[Bug 906631] Re: git-instaweb overwrites gitweb_config.perl

2011-12-19 Thread David Decotigny
** Patch added: "on top of 1:1.7.7.3-1 for precise" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906631/+attachment/2640476/+files/git-instaweb.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906631 Title:

[Bug 906631] [NEW] git-instaweb overwrites gitweb_config.perl

2011-12-19 Thread David Decotigny
Public bug reported: Patch against 1:1.7.7.3-1 attached. Description: If I edit the .git/gitweb/gitweb_config.perl file and then restart a git-instaweb instance, my modifications to the config file will be overwritten by the default config. This is because there is a call to gitweb_conf() without

[Bug 845194] Re: support --oneline option for git log completion

2011-09-08 Thread David Decotigny
** Patch added: "git log completion config with support for --oneline option" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845194/+attachment/2374240/+files/zshgitlog.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 845194] [NEW] support --oneline option for git log completion

2011-09-08 Thread David Decotigny
Public bug reported: The attached patch against lucid zsh 4.3.10-5ubuntu3 completion config for git log adds support for --oneline option. ** Affects: zsh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 483086] Re: Incorrect per-target ?= variable affectations

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
** Package changed: make (Ubuntu) => make-dfsg (Ubuntu) -- Incorrect per-target ?= variable affectations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@list

[Bug 483086] Re: Incorrect per-target ?= variable affectations

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35718303/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35718304/XsessionErrors.txt -- Incorrect per-target ?= variable affectations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483086 You r

[Bug 483086] [NEW] Incorrect per-target ?= variable affectations

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: make I am running 9.10 on x86_64 (updated yesterday), make 3.81-6. The following Makefile: - target1: OPTVAR?=/usr/local target1: echo "Value for $@ '$(OPTVAR)'." target2: echo "Value for $

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
FYI, Filed bug report https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25097 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #25097 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25097 -- cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478274 You rec

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
Reopening this issue. I am afraid there is a real problem here... As I understand by looking at the code (mainly ck-manager.c:load_seats_from_dir()), the fact that there is an invalid regular file in /etc/ConsoleKit/seats.d/ has only the following impacts: - the first correct seat created will

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
Chris: sorry, we changed the status in parellel with my former comment. Restoring to "Confirmed" as you set it. ** Changed in: consolekit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478274

[Bug 363568] Re: ConsoleKit sets active=FALSE for non-graphical logins

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
Yes, Paul, you were right: my problem was different; it was a local configuration issue. It only had similar symptoms. For your startx problem, I don't see any way other than adding a new part source script (eg. 99custom) in /etc/X11/Xsession.d, with some custom test to overload the STARTUP vari

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-15 Thread David Decotigny
Bingo ! Thank you very much Chris ! You were right: it was a local configuration issue. But I'd say consolekit seems overly sensitive and I'm not sure its behavior is really legitimate. Here is what /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon --debug tells me (in /var/log/daemon.log): Nov 15 10:50:07 xyz conso

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-14 Thread David Decotigny
Thanks for the feedback. Here is the contents of /etc/ConsoleKit/seats.d/00-primary.seat: -- [Seat Entry] Version=1.0 Name=Primary seat Hidden=false Devices= -- Is there anything wrong with it ? -- cannot mount usb v

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-14 Thread David Decotigny
Bug seems to lie somewhere between consolekit and policykit. It is apparently not related to gdm (happens with console logins as well). ** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 363568] Re: ConsoleKit sets active=FALSE for non-graphical logins

2009-11-14 Thread David Decotigny
I can just confirm this, and add that it seems close to issue #478274. In Karmic, apparently this active flag is not expected to be set by pam_ck_connector. I just don't know what is supposed to set it to TRUE, and I know that something does it (it's working on a fresh karmic installation, and not

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-14 Thread David Decotigny
Some info relevant to my problem: see issue #363568 I looked at the consolekit sources and it appears that the only flags that are set are: res = ck_connector_open_session_with_parameters (ckc, &error,

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-14 Thread David Decotigny
Digging somewhat more, it appears that none of the seats allow to activate sessions (CanActivateSession) except one. The strange thing is that that one seat doesn't contain any session. The other strange thing is that none of the seats are associated with any device (GetDevices). Anyway, here is w

