[Bug 2060575] Re: gnome-keyring fails to automatically unlock login keyring after recent updates in noble

2024-04-13 Thread Daniel Holbert
This affects me on a Microsoft Surface Pro 7+ which I upgraded in-place from 23.10 to 24.04-beta with `do-release-upgrade -d` yesterday. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060575 Title:

[Bug 29622]

2022-07-08 Thread Daniel Holbert
(In reply to Keith Briscoe from comment #0) > Either we need to somehow detect the printable area for the print > driver, modify the layout a bit We do this now (we encode it as `unwriteableMargin`) There are still edge-cases/special-circumstances where we get this wrong (e.g. bug 1763246) but

[Bug 263014]

2022-03-13 Thread Daniel Holbert
I think so, yeah. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263014 Title: fails to run when built with FORTIFY_SOURCE To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1938152]

2021-12-09 Thread Daniel Holbert
*** Bug 1720672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938152 Title: Printing output gets truncated on 90.0.0 and 90.0.1 To manage

[Bug 1811105]

2019-06-29 Thread Daniel Holbert
*** Bug 1536707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811105 Title: Browser hangs when 'open with' dialog opens. To manage notifications

[Bug 1551949]

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
*** Bug 1538487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551949 Title: Printing to PDF file loses URLs/links To manage notifications about

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2019-02-08 Thread Daniel Holbert
Hi Justin! Original reporter here -- I've been running Ubuntu 18.10 since release, and I've never once been able to reproduce this issue on that version. I have the same gnome-shell version as you, and I tested Firefox 65 (official version from Ubuntu repos) and am still unable to reproduce. I'd

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-12-27 Thread Daniel Holbert
RE cosmic (replying to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1765304/comments/52 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1765304/comments/55 ): I've installed the proposed gnome-shell-common and gnome-shell package updates, and I don't see any issues so far (after a

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-12-19 Thread Daniel Holbert
(My experience [of Cosmic being unaffected] seems to match what was reported in comment 44 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1765304/comments/44 ), too.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-12-19 Thread Daniel Holbert
Hi Brian. I have been running Cosmic (Ubuntu 18.10) as my main OS since its release, and I don't think I've ever actually hit the bug on Cosmic. (I just verified that I have the GTK_IM_MODULE=ibus variable set, too. So I think I would be hitting this bug, if Cosmic were affected.) So, my

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-12-12 Thread Daniel Holbert
The fix seems good to me! My verification steps: - I verified that I could still reproduce the issues in the first post here, in a stock Ubuntu 18.04.1 installation in a VM (all package at their "freshly installed" version, including Firefox). - In doing this, I tested both scenarios from

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-04-23 Thread Daniel Holbert
As noted on the github issue, Fedora doesn't seem to be affected at all (when testing the same ibus/mutter/Firefox versions as in Ubuntu). So this is seeming to be Ubuntu-specific, fortunately/unfortunately... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Holbert
Filed upstream: https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/2002 ** Bug watch added: github.com/ibus/ibus/issues #2002 https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/2002 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1765304] Re: Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Holbert
> the bug might be better placed on https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues instead. Thanks -- I'll file an issue there, too, later today. (I wish I knew how to test old ibus builds & bisect between them so that I could extra- confirm that it was an ibus change that broke this, and perhaps bisect to

[Bug 1765304] [NEW] Ubuntu 18.04's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox (by lowering & raising window whenever they're focused)

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: tl;dr: starting in Ubuntu 18.04, "ibus" seems to lower and raise Firefox, whenever the user tries to focus an field on a web page. This is not a regression in Firefox, as the same Firefox version runs just fine in Ubuntu 17.10 -- it seems to be a bug in ibus, because it

[Bug 1710306] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 Artful has extremely out of date Firefox package (50.1.0)

2017-08-11 Thread Daniel Holbert
OK, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710306 Title: Ubuntu 17.10 Artful has extremely out of date Firefox package (50.1.0) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1710306] [NEW] Ubuntu 17.10 Artful has extremely out of date Firefox package (50.1.0)

