Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Daniel,
Can you furnish this bug with:
Xorg.0.log
gdm.log
dpkg.log
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959494
Title:
[HP Probook 6550b] Fails to start graphical environment
To
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 44/45 systems. One
system is inaccessible in the lab. No regressions were detected and
results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-
testing/wk12_2012/lucid-proposed.html
** Tags added: certification-testing-passed
** Changed
I've seen this now on a Samsung N310 with Intel Mobile Graphics (945GM I
think) and also on the ARM Pandaboard.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572
Title:
Notify OSD panel is
Hi,
We wiped the disk and the problem is not reproducible anymore. This
might make it a bit difficult to debug...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834731
Title:
Dell PowerEdge R810
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873117
Title:
Broadcom STA driver from bcmwl-kernel-source should blacklist other
Broadcom drivers
To manage notifications
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 873117 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873117
** Tags removed: blocks-hwcert
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914983
Title:
[Thinkpad
I can't reproduce this problem except on first boot, so I'm unable to
install new kernels and test them. It's still present in Precise Beta 1
though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Please also take into account that we have an identical problem on other
systems where the card reader is on the SCSI bus.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953160
Title:
mediacard/sd
** Also affects: network-manager
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789
Title:
suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an
** Project changed: network-manager = network-manager (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120121)
Package: network-manager
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
TERM=xterm
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
apport information
** Attachment added: .home.brendand..cache.checkbox.checkbox.log.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789/+attachment/2870094/+files/.home.brendand..cache.checkbox.checkbox.log.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: .home.brendand..cache.checkbox.submission.xml.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789/+attachment/2870095/+files/.home.brendand..cache.checkbox.submission.xml.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789/+attachment/2870096/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789
Here is the contents of syslog from when the scenario is run (wifi
disconnected and then reconnected using nmcli con up). Network Manager
has it's log level set to debug
** Attachment added: network-manager syslog
Let's not do anything rash until we check a couple more things:
Haggai, can you run:
import dbus
bus = dbus.SystemBus()
ud_mgr_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, /org/freedesktop/UDisks)
ud_mgr = dbus.Interface(ud_mgr_obj, org.freedesktop.UDisks)
for dev in
Yah, stupid copy and paste :P The output of udisks is very interesting.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953160
Title:
mediacard/sd test doesn't complete
To manage
It's true that the script shouldn't try and disconnect already inactive
devices, but at the same time the whole concept of testing wireless
before and after suspend depends on their being a pre-existing wireless
connection. You *should* have been prompted to create one before this
test ran (by
Gah, ignore that comment. As you mentioned you do have wlan0
activated...
** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = High
** Also affects: checkbox
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: checkbox
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: checkbox
Assignee:
Having got to the bottom of this issue, this is actually not a bug in
Checkbox, but the nmcli tool used to drive the test. This:
Error: Device 'eth0' (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1)
disconnecting failed: This device is not active
is not what is causing the test to fail. This is:
**
Greg, I feel pretty sure this is a checkbox bug. Just to make sure, can
you paste the output of the command?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947431
Title:
[Lenovo e320] - Checkbox -
I suspect this could be because your card reader is on the scsi bus
rather than the sdio bus. Can you put this in a script and run it?
import dbus
bus = dbus.SystemBus()
ud_mgr_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, /org/freedesktop/UDisks)
ud_mgr = dbus.Interface(ud_mgr_obj,
Hi Greg,
When you get a chance can you run this script as well?
import dbus
bus = dbus.SystemBus()
ud_mgr_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, /org/freedesktop/UDisks)
ud_mgr = dbus.Interface(ud_mgr_obj, org.freedesktop.UDisks)
for dev in ud_mgr.EnumerateDevices():
try:
Hardware Certification have completed testing 53/55 systems with this
-proposed kernel. Apologies for the delay, we've had a large burden on
our labs and a few teething issues with new tests added, but from the
results that have come in we don't detect any regressions. The report,
as usual is
Importance set to Wishlist as suggested by veger on #ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdepim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619395
On 05/03/12 19:17, Jeff Lane wrote:
On 03/03/2012 01:42 PM, Brendan Donegan wrote:
I'm curious to know what kind of icon displays on the launcher when the
card is inserted? Is it an SD card icon or a plain old disk icon? If
it's an SD card icon that would be good, as at least *someone* knows
If we just add test for the scsi category then the test may pick up any
hard disk, not necessarily one with an SD card reader on it. I want to
have a look at the system to see if UDisks has some way of telling the
difference, but currently it isn't accessible in the lab.
