Public bug reported:
$ grep ^Pr /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades
Prompt=normal
$ sudo do-release-upgrade
[...]
Checking package manager
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Calculating the changes
Calculating the changes
Could not
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2063360/+attachment/5770091/+files/apt.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
Trying to upgrade from 22.04.4 to 24.04:
$ do-release-upgrade -d
Checking for a new Ubuntu release
= Welcome to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 'Noble Numbat' =
[...]
Checking package manager
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1413858
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413858
** Also affects: wayland-protocols (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413858
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
I'd consider having remnants of old package versions (and lots of them)
to be a bug, but it's your distribution, so having this dismissed is an
answer to this problem nonetheless. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863165
Title:
autoremove-kernels doesn't purge kernels
To manage notifications about this bu
So, how can I convince APT to _automatically_ remove all kernel
leftovers? I could of course run a cron job with the workaround, but
maybe this can be done The Right Way? :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Public bug reported:
Maybe this is a configuration issue, but:
# apt-get --purge autoremove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
# dpkg -l | grep ^rc | cut -c-70
rc linux-image-4.15
FWIW, this just happened again while trying out the latest mainline
kernel from https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline
* Kernels up to v5.3-rc5 work fine, but booting it takes up ~36MB of /run
(unpacking during boot)
on the Dom0 here.
* Kernel v5.3-rc6 seems to take up even more, fillin
** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771272
Title:
gnome-keyring doesn't support ecdsa or ed25519 keys
To manage n
👍
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556372
Title:
Please remove the plymouth dependency from mountall / cryptsetup
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 578431 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578431
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 578431
wpa_supplicant spams syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Launchpad really needs something similar to RESOLVED/DUPLICATE, as I had
to crawl through the whole report to find out that this is considered a
duplicate of 578431.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
I guess bug #1475676 would be the logical consequence here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
Title:
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
To manage notifications about thi
FWIW, this had been reported to upstream recently and a fix has been
commited to their source tree:
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/35585541/
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/333aea41eb8bcdb9afae6bb89f3581f8e70ee830
There have been no official net-snmp relases sinc
FWIW, Debian #81748 explains why it's safe to have world-writable
/dev/{u,}random devices.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #81748
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=81748
** Also affects: makedev (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=81748
Imp
** Summary changed:
- ssh-add does not handle ECDSA keys until ssh-agent exports are manually
launched
+ gnome-keyring doesn't support ecdsa or ed25519 keys
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
There's a patch in the VirtualBox forum for this one:
https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=70150
** Attachment added: "Fixes compilation error with Linux 4.3"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1498145/+attachment/4478176/+files/vbox_linux-4.3.diff.txt
--
Why is this bug set to "Fix released" for Trusty? This is still
happening:
$ uname -rv
3.13.0-53-generic #88-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 13 18:10:29 UTC 2015
$ modprobe xfs
$ dmesg -T | tail -2
[Fri May 29 10:41:08 2015] Request for unknown module key 'Magrathea: Glacier
signing key: 9aac900abd0220fb93c8
Workaround: create another sources.list file with http:// sources and
have apt-file use it:
$ apt-file --sources-list /etc/apt/sources.list.http update
Btw, I stumbled across the mirror:// functionality only by accident on
askubuntu.com - but could not find it documented. Any pointers?
--
You
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #738660
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738660
** Also affects: gnome-keyring (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738660
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification bec
Same here, every 2 minutes with wpa_supplicant v2.3:
$ sudo grep wpa_supplicant /var/log/messages | grep -v WPA | tail -3
Nov 14 11:24:32 acorn wpa_supplicant[942]: nl80211: send_and_recv->nl_recvmsgs
failed: -33
Nov 14 11:26:32 acorn wpa_supplicant[942]: nl80211: send_and_recv->nl_recvmsgs
fail
This just happened here with eject-2.1.5, but using "eject -i off" as
suggested by zheoffec in comment #2 helped - thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398670
Title:
eject: unable t
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 at 17:18, KDEUSER56 wrote:
> So, how do I pass mount options to /proc instead? I need to enable acl
> support for /proc for security reasons.