2017-08-11 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 17.10 Artful (current Ubuntu development version), the Firefox package is extremely out of date for some reason. Quoting the package page: https://packages.ubuntu.com/artful/firefox "Package: firefox (50.1.0+build2-0ubuntu1)" Compare to these non-development

[Bug 1693357] Re: Random system lockup with " BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018", "IP: gen8_ppgtt_alloc_page_directories.isra.38+0x115/0x250 [i915]"

2017-05-25 Thread Daniel Holbert
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1680904 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1680904 Over on the bug where I initially brought this up, Rocko tells me: === your lockup looks like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1680904 (and the upstream bug is

[Bug 1674838] Re: kernel BUG at /build/linux-7LGLH_/linux-4.10.0/include/linux/swapops.h:129

2017-05-25 Thread Daniel Holbert
(Thanks @Rocko - I'd filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1693357 but I've now marked that as a duplicate of the bug you mentioned.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1693357] WifiSyslog.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882940/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357

[Bug 1693357] RfKill.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882938/+files/RfKill.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357 Title:

[Bug 1693357] UdevDb.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882939/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357 Title:

[Bug 1693357] ProcModules.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882936/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357

[Bug 1693357] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882933/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1693357] ProcEnviron.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882934/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357

[Bug 1693357] Lsusb.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882931/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357 Title:

[Bug 1693357] PulseList.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882937/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357

[Bug 1693357] ProcInterrupts.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882935/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1693357] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882932/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357

[Bug 1693357] Lspci.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882930/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357 Title:

[Bug 1693357] IwConfig.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882928/+files/IwConfig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357

[Bug 1693357] JournalErrors.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "JournalErrors.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882929/+files/JournalErrors.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1693357] CurrentDmesg.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882927/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1693357] CRDA.txt

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357/+attachment/4882926/+files/CRDA.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693357 Title:

[Bug 1693357] Re: Random system lockup with " BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018", "IP: gen8_ppgtt_alloc_page_directories.isra.38+0x115/0x250 [i915]"

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected zesty ** Description changed: When starting a Firefox compilation job earlier today, my system locked up; ctrl-alt-f1 had no effect, etc. (I was able to restart with the REISUB technique.) I'm on 64-bit Ubuntu Zesty, and I was

[Bug 1693357] Re: Random system lockup with " BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018", "IP: gen8_ppgtt_alloc_page_directories.isra.38+0x115/0x250 [i915]"

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
(I initially reported this issue via a comment on another bug, being unsure if it was that bug or not: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1674838/comments/208 I'm filing this as its own bug as directed there. Let me know if there's any other information that I can/should

[Bug 1693357] Re: Random system lockup with " BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018", "IP: gen8_ppgtt_alloc_page_directories.isra.38+0x115/0x250 [i915]"

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
** Attachment added: "kern.log snippet for lockup" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1693357/+attachment/4882914/+files/kern-log-snippet.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1693357] [NEW] Random system lockup with " BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018", "IP: gen8_ppgtt_alloc_page_directories.isra.38+0x115/0x250 [i915]"

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: When starting a Firefox compilation job earlier today, my system locked up; ctrl-alt-f1 had no effect, etc. (I was able to restart with the REISUB technique.) I'm on 64-bit Ubuntu Zesty, and I was running a kernel version that's currently in zesty-proposed to have the fix

[Bug 1674838] Re: kernel BUG at /build/linux-7LGLH_/linux-4.10.0/include/linux/swapops.h:129

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
I installed the kernel with the fix from zesty-proposed (4.10.0-22-generic #24-Ubuntu), but after ~4 hours of uptime on that kernel, I hit what felt like the same system lockup again. (Or perhaps a new version of this lockup that the patch introduces / leaves unfixed?) Here's the kern.log from

[Bug 1648649] Re: Ubufox is broken in Firefox Nightly, due to using no-longer-supported "for each" syntax. Error console now shows "SyntaxError: missing ( after for UpdateNotifier.js:217:8"

