Changing affected package from unity to compiz.
- compiz (1:0.9.9~daily12.12.05-0ubuntu2) has this bug
- compiz (1:0.9.9~daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1) has this bug
- compiz (1:0.9.8.4+bzr3412-0ubuntu1) works as expected
Probably a side effect to avoid windows behind the launcher at setup.
The modes nev
** Description changed:
- When lauching an application from the launcher (autohide mode) its
+ When launching an application from the launcher (autohide mode) its
window location will depend om whether the launcher itself is visible or
not at the time of setup.
Test case:
1) configure l
Downgrading unity/compiz to:
- unity 6.12.0-0ubuntu4
- compiz 1:0.9.8.4+bzr3412-0ubuntu1
makes the window positioning work properly again.
Thus,, this issue has been introduced in newer version of unity and/or
compiz.
Current versions causing this issue are:
- unity 6.12.0daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1
-
** Tags added: regression-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088533
Title:
Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on
whether the launcher is visible or n
Public bug reported:
When lauching an application from the launcher (autohide mode) its
window location will depend om whether the launcher itself is visible or
not at the time of setup.
Test case:
1) configure launcher autohide mode
2) launch an application from the launcher
3) keep the launcher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1060484 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1060484
When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to
Default of []
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Thanks, your test kernel works great here so far ;)
$ uname -a
Linux ltop1 3.7.0-3-generic #9~lp1080389 SMP Wed Nov 21 17:07:50 UTC 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Same issue here for opening pdf documents.
Workaround:
Downgrade libgeist1 version 2.2.13-0ubuntu1 to 2.2.12-0ubuntu2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077376
Title:
Evince crashes whe
It's not an argument to state that this cannot be fixed as it can:
Alt 1: Remove concerned packages from the repos
Alt 2: Fix proper filtering before introducing the feature
Amazon et al should provide filtering options for this kind of stuff.
Any filterings like an adult filter should be set on
This is a regression caused by the upgrade of
overlay-scrollbar from 0.2.16+r353-0ubuntu2 to 0.2.16+r356-0ubuntu1
The source package overlay-scrollbar 0.2.16+r356-0ubuntu1 has now been
deleted from the repos.
Workaround for those that have version 0.2.16+r356-0ubuntu1 installed is:
- downgrade
Confirming this too.
This ricotz glib2.0 source package solves the issue.
glib2.0 2.33.13+git20120915.ac7dcd81-0ubuntu1~12.10~ricotz0
Confirmed by upgrading the following three packages:
libglib2.0-0
libglib2.0-bin
libglib2.0-dev
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Not really, It's only related to nautilus-open-terminal.
Using a nautilus script works
Using nautilus actions is said to work
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791
Title:
'Open in t
Partly solved by LO 3.6.1~rc2-1ubuntu5.
The menubar still is displayed in the unity panel when the globalmeny is
disabled using UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0.
Workaround for Unity with globalmeny disabled:
- remove all appmenu packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Well, it might be relevant when running a mainstream precise version.
In this case you should report this issue to the xorg crack pushers team as the
ppa says:
"For questions and bugs with software in this PPA please contact xorg crack
pushers."
--
You received this bug notification because yo
It seems you're running quantal with the wrong nouveau driver.
The nouveau driver you're running is the xorg-edgers version for precise.
So, switch to xorg-edgers for quantal and if that doesn't solve your
problem then purge xorg-edgers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Works with kernel 3.5.0-14 too so seems to have been fixed.
** Changed in: libdrm (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125
Title:
[drm] nou
The upgrade concerned above is for the glib2.0 packages.
Thus, nautilus-open-terminal need to be updated to the latest glib2.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791
Title:
Open a gn
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791
Title:
Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
Public bug reported:
Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu causes it to crash.
The terminal window opens just to immediately crash.
No crash report generated.
Open the gnome-terminal from the unity dash or via Alt-F2 works fine.