--
You received this bug
In this case it looks like the test passed, so the failure may be a one
off. The outcome of this test is influenced by the system load at the
time the test is run, and we try our best to limit this effect. For
example the 'nice -n 20' runs the cpu_scaling_test with a very low
'niceness' level,
Hardware Certification has started testing this kernel.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Greg,
Can you please locate the test, run the command and post the output
here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947366
Title:
[Lenovo e320] - CPU Test Fails
To manage
Jeff,
It's more correct to say the test *was* flaky. We run it regularly
during SRU testing and rarely have problems. If it's failing,
consistently, on a system then it should be taken seriously.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I'm curious to know what kind of icon displays on the launcher when the
card is inserted? Is it an SD card icon or a plain old disk icon? If
it's an SD card icon that would be good, as at least *someone* knows how
to tell that an SD card reader is on the SCSI bus. If it's a plain old
disk then
** Tags added: certification-testing-passed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931647
Title:
linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 45/46 systems. One
system was inaccesible in the lab. No failures were detected in the
systems that reported results. The report is available here:
http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk09_2012/lucid-
proposed.html
--
You received this
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-10.04.4 = None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943498
Title:
[HP Compaq 6000 Pro] - Wireless NOT working in 10.04.4
To manage
It's Unity 3D
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572
Title:
Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
For this bug to occur you need to go straight to 'Install Ubuntu'. Once
you're in the live session the notifications appear fine, even when
running Ubiquity. I'm trying to get a screenshot but I can't find where
the image files are going (they don't end up in ~/Pictures)
** Changed in: ubiquity
Public bug reported:
When notify-osd triggers during the install (such as when networks are
detected or connected to) the panel shown is fully opaque. The border is
dark grey and the centre is some random color (mainly aubergine,
sometime orange, red or even blue).
The same problem is not
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572
Title:
Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
The 'Take a photo' preview pane appears as empty to begin with. Clicking
'Take photo' will take a photo succesfully, so the webcam hardware is
not dysfunctional. It then shows the photo below the preview pane (where
it is supposed to go) and in the preview pane itself. There
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942030
Title:
'Take a photo' preview pane not showing live preview
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
On this freshly installed system the first thing I attempted to do was
setup Ubuntu One. After installing the client I waited for the folder
list to appear so I could select folders to sync. Every few minutes the
status pane would say that File Sync was disconnected. A few
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942078
Title:
Initial attempt to connect to U1 service exhibits frequent
disconnect/reconnects
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Donegan (brendan-donegan)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931647
Title:
linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
The suspend_test script is deprecated, in fact you will find it's not
used by any job in the Ubuntu Friendly tests. To test suspend as we do
for Ubuntu Friendly you should use:
sudo /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/sleep_test -d
In theory we should remove the script which is no longer used. In
Public bug reported:
I have none of the following problems with Banshee, so I'm pinning these
on Rhythmbox.
1.) Selecting the 'Rhythmbox' option from the menu of indicator-sound doesn't
do anything. It should open an instance of the application
2.) While a track is playing, clicking the large
** Also affects: indicator-sound (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- Integration with indicator-sound is broken
+ Rhythmbox ntegration with indicator-sound is broken
** Summary changed:
- Rhythmbox ntegration with indicator-sound is broken
+ Rhythmbox
Hi,
What version are you using? Running 'apport-collect 930223' could be
useful. It's not true to say that Checkbox depends on that specific
package (well, it might if you are talking about an older version). I'm
running Precise and python-datetime itself is not installed, but the
datetime module
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 54/55 systems for the
Oneiric -proposed kernel. One system could not be tested due to a
hardware fault. All other results look fine:
http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk06_2012/oneiric-
proposed.html
** Changed in:
Public bug reported:
This is only happening after a recent update, which may have included
changes to PulseAudio, I'm not sure.
