[Bug 1872108] Re: Bass not on working Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 7th gen running focal

2020-07-02 Thread Dwayne Nelson
@Alejandro Miranda I've noticed the command moves the sound from the top speakers to the bottom. Sounds, no doubt, but seems to disable to speakers up top. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 269851] Re: Bluetooth Logitech Dinovo Edge Keyboard/Mouse dones not work anymore

2010-04-11 Thread Dwayne Nelson
There was a question posted about this issue here: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/105987 I purchased a separate bluetooth dongle and was able to get my keyboard to sync by logging in from another computer and pairing the keyboard with the other dongle. The disadvantage of using t

[Bug 269851] Re: Bluetooth Logitech Dinovo Edge Keyboard/Mouse dones not work anymore

2010-03-30 Thread Dwayne Nelson
No "bluetooth" file in the /etc/default directory -- not sure where the file went but assuming this would mean default values were used. Will check later today whether restoring the file brings back the pre-Lucid functionality. -- Bluetooth Logitech Dinovo Edge Keyboard/Mouse dones not work anym

[Bug 269851] Re: Bluetooth Logitech Dinovo Edge Keyboard/Mouse dones not work anymore

2010-03-30 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Problem is back on Lucid -- unplugging and replacing doesn't fix it anymore -- I will check to see if the HID2HCI_ENABLED setting has changed. -- Bluetooth Logitech Dinovo Edge Keyboard/Mouse dones not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269851 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 367464] Re: Jaunty freezes randomly

2009-05-31 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I have been experiencing freezes as well -- many/most of them accompanied by a blinking caps lock. I run the latest updates of Jaunty on a Lenovo x301. I do not run ext4 either. I have been able to avoid freezes by turning off the wireless devices (including both bluetooth and wifi via the physi

[Bug 329713] Re: Jaunty: default DPI settings much too high

2009-03-21 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I have had this problem ever since I started using a TV as a display (DVI to HDMI cable from an nVidia 9600GT). Although I never checked the DPI reported by X in Intrepid, I did have the huge GDM, Etherape and Google Earth fonts. For most other apps, I can usually able to change application setti

[Bug 269851] Re: Intrepid Ibex Alpha 5 Bluetooth Logitech Dinovo Edge Keyboard/Mouse don't work

2009-01-22 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I tried Jaunty last week and can confirm that the problem exists on 2.6.28 as well. Something was broken in Intrepid. For more detail, the connection between the dongle and the keyboard remains/resumes after rebooting. I can navigate BIOS fine and have no problem navigating the boot menu when I

[Bug 269851] Re: Intrepid Ibex Alpha 5 Bluetooth Logitech Dinovo Edge Keyboard/Mouse don't work

2008-10-23 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I am having new problems with my diNovo as well - I think it may have something to do with a difference in the way that the dongle is being recognized and initialized during startup because I am able to get it to work if I follow these steps: (1) unplug the dongle from the USB slot, (2) plug the

[Bug 33269] Re: root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded)

2008-05-06 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Thanks, Michael (and Bernd). Confirming that adding "large-memory" to lilo.conf does resolve the issue for me. -- root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a

[Bug 33269] Re: root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded)

2008-04-28 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Thanks for the link, Bernd. Yes, I am running lilo. It is worth noting that the file I've been using since building my kernel (shows up as 2.6.24.3) is actually quite large. It probably shouldn't be, but even the 2.6.22 files are over 8 megabytes: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8564557 2008-04-18 00:5

[Bug 33269] Re: root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded)

2008-04-21 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I compiled a custom 2.6.24 kernel to get around the "bad gzip magic numbers" problem I was having. Unfortunately, I still can not use 3d acceleration or sound with this new compiled kernel - I guess I'll be watching for 2.6.24-17 generic. Hardy releases in 3-days ... really? I am leaving this th

[Bug 33269] Re: root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded)

2008-04-17 Thread Dwayne Nelson
In my test, 2.6.22 was re-created fine. -- root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 33269] Re: root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded)

2008-04-14 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Thanks for the suggestion. "pci=nomsi" does not work for me. I am going to try generating a new 2.6.22 image to see if that works (I don't think I have created a 2.6.22 since the move to hardy) - this should tell me whether the problem is in creating the images or if the problem is in loading the

[Bug 33269] Re: root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded)

2008-04-11 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Confirmed the problem still exists for me on 2.6.24-16. "checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (bad gzip magic numbers); looks like an initrd" Nobody else seems to be getting the above message -- I am attaching my image to this comment. For more information, the machine is a Core2 Duo and

[Bug 33269] Re: root filesystem fails to mount (sata_nv module is loaded)

2008-04-09 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I am also experiencing difficulties booting 2.6.24-15. ASUS P5K-E with 3 SATA drives in RAID-1 containing root and boot. 2.6.22-14 (and lower) boot fine. I have tried 2.6.24-12 through 2.6.24-15 and always get the following message: "checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (bad gzip magic numb

[Bug 8497] All caused by installation process failing to configure for UUIDs?

