comments in QA testcase
(https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/454/builds/314623/testcases/1801/results/)
i rebooted after install (error)
- two systems, first looked untouched (only less disk allocation)
- on booting the 'new' install
I get the lubuntu-installer-prompt asking if I want
** Description changed:
- i'll add more as I can
+ Lubuntu oracular install to
+ - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
+
+ Install ALONGSIDE
+
+ Problem appears to be internet related
+
+ Command 'apt-get update' returned non-zero exit status 100."
+
+ However why w
Get:73 http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oracular-backports/multiverse amd64
c-n-f Metadata [120 B]
Fetched 56.3 MB in 23s (2440 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
E: Failed to fetch
http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oracular/universe/binary-i386/by-hash/SHA256/82aca014827b41a9e4110177f004c
Public bug reported:
i'll add more as I can
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10
Package: calamares 3.3.8-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-8.8-generic 6.11.0
Uname: Linux 6.11.0-8-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartN
After some investigation it appears that lintian is struggling with
override files that use an architecture suffix e.g.
$binary_package_name.lintian-overrides.$arch
I see the failing test case is defining per-package architecture-
specific overrides:
fields-multi-arch-same-package-has-arch-specif
Public bug reported:
lintian 2.118.0ubuntu1 had previously built[0], but now fails to build
from source [1]. Version 2.118.2ubuntu1 stuck in oracular-proposed
currently fails to build for the same reason.
The particular failure is a build time test failure:
# Hints do not match
#
# ---
debia
** Changed in: efitools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083030
Title:
efitools FTBFS
To manage notificati
https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-
release-upgrader/+merge/474187
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083455
Title:
kdump-tools is enabled when install
73312
** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083455
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-desktop-provision
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Bingo :)
I think we just need confirmation that the SSD's PCI vendor and device
ID match the one in the quirk to close the loop, and then we know what
the root cause is
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
I think this was broken by a combination of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/00ff400e6deee00f7b15e200205b2708b63b8cf6
and
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c4f01a776b28378f4f61b53f8cb0e358f4fa3721.
Does the SSD match that PCI vendor / device ID?
--
You received this bug notificatio
What's the output of:
$ cat /sys/class/block/nvme0n1/wwid
Which is what 60-persistent-storage.rules is using to generate those
first symlinks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083176
Ti
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069417
Title:
Soundwire support
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069760
Title:
Soundwire support
Hi there and thanks for the report, could you provide the logs from
/var/log/installer please? Alternatively, you should be able to run
`ubuntu-bug subiquity` from the terminal and it should collect the
relevant information.
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Y
4:br0.0:svnQEMU:pnUbuntu24.10PC(i440FX+PIIX,1996):pvrpc-i440fx-oracular:cvnQEMU:ct1:cvrpc-i440fx-oracular:sku:
dmi.product.name: Ubuntu 24.10 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
dmi.product.version: pc-i440fx-oracular
dmi.sys.vendor: QEMU
** Affects: ubuntu-desktop-provision
Importance: Undecided
Should be some commits between the following. Before these commits, the
HDMI audio can at least been identified but needs to be manually
switched.
64b7b557dc8a drm/i915/sdvo: Setup DDC fully before output init ==> mschiu77:
bad
cc1e66394daa drm/i915/sdvo: Filter out invalid outputs more sensibly
I tested machines in hand which has AX211 just like machines mentioned
in comment. I can't see the same error message.
I tested on HP ProBook 440 and Dell Vostro 3420
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux-oem-6.11
** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux-oem-6.11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080190
Title:
Soundwire support for Del
** Description changed:
[SRU Justification]
[Impact]
The laptop of Intel RPL platform connects the external display via the
HDMI/DisplayPort on a USB Type-C interfaced dock with dual type-C cable
connected (WD19DC). The external display will stay blank after re-connect the
docking stat
** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-2066595 somerville
** Description changed:
- [SRU Justification]
- [SRU Justification]
[SRU Justification]
[Impact]
The laptop of Intel RPL platform connects the external display via the
HDMI/DisplayPort on a USB Type-C interfaced dock with dua
Public bug reported:
[SRU Justification]
[SRU Justification]
[SRU Justification]
[Impact]
The laptop of Intel RPL platform connects the external display via the
HDMI/DisplayPort on a USB Type-C interfaced dock with dual type-C cable
connected (WD19DC). The external display will stay blank after
I installed 4.3.30-1build2 from the jammy archive repository on
Ubuntu24.04 which allowed me to carry on with the project.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078638
Title:
coredumps with
I'm switching this bug report to INCOMPLETE...
