no problems on both.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-40 through 6.12.16
To manage notific
not yet
2025-06-03 21:42:11 (344 MB/s)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-40 through 6.12.16
NP
6.7.6-lp2107347s06-generic #202505261016 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon May 26
08:53:24 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
2025-05-26 20:41:28 (334 MB/s)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
This one still works fine > 350MB/s, while 6.7.7 peaks at 250MB/s
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
I am having a similar problem when using the amd igpu.
portavales@tamborim:~$ uname -a
Linux tamborim 6.14.0-15-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Apr 6
15:05:05 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
portavales@tamborim:~$ lsmod | grep -E "nvidia|amdgpu|i915"
nvidia_uvm 2113
still no problem
2025-05-12 13:54:39 (372 MB/s)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-40 through
not yet
2025-05-02 14:03:42 (347 MB/s)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-40 through 6.12.16
Same, no problem.
2025-04-29 13:25:34 (344 MB/s)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-40 throug
No, it doesn't
2025-04-24 14:20:11 (355 MB/s)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-40 through 6
I think I found the kernel which adds the first downgrade in performance
between 6.5.0-45 and 6.8.0-38. I tried the same downloads with kernels
on mainline repo:
6.7.6-060706-generic = 2025-04-22 20:17:13 (323 MB/s)
6.7.7-060707-generic = 2025-04-22 20:37:24 (229 MB/s)
--
You received this bug n
Hi @ecanepa, yes, this restores the performance to the values we were
seeing on 6.8.0-38 and 6.8.0-39, but still far from what we were seeing
on 5.15 and 6.5.
Downloads from local server:
6.5.0-45-generic = 2025-04-22 14:37:10 (344 MB/s)
6.8.0-2107347-generic = 2025-04-22 14:30:14 (248 MB/s)
--
** Attachment added: "6.12.17_before_download.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2107347/+attachment/5872449/+files/6.12.17_before_download.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Attachment added: "6.12.16_after_download.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2107347/+attachment/5872448/+files/6.12.16_after_download.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Attachment added: "6.12.17_after_download.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2107347/+attachment/5872450/+files/6.12.17_after_download.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Summary changed:
- Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-38 through 6.12.17
+ Severe Network Performance Regression with BCM57800/BCM57810 on Kernel
6.8.0-40 through 6.12.16
** Description changed:
Significant network performance degradation when usi
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872245/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Seve
ProblemType: Bug
AlsaDevices:
total 0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Apr 16 20:55 seq
crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Apr 16 20:55 timer
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay'
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No s
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872251/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
Se
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872249/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210
apport information
** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872253/+files/acpidump.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872248/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872252/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Ti
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872250/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872247/+files/Lsusb-v.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872246/+files/Lspci-vt.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347/+attachment/5872244/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107347
** Description changed:
Significant network performance degradation when using Broadcom
- BCM57800/BCM57810 (bnx2x) NICs on Ubuntu Jammy with kernels starting
- from 6.8.0-38, with the issue becoming severe and rendering the system
- unusable from 6.8.0-40 onwards.
+ BCM57800/BCM57810 (bnx2x) NI
v6.12.17 is the last problematic, v6.12.18 fixes it for the
BCM57800/bnx2x
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098961
Title:
Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.0-53 and 6.1
I've tested, didn't fix. Now I'll check for the first kernel with the
correction.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098961
Title:
Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.0-53
Hi, @weble. Yes 6.14.2 fixes it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098961
Title:
Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.0-53 and 6.11.0-17
(Xubuntu) on Proxmox 8.3 (bnxt_en
No avail.
I'm o a Dell R730xd E5-2699 v4, running Ubuntu Jammy on the baremetal,
no virtualization.
On any kernel from 5.15 up to 6.5.0-45 I reach 350MB/s in a wget from
one internal server, then on kernel 6.8.0-38 and 6.8.0-39 I see a drop
to 260MB/s and from 6.8.0-40 onwards it drops again to 3
I'm seeing the same behavior on Jammy with 6.8.0-57-generic on a
BCM57800 and bnx2x driver. Disabling gro didn't help.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098961
Title:
Severe network per
** Attachment added: "jammy-antelope after the upgrade to the package in
proposed"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5842332/+files/Screenshot%202024-12-05%20at%2012-51-54%20Container%20Infra%20-%20Clusters%20-%20OpenStack%20Dashboard.png
** Tags rem
The jammy-antelope validation was successful, the UI provides an option
to set a subnet as shown in the attached images (before and after the
upgrade to proposed), here it's the terminal log of the versions and
upgrade process
$ juju ssh openstack-dashboard/leader sudo -i
root@juju-9e541a-jammy-an
** Attachment added: "jammy-antelope before the upgrade"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5842331/+files/Screenshot%202024-12-05%20at%2012-48-24%20Container%20Infra%20-%20Clusters%20-%20OpenStack%20Dashboard.png
--
You received this bug notification
The validation for Focal has been successful, here it's the log of the
changes made to upgrade python3-magnum-ui and screenshots of reproducing
the issue and the issue fixed.