This bug is present after the upgrade to
- glib2
Upgraded to libreoffice 1:3.6.1~rc2-1ubuntu3 which doesn't solve this
issue.
LibreOffice does not respect disabling of the globalmenu
(UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0) but still draws the menubar in the Unity panel.
This in turn (or other missing check) leaves other shells, e.g gnome
classic, without an LO men
Just upgraded to libreoffice 1:3.6.1~rc2-1ubuntu3 which seems ro have
solved this load issue.
However, LO does nolonger respect disabling of the globalmenu
(UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0) and still draws the menubar in the unity panel.
This in turn leaves other shells, e.g gnome classic, without an LO
menuba
I made some further investigations for the nouveau driver today.
Kernels 3.5.0-10 to 3.5.0-12:
The issue is present with a corrupted screen and massive logging of
PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR messages.
Kernel 3.5.0-13
The issue seems gone, i.e the nouveau driver again!
It seems that the fixes for kernel
For the record this proprietary driver works just fine:
nvidia-current 304.43-0ubuntu2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125
Title:
[drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch
This bug is not fixed!
If Shotwell has not been launched once then unity-lens-photo will still
crash due to that the database
/home//.local/share/shotwell/data/photo.db won't exist. Thus, a
check whether the database exists or not is required as well.
--
You received this bug notification becaus
It seems to be a menubar issue.
After dectivating globalmenu by removing the packages:
appmenu-gtk, appmenu-qt, appmenu-gtk3, indicator-appmenu
CPU-load is back to normal again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Same here, the process unity-panel-service causes high CPU-load and I
have experienced LO freezes too today.
It has to do with LO but doesn't seem to be connected to the quickstarter
(systray) as:
libreoffice --quickstart=no
still causes high CPU-load.
--
You received this bug notification beca
@dino99
vblank only works for some nvidia graphic cards (not mine) but worth testing as
a workaround.
I guess .udeb packages exist in the repos but not visible as those are
special stripped ditto packages for special use to save ram. The kernel
uses those instead of the more memory consuming .deb
I'm attaching the kern.log when running the 3.5.0-11 kernel.
** Attachment added: "kern.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+attachment/3271727/+files/kern.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
The following messages in the kern.log seem to cause this issue:
Aug 22 00:25:01 ltop1 kernel: [ 32.421438] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: fail
set_domain
Aug 22 00:25:01 ltop1 kernel: [ 32.421444] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0:
validate vram_list
Aug 22 00:25:01 ltop1 kernel: [ 32.421447] [drm]
** Description changed:
Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for
- login screen
- desktop screen
Prerequisities:
- running the nouveau driver
- running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels
At non-autologin one can type the login password blindly but just to
enter a corrup
** Description changed:
Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for
- login screen
- desktop screen
Prerequisities:
- running the nouveau driver
- running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels
At non-autologin one can type the login password blindly but just to
enter a corrup
Another workaround to avoid this drm issue is to remove the grub splash
option.
** Description changed:
Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for
- login screen
- desktop screen
Prerequisities:
- running the nouveau driver
- - running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels
+ - runn
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125
Title:
[drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800
Data 0x
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
Public bug reported:
Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for
- login screen
- desktop screen
Prerequisities:
- running the nouveau driver
- running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels
At non-autologin one can type the login password blindly but just to
enter a corrupted desktop screen. At
light-themes ver 0.1.11-0ubuntu1 seems to have solved this issue.
Furthermore the high cpu-load (side effect?) for a running evolution is gone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015497
Ti
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bowmore (bowmore)
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bowmore (bowmore)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: Bowmore (bowmore) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Bowmore (bowmore) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Thanks for the link confirming it's an nvidia bug. Maybe it's doable to
port the xorg-edgers nvidia patch to quantal.
You're right about the headers and a more "correct" workaround would
have been to copy system.h from a 3.2 kernel, Anyway this proposed
workaround works too.
--
You received this
Public bug reported:
Installing the kernel 3.4.0-1.2 fails to build the nvidia-current module
due to missing kernel header files.