I re-installed on 780, and no issues experienced now.
https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/454/builds/313490/testcases/1802/results
( I'll continue to watch for this though ... maybe the cable was hit during
cleaning or something, thus i
Public bug reported:
This could be a duplicate, but the other bug report I've tagged replaces
to reporting 24.04 AFTER install
** to re-crate
- boot lubuntu oracular daily
- start installer
** expected results
Lubuntu 24.10 Oracular Oriole on calamares-graphics
** actual results
Lubuntu 24.0
Just an FYI...
But I mention it happening on d780 which contains a debian and three
lubuntu releases; none of which are encrypted...
Whilst dc7700 originally filed against is used for all types of
installs, thus encrypted is possible there... I believe I was doing a
REPLACE PARTITION install at t
Two ports are used on box
DVI port cable (goes to acer 16:10 monitor)
HDMI port cable (goes to dell monitor; one displaying the "Optimum resolution
1280x1024 60Hz" mentioned in initial report, as that is an old 4:3 monitor)
I am NOT using VGA, but I do have different ports being used (DVI & HDM
** Description changed:
Lubuntu oracular live; first daily using 6.11 kernel on this box which I
think is the key difference.
On boot (this is second boot of this ISO) I get on one display a message
- 1: Auto Detect (DIgital Input)
+ 1: Auto Detect (Digital Input)
Cannot Display This
If this issue only impacts LIVE (which my testing [minimal as it is]
thus far appears to indicate), this is a PETTY ISSUE, as the primary
purpose of a Ubuntu ISO is to install the system.. and my older
'oracular' install when booted with 6.11 appeared to work normally...
I'll (maybe) know more wh
Public bug reported:
Lubuntu oracular live; first daily using 6.11 kernel on this box which I
think is the key difference.
On boot (this is second boot of this ISO) I get on one display a message
1: Auto Detect (DIgital Input)
Cannot Display This Video Model
Optimum resolution 1280x1024 60Hz
an
I get the same on
- dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd
5000/6000/7350/8350)
another BIOS box, but I also note the installer (calamares) says 24.04
noble ???
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Public bug reported:
Lubuntu oracular install (to dc7700)
Types of install are
- Install Alongside, Replace a partition, Erase disk, Manual
partitioning..
The description text for "Replace a partition" is
"Replaces a partition with %1."
The %1 being the issue, whatever was supposed to replac
@Omar, what checkbox test should I run to reproduce? I didn't see the
error in the attached dmesg dmesg log during boot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077537
Title:
iwlwifi Microco
Public bug reported:
this came up after upgrading from 22 to 24.04.1, running apt update, and
trying to install virtualbox.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: qgis-providers 3.34.4+dfsg-4build2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-ge
@boukeas, can you run `apport-collect` on any of these problematic machines?
I'd like to have more information of the wifi chip and the linux-firmware
version. Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
5.0.3-1ubuntu1.1 fixes this issue for me. `docker-compose ps` works
again. Thank you!
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
I'm experiencing the same issue when accessing my Nextcloud volume
through davfs2 using Nemo:
From journalfs:
mount.davfs[155070]: segfault at 0 ip 70866a346055 sp 7ffc532bcda0
error 4 in libneon.so.27.6.0[70866a34+18000] likely on CPU 4 (core 0,
socket 0)
Accessing through shell is
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier into noble-proposed. The package
will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-distro-release-
notifier/20220915-0ubuntu6.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please h
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier into jammy-proposed. The package
will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-distro-release-
notifier/20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Pl
I'm flipping this to verification-failed, as the autopkgtests did *not* pass -
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/puppetdb/noble/amd64 and particularly
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/p/puppetdb/20240731_094926_bb178@/log.gz
It *does* look like an problem
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-noble
** Tags added: verification-failed verification-failed-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072516
Title:
autopkgtests fail
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ceph into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/19.2.0~rc2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing t
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-initial-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
initial-setup/46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Public bug reported:
[SRU Justification]
[Impact]
Missing soundwire support for Dell SKU0CDC deivces.