2017-05-15 Thread Daniel Holbert
Hi Chris! I'm still seeing this issue (in latest Firefox Nightly), BTW. I'm also noticing that "about:startpage" (the default homepage imposed by the extension) does not load in affected versions, possibly due to this same issue. Also: there's one more step that you need to perform before you can

[Bug 1648649] Re: Ubufox is broken in Firefox Nightly, due to using no-longer-supported "for each" syntax. Error console now shows "SyntaxError: missing ( after for UpdateNotifier.js:217:8"

2016-12-14 Thread Daniel Holbert
Great, thanks Chris! Note: I am not a JS expert, so my suggested replacement in comment 0 might not be exactly right for all cases of this pattern. (I believe it's correct for code that's iterating over a JS array, but the semantics might be slightly different for other structures, e.g. whether

[Bug 1648649] Re: Ubufox is broken in Firefox Nightly, due to using no-longer-supported "for each" syntax. Error console now shows "SyntaxError: missing ( after for UpdateNotifier.js:217:8"

2016-12-13 Thread Daniel Holbert
[CC'ing Alexander, Arzhel/xionox, & Chris, who are all listed as "Contributors" at the top of UpdateNotifier.js, one of the affected JS files. Hoping one of them can address this or might know who can.] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1648649] Re: Ubufox is broken in Firefox Nightly, due to using no-longer-supported "for each" syntax. Error console now shows "SyntaxError: missing ( after for UpdateNotifier.js:217:8"

2016-12-08 Thread Daniel Holbert
I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 with latest Firefox & ubufox. Package versions: $ apt-cache show xul-ext-ubufox | grep Version Version: 3.2-0ubuntu1 $ apt-cache show firefox | grep Version Version: 50.0.2+build1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1648649] [NEW] Ubufox is broken in Firefox Nightly, due to using no-longer-supported "for each" syntax. Error console now shows "SyntaxError: missing ( after for UpdateNotifier.js:217:8"

2016-12-08 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: Firefox Nightly (53) no longer supports the non-standard "for each" looping construct, as of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1293305 Unfortunately, ubufox uses this construct, which causes problems as shown in the error console at startup: > SyntaxError:

[Bug 1631208] Re: Tabs in Firefox add-ons are not rendered

2016-10-07 Thread Daniel Holbert
As I just discovered & noted in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1306425#c10 , this doesn't actually require any Firefox add-ons -- you can reproduce it in Firefox's "Certificate Viewer" UI, too. Anyway -- I'm glad we've got a fix in the pipeline here! Thanks, Martin! ** Bug watch

[Bug 1554190] [NEW] package software-center 16.01+16.04.20160217 failed to install/upgrade: triggers looping, abandoned

2016-03-07 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: Not sure what happened. I just got a notification that something had gone wrong after I logged in, and I clicked through to report it. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: software-center 16.01+16.04.20160217 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 1499088] [NEW] Text is unreadable (dark-on-dark) in ubiquity slideshow "Help & Support" slide, when installing Ubuntu 15.10

2015-09-23 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: I just installed Ubuntu 15.10 "Wily" using today's daily CD, and I noticed that the "Help & Support" slideshow slide during the installation was completely unreadable, due to having dark text on a dark background. Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/dX0Gz5F.png ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 1499088] Re: Text is unreadable (dark-on-dark) in ubiquity slideshow "Help & Support" slide, when installing Ubuntu 15.10

2015-09-23 Thread Daniel Holbert
Here's the screenshot as an attachment, in case the imgur version disappears. ** Attachment added: "screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/+bug/1499088/+attachment/4472707/+files/dX0Gz5F.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1478173] Re: Ambiance & Radiance themes are missing a "background-color" for tooltip elements (needed for GTK3-enabled Firefox Nightly)

2015-09-18 Thread Daniel Holbert
FWIW, Firefox actually worked around this bug locally by making the bits of firefox-UI in question able to paint the Theme's background gradient (and we're making sure that any future release with GTK3 enabled will include this patch). It may still be worth taking the theme patch that I attached

[Bug 1478173] Re: Ambiance Radiance themes are missing a background-color for tooltip elements (needed for GTK3-enabled Firefox Nightly)

