[Bug 896772] [NEW] Oneiric's x64 cloud image [20111124] won't boot (wrong kernel, buggy /etc/fstab, buggy /etc/network/interfaces)

2011-11-26 Thread Bfreis
Public bug reported: This report is against the latest (as of now, 2011-11-27, 02:01 GMT-2) Oneiric's x64 cloud image, available on http://cloud- images.ubuntu.com/oneiric/current/ (which is Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) Daily Build [2024]). I tried to launch an instance on my Eucalyptus

[Bug 896772] Re: Oneiric's x64 cloud image [20111124] won't boot (wrong kernel, buggy /etc/fstab, buggy /etc/network/interfaces)

2011-11-26 Thread Bfreis
As asked by SpamapS in #ubuntu-server, I quickly tested the current Precise cloud image (Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise Pangolin) Daily Build [2026]). It didn't work. I didn't analyze it, but comparing to what I've seen on Oneirice, apparently the Kernel is ok (it manages to find /dev/sda1) and

[Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-27 Thread Bfreis
Hello. Just to inform that since yesterday after when I updated to the latest version available on natty-proposed the servers are running good, and have shown no symptoms of messages from the future being discarded (verified through the absence of the error logs I was seeing in

[Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-27 Thread Bfreis
Hello. Just to inform that since yesterday after when I updated to the latest version available on natty-proposed the servers are running good, and have shown no symptoms of messages from the future being discarded (verified through the absence of the error logs I was seeing in

[Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-26 Thread Bfreis
Hello. I've just installed the update from natty-proposed on my 3 servers (2 NCs, 1 CC), and they seem to be fine. I will confirm if everything is still OK tomorrow, since the errors were intermittent. It is the first time I use -proposed, so I have a question: if everything goes smooth, and you

[Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-26 Thread Bfreis
Hello. I've just installed the update from natty-proposed on my 3 servers (2 NCs, 1 CC), and they seem to be fine. I will confirm if everything is still OK tomorrow, since the errors were intermittent. It is the first time I use -proposed, so I have a question: if everything goes smooth, and you

[Bug 854946] [NEW] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-20 Thread Bfreis
Public bug reported: In both EucalyptusNC/services.xml and EucalyptusCC/services.xml there's no ClockSkewBuffer (nor TimeToLive nor PrecisionInMilliseconds), therefore messages from the future (from the webservice's point of view) won't be accepted, even if the difference in time is minimal.

[Bug 854946] [NEW] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-09-20 Thread Bfreis
Public bug reported: In both EucalyptusNC/services.xml and EucalyptusCC/services.xml there's no ClockSkewBuffer (nor TimeToLive nor PrecisionInMilliseconds), therefore messages from the future (from the webservice's point of view) won't be accepted, even if the difference in time is minimal.