[Bug 1573594] Re: Missing null termination in PROTOCOL_BINARY_CMD_SASL_LIST_MECHS response handling

2021-05-06 Thread Brian Aker
"You can't look at the length of the returned string as the buffer is already corrupted at that point and memcached_response does not return the length either." For you to understand why what your saying is off, you will need to spend sometime understanding how memcached_response(), which internal

[Bug 1573594] Re: Missing null termination in PROTOCOL_BINARY_CMD_SASL_LIST_MECHS response handling

2021-04-23 Thread Brian Aker
Please provide a test case clearly showing the bug in the upstream project. Calling memset() would be incorrect in this case even if you were concerned about a NULL character ( i.e. the minimal change would be to insert a NULL character in the buffer after looked at the length of the returned stri

[Bug 1573594] Re: Missing null termination in PROTOCOL_BINARY_CMD_SASL_LIST_MECHS response handling

2021-04-23 Thread Brian Aker
Hi, >From the code: memcached_return_t rc= memcached_response(server, mech, sizeof(mech), NULL); if (memcached_failed(rc)) memcached_response() adds NULL to strings if memcached_response() successful, otherwise the code follows the error path. The author of this report mentions: libmemcached/r

Re: [Bug 883267] Re: 1.0.2 (and 0.53) build fails on ubuntu oneiric

2012-12-15 Thread Brian Aker
Can you post your config.log? Sent from my Ti85 On Dec 15, 2012, at 8:25, cono <883...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I guess the same issue: > > % cat memcached.c > #include > #include > #include > > int main() { >memcached_create(NULL);; >return 0; > } > > % gc

[Bug 995234] [NEW] When will collected version 5 be packaged up?

2012-05-05 Thread Brian Aker
Public bug reported: Latest collectd is version 5 (http://collectd.org/news.shtml#news89). ** Affects: collectd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 922098] Re: getServerByKey doesn't returned a cloned structure

2012-04-30 Thread Brian Aker
** Changed in: libmemcached Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922098 Title: getServerByKey doesn't returned a cloned structure To manage not

[Bug 922098] Re: getServerByKey doesn't returned a cloned structure

2012-02-12 Thread Brian Aker
** Changed in: libmemcached Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Aker (brianaker) ** Changed in: libmemcached Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: libmemcached Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 881983] Re: libmemcached resets continuum with dead server

2012-01-27 Thread Brian Aker
New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libmemcached Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Aker (brianaker) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881983 Title: libmemcached resets continuum

[Bug 901370] Re: 0.26 build error: 'drizzle_column_skip_all' was not declared in this scope

2012-01-20 Thread Brian Aker
That build is to old, you need to use the latest version of lib drizzle found in the Drizzle trunk. ** Changed in: gearmand Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 883267] Re: 1.0.2 (and 0.53) build fails on ubuntu oneiric

2012-01-10 Thread Brian Aker
This should be fixed in trunk. ** Changed in: libmemcached Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Aker (brianaker) ** Changed in: libmemcached Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: libmemcached Importance: Undecided => Medium ** No longer affects: autoconf-archive *

[Bug 881983] Re: libmemcached resets continuum with dead server

2012-01-07 Thread Brian Aker
BTW we are getting a couple of test failures after this applied. I am going to look at it myself and see what the issue might be. We have this slated for 1.0.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

Re: [Bug 881983] libmemcached resets continuum with dead server

2011-12-12 Thread Brian Aker
Thanks, I will take a look at it. Making it a new behavior makes it much more likely that I can accept it. Cheers, -Brian On Dec 12, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Trevor North wrote: > I have a branch which more or less achieves what is described above by > way of a new dead server retry timeout be

[Bug 883267] Re: 1.0.2 (and 0.53) build fails on ubuntu oneiric

2011-11-04 Thread Brian Aker
** Changed in: libmemcached Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883267 Title: 1.0.2 (and 0.53) build fails on ubuntu oneiric To manage notifications about th

[Bug 815796] Re: 0.24 make fails on 32-bit installs

2011-11-03 Thread Brian Aker
** Changed in: gearmand Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815796 Title: 0.24 make fails on 32-bit installs To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 881983] Re: libmemcached resets continuum with dead server

2011-11-02 Thread Brian Aker
For this behavior you need to create a new behavior type, and add a test case. If we were to apply this patch as is, we would break anyone who is expecting the current behavior (which comes into play when servers are replaced in place, or having flapping network service). ** Changed in: libmemcac

[Bug 883267] Re: 1.0.2 (and 0.53) build fails on ubuntu oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Brian Aker
BTW this needs to be flagged for the autoconf-archive maintainers since this is their code. ** Also affects: autoconf-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libmemcached (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 815796] Re: 0.24 make fails on 32-bit installs

2011-10-20 Thread Brian Aker
** Changed in: gearmand Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815796 Title: 0.24 make fails on 32-bit installs To manage notifications about this b

Re: [Bug 682680] Re: New upstream release, gearmand 0.23

2011-08-03 Thread Brian Aker
Hi! Updating this is on the list, which is long. On Aug 3, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Micah Gersten's message of Wed Aug 03 20:09:33 UTC 2011: >> @Monty Taylor >> Since this affects drizzle, I was wondering if this is ok to upgrade. >> > > It actually doesn't affe

Re: [Bug 682680] Re: New upstream release, gearmand 0.23

2011-07-21 Thread Brian Aker
Thanks for getting a new release out! On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: > ** Summary changed: > > - New upstream release, gearmand 0.17 > + New upstream release, gearmand 0.23 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gearman- > developers, whi

[Bug 740583] Re: drizzled --user does not actually set the uid

2011-04-25 Thread Brian Aker
** Changed in: drizzle Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740583 Title: drizzled --user does not actually set the uid -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun