Re: [Bug 438413] Re: init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2013-03-20 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Also, is wrong for dark gray. It assumes dim is mapped to dark gray, but tput reset and tput oc do not enforce this, and .e.g Ubuntu defaults to a different mapping (cyan?) for this attribute. Worse, in some console drivers (fbcon?) the "dim" and "underline" attribute color mappings are conflated.

Re: [Bug 438413] Re: init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2013-03-20 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
A further correction: it should be ncv#63 to exclude standout too, since standout is implemented using reverse-video. Also, is buggy. It tries to use dim in conjunction with black to achieve dark grey as a background, but this actually only works for a dark gray foreground. A correct would be:

Re: [Bug 438413] Re: init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2013-03-16 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
My mistake, it should be ncv#62 to exclude , since that's how bright background colors are achieved. On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Ben Wiley Sittler wrote: > Sorry, my mistake! > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > >> I'm confused by your comment, since the linux-16co

Re: [Bug 438413] Re: init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2013-03-16 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Sorry, my mistake! On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > I'm confused by your comment, since the linux-16color entry does use > ncv#54 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438413 > > Title

Re: [Bug 438413] Re: init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2013-03-14 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
It turns out there's still a bug in this entry: needs to be adjusted to ncv#54 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > ** Changed in: ncurses (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Fix Released > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report

[Bug 998612] Re: zhcon KSC and JIS support somewhat broken

2012-05-12 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
FYI, the patch has not been sent upstream or reviewed by anyone yet, but please feel do send it upstream if it seems useful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998612 Title: zhcon KSC and

[Bug 998612] Re: zhcon KSC and JIS support somewhat broken

2012-05-12 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
** Patch added: "Improve zhcon KSC and JIS support" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998612/+attachment/3143605/+files/zhcon-ksc-and-jis-fixes.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9986

[Bug 998612] [NEW] zhcon KSC and JIS support somewhat broken

2012-05-12 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Public bug reported: Attempting to set the default encoding to KSC in .zhconrc or /etc/zhcon.conf fails and actually sets the encoding to GBK. Here's the relevant config file line: defaultencode = ksc Also any attempt to use --utf8 with KSC or JIS fails since iconv does not know those charset na

Re: [Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2010-03-17 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Sorry, Ubuntu box has been down for >1yr here :( On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 19:51, Arne Goetje wrote: > ** Changed in: ttf-uralic (Ubuntu) >   Importance: Undecided => Low > > ** Changed in: ttf-uralic (Ubuntu) >       Status: Incomplete => Triaged > > -- > MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding inf

[Bug 439697] Re: zhcon --utf8 truncates output on non-Chinese character

2009-09-30 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
** Attachment added: "Patch to use glibc's iconv extension //TRANSLIT to automatically handle untranslatable output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32761294/zhcon-utf8.diff ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32761295/Dependencies.txt -- zhcon --utf8 trun

[Bug 439697] [NEW] zhcon --utf8 truncates output on non-Chinese character

2009-09-30 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zhcon When run with the --utf8 option, zhcon internally converts client output from UTF-8 to the internal zhcon encoding (GB2312/GBK/EUC-KR/etc.) and does the corresponding reverse translation to UTF-8 for input from the user. However, when a character in

[Bug 438413] Re: init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2009-09-29 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
The and in the "linux-16color" entry in my patch are broken for color 8. To fix them, replace both instanced of %{8}%> with %{7}%> and all colors should then work. -- init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

[Bug 438413] [NEW] init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2009-09-28 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Public bug reported: When using init_color(3ncurses) or the underlying capability, the red, green and blue color components are specified on a scale of 0 to 1000, inclusive. However, the terminfo data for the "linux" terminal type has a buggy which fails for component value 1000 (full intensity.

[Bug 438413] Re: init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" fails when red, green and/or blue is set to the maximum value (1000)

2009-09-28 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
** Attachment added: "Fixes for "linux" and friends, and similar bugs in a couple other terminfos; also added a "linux-16color" entry for fbcon with 256-position font" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32635354/linux-terminfo.diff -- init_color (and the capability) for terminal type "linux" f

[Bug 437314] Re: SGR handling is broken

2009-09-26 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
** Attachment added: "Patch to fix SGR handling for up to 10 parameters" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32494337/bogl-bterm.diff -- SGR handling is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 437314] [NEW] SGR handling is broken

2009-09-26 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Public bug reported: bogl-bterm's handling of Set Graphic Rendition sequences is broken in two ways: 1. SGR0 does not reset underlining 2. in a multi-parameter SGR, only the first parameter has any effect ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Dependencies: libgcc1 1:4.3.3-5ubuntu4 gcc-4.3-base 4.