Workaround:
Copy the missing header files from arm
cd /usr/src/linux-headers-3.4.0-1/arch
sudo cp arm/include/asm/system.h x86/include/asm/
sudo cp arm/include/asm/co
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993506
Title:
nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to
build
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
Those settings have the "s0_edgeflip_move = true" and that's one thing
that reveals this issue. But still the question is what causes this?
I've revealed it without edge flipping too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Sure, that makes it worse ;)
But what I wanted to say is that it's not just an edge flipping issue.
However, If I just disable snapping windows from the default compiz
settings for unity I can't reproduce this issue! So the question is what
plugin causes this? Tried to remove edge resistance for s
Hmm, meant vertically above of course ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965577
Title:
Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position
To manage notifications about this bu
It's also reproducable horizontally on a default install with default
settings by bumping a window on the top of the screen (same workspace)
back and forth.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Summary changed:
- The toolbar is not visible when the "Ambiance" theme enabled
+ Menubar text not visible when "Ambiance" theme is used
** Description changed:
- The toolbar is not displayed when the "Ambiance" theme is enabled.
+ The menubar text is not displayed when the "Ambiance" theme i
** Also affects: unity
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unity
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bowmore (bowmore)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Thanks, those small annoying dots ... but now it's done ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667
Title:
boot moves desktop icons
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bowmore (bowmore)
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Branch linked: lp:~bowmore/unity/fix_icon_workarea_issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667
Title:
boot moves desktop icons
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Well, the patching was magic, checking with bzr status/diff ;-)
Command bzr push ... said "Created new branch" but none appears on lp so I must
have overseen something.
Maybe reading the manual ;(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
It's probably easy but I'm not that familiar with bzr yet. Tried it a
few months ago and remember the tricky thing was to create the patch, ie
that part (not described) under "Now start coding"/"Create" before bzr
commit. Then I was not authorized to commit to my branch, maybe forgot
to login.
So
Sorry, the patch is for unity 5.10.0-0ubuntu3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667
Title:
boot moves desktop icons
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchp
Ok, I've tracked this down to Unity and found the root cause.
Both the panel and the launcher window struts are wrongly initialized
with the BaseWindow default geomentry (100,100,320,200) causing sporadic
compression of desktop icons in the lower part of the screen. This is
due to that the panel/l
** Also affects: nux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667
Title:
boo
This issue seems to be a nux issue.
I don't know what the Nux BaseWindow is for, but it's the one that
interfers with EWMH struts and causes this issue.
There are two functions:
- BaseWindow::BaseWindow(...)
- FloatingWindow::FloatingWindow(...)
that both set the geometry using
- SetGeometry(Geo
@Gaetano
The source package is nautilus.
You can either use the patch or update the source manually as it's just one
line of code to be added in the source for nautilus-desktop-icon-view.c.
Yes, you have to compile it using e.g
$ debuild -us -uc
to get .deb-packages
Check this example if you're
Updated patch "top_margin_workaround.patch" for nautilus
3.3.92-0ubuntu2.
Old patch removed.
** Patch added: "top_margin_workaround.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+attachment/2940231/+files/top_margin_workaround.patch
** Patch removed: "top margin patch"
I've updated the patch as the upstream margin patch has been removed.
I've also tested Gnome Classic & Compiz and not detected any issues for
the desktop icon workspace.
At current, Unity settings of those margins is done in the Unity plugin
which is to late, i.e those margins must be set one of
Garthhh, there is no right or wrong here and working in an organized way
neither means a one workspace approach nor to isolate spread functions
to the current workspace. That is more a Canonical adaptation, that I
support, to new users until now used (forced) to that way of working.
Some as myself
The reason why this issue didn't appear for 32-bit was that I hadn't
deactivated the globalmenu the same way as for 64-bit.
When I also deactivated it for 32-bit by setting UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0 this
issue appeared.
Probably a dup of bug #953479
** Description changed:
This bug has been reported
Another workaround:
Downgrade indicator-appmenu to version 0.3.1-0ubuntu2 (oneiric version).
