntu is not a supported OS." I've offered to send them a virtual machine with the problem already present, we'll see how this g

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-19 Thread Ben Erickson
I have also tested kernel 3.13.0-44 on Trusty-Proposed and it solves the bug. I have modified the tag verification-needed-trusty to verification- done-trusty. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-19 Thread Ben Erickson
Thanks, Andy- I've provided all this info in PMR 41425,227,000. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 Title: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kern

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-19 Thread Ben Erickson
I will try to open a service request based on this information. Is there anything more specific information about which of the fields is passing on the junk? Perhaps this could actually get fixed! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-16 Thread Ben Erickson
Andy, is there any way to try to prevent this from happening again like some comments in the code? As mentioned by OP, this has happened before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 T

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-14 Thread Ben Erickson
Attaching dmesg... thanks again. ** Attachment added: "dmesg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-trusty/+bug/1335478/+attachment/4281221/+files/dmesg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-14 Thread Ben Erickson
Yes, working for me too. Ubuntu 14.04 LTS x86. Thanks! I hope this gets into the mainline kernel soon! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 Title: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bind

[Bug 1269053] Re: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel 3.5.0-45.68

2014-11-28 Thread Ben Erickson
I have also commented on the new bug #1335478. Thanks to this bug being fixed, I have a workaround- which is to install one of these FIXED kernels. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269053

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-11-28 Thread Ben Erickson
Still a problem in 3.13.0-39 and 3.13.0-40.47. This affects my own network and one of my clients. I can't use the 3.13 kernel this way. I have to use a different kernel just for setuid to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U