2007-12-27 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I agree that it is possible (likely even) that the comments here reflect several problems and not just one. As an end-user, I report on symptoms as best I can (i.e. "wont boot after kernel update"), the underlying problems are probably better identified by those more familiar with the structure of

[Bug 148325] Re: Certain processes show incorrect memory usage when using xgl

2007-12-03 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I get it too: xgl+x64 and restricted nVidia -- Certain processes show incorrect memory usage when using xgl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-09-07 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Problem solved (again) I used the liveCD from Gutsy to boot, and re-assembled the array using info from this page: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=408461 mounted the volume and then ran lilo following some information I found here: http://www.syrlug.org/contrib/boot-loaders.html#LI

[Bug 8497] Re: grub guessed BIOS disk order incorrectly

2007-09-04 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I am wondering if my bug #107249 is also being caused by this. In my case, kernel updates have sometimes failed and have resulted in the system presently being unbootable. My machine, an Asus A8V, reports 4 sata drives, two on each controller. Three of these drives are being used by linux: a boot

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-09-04 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Over the weekend some process caused me to need to reboot the machine - which is a problem because the machine "doesn't have a valid boot signature" as of the last kernel update. This is the third time a failed semi-automatic kernel update has left the computer unusable (I typically accept kernel

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-09-01 Thread Dwayne Nelson
The latest kernel update has failed. This time the message that I receive is "Fatal: First sector of /dev/sda1 doesn't have a valid boot signature". This does not appear to have anything to do with the RAID - mdstat shows all volumes are up: Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] m

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-06-13 Thread Dwayne Nelson
So I added sdc1 back to the md0 array. This was enough to get me past the errors in the upgrade and everything checks out ok. I guess I'll really know when I next try to reboot. It is not clear to me why sdc1 was dropped from the array ... I will look for a log to see if I can find an explanatio

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-06-13 Thread Dwayne Nelson
i think this has something to do with my RAID, for whatever reason. "cat /proc/mdstat" produces the following output, suggesting md0 is not fully functional. Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md1 : active raid5 sdc2[0] sdb2[2] sdd2[1] 468856832 blocks level 5, 64k chunk,

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-06-12 Thread Dwayne Nelson
With the last kernel update, I think I've encountered the problem again. My guess is that this machine will not be able to reboot so I hope to keep it running for long enough to provide any log files that might be related. To start with, I'm attaching a screenshot which shows the error message. *

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-06-03 Thread Dwayne Nelson
The latest kernel update worked fine so I am assuming that the problem no longer exists. This report should be closed. -- failed kernel update followed by boot failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-04-20 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I have re-installed using the release version. I did save all of the contents from my /var/log directory so any files that would have been there are still available. Also - I recovered my firefox session where I was searching for an answer after the upgrade failure and before the reboot. The str

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-04-19 Thread Dwayne Nelson
the /var/log/dist-upgrade directory is empty. BTW: mounted md0 by the following steps: installed mdadm (not positive this was necessary) created directory /mnt/md0 typed "sudo mount -t auto /dev/md0 /mnt/md0" -- failed kernel update followed by boot failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-04-19 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Right now I don't have access to md0 which contains that directory. If I could install RAID support after booting from the live CD, then I might be able to access these files. -- failed kernel update followed by boot failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107249 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-04-18 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I expect to install the release version of Feisty tomorrow evening - I've decided that having a running system is far more important than preserving the configuration data stored on /etc/openvpn, /etc/apache2, and /var (addressing the repair/restore install issue). However, I still fear that the u

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-04-18 Thread Dwayne Nelson
** Description changed: I installed feisty from the 4/14/07 alternate CD (to support software RAID) and was able to boot thanks to the fix to bug #103177. The system worked fine for a day or so - then the update manager provided kernel 2.6.20-15, which was not able to install (not sure

[Bug 107249] Re: failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-04-18 Thread Dwayne Nelson
** Description changed: I installed feisty from the 4/14/07 alternate CD (to support software - RAID) and was able to boot thanks to the fix to bug #103177: - - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/103177 + RAID) and was able to boot thanks to the fix to bug #103177. The

[Bug 107249] failed kernel update followed by boot failure

2007-04-17 Thread Dwayne Nelson
Public bug reported: I installed feisty from the 4/14/07 alternate CD (to support software RAID) and was able to boot thanks to the fix to bug #103177: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/103177 The system worked fine for a day or so - then the update manager provided kernel 2

[Bug 103177] Re: boot-time race condition initializing md

2007-04-05 Thread Dwayne Nelson
I believe I am having this same problem. My machine contains 4 sata drives, 3 of which are being used for linux, configured as two RAIDs: md0: RAID1: / md1: RAID5: LVM: /home /tmp swap The above configuration worked well in Edgy, but I didn't have access to my wireless ethernet (WPA