Conclusion:
There's a regression from version 0.3.1-0ubuntu2 to 2.31.20-0ubuntu1
** Tags added: regression
** Tags removed: regression
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notific
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956509
Title:
unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_tuple()
To manage notifications about this bug
By initialized properly I mean:
The X window properties: top.height = bottom.height = left.width = right.width
= 0
So here it's not a matter of when Unity/Compiz updates the top.height
(panel) and the left.width (launcher).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
This is not a duplicate of bug #737758.
That bug describes how the whole desktop icon container moves horizontally due
to an inconsistent handling of the unity launcher width.
This bug brings up another issue, i.e when the desktop icon container
width and/or height sizes are defined smaller than
Reassigning this bug to Compiz.
Some tracing points to Compiz and more specifically a Compiz struts
issue.
Details:
windows.cpp
CompWindow::updateStruts ()
struts [0]=0, [1]=0, [2]=300, [3]=0,
struts [4]=0, [5]=0, [6]=0, [7]=0
struts [8]=100, [9]=419, [10]=0, [11]=0
The setting of struts [2] =
** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) => compiz (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667
Title:
boot moves desktop icons
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
Tested that during the weekend but it didn't work then but for some
magic reason now it mostly does :)
> you would have no other way for maximized app when you want to drop on
the left part
Not sure what you mean here but probably a strong reason to keep the
behaviour.
However, not happy with th
Sorry, just noticed that both network icons disappeared :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938380
Title:
Network-manager icon displayed twice in panel
To manage notifications about th
The solution here is to add Unity to NotShowIn in the .desktop-file:
/etc/xdg/autostart/nm-applet.desktop
and probably also to:
/usr/share/applications/nm-applet.desktop
Not sure about app-install-data:
/usr/share/app-install/desktop/network-manager-gnome:nm-applet.desktop
--
You received this
> launcher is hidden by default and so we can have icon on the far left.
Well, that would be great, but implies another launcher behavior when
you drag an icon, right?
As is today the hidden launcher always pops up when you drag an icon on
the desktop which prevents you from using that leftmost p
Yes, that could be a workaround until we find out why reveived screen
window margins sometimes have incorrect values. However, imo a final
solution shall trust those margins and that those are the root cause of
the problem.
Margins here shall be controlled by Unity but I suspect that there are
oth
@Fitoschido: Nope ;)
Consider the case when a user unlocks the home icon in the launcher.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932143
Title:
Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant t
Just tested the moving icon scenario now and found two side-effects:
Glitching
What happens here is that the desktop icon workarea is updated three times!
- first update with a correct value for left margin
- second update with left margin = 0 !!!
- third update with a correct value f
Another better solution is to always register the left margin (launcher
width + any pad) to X independent of whether the launcher is visible or
not and remove the adjustment "left += UNITY_LAUNCHER_WIDTH - 15".
The pros is that there is no "visible" empty column between a visible
launcher and the
That bug does concider the fact that the desktop icon container shall be
unchanged idependent of whether the kauncher is visible or not. That
(design decision?) is stated in bug #684649.
The the left margin might be decreased or adjusted but not too low as
this causes side effect especially with t
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938999
Title:
Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/u
Here's a proposed patch for the package nautilus_3.3.90-0ubuntu2.
** Patch added: "nautilus_left_margin.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+attachment/2772267/+files/nautilus_left_margin.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
The desktop icon container left margin differs dependent on whether the
launcher is autohide or not. My interpretation is that the icon
container's left margin shall be static, i.e the same, independent of
the choice of the two launcher options, acc to a design decision.
Also
Why! What's wrong with multiple options to achieve something?
Furthermore, the bookmark menu in the launcher's quicklist is
premature., i.e not sorted the right way and this is known but not acted
upon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Description changed:
- The indicator-weather crashes sporadically during a session
- .
+ The indicator-weather crashes sporadically during a session.