Re: [Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2009-01-18 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
That sounds good to me. As I said, once I have access to an Ubuntu machine again, I will test. On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Arne Goetje wrote: > I will fix the _package_ in that regard, that the font does not get used > automatically and that the replacement configurations are removed. > Mean

Re: [Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2008-11-10 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Hi, Arne. Both of my Ubuntu boxes are currently down and have been for some months. I will test as soon as I have one of them working again. Sorry for the delay! -Ben On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Arne Goetje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > need feedback. does the proposed solution work for you

[Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2008-11-10 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Hi, Arne. Both of my Ubuntu boxes crashed (different reasons in each case) a couple months ago. I don't know when I'll be able to get them working again, but I will test this when I do. I do apologize for the inconvenience! -Ben -- MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information https://bug

[Bug 261216] [NEW] symbol '_gotoxy' in /usr/lib/bcc/libdos.a should be exported to match

2008-08-25 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bcc I ran into a problem while trying to compile this file: /* home.c - home the cursor using Borland-style conio compile with: bcc -ansi -Md -o home home.c */ #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { gotoxy(1,1); return 0; } The error was: u

[Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2007-09-23 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
my mistake, i misread your update. the new font works correctly for the modified cp1251 encoding, but fails horribly (as before) in unicode- aware applications. -- MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73211 You received this bug notification because y

Re: [Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2007-09-23 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
i installed and tested this font (with no other uralic fonts present), and it still does not work correctly. it does not seem to contain correct unicode mappings, or at least it does not display the special udmurt and mari characters in firefox (firefox falls back on a different font, freemono perh

Re: [Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2007-09-13 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Yes, the bug is only with the Unicode mapping. The 8-bit encoding seems well-established and correct. And I can confirm that this package still has this bug on my system :( On 9/6/07, Arne Goetje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From the README file: > ---

[Bug 93885] Re: It's completely broken: missing org/mozilla/javascript/tools/shell/Main

2007-03-20 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
i can confirm this in feisty: $ rhino Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.mozilla.javascript.tools.shell.Main    at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run(libgcj.so.70) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.mozilla.javascript.tools.shell.Main not found in gnu.gcj.run

[Bug 73211] Re: MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2006-11-24 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
just fyi, the version: 0.0.20040829-1ubuntu1 -- MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information https://launchpad.net/bugs/73211 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 73211] MonoUralic contains incorrect encoding information

2006-11-24 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ttf-uralic the MonoUralic font (/usr/share/fonts/truetype/uralic/monou___.ttf) has incorrect character map information and so displays characters in the Unicode range U+0080 ... U+00FF incorrectly (as cyrillic.) this is especially a problem since the pack

Re: [Bug 56633] Re: buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings

2006-10-02 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
btw, i can confirm that this fix has been applied in edgy on the following python interpreters: python2.4 2.4.3-8ubuntu2 python2.5 2.5-0ubuntu1 however it's still broken in the following edgy python: python2.3 2.3.5-15ubuntu1 and in dapper it's broken too, at least in the version i have install

[Bug 56633] Re: [Bug 56633] Re: buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings

2006-08-27 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
this bug does not appear to be actually fixed in version 2.4.3-8ubuntu1 (i.e. the patch has not been applied): $ apt-cache show python2.4 | fgrep Version Version: 2.4.3-8ubuntu1 Version 2.4 of the high-level, interactive object oriented language, Python-Version: 2.4 $ python2.4 -c 'assert(repr(u"

[Bug 56633] Re: [Bug 56633] Re: buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings

2006-08-22 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Thanks! Perhaps this will inspire me to write a patch for the buggy UTF-7 codec... On 8/22/06, Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It appears that Georg Brandl has applied this patch. > > It should show up in the next release of Python 2.4. > > ** Bug watch added: Python at Sourceforge #1541585

[Bug 56633] Re: buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings

2006-08-16 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
thanks! let me know if they need any more info from the systems i tested this on. -- buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings https://launchpad.net/bugs/56633 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 56633] Re: buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings

2006-08-16 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
i don't care who gets credit and i'm really busy. can you send it upstream? btw, i've attached the patch. -- buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings https://launchpad.net/bugs/56633 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-b

[Bug 56633] buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings

2006-08-16 Thread Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
Public bug reported: hi, i discovered a bug yesterday in repr() for unicode strings. this causes an unpatched non-debug wide (UTF-32/UCS-4) build of python to abort: python2.4 -c 'assert(repr(u"\U0001" * 39 + u"\u" * 4096)) == (repr(u"\U0001" * 39 + u"\u" * 4096))' the problem i