Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-numeric
I was just running the upgrade.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ErrorMessage:
ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status
134
Package: python-numeric 24.2-9ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700865
Title:
package python-numeric 24.2-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: acpi-support
My Thinkpad X31 fails to enter suspend or hibernate when my PCMCIA
wireless card is inserted. If I rmmod the rt2500pci module, suspend and
hibernate both work perfectly. If I add this to my ACPI config:
SUSPEND_MODULES=rt2500pci
...I can
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: acpi-support
My Thinkpad X31 fails to enter suspend or hibernate when my PCMCIA
- wireless card is inserted. If I rmmod the rt2500pci module, suspend and
- hibernate both work perfectly. If I add this to my ACPI config:
+ wireless card is
Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be fixed. It is still intermittent,
and while I sometimes get high speeds (50MBps), I sometimes get the
expected low (10MBps) speeds. As others have pointed out, it does seem
to be related to which SATA port the drive is connected to. I do need to
properly test
Status was changed as a result of a comment I made, which turned out to
be premature. Reopening the bug...
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
--
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a
This seems to be resolved for me in 2.6.24. I shall test Alpha5 when the
LiveCD is available.
--
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: Output of a quick /usr/bin/time test while copying an
Ubuntu 7.10 ISO image around my various drives
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12917918/C%3A%5CDocuments%20and%20Settings%5Ckhvt356.EMEA%5CDesktop%5Clspci%5Chddspeedtesting.txt
--
Slow SATA performance
Since my last comment, I have done some more testing. While performance
is generally much better than it was a year ago, it still isn't quite as
fast as it should be on two of my drives, and these drives don't appear
to be running in any UDMA mode. The other one seems to perform a bit
better, and
Just checking in the keep the thread alive - problem still exists for
me in Gutsy. I average 5 - 10MBps during file copies.
--
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Having upgraded to Gutsy, transfer speed is a lot faster for me, but I'm
not certain the issue is fully resolved yet - I got between 20 and 40
MBps when copying this evening, so I will test further and report back.
It is a definite improvement though, no question.
--
Slow SATA performance
I have heard anecdotal evidence that this is resolved in Gutsy. I will
try and give it a test and report back.
--
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Users of Intel, nForce, ALi, ATI and Silicon Image SATA controllers have
all reported this issue - it does not seem limited to any one
manufacturer.
** Summary changed:
- Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel, nForce, ALi chipsets
+ Slow SATA performance
** Description changed:
Hi
This
** Summary changed:
- Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) nForce chipsets
+ Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel, nForce, Ali chipsets
** Tags added: ali
** Tags removed: ich7
** Summary changed:
- Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel, nForce, Ali chipsets
+ Slow SATA HDD
** Summary changed:
- Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) chipset
+ Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) nForce chipsets
** Tags added: nforce nvidia
--
Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) nForce chipsets
This doesn't seem to be limited to Intel chipsets - it also seems to
affect nForce based systems, as per the discussion at the previously
quoted thread.
--
Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) chipset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification
Here's the output of uname -a:
Linux Panoramix 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686
GNU/Linux
The output of dmesg | head is attached to this post.
Thanks!
** Attachment added: dmesg_pipe_head.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8054489/dmesg_pipe_head.txt
--
Slow SATA
Public bug reported:
Hi
This issue has been discussed over at
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=447474, and seems to affect a
number of us.
File copy speed is very slow (roughly 5-10MBps) on SATA drives using
this Intel chipset (and possibly others). Copying within the same
physical
** Summary changed:
- Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel ICH7 chipset
+ Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) chipset
** Tags added: hdd ich7 intel sata slow
--
Slow SATA HDD performance on Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) chipset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received
19 matches
Mail list logo