I don't think procfs supports ACLs:
$ sudo mount -o remount,acl -v /proc
mount: mount failed
proc: unrecognized mount option "acl" or mi
FWIW, Fedora also ships plymouth by default but it is entirely possible
to remove all plymouth packages w/o any hard dependencies. I was really
surprised by this, given that RPM based distributions have a bad rep for
the "rpm hell". Not anymore, it seems...
--
You received this bug notification b
FWIW, http://bugs.debian.org/119886 deals with a similar issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954620
Title:
SSH StrictModes does not work correctly
To manage notifications about thi
@Frank: does your home belong to your own per-user group? If so,
StrictMode=yes might notice that and still allow login. In my case:
christian@alice$ ls -ld $HOME
drwx-- 24 christian christian 20480 Jul 23 03:44 /home/christian
=> Now, setting $HOME to 0720 will still allow login with publi
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 at 21:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This dependency:
> - is not a bug in plymouth.
Well, no, but it's a bug in packages like mountall an cryptsetup which
DEPEND on plymouth - that's the whole point of this bug.
> - is not up for debate.
Oh? Why so?
> You do not have a prope
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 at 00:22, Steve Langasek wrote:
> ** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
>Status: Confirmed => Invalid
Can you comment on this one, please? So far there has been no technical
reasoning in #556372 as to why a "Depends: plymouth" should be warranted.
OTOH, technical reasons h
** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556372
Title:
Please remove the plymouth dependency from mountall / crypt
This bug is not meant to "remove plymouth" - if you feel that way,
please file another bug.
Speaking of which: this bug here is set to "wontfix" - do I need to file
a new bug or can this be set to "confirmed" again?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Hah! Great, thanks!
os-prober doesn't come with any documentation (I guess this warrants
another bug :-)), never thought that it was to blame here. For the
record, /usr/bin/os-prober calls /usr/lib/os-probes/init/10filesystems,
where it does something like this:
for fs in $FILESYSTEMS; do
m
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597/+attachment/3529257/+files/UdevLog.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597/+attachment/3529256/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597
Title:
Do
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597/+attachment/3529255/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597/+attachment/3529254/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597/+attachment/3529253/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125597
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Every time the kernel is upgraded and initrd is regenerated, some
modules are loaded. These modules are not necessary for the system to
run, take up memory and may even enlarge the attack surface when
(security-)i
Public bug reported:
Every time the kernel is upgraded and initrd is regenerated, some
modules are loaded. These modules are not necessary for the system to
run, take up memory and may even enlarge the attack surface when
(security-)issues were to be found in these modules.
How to reproduce on th
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #696383
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696383
** Also affects: iscsitarget (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696383
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification becau
No, I don't. But looking at Ubuntu 12.04 I see now that linux-image-
virtual (3.2.0-33) did not contain the JFS module as well. "apt-cache
search jfs" does not return any kernel images.
I guess listing all the modules provided by linux-image-extra would make
its description overly long (Are there
Public bug reported:
After upgrading from Ubuntu 12.04 to 12.10, the module for the JFS
filesystem seems to be missing from the new kernel, although its config
states that JFS has been enabled:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 12.10
Rele
Public bug reported:
Passing mount options (here: "hidepid=2") for /proc via /etc/fstab does
not seem to work:
$ grep /proc /etc/fstab /etc/mtab /proc/mounts
/etc/fstab:proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid,hidepid=2 0 0
/etc/mtab:proc /proc proc rw,noexec,no
** Changed in: cryptsetup
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556372
Title:
Please remove the plymouth dependency from mountall / cryptsetup
To manage noti
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936667
Title:
Upstart early job logging causes boot failure for systems with no
initramfs (error is "No available pty
Whooha, language!
