Created attachment 120261
Possible fix
A bit lower brow than the proposal to always get DDC working.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873942
Title:
xf86-video-geode: driver initializat
Created attachment 121450
Improved fix
You're right. The panel resolution would usually be too big for an
external display. This new patch picks the largest mode mentioned in
xorg.conf if anything is there. Otherwise it uses those three modes with
a preference for 800x600.
--
You received this b
Yes, removing them is essentially the same as nihui's fix since Upload /
Download stuff will now be done by EXA itself. Eugenij should open a
sparate bug if needed because I don't see how int10 and EXA are related.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
This should be under mesa btw.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106060
Title:
[r128 1002:5446] Selecting the Molecule screensaver makes the PC
freeze. It is completely unresponsive.
Not a fix, but it works if you add -no-labels -no-bbox to the hack.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106060
Title:
[r128 1002:5446] Selecting the Molecule screensaver makes the PC
fre
Yes, Flash chose to make itself slow in that regard:
http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/wiki/FAQ Supporting these relatively
useless features came at a large performance cost. I was kind of hoping
that HTML5 wouldn't make the same mistake :S
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #248)
> (In reply to Connor Behan from comment #245)
> > (In reply to Ralph Giles (:rillian) from comment #241)
> > > Running codecs which other browsers don't support doesn't help web
> > > authors.
> > > Our
(In reply to Oleg Romashin (:romaxa) from comment #242)
> This patch was hacked by 3-4 different people. and it is a bit outdated.
> Right way to add gstreamer support is open interface which would allow to
> use external codecs (HW accelerated, gstreamer et.c.) so community could
> maintain media
(In reply to Ralph Giles (:rillian) from comment #241)
> Running codecs which other browsers don't support doesn't help web authors.
> Our goal is not to inspire web pages 'Best viewed in Firefox'. Quite the
> opposite. So adding the wide range of formats gstreamer offers doesn't
> advance the web
I completely agree. I'm aware of all the comments telling us to "stay on
topic" but at this point, that amounts to telling us to "be content with
the fact that a perfectly good patch is collecting dust." If the patch
is still not ready, please give Oleg a list of ATTAINABLE GOALS
explaining how it
10 matches
Mail list logo