Anyway - the steps to reproduce on my system are:
1. Run pacmd
2. Run list-sinks to see if the C-Media_USB_Audio_Device is selected (has an
asterisk next to it)
3.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928980
Title:
Browser generated audio comes out the wrong sink
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Description changed:
This is only happening after a recent update, which may have included
changes to PulseAudio, I'm not sure.
Anyway - the steps to reproduce on my system are:
1. Run pacmd
2. Run list-sinks to see if the C-Media_USB_Audio_Device is selected (has an
asterisk
Hi Joseph,
The problem I have is that if I reboot the system then the problem goes
away and even doesn't reoccur when I run the script which triggers it.
If I could get an ISO that uses the mainline kernel or whichever kernel
you want me to test with then I could be sure it does or doesn't fix
Steve,
Unless a fix is imminent it might be useful to put the workaround here
(I'm asking this in selfish mode, since I want to get Flash audio
working again : ) )
What do the contents of asound.conf need to be (bearing in mind that I
don't seem to even have such a file in my system)
Thanks,
** Tags added: blocks-hwcert precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834731
Title:
[Dell PowerEdge R810] 'Prunes' fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1
To manage notifications
Hi Steve,
Yeah, 'Prunes' is just the hostname - sorry if that's confusing. Since
this system is in a datacenter it might take some time to process your
suggestion, but we'll see if we can give it a try and I'll let you know
what happens.
Thanks,
** Summary changed:
- [Dell PowerEdge R810]
Also, sorry if this seems like the wrong question but doesn't the fact
that it worked just fine with Natty indicate it's a genuine bug
(hardware config would have been identical)? It may be you just want to
establish that the RAID signature is or isn't causing the bug - in which
case ignore me.
Another test run done today seems to indicate that the CPU is not
offline initially. Perhaps one of our tests is making it go offline
(this wouldn't be intentional and might still be a bug)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Note that this means that the problem may not actually be gone in the
upstream kernel and may be present in Oneiric. We haven't specifically
tested these releases in the same way yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I changed the title to further reflect the circumstances this happens
in. I can't think of a better word than 'randomly' right now as the CPU
is not being specifically requested to go offline and we haven't
determined what the cause is yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
We also have an IBM X3500 M3 exhibiting the same. Common thread is still
the 16 cores. CPU model doesn't seem to be the factor.
** Summary changed:
- CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default
+ CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly'
--
You
This seems to be caused by running our cpu_frequency_governers test.
This script is playing around with the frequency governors supported by
different CPUs. I'm going to install Oneiric now and see if the same
thing happens.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Confirming gain that this is *not* the case with Oneiric, even if the
frequency_governors test is run
** Summary changed:
- CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly'
+ CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after
excercising frequency
Also not the case in the mainline kernel it seems.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Title:
CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after
exercising
So, if I reboot the system then all the CPUs are online again.
Furthermore if I rerun cpu_frequency_governors then CPU1 has not gone
offline (all of this with the 3.2.0-12.21 kernel) after it finishes.
This makes it difficult to determine if the problem is really gone in
the mainline kernel. I
Hardware Certification has begun testing this -proposed kernel.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Brendan Donegan (brendan-donegan)
** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
It looks to me like the events at 1905 are associated. Not sure what is
the relevance of IRQ 119.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Title:
CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is
It wouldn't be present in the packaged version, only in the trunk of the
bazaar tree.
** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hardware Certification is no longer testing Natty kernels. Can you
please add our task to the blacklist? Thanks!
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Assignee: Canonical Hardware
Public bug reported:
Running Precise Alpha2 on a Dell PowerEdge M610 I am finding that:
echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
fails because the content of the 'online' file is already 0. This means
1 of the systems 16 cores is offline by default. I have not seen this in
Oneiric so I
** Attachment added: CPU Information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+attachment/2710633/+files/m610_cpuinfo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Attached is the cpuinfo file from the system. While getting this I made
the discovery that the /sys/devices/system/cpu/online file on this
system contains:
0,2-15
This would explain why one CPU is offline.
** Attachment removed: CPU Information
I can confirm that with an Oneiric install all 16 cores are online and
the contents of /sys/devices/system/cpu/online is:
0-15
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Title:
CPU1 on
** Tags added: blocks-hwcert
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Title:
CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Running through the server installer, everything is progressing fine
until reaching tasksel.