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
Here's a patch to fix this. (generated against source obtained from apt-get source ubuntu-themes). I'm hoping someone here can take this land it. Please let me know if there's anything else that's needed here. Thanks! ** Patch added: patch

[Bug 1478173] Re: Ambiance Radiance themes are missing a background-color for tooltip elements (needed for GTK3-enabled Firefox Nightly)

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
FWIW, I verified that this patch fixes the Firefox issue if I apply it directly to my system, like so: cd /usr/share/themes/ sudo patch -p1 /tmp/theme-patch.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1478173] [NEW] Ambiance Radiance themes are missing a background-color for tooltip elements (needed for GTK3-enabled Firefox Nightly)

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: Firefox Nightlies recently became GTK3-enabled, and that uncovered an issue with Ubuntu's Ambiance Radiance GTK3 themes. They're missing a background-color for the .tooltip {...} CSS rule in their config files. They have a tooltip_bg_color variable, which they use to set up

[Bug 1478173] Re: Ambiance Radiance themes are missing a background-color for tooltip elements (needed for GTK3-enabled Firefox Nightly)

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
Steps to reproduce (sorry for not including these up-front): 1. Download a Desktop firefox nightly build from https://nightly.mozilla.org/ 2. Extract the tarball, e.g.: tar jxvf firefox-42.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 3. From inside the extracted directory, create an empty folder and

[Bug 1478173] Re: Ambiance Radiance themes are missing a background-color for tooltip elements (needed for GTK3-enabled Firefox Nightly)

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
Note that *actual tooltips* are fine, since they render with the background-image, as specified in gtk-widget.css. But firefox's notification bars have trouble because they don't get rendered with the full GTK styling. Firefox sets up a dummy widget and styles it as a tooltip, and reads its

[Bug 1096286] Re: Firefox Search Engine is Broken

2014-12-29 Thread Daniel Holbert
#36 is off-topic for this bug. I don't know where the correct place is to send requests for that addon, but it's certainly not here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096286 Title:

[Bug 1228548] Re: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV in LIBMTP_Get_Storage()

2013-09-22 Thread Daniel Holbert
I hit this when unmounting my nexus 7 (original series, from 2012, running up-to-date Android 4.3). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228548 Title: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Bug 526482]

2013-03-29 Thread Daniel Holbert
(To be clear, Olli is pointing out that you need to update the hexadecimal UUID here to a new randomly-generated UUID: https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/widget/nsIPrintSettings.idl#25 since the interface is changing. Sorry, I should've caught that when I first looked at this.)

[Bug 526482]

2013-03-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
Comment on attachment 729488 Save resolution (dpi) and duplex settings v1 I think this patch generally makes sense. Looks like this is just two pieces of data that are configurable in the print dialog, which we don't currently save between print jobs, but which we easily can by storing them in

[Bug 526482]

2013-03-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
[I'm narrowing the scope of the bug-summary to be more specific cover what the attached patch actually addresses. I believe the rest of comment 0 is already covered in other bugs (or can be tracked in a new bug)]. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1115466] Re: _sysconfigdata_nd.py missing in /usr/lib/python2.7/

2013-02-04 Thread Daniel Holbert
Marco's workaround in comment 4 here fixed the problem for me, too (though I used a symlink instead of moving the file). Specifically, I ran these commands: cd /usr/lib/python2.7 ln -s plat-x86_64-linux-gnu/_sysconfigdata_nd.py . and I was able to build firefox after doing that. -- You

[Bug 1042907] Re: LightDM doesn't handle Lock Screen or Switch Session for GNOME Shell 3.5

2012-09-10 Thread Daniel Holbert
It will however make your screen appear locked but you won't need a password to unlock it, so that's still a bug but not as critical. IMHO that's still pretty critical. (Way higher than Low, IMHO) In an office environment, it's pretty important to be able to lock your screen when you step away

[Bug 1023577] Re: package python3 3.2.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 4