No problem however to restart it again.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1
For clarity, the patch "top margin patch" is for the precise package
nautilus_3.3.90-0ubuntu1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667
Title:
boot moves desktop icons
To manage notific
The issue causing desktop icons at the bottom of the screen to be moved
upwards and in some cases (sporadically) overlap other icons is caused
by multiple setups of the desktop icon container in combination with a
first too high top margin value setting the height of the desktop icon
container. Fut
Confirmed, gnome battery applet back again!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833397
Title:
indicator power displayed twice on panel
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
Yes, compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu3 seems to have fixed it. No more
ghost menus ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933615
Title:
menu shadows not clearing when menus close
To manag
@Colin: It's hard to file a new bug as when I try to all it does is to
refer to this bug.
Mine crashed today after selecting manual partitioning.
I have 20+ partitions on sda (from pre-lucid times) if that mignt be an issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
> IIRC, we do plan to support a view showing all the windows of an app
> across all workspaces, but I don't think this is implemented to spec yet.
This would be great ;)
One more question:
Does this new approach. basic views etc limited to the current workspace,
include e.g launching of applicat
@Mark: I'm sorry to have to disagree with you in this matter.
The following makes sense
- spread för all applications windows in current workspace (alt-tab)
- spread for a specific application's windows incl all workspaces
However, this does not make much sense
- spread for a specific application
Agree upon that this really is a poor decision.
Linux is a multi-workspace operating system and this has to be
considered on designing features.
Assume the following as one of examples:
- the user has set up a number of workspaces
- a nautilus window exists on two or more workspaces
This design
Respecting design decisions in general I however think this is an odd
one. I guess this implicitly means that the same restrictive approach
will apply to icons, fonts, etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922678
Title:
System Settings > Appearance theme list lacks existing themes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
Public bug reported:
System Settings > Appearance only lists the themes Adwaita, Ambiance,
Radiance, HighContrast and HighContrastInverse. This while Advanced
Settings (Gnome Tweak Tool) also lists Greybird and Raleigh plus any
Gtk+ themes in the user's ~/.themes.
There may be an intentional dr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 918657 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918657
Marking this a duplicate of bug #918657
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918916
Title:
Icon to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 918657 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918657
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 918657
unity-greeter_0.2.0-0ubuntu2 breaks desktop-selector
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
> We can maybe link to that, but we have to take into account the case where
> there
> is no nautilus window opened, raise to focus this one, move your current
> workspaces
> and such.
All that work for e.g. firefox even when there is no current firefox window but
I guess nautilus is not desig
I would rather prefer that shortcuts in the quicklist open new tabs than
new windows. That was also what I expected the first time I tested this
new Home quicklist.
Myself I use a number of customized quicklists and one example here is
firefox. There I use "firefox -new-tab " to achieve that and t
I prefixed the bookmarks from the top folders with "|> " without quotes
as a wotkaround. This will list top folder (Desktop, Documents,
Downloads, Music etc) first and "remaining" bookmarks last in the
quicklist. I think this is the preferred way as top folder are few (at
least if only default fold
Ok, I see.
Anyhow, one approach could be to use the output from command ls below
cd ~
ls -d */
which lists ALL not hidden user top folders.
Another approach is to extract the default top folders from the file
~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and adding the home folder.
>From that those top folders can b
A comment to this fix:
It's not a good idea to alphabetically sort folders and bookmarks as one group
of objects. The quicklist should group Computer folders and Bookmarks
separatelly and preferably in that order. Confer the presentation in Nautlius
sidebar.
--
You received this bug notificati
Creating a folder and a file with the same name in a folder is not allowed. The
reason is that a folder is a special type of a file, i.e it's a file including
the file mode bit d.
Also see e.g http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_file_types
Thus, this does not work
touch ~/Downloads/test
mkdir ~/Do
There is a Unity Staging PPA for Oneiric that you might try:
https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/staging?field.series_filter=oneiric
It's for testing purposes only and might break your system so ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