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-14 Thread David Decotigny
Well, the "dbus" trick didn't make it either. I tried with the following script: --- import dbus, traceback bus = dbus.SystemBus() mgr = bus.get_object('org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit', '/org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Manager') for seat_name

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-14 Thread David Decotigny
Just FYI... I tried to force /usr/bin/ck-launch-session to run in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit because it was not enabled at STARTUP as XDG_SESSION_COOKIE is defined. This doesn't make things better: it just created another parallel inactive session. Both sessions were still marked "active = FA

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-12 Thread David Decotigny
If it can help, here is what /var/log/ConsoleKit/history tells me since I last rebooted: 1258028674.109 type=SEAT_ADDED : seat-id='Seat2' seat-kind=0 1258028721.681 type=SEAT_ADDED : seat-id='Seat3' seat-kind=1 1258028721.931 type=SEAT_SESSION_ADDED : seat-id='Seat3' session-id='Session1' session

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-12 Thread David Decotigny
Well, I just chose my login name from the gdm login screen, typed my password and that's it. I'm physically on the machine. How is that 'active' flag determined ? -- cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478274 You received this bug no

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-12 Thread David Decotigny
Some further information coming from the beginning of my ~/.xsession-errors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2658): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `_PolkitError' (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2658): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic

2009-11-12 Thread David Decotigny
Thank you for your support. The following is the output from ck-list-sessions: Session2: unix-user = '1000' realname = 'david' seat = 'Seat4' session-type = '' active = FALSE x11-display = ':0' x11-display-device =

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized"

2009-11-08 Thread David Decotigny
mark it related to policykit ** Package changed: yelp (Ubuntu) => policykit (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized" + cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic -- cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic htt

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized"

2009-11-08 Thread David Decotigny
Well, I used 'yelp' to file this bug report, so this bug report appears related to yelp. Of course it doesn't have anything to do with yelp. IMHO, it's probably more related to devkit pour policykit. -- cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized", after upgrade to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 478274] Re: cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized"

2009-11-08 Thread David Decotigny
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35362079/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35362080/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35362081/ProcStatus.txt -- cannot

[Bug 478274] [NEW] cannot mount usb volumes: "Not authorized"

2009-11-08 Thread David Decotigny
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp My machine (amd64) was running fine under jaunty (amd64) until yesterday, when I upgraded to Karmic. Things seem to run well, except for (at least) a devkit/policykit problem. When I plug a USB memory stick, a window shows up telling me that the vol

[Bug 107950] Re: x-session manager eats 100% CPU, nautilus won't start, applications won't start

2009-08-11 Thread David Decotigny
Same problem for me: intrepid x86_64 (up-to-date from today) after 2 days up. Never happened before, even with longer uptimes. I confirm the problem seems to be related to this funky poll() on thousands of files. And, err, well, I don't have thousands of windows showing up on my desktop. Looking a

[Bug 376128] Re: ftdi_sio doesnt work propertly

2009-06-26 Thread David Decotigny
Thank you ! You're perfectly right, any recent mainline > 2.6.28 already contains the fix. I tried with http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.29.5/ and our ftdi is fine again. How do you manage this kind of issue at Canonical ? You patch the current 2.6.28 ? Or you jump directly to

[Bug 376128] Re: ftdi_sio doesnt work propertly

2009-06-26 Thread David Decotigny
Looking at the git, I noticed this changeset: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-jaunty.git;a=commit;h=4a90f09b20f4622dcbff1f0e1e6bae1704f8ad8c This adds a few reference counting tweaks. Most notably, in ftdi_process_read, there reference acquires and release in the form of "goto out" (w

[Bug 376128] Re: ftdi_sio doesnt work propertly

2009-06-26 Thread David Decotigny
We are using ftdi_sio with a 232M chip. On intrepid and with jaunty's 2.6.27 kernel, ftdi_sio works like a charm on different setups (x86 IA32 and x86_64). On 2.6.28-10 and -13, we have the following regression (x86 IA32): one program opens the device, sends/receives data, then closes it. This wo