[Bug 1144558]

2013-07-04 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #70) commit 22fd5ca947b58901927d100d2b1aa0f1672b3435 Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Jun 28 16:54:08 2013 +0100 drm/i915: Only clear write-domains after a successful wait-seqno In the introduction of the non-blocking wait, I

[Bug 1144558]

2013-07-04 Thread Coacher
This bug just reappeared with xf86-video-intel-2.21.10. Next thing I am going to try is this commit you've posted above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558 Title: Images

[Bug 1189850]

2013-07-03 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #70) commit 22fd5ca947b58901927d100d2b1aa0f1672b3435 Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Jun 28 16:54:08 2013 +0100 drm/i915: Only clear write-domains after a successful wait-seqno In the introduction of the non-blocking wait, I

[Bug 1189850]

2013-06-29 Thread Coacher
This bug just reappeared with xf86-video-intel-2.21.10. Next thing I am going to try is this commit you've posted above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189850 Title: saucy has

[Bug 1144558]

2013-06-13 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #68) It's back: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/ 1189850 Thanks for the link. I've tried today's xf86-video-intel git with the commit which is marked as a solution via link you provided. I can confirm that I was unable to reproduce

[Bug 1144558]

2013-05-23 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #66) Ok, having made a new release, it is time to see if anyone else is seeing this bug: commit 8e42637050275945200797538a34c13c90b295cc Author: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Tue May 21 11:13:03 2013 +0100 sna: Re-enable read-read optimisations

[Bug 1144558]

2013-05-09 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #64) That's unexpected - those updates should have had no impact upon this issue. :| Nevertheless, the overall look and feel in firefox was improved somehow. Now I've updated mesa to 9.1.2 and kernel to 3.9.0 and these positive effects are preserved. The situation is much

[Bug 1144558]

2013-04-25 Thread Coacher
Hello. At last, there is some positive dynamic! Though I still from time to time see corrupted rendering of certain elements on some pages, but at least I haven't seen for a while any completely corrupted previews like it was before. Portions of previews could be corrupted, but only those

[Bug 1144558]

2013-04-13 Thread Coacher
Same issue with firefox 20 and xf86-video-intel 2.21.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558 Title: Images corruption in firefox when using sna To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1144558]

2013-04-08 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #57) Ok, I have ff-19 built at last using gentoo ~amd64 on a lowly ilk. It seems to be doing the right thing regarding using system-cairo and server-side gradients. Next step is to piece together enough components to see if I can reproduce the bug. Ok, tell me what info I

[Bug 1144558]

2013-04-08 Thread Coacher
I was able to reproduce that stack trace from Xorg log and intel driver is not an issue here at all. I found out that the cause of this is the fast spinning mouse wheel. I have a mouse with a wheel which can be scrolled like in 'free roam' mode, without that 'clicks', you know. And if I scroll

[Bug 1144558]

2013-04-08 Thread Coacher
Well, I am still experiencing this issue even with latest intel driver :( Are you running Gentoo now? What is your setup? Could you please give me the output of `emerge --info firefox` and `emerge --info xf86-video- intel`? I haven't tried Firefox 20 yet though. Could it be the issue in Firefox

[Bug 1144558]

2013-03-15 Thread Coacher
What do you think about comment #39? And how can I check if pixman time shown in `perf top` belongs to Xorg or Firefox? (see comment #46) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558 Title:

[Bug 1144558]

2013-03-15 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #51) If you have the ncurses gui, the second column shows you the comm i.e. the process name. Similarly in the perf report. Oh, finally, I was able to get it. Yes, that pixman rendering belongs to Firefox process, not Xorg. Though there is somehow no comm column in my

[Bug 1144558]

2013-03-15 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #53) Reading http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/firefox/ firefox-19.0.2.ebuild?view=markup it seems that the use of system-cairo has been dropped. Which is a shame. Well, you've seen the patches applied on top of firefox and support for

[Bug 1144558]

2013-03-15 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #53) Reading http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/firefox/ firefox-19.0.2.ebuild?view=markup it seems that the use of system-cairo has been dropped. Which is a shame. You are not seeing thing like we're enabling system cairo here ... directly

[Bug 1144558]

2013-03-15 Thread Coacher
(In reply to comment #53) Reading http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/firefox/ firefox-19.0.2.ebuild?view=markup it seems that the use of system-cairo has been dropped. Which is a shame. And the last one, you can find sources of eclasses in your $PORTDIR/eclass