2012-07-12 Thread Daniel Holbert
So at least in my case, the error was something like: running python rtupdate hooks for python3.2... Usage: py3clean [-V VERSION] [-p PACKAGE | DIR_OR_FILE] and it was happening because I had a .rtupdate file that included the command py3clean -p ubuntu-drivers-common

[Bug 300080]

2012-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbert
*** Bug 730258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300080 Title: print selection only option cuts multi-page text To manage notifications

[Bug 612082] Re: optparser attribute missing in cli.py (warning-message-printing fail when --part is given a nonexistent file)

2011-10-27 Thread Daniel Holbert
Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612082 Title: optparser attribute missing in cli.py (warning-message-printing fail when --part is given a nonexistent

[Bug 612082] Re: optparser attribute missing in cli.py (warning-message-printing fail when --part is given a nonexistent file)

2011-10-27 Thread Daniel Holbert
Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612082 Title: optparser attribute missing in cli.py (warning-message-printing fail when --part is given a nonexistent file) To manage

[Bug 488857]

2011-10-04 Thread Daniel Holbert
This bug, as-filed, is fixed (in a fresh profile), by changing the default print target to PDF. There's apparently a mysterious separate issue with state in existing profiles that makes Firefox default to PS and hit this bug. Right now this bug has a mixture of comments about both of these

[Bug 488857]

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
(In reply to Daniel Holbert [:dholbert] from comment #32) If so, then shouldn't part of this fix involve removing them, at least during a transition period? Possibly. Perhaps we could add a special case, so that when this pref is read, we could just check if its value begins

[Bug 488857]

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
Jonathan: thanks -- so presumably there's something stuck in your Firefox profile that's making you default to Postscript. If possible, it'd be helpful if you could isolate whatever's doing that by doing something like the following: (1) backup your profile (tar czvf ~/backup.tar.gz

[Bug 488857]

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
(In reply to Jonathan Kamens from comment #31) I'm encountering the problem with TB, not FF. (oops, sorry, I forgot about that) I removed a bunch of print_to_filename preferences from prefs.js and that made the problem go away. Ah -- thanks, that's very helpful! When I printed to a file

[Bug 488857]

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
Ah, ok. That's odd then - you might be right about them being obsolete, and I also don't understand how those prefs tie into triggering this bug. :( It might initially seem that a PS path in that pref would trigger PS behavior which triggers this bug -- but that's not the case in my profile. I

[Bug 488857]

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
Per previous comment, I'm re-marking this bug as FIXED, based on the belief that any remaining issues arise from stale data in profiles, which we're now tracking in bug 691430. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 488857]

2011-09-30 Thread Daniel Holbert
(In reply to Timothy Arceri from comment #27) Hi Daniel, Thanks for the feedback. Feel free to look into why your profile is stuck defaulting to PS as I can't reproduce this on either of my Linux machines. Oddly, it fixed itself in the past few days -- not sure what was going on.

[Bug 861931] Re: Ubuntu's version of Firefox says You are currently on the update channel in Help|About

2011-09-30 Thread Daniel Holbert
** Description changed: STR:  1. Start up Ubuntu's version of Firefox.  2. Visit Help|About Firefox ACTUAL RESULTS:   It says You are currently on the update channel. (Note the missing channel-name between the and update. The dialog has 2 spaces there, and no channel-name.)

[Bug 861931] Re: Ubuntu's version of Firefox says You are currently on the update channel in Help|About

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
I ran across this with the (updated) beta2 release of Ubuntu 11.10, in the Ubuntu-provided Firefox package (version 7.0+build2+nobinonly- 0ubuntu4) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861931

[Bug 861931] [NEW] Ubuntu's version of Firefox says You are currently on the update channel in Help|About

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: STR:  1. Start up Ubuntu's version of Firefox.  2. Visit Help|About Firefox ACTUAL RESULTS:   It says You are currently on the update channel. (Note the missing channel-name between the and update. The dialog has 2 spaces there, and no channel-name.) EXPECTED RESULTS:  

[Bug 861931] Re: Ubuntu's version of Firefox says You are currently on the update channel in Help|About

