[Bug 2063996] [NEW] libogdi multiarch support broken in Noble

2024-04-28 Thread Even Rouault
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Nobble is currently at ogdi 4.1.1+ds-3, but Debian has just applied in https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/ogdi- dfsg/-/commit/bd47d6548f066cb5237d82735a2ce4b58caf595d for 4.1.1+ds-4, that fixes an issue with a wrong path written in libogdi that prevents it from

[Bug 1960326] Re: libpng: memory leak in png_handle_eXIf() in case of CRC error

2022-05-03 Thread Even Rouault
Turning that as a security issue, as this could cause a denial of service in a situation where a long living process would get exposed to broken images ** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1960326] [NEW] libpng: memory leak in png_handle_eXIf() in case of CRC error

2022-02-08 Thread Even Rouault
Public bug reported: Package: ii libpng16-16:amd64 1.6.37-2 amd64PNG library - runtime (version 1.6) $ lsb_release -a LSB Version:core-11.1.0ubuntu2-noarch:security-11.1.0ubuntu2-noarch Distributor ID: Ubuntu

[Bug 1960326] Re: libpng: memory leak in png_handle_eXIf() in case of CRC error

2022-02-08 Thread Even Rouault
** Attachment added: "Reproducer for memory leak" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpng1.6/+bug/1960326/+attachment/5559713/+files/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-gdal_filesystem_fuzzer-5278568668594176 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1905741] Re: poppler 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15 security updates break Splash output

2020-11-26 Thread Even Rouault
@mdelsaur Thanks for the prompt fixes. I confirm they fix the issues I had observed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905741 Title: poppler 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15

[Bug 1905741] Re: poppler 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15 security updates break Splash output

2020-11-26 Thread Even Rouault
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905741 Title: poppler 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15 security updates break

[Bug 1905741] Re: poppler 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15 security updates break Splash output

2020-11-26 Thread Even Rouault
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905741 Title: poppler 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15 security updates break

[Bug 1905741] [NEW] poppler 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15 security updates break Splash output

2020-11-26 Thread Even Rouault
Public bug reported: The security updates 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.11 and 0.41.0-0ubuntu1.15 break the Splash output rendering, for example if using the xpdf utility that relies on Poppler splash output, or as used by the GDAL library (the issue was detected due to breakage in GDAL continuous integration

[Bug 1700937] Re: Heap-buffer overflow in nodeAcquire

2017-07-14 Thread Even Rouault
Will there be a security package with the patch ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700937 Title: Heap-buffer overflow in nodeAcquire To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1700937] Re: Heap-buffer overflow in nodeAcquire

2017-07-07 Thread Even Rouault
@seth There's an error regarding the SQLite version number in the CVE text. It should read "in SQLite before 3.17.0" (and not 3.11.0) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700937 Title:

[Bug 1700937] Re: Heap-buffer overflow in nodeAcquire

2017-07-06 Thread Even Rouault
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700937 Title: Heap-buffer overflow in nodeAcquire To manage notifications about

[Bug 1670036] Re: Misapplied patches in 4.0.6-2ubuntu01 break reading and writing JPEG compressed files

2017-03-30 Thread Even Rouault
** Attachment added: "Updated debian/series file with CVE-2016-9297_and_CVE-2016-9448_correct.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tiff/+bug/1670036/+attachment/4850345/+files/series -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1670036] Re: Misapplied patches in 4.0.6-2ubuntu01 break reading and writing JPEG compressed files

2017-03-30 Thread Even Rouault
** Patch added: "Patch that should replace CVE-2016-9297.patch and CVE-2016-9448.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tiff/+bug/1670036/+attachment/4850336/+files/CVE-2016-9297_and_CVE-2016-9448_correct.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1670036] Re: Misapplied patches in 4.0.6-2ubuntu01 break reading and writing JPEG compressed files

2017-03-30 Thread Even Rouault
I'm attaching a new patch CVE-2016-9297_and_CVE-2016-9448_correct.patch that should be used in replacement of (so, *not* on top of) CVE-2016-9297.patch and CVE-2016-9448.patch ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-9297 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-

[Bug 1640360] Re: segfault on gdal.OpenEx() call

2016-11-12 Thread Even Rouault
There's no change regarding KML. Both drivers KML and LIBKML exist. There LIBKML is normally the first one to be tried when iterating over drivers, hence the LIBKML name being reported -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1402291] [NEW] Segmentation fault on corrupted database