And I think they "fixed" it, albeit in a weird way:
CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT is enabled in the kernel config, but the feature
is still disabled unless the kernel is booted with "delayacct" as a boot
parameter, see my comment above.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Still present with3.2.0-24-generic. Upstream bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43191
The workaround from comment #8 works here (Lenovo Ideapad S10), thanks nealmcb
:)
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #43191
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43191
** Also a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 925760 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925760
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 925760
Constant warnings from the kernel: Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 925760 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925760
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 925760
Constant warnings from the kernel: Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Feel free to attach the resulting .deb (if one is allowed to attach
binary files).
Maybe users will be more comfortable doing this on their own, so they
"see" what they're installing. And yes, the deb works for all Ubuntu
versions. Also yes: the equivs version will have no functionality
whatsoever
@Oliver: this can be achieved via "equivs", see my comment #16. This
creates a dummy package (with "Provides: plymouth") that will fullfil
this depenancy. Works like a charm here :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Booting Linux 3.3.0-rc5 (vanilla, no initramfs) with
upstart-1.4-0ubuntu9 (from James' upstart-job-logging PPA) went fine,
even w/o the "--no-log" kernel option. However, at the end of the
booting process, syslog says:
kernel: [ 17.913723] init: No available ptys
kernel: [ 17.913826] init: F
I still don't understand what the _technical_ reason is not to switch to
Recommends: rather than Depends: as it is now. If plymouth would be
"recommended" only - nothing would change, since "Install-Recommends" is
on by default and everything would just continue to work. But the
sysadmin is free to
The attached patch will prevent lxdm from starting in runlevel 2 (and 1,
don't know why lxdm is supposed to start in RL 1). One has to edit their
/etc/init/*dm.conf for the desktop manager they're using.
But I agree with James here: there's no reason to start X11 in runlevel
2. Just because some-o
Why has this been set to WONTFIX again? Has a consensus been reached
already? From looking at the comments here, I doubt that. I still think
"Depends" is too hard and think "Recommends" is a better suit for this.
As APT::Install-Recommends=true is the default, nothing would change for
the general u
Why has this been set to WONTFIX again? Has a consensus been reached
already? From looking at the comments here, I doubt that. I still think
"Depends" is too hard and think "Recommends" is a better suit for this.
As APT::Install-Recommends=true is the default, nothing would change for
the general u
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #620800
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620800
** Also affects: rpcbind (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620800
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because y
Will this be fixed in 10.04 (LTS!) too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608701
Title:
vino establishes a HTTP connection to check connectivity
To manage notifications about th
Yesterday I found this in my log:
Aug 1 12:39:33 len IN= OUT=eth1 MAC= SRC=192.168.0.107 DST=189.38.80.51
LEN=60 TOS=10 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=43445 CE DF PROTO=TCP SPT=39385 DPT=22
SEQ=3475551532 ACK=0 WINDOW=5840 SYN URGP=0
This 189.38.80.51 maps back to kamotini.kinghost.net but is also the
addr
For the record: I still find it odd/wrong that /etc/init.d/cachefilesd
is messing with module loading at all (/etc/init.d/network does not load
network drivers...), but that'd have to be reported against the
cachefilesd package, I suppose.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Out of curiosity: why does commit
ec7d302a6ca9e7974a05d338267b40491a1d7abb close #628919 (dup of #484499,
syntax errors in /etc/default/grub)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793387
Titl
This has been fixed upstream:
http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-
dev/2011/06/msg6.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793387
Title:
chronyd won't start w
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: chrony
This is a copy of Debian's #628919.
With Linux 3.0-rc1, this happens:
$ uname -r
3.0.0-rc1+
$ sudo /usr/sbin/chronyd -d
sys_linux.c:688:(get_version_specific_details)[06-06:52:55] Initial
txc.tick=1 txc.freq=
Computer freezes / issues with Unity surely belong to another bug
report, right? :-) If chrony is running fine in 10.10 though, that's
good news...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659649
Is this still happening in 11.04? Can you run "sh -x
/var/lib/dpkg/info/chrony.postinst" and see why it fails?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659649
Title:
package chrony 1.23-7 faile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659649 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659649
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659649
package chrony 1.23-7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659649 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659649
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659649
package chrony 1.23-7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You received this bug
Still there on 10.04.2. Disabling apparmor (boot with security="")
helped. Rebooting with apparmor enabled again (security=apparmor) still
allows openntpd to run. So, this looks like an apparmor related problem
- openntpd can't do much about it (but its install scripts can).