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
** Description changed: STR: - 1. Start up Ubuntu's version of Firefox. - 2. Visit Help|About +  1. Start up Ubuntu's version of Firefox. +  2. Visit Help|About Firefox ACTUAL RESULTS: - It says You are currently on the update channel. +   It says You are currently on the update

[Bug 861931] Re: Ubuntu's version of Firefox says You are currently on the update channel in Help|About

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
** Attachment added: Screenshot of the official Mozilla version's Help|About Firefox dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/861931/+attachment/2477589/+files/ff_official.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 861931] Re: Ubuntu's version of Firefox says You are currently on the update channel in Help|About

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
** Attachment added: Screenshot of the Ubuntu version's Help|About Firefox dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/861931/+attachment/2477587/+files/ff_ubuntu.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 488857]

2011-09-27 Thread Daniel Holbert
Just to add another data point -- this is WORKSFORME in a *fresh* Firefox profile. However, I have the same results as Jonathan in my normal (non-fresh) Firefox profile -- that is, in my normal profile, print-to-file still defaults to the name .ps, and when I tick PDF, it suggests the filename

[Bug 187313] Re: [MASTER] right click (with button release) might activate random popup-menu-item

2011-05-26 Thread Daniel Holbert
WORKSFORME in a Kubuntu 11.04 Live USB environment with the included Firefox 4.0 version. If you can reproduce the issue described in #320 / #322, please file a bug at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org (ideally with more information about how to reproduce), rather than adding the three hundred and

[Bug 187313] Re: [MASTER] right click (with button release) might activate random popup-menu-item

2011-05-23 Thread Daniel Holbert
This bug is regressed in FF 4.0.1 on Xubuntu 11.04. I'm not convinced that it's this bug, even if the STR are the same. (_This_ bug wasn't image-specific, and it was due to specific code issue that was fixed.) Could you file a new bug? This bug is already absurdly long (300 comments), and as

[Bug 772152] Re: unity-place-applications.menu has double-hyphen in XML comment, causing cxmenu:error: unable to parse '/etc/xdg/menus/unity-place-applications.menu': Invalid string in comment field

2011-05-20 Thread Daniel Holbert
Nate: You're probably applying the patch wrong. If you don't feed anything to the patch program, it just sits there doing nothing. Supposing you'd downloaded it to your Desktop as unity-xml-comment-fix.patch, you'd apply the patch as follows: cd / sudo patch -p1

[Bug 758398] Re: Bitcoin top-level window unmapped

2011-05-16 Thread Daniel Holbert
cako: This didn't previously affect Ubuntu 10.10. As I understand it, this was due to wxwidgets (bitcoin's widget toolkit) having a bad interaction on Ubuntu 11.04. See discussion in the thread from Comment #2 here. If you're hitting problems with Bitcoin not showing up on Ubuntu 10.10, I'd

[Bug 782333] [NEW] notify-send fails with scary output -- GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed, aborting..., Aborted -- when running in ssh with DISP

2011-05-13 Thread Daniel Holbert
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notify-osd STEPS TO REPRODUCE: $ ssh -x localhost # the -x means no x forwarding [authenticate if necessary] $ notify-send ohai EXPECTED RESULTS: Nothing happens, probably. Or maybe an innocuous warning message saying that no

[Bug 782333] Re: notify-send fails with scary output -- GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed, aborting..., Aborted -- when running in ssh with DISPLA

2011-05-13 Thread Daniel Holbert
VERSION INFORMATION: I'm running up-to-date Ubuntu 11.04, with notify-osd package version 0.9.30-0ubuntu4. notify-send --version reports notify-send 0.7.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 782333] Re: notify-send fails with scary output -- GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed, aborting..., Aborted -- when running in ssh with DISPLA

2011-05-13 Thread Daniel Holbert
The situation in which I encounter this is: I have some long-running scripts aliases that include a notify-send message when they complete, using Dustin Kirkland's alert alias: http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2010/07/dear-command-line-please-ping-me-when.html When I run these commands on a

[Bug 761869] Re: When running meld with $DISPLAY unset: meld crashed with AttributeError in __main__: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'append_search_path'