[Fix]
The upstream fix 9307694f340e ("ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw: Add quirks from some new
Dell laptops") and its dependency are required.
[Test Case]
1. Install linux-firmware proposed in
https
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 23.10 (mantic) reached end-of-life on July 11, 2024.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it anymore. But
Thanks @Dan. Will try to make an exception request for Oracular.
Proposed a MR for Oracular just in case.
https://code.launchpad.net/~mschiu77/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+git/alsa-utils/+merge/472762
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
If people are interested; I'll provide
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
release/2024-September/006225.html
For now I also suggest waiting as Moshe/mcaspi12 suggested.
--
You received this bug notificat
Gentle ping. @Theis, any update for the new installed kernel?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073676
Title:
after update of kernel HDMI audio is not working
To manage notifications a
I have a couple of questions with the test plan - as it stands, I don't see
where we're performing before/after tests of the xdg-desktop-portal package?
That is - where, in the test plan steps, do we actually install the package
from proposed? Do we need to
> delete ~/.local/share/flatpak/db/we
** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077587
Title:
Refresh WebExtensions portal patch
To manage
OK. That's a bunch of changes, some of which are a little bit code-
clean-up-y, but everything looks acceptable. Please add at least enough
information to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-
setup/+bug/2068856 so that we can tell whether or not the bug is fixed,
and give me a p
This is missing the SRU details. Particularly - there's no test case
here. What is the *expected* behaviour? How do we know if this is fixed?
(Some of the other bugs in this upload are light on SRU details, but I
think the others generally get covered by the test case in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Is there any way to fix this locally for podman while we wait for a fix?
I've tried changing profiles in /etc/apparmor.d but to no avail.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040483
Title:
> Isn't the timezone supposed to be basically autodetected when the ISO
starts though?
I would like to think so, alas not always.
On occasion if I boot system & start a 'live' system and then start
install
- in most cases I'm told I'm with a 50-200km of home (commonly on the other
side of my ci
Public bug reported:
This is what I had tried from command line to upgrade Ubuntu 22.04 to
Ubuntu 24.04.1
❯ sudo do-release-upgrade -d
Checking for a new Ubuntu release
= Welcome to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 'Noble Numbat' =
The Ubuntu team is proud to announce Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 'Noble Numbat'.
To see w
Following-up my previous comment: While dracut-core initially seemed to
fix the corruption problem, I did eventually get some small corruption
again (which BTRFS immediately detected), and it turns out that at some
point I had started getting some (smaller) shutdown errors again (I
don't know why)
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2055388
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
bu
Public bug reported:
On some hardware, the graphic plymouth isn't used (where Ubuntu Unity
has a graphic in package form), but on boxes such as this one, the
system boots reporting itself as Ubuntu 24.04 LTS instead...
** Expected outcome
System reports as Ubuntu Unity 24.04 LTS during boot
**
You can verify your package information by `dpkg -l` and `dpkg -s`.
But yes, the boot option will still be 6.38.0-38.
So I think you still reproduce the same issue even with this kernel?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
this has been mentioned before I believe (sorry I forget specifics)
and also expected result will depend on a lot of conditions... HOWEVER
YEAH ERROR ain't great !
