[Bug 877064] Re: Can't type in Dash search box

y clears up the problem w/Unity's search. I can type fast and no key strokes are lost. Of course now I can't type Japanese. Thanks for looking into it. Let me know if I can provide any more info or test any patches. Eric P. -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 853584] [NEW] Sync ampsharp 2.0.4-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Public bug reported: Please sync ampsharp 2.0.4-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) All changelog entries: ampsharp (2.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release. (Closes: #637541) -- Eric P. Mangold Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:00:00 + ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided

[Bug 693156] Re: [ICH4 - Intel 82801DB-ICH4] ALSA test tone not correctly played back

Having the same issue (no sound on test tone or anywhere else) on an older Gateway laptop running up-to-date 11.04. Alsamixer (CLI) is showing... Card: Intel 82801DB-ICH4 (same as subject) Chip: Conexant Cx20468-31 (not sure) Eric P. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 666389] Re: package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.4 failed to install/upgrade: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive

-- package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.4 failed to install/upgrade: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 666389] [NEW] package libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.4 failed to install/upgrade: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive

Public bug reported: not sure what to say just said it was reporting this problem sorry ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386

[Bug 472748] Re: Could not install the upgrades

** Attachment added: "update-manager-bug-report-logs.tar" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35030555/update-manager-bug-report-logs.tar -- Could not install the upgrades https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 472748] [NEW] Could not install the upgrades

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager While upgrading from Kubuntu 9.04 to 9.10, the following error is observed: Could not install the upgrades The upgrade is now aborted. Your system could be in an unstable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). Please rep

[Bug 315314] Re: Tomcat BasicDataSourceFactory class not found due to incompatible location in libcommons-dbcp-java

** Tags added: tomcat -- Tomcat BasicDataSourceFactory class not found due to incompatible location in libcommons-dbcp-java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 315314] [NEW] Tomcat BasicDataSourceFactory class not found due to incompatible location in libcommons-dbcp-java

.18-0ubuntu3 Thanks and let me know if I can provide further details. Eric P ** Affects: libcommons-dbcp-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Tomcat BasicDataSourceFactory class not found due to incompatible location in libcommons-dbcp-java https://bugs.laun

[Bug 300418] Re: Size mismatch - Gutsy Nov 2008

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 300247 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300247 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 300247 apt-get upgrade (hplip...) fails on gutsy -- Size mismatch - Gutsy Nov 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300418 You received this bug notification

[Bug 300065] [NEW] flashplayer-nonfree 9.0.151.0 upstream available

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree APSB08-20 Flash Player update available to address security vulnerabilities http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb08-20.html APSB08-22 Additional disclosure of secur

Re: [Bug 292436] Re: FireGL V5200 not listed as a supported card even though it works

Here you go. I have not mady any xorg.conf changes. On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi teratorn, > > > Please attach the output of `lspci -vvnn`, and attach your > /var/log/Xorg.0.log file from after reproducing this issue. If you've made > any cust

Re: [Bug 292436] [NEW] FireGL V5200 not listed as a supported card even though it works

up to date list in debian/control, we > might opt to just not provide "any" list. > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 08:38, Eric P. Mangold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Yes it does show up in Jockey. Yes I'm only talking about the package >> comments, whi

Re: [Bug 292436] [NEW] FireGL V5200 not listed as a supported card even though it works

an you confirm whether it was listed in Jockey (Hardware Drivers)? If not, > then AMD doesn't believe this card should be working with this release. Are > you strictly referring to the packaging comments in debian/control (Which > haven't been updated in a long time)? > &g

[Bug 292436] [NEW] FireGL V5200 not listed as a supported card even though it works

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg-driver-fglrx The release notes for Intrepid talk about certain ATI cards no longer being supported by the proprietary FGLRX driver. My card, a FireGL V5200 in a ThinkPad T60P has *not* been listed as having support removed. And indeed, the Intrepid