$ juju ssh magnum-dashboard/leader sudo -i
root@juju-aa3bad-zaza-0ac9fbf43d8c-18:~# apt policy python3-magnum-ui
python3-ma
** Attachment added: "focal with the issue fixed using the package from
proposed"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5842114/+files/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2013-04-59%20Container%20Infra%20-%20Clusters%20-%20OpenStack%20Dashboard.png
** Tags remo
** Attachment added: "focal with the issue reproduced"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5842113/+files/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2013-03-16%20Container%20Infra%20-%20Clusters%20-%20OpenStack%20Dashboard.png
--
You received this bug notification b
** Attachment added: "jammy before the upgrade"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5842108/+files/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2011-12-10%20Container%20Infra%20-%20Clusters%20-%20OpenStack%20Dashboard.png
--
You received this bug notification because
** Attachment added: "jammy after the upgrade to proposed (with the bug fixed)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5842109/+files/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2011-14-59%20Container%20Infra%20-%20Clusters%20-%20OpenStack%20Dashboard.png
** Tags removed
The validation for Jammy has been successful, here it's the log of the
changes made to upgrade python3-magnum-ui from the version in -updates
to the one in -proposed, also attaching screenshots of the UI before and
after the upgrade. The cluster was created successfully with the
parameters/configur
@raof , does my comment #14 address your concern?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038663
Title:
[SRU] no option to override the fixed_subnet when creating a new
cluster
To manage n
Same problem here after upgrading from Ubuntu 22.04 to Ubuntu 24.04.
I tried installing pulseuadio; it did not work.
I tried blacklisting snd_soc_avs; it did nor work.
Kernel: 6.8.0-45-generic
** Attachment added: "alsa-info.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/20631
> How does this interact with
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum/+bug/2038109 ? It looks
like > maybe it does? Do these need to be tied together at all?
this patch is a UI related change (web ui specifically), it doesn't rely
on the patch provided on bug 2038109 . They are independen
: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/seq:felipe 1798 F pipewire
/dev/snd/controlC0: felipe 1798 F pipewire
felipe 1803 F wireplumber
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop
Hello again,
It was during a installation, I was trying tactile app + Ubuntu extensions
for windows resizing and removed something that wanst supposed to.
I tried to reset gnome but the taskbar still missing
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, 5:50 PM Chris Peterson <2077...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Hi the
Ok, the issue happened again in one of my VMs. It's currently in the
state where lxcfs process can't start because the folder isn't empty.
Here are the files list:
```shell-session
$ tree /var/lib/lxcfs-on-kubernetes
/var/lib/lxcfs-on-kubernetes
├── proc
│ ├── cpuinfo
│ ├── diskstats
│ ├──
quick question: With Ubuntu Live Patch turned on, will I be able
to receive kernel update according to Canonical's updates?
Kind regards,
Felipe.
Em sex., 16 de ago. de 2024 às 14:30, Philip Cox <2077...@bugs.launchpad.net>
escreveu:
> Hi, thanks for taking the time to file this bug re
Public bug reported:
Computer was in sleep mode. Opened up the lid and got the error.
Thinkpad L14 Gen 2 operating with liquorix kernel 6.8.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-hwe-6.8-tools-6.8.0-40 6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3
Uname: Linux 6.9.12-1-liquorix-amd64 x86_64
Appor
On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 16:57 +, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> > [ Test Plan ]
>
>
>
> > 1. Install python3-ironic: apt-get install python3-ironic
> > 2. Check the file /usr/lib/python3/dist-
> > packages/ironic/drivers/raid_config_schema.json is available
>
>
> This is insufficient. The Impact s
** Changed in: rpds-py (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Felipe Reyes (freyes) => (unassigned)
** Description changed:
[Availability]
The package rpds-py is already in Ubuntu universe.
Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpds-py
[Rationale]
- This is a new dependency used
** Description changed:
[Availability]
- Currently in universe
+ The package rpds-py is already in Ubuntu universe.
+ Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpds-py
[Rationale]
- This is a new dependency used by python-jsonschema
+ This is a new dependency used by python-json
Noble (Caracal) has been verified using Sunbeam, this is content of the
octavia-api rock:
```
# ls /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/octavia/amphorae/backends/agent/templates
amphora_agent_conf.template
```
The image correctly contains the template file (data file).
I built the rock using this patc
Hi, will there be a backport for Jammy?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020409
Title:
can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable
To manage notifications about thi
The verification has been successful for jammy-caracal, here it's the
relevant chunk of the testing log:
**withtout** proposed:
-06 04:13:29 [INFO]
==
2024-08-06 04:13:29 [INFO] ERROR: test_create_loadbalancer
(zaza.openstack.c
package that the OpenStack Team will take care of
[Background]
rpds-py is a Python bindings to the Rust rpds crate for persistent data
structures. This library is a new dependency of python-jsonschema.
https://docs.rs/rpds/latest/rpds/
** Changed in: rpds-py (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Felipe Reye
** Description changed:
python-jsonschema -> rpds-py (and via python-jsonschema-specifications
-> referencing -> rpds-py)
- TBC
+ [Availability]
+ Currently in universe
+
+ [Rationale]
+ This is a new dependency used by python-jsonschema
+
+ [Security]
+ No security history
+
+ [Quality
** Changed in: rpds-py (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Felipe Reyes (freyes)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072621
Title:
[MIR] rpds-py
To manage notifications about t
** Description changed:
[Impact]
When creating a new "cluster"that overrides the fixed network defined in
the cluster template, but not the subnet.
It would be expected that the cluster create request fails with a 400
error since the client is submitting an invalid request.
[E
marking bobcat as won't fix since it's EOL
** Patch removed: "lp2038109_zed.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum/+bug/2038109/+attachment/5798100/+files/lp2038109_zed.debdiff
** Changed in: cloud-archive/bobcat
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
** Summary changed:
marking Zed as won't fix, because is EOL
** Changed in: cloud-archive/zed
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038109
Title:
Failed to create port
** Description changed:
[Impact]
When a cluster template sets fixed_network and fixed_subnet and the user
tries to create a new cluster using that template and decides to
override the network, the fixed_subnet will inherited from the template,
leaving an invalid configuration and late
** Patch added: "lp2038663_focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5801999/+files/lp2038663_focal.debdiff
** Summary changed:
- no option to override the fixed_subnet when creating a new cluster
+ [SRU] no option to override the fixed_subnet
** Patch added: "lp2038663_jammy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5801998/+files/lp2038663_jammy.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Patch added: "lp2038663_antelope.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magnum-ui/+bug/2038663/+attachment/5801997/+files/lp2038663_antelope.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
** Also affects: linux-meta-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028830
Title:
[mpt3sas, UBSAN] ]linux 6.5-rc give error messag
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The python3-ironic package available in Ubuntu Noble fails when trying
to load the ironic drivers, because there is a json schema file missing.
This is because the package is not including it when it was built.
Stacktrace:
2024-07-19 15:24:28.5
Status: Triaged
** Affects: cloud-archive/caracal
Importance: Undecided
Status: Triaged
** Affects: ironic (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Felipe Reyes (freyes)
Status: Triaged
** Affects: ironic (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Tr
marking magnum-ui (ubuntu)/devel as invalid since the fix is part of the
package shipped with Noble
** Changed in: magnum-ui (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: cloud-archive
Status: New => Invalid
** No longer affects: cloud-archive/caracal
--
You received this
marking magnum-ui as fix released, since the patch landed during the
Caracal devel cycle and it's part of magnum-ui-14.0.0 -
https://github.com/openstack/magnum-
ui/commit/6f6c3db282fe2f0e08ad69c557eb153858b0164a
** Changed in: magnum-ui
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received
Zed is EOL
** Changed in: cloud-archive/zed
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038663
Title:
no option to override the fixed_subnet when creating a new c
Marking Bobcat as won't fix since it's going EOL and this patch is not
needed when doing upgrades.
** Changed in: cloud-archive/bobcat
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Removing tasks for the releases that are EOL.