eg. if it's daytime locally; I don't expect to notice any effect if I
start redshift on a system (with timezone setup correctly).. t
Hello Coenraad, or anyone else affected,
Accepted svn2git into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/svn2git/2.4.0-3ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Hello MimziM, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gammu into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gammu/1.41.0-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
I booted current daily on
- samsung 700t1c-p10aat (i5-3317u, 4gb, 3rd gen.core.intel.graphics.4000)
and whilst it offered various (neighbor) wifi connections; it did not
show my own (silent), so I'd not have been able to complete testcase on
this device either
this is another wifi only device; b
** Description changed:
- i'll add more when at a real keyboard
+ this bug could be with TESTCASE itself & not what I've filed against. Install
attempted on
+ - sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
- this bug is petty (failure requires bug report) and because of
Public bug reported:
this bug could be with TESTCASE itself & not what I've filed against. Install
attempted on
- sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
The 1811
(https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds/311610/testcases/1811/results/)
testcase requir
How does this interact with
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum/+bug/2038109 ? It looks
like maybe it does? Do these need to be tied together at all?
** Changed in: magnum-ui (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: magnum-ui (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New =>
Hello Bryce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted open-vm-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-
tools/2:12.4.5-1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
So, do we have a conclusion on whether to do a new RC or not?
Re: versions - oh, so this is a 19.2.0 RC, that internally reports as
19.1.0? Weird. I think that something like 19.2.0~is.really.19.2.0rc2
(or whatever the actual reported version is) would work, but really
that's cosmetic.
--
You re
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065515
Title:
[SRU] Ceph Squid release candidate
To manage notifications about thi
Hi there and thanks for the report. Was this during an installation or
just during normal operation of your installed system?
** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
the issue is still present on 6.8.0-41 on a dell XPS 9640
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072973
Title:
Primary screen goes crazy since Ubuntu 24.04 update (6.8 fails but 6.5
works)
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/472024
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/472025
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04.1 => None
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] Update ubuntu-classic-2404-amd64.model defintion in Noble
+ Update ubuntu-classic-2404-amd64.model definition
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077899
Title:
(Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Peterson (cpete)
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
fail, but no other image builds will be affected.
[1]
https://github.com/snapcore/models/commit/d864558b66f735c1adc238468e8a690c09ef7bba
** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug
Thanks for confirming. This is confusing indeed since I am unable to
reproduce, even using the exact cloud-config you provided. Would you
mind sharing the contents of /var/log/installer? Also a copy of the
journal log since boot would be good as well.
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Hi Raymond, thanks for reporting this. Unfortunately I'm unable to
recreate this with a recent iso build.
Could you detail which ISO build you're encountering this on by getting
the contents of "/.disk/info" , please?
Currently the daily build shows 08/08/2024 is the latest build and I
see:
Ubun
Ok. So, as far as I can tell, python3-apt on armhf *and only* on armhf
gets a versioned dependency on libapt-pkg6.0t64 (>=
$THE_VERSION_IT_BUILT_AGAINST). It's unclear to me what is causing this
behaviour; the symbols file for that library in the apt source looks
unremarkable, and there's no weird
I've set the phasing of python-apt to 0.
Now, of course, we have the most annoying kind of regression to untangle
- any rebuild of python-apt in -proposed will *also* exhibit this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Public bug reported:
The python-apt 2.7.7ubuntu2 update has a versioned dependency on libapt-
pkg6.0t64 (>= 2.8.1) (on armhf only). Presumably there's an armhf-only
symbols difference resulting in the armhf package (and *only* the armhf
package - none of i386, amd64, ppc64el, s390x, or riscv64 are
(Marking the Ubuntu task as fix-released as the new version *is* in
Oracular, and has been for the necessary ~6 weeks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073317
Title:
Backport of open-v
An upload of open-vm-tools to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "This upload has a version
(2:12.4.5-1ubuntu0.24.04.1) that is higher than the version in the
development release (2:12.4.5-1). Otherwise this is fine.".
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubu
(SRU team hat)I've a couple of questions:
1. How long until we can expect a full ceph release? We've already
missed the “people upgrading from 23.10 get a broken upgrade” window;
should we be publishing an RC release now, rather than waiting for those
bugs to be fixed and publishing the final rele
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072813
Title:
Please merge 2.40.2-1 into oracular
To manage notificatio
Dropping the severity to Medium now that we know there is an acceptable
workaround for now.
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Project changed: subiquity => subiquity (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Peterson (cpete)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because
1 - 100 of 30863 matches
Mail list logo
