[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss

2009-03-15 Thread CowboyTim
@Tom I might not be good at making my point sometimes, but you clearly sum things up very good. Way better than I do. @Aryeh In Ext3, too many applications use fsync, I think that was from the ext2 day-and-era, where not syncing could lead to corrupt filesystems, not just empty files. Same with

[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss

2009-03-14 Thread CowboyTim
@helios I fail to see the fact that this would ever be a KDE bug. fsync only *helps*, it will never ever make sure that things will be solved permanently for good. The reason that a rename() is used with a temp file that *nothing* can get 100% durability (even using fsync). App developers want

[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss

2009-03-12 Thread CowboyTim
@Hiten I agree with your comment, I think. I was about to make that same post. I would even dare to say that fsync(fd) is an evil call that never should be used by any application. The reason for this is very simple, it doesn't make a difference: if fsync(fd) needs to write 100MB to disk and a

[Bug 242562] Re: slashdot comment options bar slows down scrolling

2009-01-24 Thread CowboyTim
I'm still having this problem with all software based X servers. This is e.g. Xnewt on SunRay 1g (ubuntu 8.04.1 64-bit up to the latest version except for the kernel). Also the framebuffer X server on the PS3, this is ubuntu 8.10 ppc64 latest version. On my desktop PC, with the nvidia card,

[Bug 125970] Re: MASTER - slow scroll with image as background-repeat

2009-01-24 Thread CowboyTim
Can someone check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/242562 ? The problem is IMHO 'in firefox', probably cairo, as that does the rendering (?!). On software based X servers the problem doesn't go away. The beta 180.16 drivers from nvidia make the problem dissapear on a

[Bug 242562] Re: slashdot comment options bar slows down scrolling

2008-08-15 Thread CowboyTim
I have exactly the same problem on a SunRay 1g, where the Xnewt X server is used. I'm using this on ubuntu 8.04.1 64-bit, desktop install. It's on a quite fast machine: dual quad core 3.2 GHz. After realizing that I had seen that problem elsewhere before, I realized that that was on my home PC: