** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
review note: while libreoffice in oracular is up to version
4:24.8.6-0ubuntu0.24.10.2 (and the backport uses version
4:24.8.6-0ubuntu0.24.10.1), the release bump was due to a no-change
rebuild for the security pocket:
libreoffice (4:24.8.6-0ubuntu0.24.10.2) oracular-security;
urgency=medium
* S
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097688
Title:
[BPO] openvpn/2.6.12 from Noble to Jammy
To manage no
lgtm. thanks!
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097688
Title:
[BPO] openvpn/2.6.12 from Noble to Jammy
Public bug reported:
Commit 4a4c4e0a27cfd159ac0bbc135d4eff06be8bde1c completely broke pull-
lp-source --upload-queue, which now fails with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pull-lp-source", line 14, in
PullPkg.main(distro="ubuntu", pull="source")
^^
Thanks for testing with network-manager! I feel better about not
including the Breaks:, as I think many people do use network-manager-
openvpn (I do on my laptops).
> New patch removing the breaks rule for network-manager-openvpn
A few minor requests:
1. It looks like the security team has updat
> When you generate the new source package to upload
I just realized you might not have upload rights and maybe @waveform
sponsored it? In that case the last point in my comment would be
directed to @waveform, or whoever is doing the building and uploading.
--
You received this bug notification
>netowrk added Breaks rule for network-manager-openvpn as the package
has patches for openvpn 2.6 in noble.
Since jammy's network-manager-openvpn version is 1.8, and there is no
backport of network-manager-openvpn in jammy, this appears to completely
prevent the use of network-manager-openvpn with
** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104962
Title:
[BPO] audacity/3.7.3+dfsg-1 from plucky
To manage no
** Also affects: audacity (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer)
** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103497
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 24.8.5 for jammy/noble
To manage
@mapreri looks like this was already uploaded as a no-change backport,
which i agree seems reasonable; i approved the upload.
** Changed in: qtractor (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
** Changed in: qtractor (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102057
Title:
[BPO] qtractor/1.5.3-1 from plucky
To manage notific
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103497
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 24.8.5 for jammy/noble
To manage
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095235
Title:
[BPO] libffado/2.4.9-1 from plucky
To manage notific
LGTM, approved, thanks!
** Also affects: libffado (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notificat
** Changed in: sphinxcontrib-globalsubs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095011
Title:
[BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-
LGTM, approved, thanks!
** Changed in: sphinxcontrib-globalsubs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: sphinxcontrib-globalsubs (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091282
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 24.2.7 for jammy
To manage noti
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091282
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 24.2.7 for jammy
To manage notif
** Changed in: obs-studio (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077563
Title:
[BPO] obs-studio/30.2.3+dfsg-1 from oracular
To ma
approved, thanks!
** Changed in: obs-studio (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077563
Title:
[BPO] obs-studio/30.2.3+dfsg-1 fr
setting as fix-released since it looks like it's built and published for
amd64 and s390x, though the arm64/armhf builds haven't started
yet...presumably they'll build sometime soon
** Changed in: obs-studio (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug noti
setting as fix-released in oracular and fix-committed in noble, since
the target here is noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072793
Title:
[BPO] obs-studio/30.1.2+dfsg-1build1 from
> obs-studio dependency waits on ppc64el and riscv64 due to missing the
proper version of lua libraries on those architectures
I feel like this isn't ideal and would be nice if it could be fixed for
those archs, but not a blocker for this backport since, as you pointed
out, it's also missing its d
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073502
Title:
[BPO] package-notes/15 from oracular
To manage
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069775
Title:
[BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.16-1 from oracular to noble
** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069775
Title:
[BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.16-1 from oracular to noble
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544
Title:
[BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular
To manage
accepted, thanks!
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056201
Title:
[BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble
To manage noti
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056732
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.6.5 for jammy
To manage notif
** Also affects: rpki-client (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056732
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.6.5 for jammy
To manage notifi
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056201
Title:
[BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble
To manage notificatio
thanks, I reviewed and uploaded to the focal-backports queue.
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614
Title:
@kilobyte have you been able to find a sponsor to upload for you, and
also can you clarify that you tested the backport and verified it works
correctly (as mentioned in comment 3)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
** Also affects: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
uploaded to -backports queues for bionic and focal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758
Title:
[BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
To manage notificati
uploaded to -backports queues for bionic and focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800
Title:
[BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package
building (missing dep
as impish is a non-LTS release and will EOL next month, marking as
wontfix.
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19657
The backporters team decided in a previous mtg to take the approach of
reverting the use of debugedit.
** Summary changed:
- debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing
dependency)
+ [BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building
(missing
As this still requires a sponsor, I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-backporters
team, and subscribing the ubuntu-sponsors team, however it's up to you
(Preetham Gujjula) to follow through with preparing the backported
package and finding a sponsor to upload it for you.
--
You received this bug notificatio
As this still requires a sponsor, I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-backporters
team, and subscribing the ubuntu-sponsors team, however it's up to you
(wurstsemmel) to follow through with preparing the backported package
and finding a sponsor to upload it for you.
--
You received this bug notification bec
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974167
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.2 from Kinetic to Focal
To
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974167
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.2 from Kinetic to Focal
To manage n
** Also affects: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197
** Description changed:
- A customer reported network disconnections on their storage
+ [impact]
+
+ manual disabling of ipv4 DAD (IACD) for static link-local address does
+ not work in jammy
+
+ [test case]
+
+ see 'Reproducer' in original description below
+
+ [regression potential]
+
+ fa
** Description changed:
[impact]
when talking to upstream nameservers, systemd-resolved limits its
advertised max packet size as 512 in its edns0 opt. However, one of the
primary benefits of edns0 is to allow using packet sizes larger than
512, which is the pre-edns0 max packet size.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Eoan)
Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned)
** C
This is released now for focal-backports, except for arm64/armhf, which appear
to be having quite a hard time keeping up with builds, as they currently
haven't even started:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.10.1~bpo20.04.1
I'm marking this fix released for foc
uploaded to k, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968805
Title:
Hibernation fails when an additional swapfile is added due to priority
mismatch
To manage notifications about t
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
To manage
Ok that sounds good to me, thanks!
One note for future changes, in this upload the bug reference was 'LP:
1971109', however the launchpad tooling requires that to be 'LP:
#1971109' (with the '#'); it's not important enough to require a new
upload but do try to remember for next upload.
** Also af
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973594
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.7 for focal
To manage notif
Hi, sorry for the delay, accepted into focal-backports.
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
Looks mostly ok, couple of questions though:
1) the description says 5.6.2 has several important bugfixes; if that
means the 5.6.0 version in jammy is affected by those bugs, the correct
approach is to patch that version to fix the bugs. The backports pocket
shouldn't be used *instead* of the SRU
interestingly, paramiko is also broken when connecting to older servers,
but not for the same reason as this bug. See bug 1973241
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961833
Title:
openssh
Note that for servers showing this problem, using openssh to connect is
also broken, but for a different reason (because the ssh-rsa alg is
disallowed by default), see bug 1961833
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Public bug reported:
[impact]
paramiko fails to connect to some servers.
[test case]
attempt to connect to a server that does not support server-sig-algs and
also only supports ssh-rsa (specifically, does not support rsa-
sha2-512). the connection will fail:
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:Finalizing
For reference to anyone coming here with this problem, when connecting
to a remote sshd server you can find what host key algorithms the remote
host uses by using -vv and check the debug output; look first for the
*peer* server KEXINIT proposal (not the earlier *local client* KEXINIT
proposal):
de
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Nicolas Bock (nicolasbock) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: Nicolas Bock (nicolasbock) => Bruce Elrick (virtuous-sloth)
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
** Tags r
** Also affects: reprepro (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933363
Title:
Backport reprepro fixes to focal..hirsute
To manag
uploaded to kinetic, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965325
Title:
upstream patch from opendev - double encoding-decoding
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969808
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.6 for focal
To manage notif
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969808
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.6 for focal
To manage notifi
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
per comment 6, this should be fixed in jammy, so marking fixed released
there.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928
> You sure nothing else needs to be done for this in Debian?
To be specific: are you sure that it's better to leave {base} set to
/usr and prefix the various paths with 'local'? Any package build that
chooses a different {base} will then still have things put into their
custom {base}/local/... whi
> This is by design. See: https://lists.debian.org/debian-
python/2022/03/msg00039.html
I get that, my point is it doesn't seem to be done correctly.
> There was a Debian bug tracking the effect on Meson, apparently the issue was
> fixed upstream.
> See: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
> It seems this issue may occur not only when receiving addresses on
multiple interfaces, but also when dhcp requests on multiple interfaces
times out and the hook script was called with 'reason' == FAIL.
yep, the try-reload-or-restart is done for those as well and this should
be fixed for those $
I have no comment on working around this by changing ec2-hibinit-agent,
but is this a dup of bug 1910252 (i.e. maybe fixing that bug would solve
this as well?)
I never found time to fix that bug with upstream systemd (and sru the
fix) but it's probably worth doing at some point.