--
You received this
With2.6.38-9-virtual from -proposed the 'cachefiles' module is there and
cachefilesd is working again. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770430
Title:
module "cachefiles" missing
bump!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496422
Title:
cachefilesd not starting with CONFIG_CACHEFILES=y
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.co
In 10.04.2 linux-image-server depends on linux-image-generic-pae which in
turn depends on linux-image-2.6.32-21-generic-pae which has
TASK_DELAY_ACCT enabled.
However, be sure to pass "delayacct" to your boot options, otherwise it
won't work (sigh...)
Christian.
--
You received this bug noti
This still happens in Ubuntu 11.04 & nautilus 2.32.2.1
** Summary changed:
- connect to server--(using webdav(http))--failed to open big folder
+ webdav: DBus error / org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply
** Summary changed:
- webdav: DBus error / org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply
+ nautilus: DBu
FWIW, the equivs package[0] from comment #16 is still working, no need
to upgrade every time a new mountall/cryptsetup/whatnot version is
released.
cheers,
C.
[0] http://nerdbynature.de/bits/LP-506297/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
@Maintainers, please reconsider.
I just had a real usecase here where some box just hung and the last message I
was seeing came from "plymouth". I booted with
"ro nosplash noplymouth INIT_VERBOSE=yes init=/sbin/init -v", but it still
hung. See plymouth-1.png under:
http://nerdbynature.de/bit
Thanks Ferdinand, this helped a lot. Quick PoC with installing/purging a
samba4 (13.5MB):
# grep btrfs /proc/mounts && uname -r
/dev/sda2 / btrfs rw,nodev,noatime 0 0
2.6.35-27-generic
# sysctl -w vm.drop_caches=3
# time (LD_PRELOAD=/usr/local/lib/libnosync.so apt-get -y install samba4 &&
sync)
Here too: linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic (2.6.32-28.55) with 'delayacct'
running fine, iotop working too. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493156
Title:
Please enable CONFIG_TASK
Tim, If I understand your comment correctly, you're going to enable
CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT in the config but the actual delay accounting
will be disabled unless booted with "delayacct"? What happened to
Leann's RFC[0] and all the comments in this bug? Why introduce another
bootoption for that? What
Wow. I just came over from #532490 to see that bugs like these
("wishlist", really?) are being "happily" set to WONTFIX. I still fail
to understand the reasoning behind that decision and I hope this will be
revisited. Again:
- Iotop doesn't work properly w/o CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
- There is no m
@Leann: can you change the importance from wishlist back to something
more serious? Without the *_FSCACHE options, the cachefilesd package is
pretty much useless :-\
--
Kernel modules not compiled (Stats, NFS, AFS, etc)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440522
You received this bug notification bec
If plymouth is really needd and actually doing something useful besides
providing fancy booting, then its package desciption should be changed
to something more verbose (a bug against plymouth should be filed, I
guess). However, when following the package page for plymouth I
eventually end up on th
Oh, and openSuSE 11.3, Fedora 13 and Debian's 2.6.32 kernel package have
it enabled too:
CONFIG_TASKSTATS=y
CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT=y
CONFIG_TASK_XACCT=y
CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING=y
Dunno about Vista, though :-)
--
CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT not enabled in kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5324
I did a really quick test: bonnie++ [0] on a SunV40z, 16GB RAM with
CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT=y and another test with nodelayacct:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/LP-532490/
AFAICT bonnie++ was slightly faster with nodelayacct for ext4, but
slightly slower for btrfs. Latencies seem to be slightly lower (
In the URL above it's mentioned that it would cause a performance hit
and has therefore been disabled in the config. However, delay accounting
can be disabled by passing nodelayacct as a boot parameter (see
Documentation/accounting/delay-accounting.tx). I have not seen actual
numbers confirming thi
Oh, and for "libdrm is the interface to the kernel rendering manager" -
yes, for desktop systems that may be valid. But there's still the
"Ubuntu server" installation. Less dependencies, less code - less
(security) issues.