2011-04-28 Thread Daniel Holbert
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761869 Title: When running meld with $DISPLAY unset: meld crashed with AttributeError in __main__: 'NoneType' object

[Bug 727386] Re: Please remove several kde3 packages (source and binary)

2011-04-27 Thread Daniel Holbert
Please remove these kde3 packages from the archive: Any reason for these removals, and any suggested alternative way to obtain the removed packages? Personally, I find kdirstat to be a super-useful part of my toolchain, and I'm bummed that I can't apt-get install it on Natty. -- You received

[Bug 727386] Re: Please remove several kde3 packages (source and binary)

2011-04-27 Thread Daniel Holbert
(To answer one of my own questions, RE alternative ways to obtain these packages: I just visited the Ubuntu Maverick package page for i386 kdirstat ( https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/i386/kdirstat ), clicked on the 'version' link, downloaded the .deb from there, and then opened that deb in

[Bug 752376] Re: Software center won't allow install from .deb file

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Holbert
This appears to be because Software-Center doesn't accept file:/// URIs, which appears to be is the type of URI that Firefox passes to it, when you do Open With: [Ubuntu Software Center] in the file-download dialog. Simpler steps to reproduce: 1. Download a deb to e.g. /tmp/foo.deb 2. Run in a

[Bug 752376] Re: Software center won't allow install from .deb file

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Holbert
(Compare to e.g. file-roller and eog, both of which handle file:/// URIs just fine.) ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #652863 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652863 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 752376] Re: Software center won't allow install from .deb file

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Holbert
(For anyone hitting this, a simple workaround is just to double-click the file in a file manager like nautilus.) FWIW, I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652863 for this on the Mozilla side -- I'm not sure what will result of that though - it may end up being resolved as

[Bug 752376] Re: Software center won't allow install from .deb file

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Holbert
** Attachment added: screenshot of error message https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/752376/+attachment/2090296/+files/Screenshot-1.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 300080]

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Holbert
*** Bug 642824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300080 Title: print selection only option cuts multi-page text -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 337333] Re: Importing secret key not working

2011-02-23 Thread Daniel Holbert
I just hit this same warning in Ubuntu 10.1... ** (seahorse:2658): WARNING **: imported key but then couldn't find it in keyring: [long-key-id] ...but in my case it was because $HOME/.gnupg/pubring.gpg was owned by root for some reason. (I must have accidentally run some command with sudo that

[Bug 337333] Re: Importing secret key not working

2011-02-23 Thread Daniel Holbert
I just hit this same warning in Ubuntu 10.1... Sorry, that should read Ubuntu 10.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337333 Title: Importing secret key not working -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 612082] Re: optparser attribute missing in cli.py

2010-12-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
I had this exact problem, and I just figured out what was going wrong. It turned out to be that I'd passed a nonexistent file to --part in my vmbuilder command. (In the bug-reporter's case -- I'm not sure whether --part accepts relative paths or not, but if you're sure that vmbuilder.partition

[Bug 612082] Re: optparser attribute missing in cli.py (warning-message-printing fail when --part is given a nonexistent file)

2010-12-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
hypervisor.optparser.error(%s parsing --part option: %s % (errno, strerror)) My python-fu is not strong, but from looking at the rest of the cli.py file, I think we want self.optparser, not hypervisor.optparser. Testing that to see if that fixes it locally... -- You received this bug

[Bug 612082] Re: optparser attribute missing in cli.py (warning-message-printing fail when --part is given a nonexistent file)

2010-12-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
self.optparser didn't work -- tried that because there was one other usage of that in the file, but it gives me AttributeError: 'CLI' object has no attribute 'optparser So the existing self.optparser line is probably just as busted as this bug's hypervisor.optparser line. :) Trying just plain

[Bug 612082] Re: optparser attribute missing in cli.py (warning-message-printing fail when --part is given a nonexistent file)

2010-12-03 Thread Daniel Holbert
that didn't work -- reading the file slightly more intelligently, I see that optparser is a local variable initialized in main and passed to its helper functions. It's not passed to set_disk_layout, though (but it should be). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

  1   2   >