is listed in nss_initgroups_ignoreusers in the
/etc/ldap.conf file.
What happened instead:
It seems that a connection is made anyways.
Thank you,
Deric Sullivan
** Affects: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you
is listed in nss_initgroups_ignoreusers in the
/etc/ldap.conf file.
What happened instead:
It seems that a connection is made anyways.
Thank you,
Deric Sullivan
** Affects: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you
Actually, the original post without the auto bond0 is from mar_rio.
I'm the second person reporting the bug. I assumed that you didn't put
auto bond0 because we've been quoting the README as authoritative and
it doesn't have the auto for the bond. To reproduce the original bug I
simplified my
Regarding comment #9:
Maybe there is some type of race condition that could cause the bug but I have
many servers that had never shown this bug. And regardless of any possible
race condition, the SRU guarantees that the bug will appear.
Regarding comment #8 and #9:
I tried the config as
I do not see this bug in lucid but I do see it in lucid-updates.
Deric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823366
Title:
bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces
To manage
I would lke to correct my previous comment.
I should have said:
I do not see this bug in the previous lucid-updates (1.1.0-14ubuntu2.1) but I
do see it in the current lucid-updates (1.1.0-14ubuntu2.2).
Thanks,
Deric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The patch for this bug breaks the use of bond_primary in
/etc/network/interfaces. See Bug #823366.
The following piece of code from the setup_master() function in
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave will only setup a primary if the
primary is listed as a slave (which will not be the case with the
I've updated bug #482419 to indicate that its fix has caused this bug.
Deric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823366
Title:
bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces
To
Martin, thanks for the clarification on how/when the fixed package moves from
-proposed to -updates.
But is there anything else needed? I waited 10 days to be safe, and still the
package is not in -updates. It's also still listed on the Pending Ubuntu
stable release updates web page.
Thanks,
Martin, thanks for the clarification on how/when the fixed package moves from
-proposed to -updates.
But is there anything else needed? I waited 10 days to be safe, and still the
package is not in -updates. It's also still listed on the Pending Ubuntu
stable release updates web page.
Thanks,
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if there is anything else that I'm supposed to
do to get this fix into lucid-updates.
When I look at the web page for Pending Ubuntu stable release updates
(at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html;) I
see, in the lucid section, that
Thanks again.
Deric
On 05/06/11 15:52, Serge Hallyn wrote:
The package will be moved to lucid-updates 7 days after this bug
was marked verification-done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if there is anything else that I'm supposed to
do to get this fix into lucid-updates.
When I look at the web page for Pending Ubuntu stable release updates
(at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html;) I
see, in the lucid section, that
Thanks again.
Deric
On 05/06/11 15:52, Serge Hallyn wrote:
The package will be moved to lucid-updates 7 days after this bug
was marked verification-done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt wrote:
Accepted qemu-kvm into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 05:40, Martin Pitt wrote:
Accepted qemu-kvm into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
Please note that I tried this on lucid only (and the bug was fixed). I
don't have access to any maverick systems.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 17:30, Deric Sullivan wrote:
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt wrote:
Accepted qemu-kvm into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 05:40, Martin Pitt wrote:
Accepted qemu-kvm into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
Please note that I tried this on lucid only (and the bug was fixed). I
don't have access to any maverick systems.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 17:30, Deric Sullivan wrote:
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed.
Thanks,
Deric
On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt
Great. Thanks.
Deric
On 04/30/11 15:16, Clint Byrum wrote:
No it was not denied. I've gone ahead and accepted the bug for
lucid/maverick SRU.
** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick)
Great. Thanks.
Deric
On 04/30/11 15:16, Clint Byrum wrote:
No it was not denied. I've gone ahead and accepted the bug for
lucid/maverick SRU.
** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick)
Hi Serge,
Was the SRU for lucid to fix the once bug in qemu-kvm denied?
I've seen an update since you requested the SRU but it doesn't seem to
include the fix for the once bug.
Thanks,
Deric
On 02/17/11 20:41, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Deric Sullivan (deric.sulli...@ec.gc.ca
Hi Serge,
Was the SRU for lucid to fix the once bug in qemu-kvm denied?
I've seen an update since you requested the SRU but it doesn't seem to
include the fix for the once bug.
Thanks,
Deric
On 02/17/11 20:41, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Deric Sullivan (deric.sulli...@ec.gc.ca
Hi Serge,
Thanks for looking into this.
I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix.
Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS on
the hard drive.
I'm OK with an importance of low, I was using the workaround of
simply stopping the qemu-kvm after the first
Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into lucid-
updates?
Deric
On 02/17/11 18:40, Deric Sullivan wrote:
Hi Serge,
Thanks for looking into this.
I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix.
Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS
Hi Serge,
Thanks for looking into this.
I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix.
Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS on
the hard drive.
I'm OK with an importance of low, I was using the workaround of
simply stopping the qemu-kvm after the first
Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into lucid-
updates?
Deric
On 02/17/11 18:40, Deric Sullivan wrote:
Hi Serge,
Thanks for looking into this.
I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix.
Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
Package: qemu-kvm
The once parameter does not seem to work with the -boot option.
To reproduce:
create an image file to be used as a hard disk:
qemu-img create test-img 1G
Starting a VM guest using once + order ignores the once:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
Package: qemu-kvm
The once parameter does not seem to work with the -boot option.
To reproduce:
create an image file to be used as a hard disk:
qemu-img create test-img 1G
Starting a VM guest using once + order ignores the once:
30 matches
Mail list logo