--
Please remove the plymouth dependency from mountall / cryptsetup
https:
Yet anouther workaround: instead of patching (Thanks, Ingo!) mountall
and all the other packages depending on "plymouth" now, one could
install plymouth-pseudo package. This way the dependency would be
satisfied but one can still receive updates on the other Ubuntu
packages:
$ apt-get install equi
Setting to confirmed as it seems to affect other people as well. Please
don't just set to WONTFIX if discussion is still ongoing.
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed
--
Please remove the plymouth dependency from mountall / cryptsetup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu)
--
cpufreq directory missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: jfsutils
Jfsutils v1.1.14 is out since 2009-04-06 (http://jfs.sourceforge.net).
Although jfsutils (and JFS) is not actively developed, it is still
maintained and important bugfixes have been commited to newer versions,
which might help remediate currently
> Plymouth merely regulates access to the system console in cases of
filesystem decryption and error
Again, my system runs fine w/o plymouth. Also, why is plymouth marked
"optional" then when it appears to be required? And what about the
libraries plymouth drags in, is libdrm-* really required to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mountall
I noticed that mountall (and cryptsetup) depends on plymouth now.
Whatever plymouth is doing or not doing, my headless system is booting
fine without plymouth (dpkg --force-depends -P plymouth), yet all disks
(local, NFS) are mounted and cryptset
Btw, why is this tagged "wishlist"? It's clearly a serious bug - it's
like having no sound at all. It's "sound coming out of the speaker" but
it's not really usable. So, no multimedia for all the iMac users out
there :-\
--
Poor quality sound on Aluminium iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990
If the bug is still about "poor sound quality" (and not about "sound not
working at all", that's a different issue):
I managed to get sound working with "options snd-hda-intel model=imac24" (for
this iMac8,1) but it's lacking any bass. Switching through the different
hardware-profiles ("gnome-vo
Whoops, too soon: when I looked at the changelog, I forgot that this is
still Chuck's version of munin-node[0] that is installed on my system.
So no, the bug is still present in hardy/8.04 and it would be most
helpful if someone was able to upload Chuck's version[1] to the official
archives. Later
The bug has been fixed for 8.04, although the changelog is missing the
LP#:
munin (1.2.5-2ubuntu3.2) hardy; urgency=low
* Added patch to fix irqstats using the 2.6.24 kernel.
-- Chuck Short Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:34:39 -0400
And /usr/share/munin/plugins/irqstats is indeed working correctly wit
FWIW, the experimemental tag has been removed in mainline:
http://tinyurl.com/y8h8yq6
@Pete: please elaborate if you're changing bugs to WONTFIX.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed
--
Kernel modules not compiled (Stats, NFS, AFS, etc)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team)
--
Kernel modules not compiled (Stats, NFS, AFS, etc)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440522
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
@Leann: Perhaps it's too late now, I should've double checked the moment
you were replying: you're saying that the *_FSCACHE modules cannot be
enabled in an Ubuntu kernel, because they depend on EXPERIMENTAL. While
I'm currently trying to convince[0] upstream to remove the EXPERIMENTAL
flag from NF
#50430 is titled "NIS has problems starting before the network comes up"
which is not the case here. The machine is up & running, network is
working fine, but "apt-get install nis" is still showing this behaviour:
---
Selecting previously deselected package nis.
Unpacki
@Jorge: no, this has nothing to do with cachefilesd, this is your
"normal" filesystem cache.
The issue Wido raised is that the *_FSCACHE modules are not compiled
into the kernel and hence cachefilesd is not working.
--
Kernel modules not compiled (Stats, NFS, AFS, etc)
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: cachefilesd
I've compiled a custom kernel and /etc/init.d/cachefilesd won't start:
# service cachefilesd start
- * Starting FilesCache daemon cachefilesd
+ * Starting FilesCache daemon cachefilesd
FATAL: Module cachefiles not found.
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