2014-12-13 Thread Even Rouault
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS x86_64 ii libsqlite3-0 3.6.22-1 SQLite 3 shared library ii sqlite3 3.6.22-1 A command line

[Bug 731540] Re: Regression when reading CCITTFAX4 files due to fix for CVE-2011-0192 (tif_fax3.h)

2011-03-10 Thread Even Rouault
Bug has been fixed in upstream libtiff CVS. See http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2297#c10 Please provide updated packages with that regression fix. Thanks ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.maptools.org/ #2297 http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2297 -- You received this bug

[Bug 731540] [NEW] Regression when reading CCITTFAX4 files due to fix for CVE-2011-0192 (tif_fax3.h)

2011-03-08 Thread Even Rouault
Public bug reported: The * SECURITY UPDATE: denial of service and possible code execution via buffer overflow in Fax4Decode - debian/patches/CVE-2011-0192.patch: check length in libtiff/tif_fax3.h. - CVE-2011-0192 causes a regression when reading CCITFAX4 compressed TIFF file

[Bug 284578] Re: gdal in intrepid cannot handle hdf EOS data

2010-03-13 Thread Even Rouault
This is/was not a Ubuntu packaging bug but a core GDAL one. It works for sure with latest GDAL SVN trunk, maybe with 1.7.1, but the various fixes done recently as http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3386 are related so latest trunk is probably needed. ** Bug watch added: trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ #3386

[Bug 459178] Re: ogrinfo assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: ogrinfo terminated

2009-11-14 Thread Even Rouault
Likely a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal/+bug/271670 -- ogrinfo assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: ogrinfo terminated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 344751] Re: Disable stack protector for gdal

2009-11-14 Thread Even Rouault
See also http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3223 ** Bug watch added: trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ #3223 http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3223 -- Disable stack protector for gdal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344751 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 271670] Re: Please sync gdal 1.5.2-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-11-14 Thread Even Rouault
Additionnal ticket and fix for similar issue (buffer overflow triggered by -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2) : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3223 ** Bug watch added: trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ #3223 http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3223 -- Please sync gdal 1.5.2-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

[Bug 370472] Re: Libtiff-3.8.2 is distributed as libtiff4

2009-07-19 Thread Even Rouault
I just wanted to rectify Jay's statement about BigTIFF support in libtiff. BigTIFF support will appear in libtiff 4.0, and not in 3.9.0. BigTIFF support requires ABI changes (the toff_t typedef is increased to be 64bit instead of 32bit), so it couldn't make into the 3.X branch of libtiff. --

[Bug 344751] Re: Disable stack protector for gdal

2009-03-18 Thread Even Rouault
I'd like to insist that such problems should also be reported to gdal trac system (http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal) and gdal-dev mailing list, otherwise they have a high chance getting unnoticed ! This one got fixed almost by chance... -- Disable stack protector for gdal

[Bug 57716] Re: Edgy Eft - fglrx module not started

2006-11-04 Thread Even Rouault
I forgot to mention that I also had to add the following section into /etc/X11/xorg.conf Section Extensions Option Composite 0 EndSection -- Edgy Eft - fglrx module not started https://launchpad.net/bugs/57716 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 57716] Re: Edgy Eft - fglrx module not started

2006-11-03 Thread Even Rouault
I'm using Edgy, 64 bit version. I upgraded from Dapper where I could never get fglrx work. After the update to Edgy, it didn't work better. First because the module fglrx wasn't loaded. After loading it, glxinfo was using Mesa. LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo showed that it was looking for

[Bug 48596] Re: amd64 fglrx No matching visual for __GLcontextMode

2006-09-09 Thread Even Rouault
Is this bug taken into account ? I can give you more information if needed. -- amd64 fglrx No matching visual for __GLcontextMode https://launchpad.net/bugs/48596 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 37980] Re: Errors __GLcontextMode in x86_64 version of fglrx drivers

2006-07-08 Thread Even Rouault
I created a bug for a similar problem a few weaks ago : [Bug 48596] amd64 fglrx No matching visual for __GLcontextMode In my case, the problem occurs even with a regular X server not XGL. -- Errors __GLcontextMode in x86_64 version of fglrx drivers https://launchpad.net/bugs/37980 --