Bump. This is extremely frustrating.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778717
Title:
Ubuntu 18.04 guest hangs during diskio stress
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
+1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409280
Title:
Graphviz's sfdp is seriuosly crippled without a triangulation library
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.laun
This affects me as well.
@abone Yes, that's necessary. It doesn't matter where you put it in the
file, though. For example:
/etc/pam.d/sudo
=
auth required pam_env.so readenv=1 user_readenv=0
auth required pam_env.so readenv=1 envfile=/etc/default/locale
user_readenv=0
@incl
a symbolic link referring to
/usr/lib/libreadline.so.3.
Dustin
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Dustin Oprea
wrote:
> And yet you had time for that. I'll assume a "yes" from the implications
> that I cited previously.
>
> Thanks, Andreas.
>
> Dustin
> On Apr
And yet you had time for that. I'll assume a "yes" from the implications
that I cited previously.
Thanks, Andreas.
Dustin
On Apr 22, 2014 11:31 AM, "Andreas Henriksson" wrote:
> ... will have better luck in the other places already mentioned.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because
5 AM, "Andreas Henriksson" wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:25:13PM -, Dustin Oprea wrote:
> > What makes you think that I need development files?
>
> The topic of the bug report made me think that.
> You said: "libarchive.so is not symlinked"
>
>
Unless you're saying that it'll become 13.1, and 14 will only be introduced
when it's backwards-incompatible with 13.
Dustin
On Apr 22, 2014 11:07 AM, "Dustin Oprea" wrote:
> I've never considered the .so to be a "development" library.
>
> So, w
What makes you think that I need development files? I just need the
library. If I have to install the development package to get the library,
then what's the point of the libarchive package?
Dustin
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Dustin Oprea!
&g
And yet, how do you reconcile that with the following from 13.10?
$ ls -l /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libarchive.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Feb 9 20:28
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libarchive.so.13 -> libarchive.so.13.1.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 699252 Apr 4 2013
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libarchive
Public bug reported:
In Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04, there is a libarchive.so.12 and
libarchive.so.13, respectively. However, there is no libarchive.so .
This makes it hard to build against.
Can you add this?
** Affects: libarchive (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You rec
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016993
Title:
package memtest86+ 4.20-1.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
err
Public bug reported:
Doing a distribution upgrade, and there seems to be a problem with, what I
believe, was a custom-made package.
===
Setting up openoffice.org-math (1:3.3.0-7ubuntu7) ...
Setting up libreoffice-gnome (1:3.5.3-0ubuntu1) ...
Setting up openoffice.org-gnome (1:3.3.0-7ubuntu7) ..
12 matches
Mail list logo