** No longer affects: cloud-archive/victoria
** No longer affects: cloud-archive/wallaby
** No longer affects: cloud-archive/xena
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Attaching debdiff for Jammy (Yoga)
** Patch added: "lp2038109_jammy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/zed/+bug/2038109/+attachment/5798101/+files/lp2038109_jammy.debdiff
** Changed in: magnum (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notificat
Attaching debdiff for Focal (Ussuri)
** Patch added: "lp2038109_focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/magnum/+bug/2038109/+attachment/5798102/+files/lp2038109_focal.debdiff
** Changed in: magnum (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this b
Attaching debdiff for Antelope
** Patch added: "lp2038109_antelope.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2038109/+attachment/5798098/+files/lp2038109_antelope.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Attaching debdiff for Zed
** Patch added: "lp2038109_zed.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2038109/+attachment/5798100/+files/lp2038109_zed.debdiff
** Changed in: cloud-archive/antelope
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: cloud-archive/bobcat
Status:
Attaching debdiff for Bobcat
** Patch added: "lp2038109_bobcat.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2038109/+attachment/5798099/+files/lp2038109_bobcat.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
Marking Caracal as invalid since this patch is already included in the
version shipped with OpenStack Caracal
** Also affects: magnum (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: magnum (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: clo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2022947 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2022947
I'm having the following warnings when issuing 'netplan apply' for nics
which are members of bonds (since they share the same mac address after
they're brought up)
WARNING:root:Cannot find unique matching i
** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu)
Assignee: James Page (james-page) => Felipe Reyes (freyes)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072526
Title:
ERROR octavia.controller.worker
The Debian package in sid has this file -
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=amphora_agent_conf.template&mode=path&suite=unstable&arch=any
FilePackages
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/octavia/amphorae/backends/agent/templates/amphora_agent_conf.template
python3-oc
Adding charm-octavia in case the charm is at fault, although everything
seems to point out to a packaging issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072526
Title:
ERROR octavia.controller
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Octavia fails to provision the amphora, the stacktrace logged is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/taskflow/engines/action_engine/executor.py",
line 52, in _execute_task
result = task.execute(**arguments)
File
"/usr/
I have no way to reproduce this issue reliably. Next time I notice it, I
will make sure to get the files list before deleting them. It can take
days or months. :(
For example, I wonder if this issue happens when OS crashes and reboots
ungracefully, or when the VM gets down abruptely for whatever r
I believe this is not a RFE/Wishlist, but rather a deb packaging issue,
the package python3-octavia already ships the prometheus-proxy binary,
but fails to include it's systemd unit[1].
By just creating the unit everything works as expected.
---
I've got to say I stumble upon this issue every now and then. And in my
case, my /var/lib/lxcfs directory is dedicated to lxcfs.
I don't know how come it gets populated with files, but every time I
just need to delete the folder to make it work again.
Given the directory is exclusive to lxcfs I t
Hey Jeremy, I opened a new bug,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2067519
Would you give me any tips to try to debug this further ?
The error is coming from this section of the code:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/blob/master/src/grd-settin
Hi, I still have this issue.
Any tips on what I can do to try to debug this further would be appreciated.
Thank you
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067519
Title:
gnome-remote-de[89198
** Also affects: magnum-ui (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: magnum-ui (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/victoria
Import
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I am encountering a problem similar to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206
I do have the latest package installed:
$ apt search gnome-remote
Sorting... Done
Full Text Search... Done
gnome-remote-desktop/noble-updates,noble-security
Hi,
I am encountering the same issue described here.
I do have the latest package installed:
$ apt search gnome-remote
Sorting... Done
Full Text Search... Done
gnome-remote-desktop/noble-updates,noble-security,now 46.2-1~ubuntu24.04.2
amd64 [installed,automatic]
Remote desktop daemon for GNOME u
I saw Jeremy had a fix.
What should I do to get the fix ? I already did the usual apt-get update
upgrade etc...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064647
Title:
Documentation for how to
Hey Robert,
I had the exact same issue as you had. How did you solve it ? You mentioned
trying to run the grdctrl command. Which ones ? I couldn't find in the link you
provide above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
** Changed in: charm-ceph-osd
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064717
Title:
ceph-volume needs "packaging" module
To manage notifications
** Changed in: charm-ceph-osd/reef
Assignee: (unassigned) => Felipe Reyes (freyes)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064717
Title:
ceph-volume needs "packaging" modu
** Also affects: charm-ceph-osd
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: charm-ceph-osd/reef
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: charm-ceph-osd
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: charm-ceph-osd
Assignee: (unassigned) => Peter Sabain
** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064190
Title:
mportance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: cloud-archive/victoria
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: cloud-archive/wallaby
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: magnum (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects:
Hi, I can confirm that linux 5.15.0.106.106 (package version
5.15.0-106.116) from -proposed works, without the issue.
Thanks!
FF
PS: To clarify: the previous versions I had were 5.15.0-101.111 and
-105.115, not -102.112.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
1 - 100 of 2378 matches
Mail list logo
