[Bug 1582323] Re: Commissioning fails when competing cloud metadata resides on disk

2017-02-24 Thread DesktopMan
Is this fix available in the 16.04 LTS image used by MaaS? Commissioning fails for me and I'm wondering if this is the reason. "Can not apply stage config, no datasource found! Likely bad things to come!" "Failed to start Apply the settings specified in cloud-config" -- You received this bug no

[Bug 1648380] Re: cloud-init fails to find CloudSigma datasource with cloud-init 0.7.8-1-g3705bb5-0ubuntu1

2017-02-24 Thread DesktopMan
Might be the wrong place to ask, but: I'm using Ubuntu MaaS, will this fix be available in the 16.04 LTS images? Right now my nodes fail to commission which I believe comes from this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 228442] Re: KVM eats 100% CPU, Host Hardy64, Guest XP with more than 1 VCPU

2009-06-04 Thread DesktopMan
Not sure if more information is needed at this point, but this bug also affects me. Setup: Jaunty 64bit kvm 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.1~ppa6 no acpi or apic 1 or 2 cpus, doesn't matter >From what Dustin says ACPI + XP has been fixed? Am I understanding that correctly? -- KVM eats 100% CPU, Host Hardy

[Bug 343781] Re: nvidia-based Mac Mini (Macmini3, 1) won't reboot (but will halt)

2009-05-16 Thread DesktopMan
Same issue, Ubuntu 9.04 i386, 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux. Since the mac 2009 hardware is virtually identical for all configurations except for ram and harddrive it likely happens all configurations. -- nvidia-based Mac Mini (Macmini3,1) won't rebo

[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm with Raid5 stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2009-01-08 Thread DesktopMan
I do not have this setup anymore (9+ months, needed it operational), but there have been other people reporting the same problem more recently. Hopefully one of them will be able to confirm. -- mdadm with Raid5 stuck in uninterruptable sleep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551 You received thi

Re: [Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-08-21 Thread DesktopMan
I had to swap to Debian as this bug made the server useless. I haven't had any deadlocks here yet, but it might still apply for all I know. Or is Debian using different code? I'm running testing, on 2.6.25-2 I am happy someone eventually identified the cause though. Christian Colin King wrote:

[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-05-06 Thread DesktopMan
Not sure if it is related, might be. I honestly gave up on it after concluding that the problem was too erratic and virtually impossible for me to debug. If I remember correctly I also got messages about the SATA link going down, then reset and back up. -- mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterrup

[Bug 198871] Re: Jmicron AHCI controller probs...

2008-03-30 Thread DesktopMan
Exactly the same happens to me. Asus X38 Maximus formula, ICH9R. If the jmicron controller is enabled I get the same errors as you do. Ironically I can use the IDE part of the jmicron controller, but it even prevents other SATA controllers (like the onboard AHCI controller) working. -- Jmicron AH

[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-30 Thread DesktopMan
Was copying from a file set up with losetup + cryptsetup on a raid5 array (the one above) to a raid6 array, all of which with XFS. During this copy I ran mdadm --examine --scan, and the raid5 crashed (the one I was reading from), giving me input/output errors. md device is fine on the other hand, a

[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-28 Thread DesktopMan
mdadm -D returned after a couple of minutes, at which point it started writing again. During the period it was running nothing was written. -- mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-28 Thread DesktopMan
Sigh. Spoke too soon. Ran mdadm -D while it was beeing copied to, hanged again. 2TB transferred. Guess it's directly related to the number of processes that access to the device. Won't be able to restart it until tomorrow, but I can try any suggestions on the hanged system. -- mdadm, Raid5 and XF

[Bug 208551] [NEW] mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-28 Thread DesktopMan
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch) Release:8.04 Linux ubuntu-beta 2.6.24-12-server #1 SMP Wed Mar 12 22:58:36 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux mdadm: Installed: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3 xfsprogs: Installed: 2.9.4-2 Raid 5 on five 1TB drives,

[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-06-16 Thread DesktopMan
Beeing somewhat new to Linux I'm not sure what constitutes a kernel crash. Everything locks up completely, sysrq does not work. No output to the monitor. -- Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-06-08 Thread DesktopMan
I can confirm that everything works as it should on 2.6.17-11 I haven't come any closer to figuring out what happens on 2.6.20-15 and 2.6.20-16. Sometimes it crashes on mount, sometimes it can work for hours. -- Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304

[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
Yes I know everything seems fine now, but at boot it refused to start, I had to manually re-add one of the drives and mdadm --run it. The crash has happened twice. I'm currently checking if it also occurs with the old kernel (2.6.17-11) The reason I upgraded in the first place was to prevent data

[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
It crashed after having been up for atleast some hours. (crashed while I was sleeping) The raid array was mounted, but as I said I don't really know if it's related or not. -- Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
** Attachment added: "Output from mdadm --examine /dev/sd*" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7411695/drives.txt -- Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug con

[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
** Attachment added: "Output from mdadm --query --detail /dev/md0" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7411694/detail.txt -- Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

[Bug 107080] Re: Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
I've opened up another bug for my other troubles, as they might not be entirely related to the UUID problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/110304 -- Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107080 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 107080] Re: Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
This also happened to me. I managed to start it by changing the UUID in mdadm.conf to what was reported by mdadm --examine. I still have issues though, hard crashes etc. -- Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107080 You received this bug n

[Bug 110304] Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
Public bug reported: Running Linux 2.6.20-15-server #2 SMP 32bit First, I also had the "UUID of raid devices have changed after upgrade to Feisty", which I "fixed" by editing mdadm.conf with the new id. After that I started the array which rebuilt itself. I thought everything was allright, until

[Bug 105761] Re: No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Driver from http://www.nvidia.com works fine, also seem to fix the lcd/crt swap issue. *Happy* -- No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 105761] Re: No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Thanks that gave me a bit more info to work with. Basically it says "Failed to initialize the NVIDIA graphics device PCI:1:0:0. no screens found." This can't be the original problem though, as I didn't get any display image without the nvidia driver either. I reverted back to "nv" (was using "nvi

[Bug 105761] Re: No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Forgot to mention that I'm using the 64 bit version of Ubuntu. ** Description changed: - I tried installing Ubuntu Feisty Beta (Xubuntu edition), but I just get + I tried installing Ubuntu Feisty Beta (Xubuntu edition), but I just got a black screen on the graphical installer. I then downloaded

[Bug 105761] No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Public bug reported: I tried installing Ubuntu Feisty Beta (Xubuntu edition), but I just get a black screen on the graphical installer. I then downloaded the alternate install CD which worked fine. After GRUB is displayed I get nothing; everthing is black. Computer is working fine, as I installed