[Bug 238066] Re: segfault in libjvm with unknown cause

2008-08-05 Thread Emblem Parade
The hardy-proposed package seems to have made the bug disappear for me, at least after a day of working with it. However, since it's not straightforward in my scenario to reproduce this bug, I would be careful about saying we're in the clear... I hope other people can report their experiences! Tha

[Bug 238066] Re: segfault in libjvm with unknown cause

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
Further investigation reveals that this is a bug with the HotSpot virtual machine included in all versions of Java 6 from Sun and OpenJDK. It has to do with how HotSpot handles recompilation of mutable classes (basically, any class that has "volatile" fields). This bug seems to have been fixed wit

[Bug 238066] Re: segfault in libjvm with unknown cause

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
** Attachment added: "hs_err_pid6477.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15798483/hs_err_pid6477.log -- segfault in libjvm with unknown cause https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 238066] Re: segfault in libjvm with unknown cause

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
Wow, as soon as I posted my "workaround," it crashed. Something is very wrong. -- segfault in libjvm with unknown cause https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 238066] Re: segfault in libjvm with unknown cause

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
My current workaround is to use Sun's latest JDK 6 binary for Linux. It seems as if this bug was solved. It's also pretty safe -- the archive opens in a single directory and does not install files anywhere else. So, when this bug eventually is fixed for Ubuntu, you can simply delete the directory.

[Bug 238066] Re: segfault in libjvm with unknown cause

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
Note that this affects Sun's JDK 6 as well as OpenJDK, and that it also affects the Sun's 32bit virtual machine (package: ia32-sun-java6-bin). This seems like a very major bug to me -- Java seems essentially broken on Ubuntu AMD64. -- segfault in libjvm with unknown cause https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 245099] Re: Segfaults (SIGSEGV) with Java 6, both Sun and OpenJDK

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238066 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238066 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 238066 segfault in libjvm with unknown cause -- Segfaults (SIGSEGV) with Java 6, both Sun and OpenJDK https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245099 You received thi

[Bug 245099] Re: Segfaults (SIGSEGV) with Java 6, both Sun and OpenJDK

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
Actually, my workaround does not work. I am getting the same segfaults with the 32bit virtual machine. -- Segfaults (SIGSEGV) with Java 6, both Sun and OpenJDK https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 245099] [NEW] Segfaults (SIGSEGV) with Java 6, both Sun and OpenJDK

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
Public bug reported: The virtual machine occasionally crashes with the following type of error: # # An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7fad1a62025a, pid=12503, tid=1107077456 # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (10.0-b22 mi

[Bug 245099] Re: Segfaults (SIGSEGV) with Java 6, both Sun and OpenJDK

2008-07-03 Thread Emblem Parade
** Attachment added: "hs_err_pid12503.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15776714/hs_err_pid12503.log -- Segfaults (SIGSEGV) with Java 6, both Sun and OpenJDK https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 228067] Re: lyx 1.5.3-1 crashes as soon as it starts

2008-05-27 Thread Emblem Parade
Glad it works for you, guys! "make install" is necessary only if you want to fully install it in your system. If you do that, I recommend that you remove the LyX you installed from the repositories first, otherwise the two versions will mix with each other. I know it leaves a big directory... as

[Bug 228067] Workaround for LyX

2008-05-12 Thread Emblem Parade
As others have said, the best solution for those stuck with LyX not working is to build LyX locally. I suggest doing this *without* installing your built LyX, just by building it, meanwhile keeping your Ubuntu LyX installation intact. This will have no effect at all on your Ubuntu installation and