[Bug 227808] Re: file permissions destroyed by vim/gvfs/fuse

2014-07-03 Thread Edward Murrell
@Marc Thomas: A not particular work around is to install sshfs* and mount the file systems manually. I found that IntelliJ (netbeans) stopped overwriting permissions when mounted this way. *See: http://shellspells.org/sshfs/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 297408] Re: pam_group does not support NSS groups

2011-02-16 Thread Edward Murrell
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297408 Title: pam_group does not support NSS groups -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 297408] Re: pam_group does not support NSS groups

2010-11-16 Thread Edward Murrell
The patch was rolled up into Pam 1.1.2 as per the link below. Credit would have been nice though. :( http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1280924965.5791.770.camel%40vespa.frost.loc&forum_name =pam-patches -- pam_group does not support NSS groups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 297408] Re: pam_group does not support NSS groups

2010-11-16 Thread Edward Murrell
I really need to have a chat to the PAM maintainers about having this implemented in mainline pam. In any case, the patch at the top compiles cleanly with 10.4 packages. I've built a bunch of packages, which are listed below - only the first one should actually matter; http://tin.murrell.co.nz/~ed

[Bug 182960] Re: Please set memory limits by default

2010-05-13 Thread Edward Murrell
The above fix I have written does what it is coded to, but does NOT create the required behaviour. If a user has a process that starts eating memory, then the entire session will be terminated, and the user will be booted back to the login screen. -- Please set memory limits by default https://bu

[Bug 297408] Re: pam_group does not support NSS groups

2010-04-22 Thread Edward Murrell
** Summary changed: - pam_group does support NSS groups + pam_group does not support NSS groups -- pam_group does not support NSS groups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 297408] Re: pam_group does support NSS groups

2010-04-21 Thread Edward Murrell
The patch itself doesn't support LDAP directly, but through the NSS library, so the query will be determined by the configuration of if libnss-ldap or libnss-ldapd packages. So, to answer your query, it only supports POSIX/unix groups that it is a member. In most circumstances this will be where m

[Bug 182960] Re: Please set memory limits by default

2010-04-06 Thread Edward Murrell
I have the percentage based memory limits working fine. Currently, if the char suffixing the value in security.conf is a %, it will calculate the max virtual memory size based on the physical memory size. I'm tweaking it, and bug testing it at the moment. Do any of the other memory limiting option

[Bug 182960] Re: Please set memory limits by default

2008-11-13 Thread Edward Murrell
A plausible solution would to be enable pam_limits by default, and add support for setting virtual memory limits with a percentage. In that vein, it would be also handy to be able to set the max number of processes based on the number of cores. -- Please set memory limits by default https://bugs

[Bug 297408] Re: pam_group does support NSS groups

2008-11-12 Thread Edward Murrell
** Attachment added: "Allows NSS groups to be used in pam_group" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19604707/099_pam_group_nss_groups -- pam_group does support NSS groups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 297408] [NEW] pam_group does support NSS groups

2008-11-12 Thread Edward Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-modules The pam_group module allows assigning groups based on group membership. This is handy, if for example you want to automagically enable various rights on a specific server dependant on a users membership in a given netgroup. The following li

Re: [Bug 68312] Re: Incorrect port for kpasswd entry in /etc/services

2006-10-29 Thread Edward Murrell
I downloaded the various packages, and it looks like the problem was fixed in Edgy. Figures. However, the bug still definitively exists in dapper and earlier, and upstream in Debian as well. Would this be something that should be fixed in Dapper as part of the LTS support? Scott James Remnant wrot

[Bug 68312] Incorrect port for kpasswd entry in /etc/services

2006-10-25 Thread Edward Murrell
Public bug reported: Currently, /etc/services lists the following; kpasswd 761/tcp kpwd# Kerberos "passwd" It should be udp port 464. ** Affects: netbase (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Incorrect port for kpasswd entry in /etc/se