[Bug 1322227] Re: Lock on suspend variable cannot be set

2014-06-06 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
As xflock4 is just a script to issue lock command with whatever screensaver/locker is in use, I juast started to suspect some kind on race condition, where screen lock has not enough time to activate on start of suspend sequence. As crude workaround I tried to add a script in /etc/pm/sleep.d,

[Bug 973778] Re: Unable to connect to Xfce Power Manager

2014-05-24 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
There's more to it - commands with --quit and --restart options won't do anything ~$ ps -ef | grep power-manager | grep -v grep u**+ 25698 23969 0 00:45 ?00:00:00 xfce4-power-manager ~$ xfce4-power-manager --quit ~$ ps -ef | grep power-manager | grep -v grep u**+ 25698 23969 0

[Bug 1322227] Re: Lock on suspend variable cannot be set

2014-05-22 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137 Title: Lock on suspend variable cannot be set To manage notifications

[Bug 1322227] Re: Lock on suspend variable cannot be set

2014-05-22 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
Then we have another problem - although Lock screen before sleep is checked in xfce4-session, screen remains unlocked on resume if light- locker has --no-lock-on-suspend variable set. Manual activation of xflock4 locks screen though. Problem might be in xfce4-session then. All in all - if

[Bug 1322227] Re: Lock on suspend variable cannot be set

2014-05-22 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
It is actually a desktop computer. Suspend is made from logout-dialog. There might actually be one other problem related to this, because power manager settings can not be accessed properly - something quite similar to report #1302244. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1322227] Re: Lock on suspend variable cannot be set

2014-05-22 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
There seems to be quite a mess with xfce4-power-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power- manager/+bug/973778 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137 Title: Lock

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation / Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid

2014-01-28 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
I just tried a bit of surgery - I made a new installation (from the scratch) into Virtualbox and took all contents of /etc/pam.d and merged it into my main system - the one with this bug - thus overwriting files with new ones but keeping all additional files - not from the system itself -

[Bug 1171342] Re: mouse scroll wheel not working in gedit System Monitor

2013-11-28 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
Well... as stated in #34 status us set to Fix released for gtk+3.0, but what about Saucy users? Do we have to move on using Trusty to get this bug fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation....

2013-11-12 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
If this bug is marked as confirmed for lxdm, then it must also be marked as such for lightdm as same workaround is applicable for both of them in case of a problem as seen in #33 - which was my case BTW. Of course it depends on which display manager is used as only one can be in use at a time -

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation....

2013-10-19 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
Both of my installations were upgraded by means of Update Manager in usual way, however one of them did not show this problem. Both are 64-bit. About this reference to previously mentioned archlinux thread - it looks quite obvious, that problem poassaibly had some relation to lightdm, because it

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation....

2013-10-18 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
Well... I am not sure, whether it will help or not, but I had two installations upgraded 13.04 - 13.10. One worked fine, other one got this very same problem. I am not completely sure, is this crude workaround or not, but I found help in this archlinux forum thread as all symptoms were the same.

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation....

2013-10-18 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
Just a small addition - my problem was also present on login screen as it was not possible to issue shut down or restart command from there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240336

[Bug 218202] Re: numlockx does not turn num lock keyboard light on.

2010-10-15 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
This is occuring now with Maverick and in interesting way - if numlock is activated in BIOS settings, then it is on initially, but very shortly after the grub menu numlock LED goes OFF and stays off. I previously had the numlockx on in XFCE startup and it worked before. As I primarily use XFCE

[Bug 659546] Re: kmix (with pulseaudio) main channel affects other channels as well. also there is no way to control channels directly anymore

2010-10-14 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
I had the same problem before on Lucid, when I tried the updates from the kubuntu-ppa repositories, which gave the 4.7 version of qt. I tried this repeatedly and always rolled back because of this problem. Now with Maverick there's nowhere to roll back to, but luckily there just might be a

[Bug 585053] Re: ntpdate shouldn't be run by ifup on desktops (conflict with time-admin's NTP options)

2010-05-24 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 322518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322518 I should note here, that this all happens, when connection is managed using NetworkManager - as if in clean unaltered install. I put this bug initially under gnome-system-tools, because the situation is kind

[Bug 585053] [NEW] no user interface to configure ntpdate

2010-05-24 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 $ uname -a Linux U-001 2.6.32-22-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 28 13:28:05 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ apt-cache policy gnome-system-tools gnome-system-tools:

[Bug 585053] Re: ntpdate running in the background by default

2010-05-24 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
As I said before, this appeares in syslog, when the network connection is established - I discovered it initially, when I was trying to debug the problems with the wireless connection on laptop. The problem is not that the ntpdate runs all time in the background, but the script

[Bug 585053] Re: ntpdate shouldn't be run by ifup on desktops (conflict with time-admin's NTP options)

2010-05-24 Thread Dimitri Bakalow
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 322518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322518 I should note here, that this all happens, when connection is managed using NetworkManager - as if in clean unaltered install. I put this bug initially under gnome-system-tools, because the situation is kind