--
You received
Public bug reported:
the 3.10 version of python in debian and ubuntu appears to have changed its
installation scheme from 'posix_prefix' to the debian-specific 'posix_local',
which breaks things, for example meson is no longer buildable:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/595057055/buildlog_ubuntu-j
I suspect this might be a rather critical problem to fix before jammy
releases? Just guessing though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967920
Title:
sysconfig installation scheme chang
> I think you have a problem there too.
oh I'm certainly not claiming a 1g default swap is appropriate, that
does seem far, far too small to me and will likely cause widespread
issues beyond just this, I was only saying that tweaking the systemd-
oomd swap % full setting would IMHO not be likely t
> it's going to be hard to get around the core issue of oomd counting
pagecache as memory pressure
assuming my quick 10-minute assessment of this bug is correct, of
course...maybe i'm totally wrong about what the problem is ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
> So, maybe the default SwapUsedLimit is not appropriate for Ubuntu
I don't think tweaking that will help much if at all, it's going to be
hard to get around the core issue of oomd counting pagecache as memory
pressure
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
wow, looking at the systemd code (even upstream), oomd is counting
pagecache as 'used' memory which is massively unfair as the kernel is
responsible for pagecache use, not userspace, and it's not even accurate
(from a OOM perspective) since the kernel will drop pagecache as memory
pressure increase
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
> Sorry for not making clear my intentions in the bug description.
No problem, it was my misunderstanding, and sorry for the confusion.
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: gram
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/417981
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965180
Title:
apt-add-rep
> also backporting debugedit sounds like the correct thing to do
I don't think we can backport debugedit for i386 currently, since
debugedit's i386 build depends on debhelper which depends on debugedit's
i386 build.
Maybe we can do a build without the backports pocket in a PPA, then
binary-copy d
> *If* want to fix this in bionic and focal, a full SRU will be
required
agreed, and that would require its own [SRU] bug separate from this
[BPO] bug
> I'll take this on, I have some spare cycles today this afternoon.
@teward did you get a chance to prepare this? I didn't see it in the
upload
Just a note that this needs a sponsor to review and upload it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: simplestreams (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951601
Title:
[BPO] simplestreams/0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1
I just realized I probably misunderstood, as this is fixing bugs in the
*previous* backport for this, which (if that's the case) is totally fine
to backport as-is.
Can you just clarify if that's correct, and also if any of this
backport, or the last backport, fixes bugs in the official focal
versi
It's slightly concerning that -backports may be getting used here just
for fixes? The concern is that bug fixes should be done as SRU so that
everyone gets the bug fixes. The backports pocket generally should be
limited to mainly pulling new features/functionality back; stuff that
would be inapprop
** Changed in: simplestreams (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951601
Title:
[BPO] simplestreams/0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1
uploaded to bionic queue, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940141
Title:
OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a
CertificateRequest
To manage notifications
If you'd rather remove the opt-in part, that's fine with me; I can
sponsor the debdiff then with the opt-in parts left out, if that works
for you Bruce and Nicolas.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
@ubuntu-security since this is openssl, could you give the debdiff a
review? I can sponsor it as a normal SRU if you have no objections (and
the changes look ok to you), as it doesn't really seem like it would
specifically need to go to the -security pocket.
--
You received this bug notification
> It's not needed for actual functionality of the backport but that
assumes that any future backports or fixes don't break this backport
yes i get that, my comment is about whether or not the patch changes any
code *outside* of the self-tests, e.g. the TLSProxy perl code changes.
If that's *only*
The 2nd upstream patch appears to add new functionality, for actually
parsing a certificate request; is that actually needed (outside of the
self-tests)? If not, it shouldn't be included in the backport.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
> Default to SHA256 for key fingerprints.
Typically changes should go upstream first, and it doesn't seem this was
patched upstream yet or even an issue opened? And not patched in Debian
yet either?
> MD5 is long deprecated, OpenSSH has switched to SHA256.
is this accurate even for key fingerpri
> I have update ongoing on esm-infa-staging for it
just to clarify, if the systemd patch isn't added to the actual main
(currently closed) xenial-updates repo, it won't be very much help to
anyone wanting to create new xenial containers on jammy. So, just
patching systemd in the esm repo likely is
> I think this commit [1] may be related (landed in systemd v249)
yeah, that commit seems to be intentionally forcing ACD on for
statically configured ipv4, i'm not sure quite why, it seems like a
user-configured setting should be honored; but possibly Yu was trying to
default it to on instead of
@ubuntu-security team, as this only affects FIPS, could you take a look
at this and determine if you should create a FIPS-specific version of
this package?
** Also affects: pam-ssh-agent-auth (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pam-ssh-agent-auth (Ubuntu I
1 - 100 of 1735 matches
Mail list logo
