Yes, I'm going to be switching to Mint at the earliest opportunity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830404
Title:
Proposed removal of GNOME Classic desktop would be a serious usability
Thanks for these changes, they will simplify dependency issues for the
S3 backend of Tahoe-LAFS. dateutil is a good choice -- simple and well-
tested. (It's unfortunate that its Python 3 variant is a higher version
number for the same package rather than a different package, but that
can be worked
I'm not using xfce or any of the download or clipboard managers
mentioned, but I see the same traceback as comment #21 when copying.
This is with a file created by Inkscape on Windows, with text objects
using fonts that are not available on Ubuntu -- similar to the original
report in the bug descri
'tahoe debug trial' is indeed the correct way to run the tests for the
installed version.
The following failure:
twisted.trial.unittest.FailTest: We seem to be testing the code at
'/usr/lib/pymodules',
(according to the source filename
'/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/allmydata/__init__.pyc'),
bu
Is it considered acceptable that doing anything involving package
management can fail due to bad luck? Perhaps the dist-upgrade should be
holding the lock for a much shorter time, and/or perhaps the error
message could say what the actual problem is (for example by identifying
the process holding t
> If someone can point to some thorough test procedure, please do.
The test suite can be run using 'python setup.py trial'. Thanks for the
manual testing; the test suite isn't intended to replace that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
"I often have to type my letters twice as the characters are not being
registered. Typing slowly makes the process a bit manageable."
That doesn't really sound like the same bug. The other reports here are
of the keyboard becoming completely unresponsive. (I've had that symptom
since my last repor
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 811721 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 811721
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Bug 843000 was a duplicate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
Broken in Natty due to bug 769935, I mean.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815397
Title:
Sync tahoe-lafs 1.8.2-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage notifications about t
If I understand correctly, this has only been fixed in Oneiric. It is
also broken in Natty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815397
Title:
Sync tahoe-lafs 1.8.2-3 (universe) from Debian
This was a critical performance regression in 10.10, and certainly
should be fixed there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665580
Title:
apt-get automatically starts and uses 100% CPU f
Public bug reported:
In
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/739812/comments/5 ,
Mark Shuttleworth said,
"... we have the Classic desktop fallback in Natty, but will not in
Oneiric."
This is worrying. Any attempt to remove support for the Classic desktop
is likely to cause seriou
Sounds like I dodged a bullet by not upgrading to 11.04. Why on earth is
the upgrade removing or disabling any video driver? How can that not end
up screwing peoples' systems?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Oh, another symptom is that *sometimes* when this happens, the system
behaves as though the shift key were held down (e.g. left mouse clicks
cause a selection rather than a click). However I'm pretty sure that
none of the modifier keys are physically stuck down; if that were the
problem, I wouldn't
I also have keyboard lockups on Ubuntu Maverick with KDE 4.5.5 (kubuntu-
desktop packages on top of a Gnome install). Ctrl-Alt-F1 does *not* work
when the keyboard is locked up, in my case. This is the laptop keyboard,
not a USB keyboard, on a Dell Pavilion dv8 ea1110. (Not quite the same
system as
... and I don't think it is the same bug as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521663 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410098
Title:
Installing python-nevow breaks twis
Zooko: the bug is explained in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel/7363/focus=7409
.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410098
Title:
Installing python-nevow breaks
I meant http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0386 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications about this bug g
What Zooko said. (I reviewed the changes to pycryptopp and they all look
harmless or low-risk.)
Bear in mind that debian/control in Tahoe-LAFS also needs to be changed
to depend on "python-pycryptopp (>= 0.5.20)" here:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jtaylor/ubuntu/oneiric/tahoe-
lafs/fix-769935/view
If I understand correctly, the fact that pycryptopp 0.5.29-1 has been
uploaded means that the change in
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jtaylor/ubuntu/oneiric/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-
lafs-fix/revision/9 is no longer required or desired.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
I haven't been able to reproduce this bug (although I'm sure it was
valid).
I frankly don't understand why there are debugging assertions in the
Gnome code that don't log a stacktrace automatically (logging it at the
point of the assertion would give more information than nothing, even if
that's n
Paul Hummer wrote about this bug on the tahoe-dev mailing list, and I
replied:
On 07/06/11 01:17, Paul Hummer wrote:
> > Hi folks-
> >
> > The context of this email is here:
> >
> > https://code.launchpad.net/~jtaylor/ubuntu/oneiric/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs-fix/+merge/63631
> >
> >
> > Some o
OK, the foolscap packaging error is fixed in the package for foolscap
0.6.1-2. But the Tahoe-LAFS package doesn't require foolscap 0.6.1-2,
does it? So a user of Tahoe-LAFS can still hit the error if that package
dependency isn't updated, IIUC.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Well, can you suggest a way to get a stacktrace at the point where the
assertion fails? Since it does not crash, apport won't work. However I
can add debugging code to gnome-session if necessary.
(BTW, the Firefox hang was probably a red herring. It has happened since
without any interaction with
As I clearly said in the report, there is no possibility of getting a
crash trace. I know this message is automated, but closing bugs as
invalid without reading them is impolite and discourages feedback. I
will think twice about bothering to file bugs against Gnome in future
:-(
(And yes, asynchro
Correction: Firefox hung, it didn't crash.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743761
Title:
Gnome reverts partially to default theme and fonts; "gnome-
session[...]: GLib-GObject-CRITIC
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
The icons, fonts, and some (but not all) window styling in Gnome
suddenly reverted to the default theme. At the same time, an instance of
Firefox crashed, although I don't know whether the Firefox crash caused
the Gnome problem or vice-versa
The VirtualBox-related bug is on the VirtualBox tracker as
http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/7716 . I suggest not considering that
issue to be part of this one, since it has different symptoms, and seems
quite deterministic unlike this one. It almost certainly doesn't have
anything to do with having
We are seeing this bug on one of the Tahoe-LAFS buildslaves: http
://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1235
** Bug watch added: Tahoe-LAFS Trac #1235
http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1235
** Also affects: tahoe-lafs via
http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1235
Im
I wrote:
> Another option is for Ubuntu to package the "slim" version of zfec that
> doesn't depend on pyutil...
Oh, I was confused. That just changed zfec not to bundle pyutil; it
still depends on it.
--
zfec dependencies are broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606022
You received this bug
Another option is for Ubuntu to package the "slim" version of zfec that
doesn't depend on pyutil:
http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec/ticket/2
I don't know exactly what this omits. Zooko?
** Bug watch added: tahoe-lafs.org-zfec trac #2
http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec/ticket/2
--
zfec dependenc
32 matches
Mail list logo