Steps to reproduce:
1.) In tasksel select all tasks except for 'Virtual Machine host' and 'Manual
package selection'
2.) Select next
Expected result:
Packages are installed for
** Attachment added: installer syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923681/+attachment/2701059/+files/syslog.txt
** Summary changed:
- Server install fails when selecting everything but VM host from tasksel
+ Server install fails when selecting everything but 'VM host' 'Manual
selection'
Jeff,
Have you tried using the 'DeviceIsReadOnly' property of
org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device? That might be a straightforward way of
telling if a partition is read-only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862322 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862322
Hi,
Thanks for the report. We're already aware of this issue and as you can
see from the duplicate bug, there is a fix being included in the next
Checkbox update.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of
Why has an old bug which has nothing to do with software-center crashing
been modified to serve as the master bug for an issue in Precise? This
is deeply confusing for new bug reporter, as this bug is several years
old so most would think that it couldn't have anything to do with
software-center
The apport logs are present in https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox-
satellite/+bug/907188/comments/2
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hardware Certification have completed testing of this -proposed kernel
on a selection of 53 systems from our labs. No regressions were detected
- results can be found at: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-
testing/wk2_2012/natty-proposed.html
** Tags added: certification-testing-passed
**
I'm not sure I quite understand. With the changes you made, does the
test still fail if it has any writable partitions? In my opinion it
shouldn't - it just makes things confusing for the tester. As Daniel
mentioned before, a good idea might be to test reading at a minimum for
read-only
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 45/46 systems (one
system did not report due to faulty hardware). The report can be found
here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk2_2012/lucid-
proposed.html
** Tags added: certification-testing-passed
** Changed in:
Donegan (brendan-donegan)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911195
Title:
linux: 2.6.38-13.54 -proposed tracker
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hardware Certification has finished testing 53/53 systems with the
-proposed kernel. No regressions were detected. The report is available
at: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk2_2012/oneiric-
proposed.html
** Tags added: certification-testing-passed
** Changed in:
intel_iommu=off worked a charm. What does that mean then?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907377
Title:
HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise
Alpha 1
Hardware Certification have begun testing this kernel.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing
Assignee: Canonical Hardware Certification (canonical-hw-cert) = Brendan
Donegan (brendan-donegan)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Alex, we all agree that he makes some valid points - but it's not like
people don't realise these problems exist and are ignoring them.
Certainly from my point of view Oneiric was better quality than Natty
(though this was largely down to less churn rather than better quality
processes).
Hadmut,
For the record, the reason this bug report is invalid is not because I
think you're wrong, but because it's not a bug. A bug is an issue that
can be fixed. Making a catch all statement like 'the QA is
dysfunctional' doesn't help anyone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
We want to check the USB subsystem is working properly. Just mounting a
partition is not really good enough (would you test Wifi by just
checking that it pairs with an access point?). I would suggest that we
should try to write to every partition which is writable, and just
ignore the ones that
This is still present in the latest dailies, same error.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907377
Title:
HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise
Alpha 1
Daniel (or mtvoid)
The Oneiric kernel had a patch reverted and was updated to 3.0.0-15.25;
I'm not sure if the two issues are related but it might be worth testing
again just to make sure the problem is still there.
Thanks,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Joe,
If the problem is with the kernel in the installer, how am I supposed to
test with the upstream kernel? Maybe there is a way, but I could do with
some pointers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
Steps to reproduce:
1.) Select 'Ubuntu One' from the launcher
2.) Click on 'I already have an account link'
3.) Enter a valid username and password and click 'Connect'
Expected result:
Ubuntu One reaches the 'logged in' state
Actual result:
Public bug reported:
Steps to reproduce:
1.) Select 'Ubuntu One' from the launcher
2.) Click on 'I already have an account link'
3.) Enter a valid username and password and click 'Connect'
Expected result:
Ubuntu One reaches the 'logged in' state
Actual result:
Red letters stating 'There was
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908075
Title:
SSO client complains 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials'
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
701 - 800 of 1855 matches
Mail list logo
