[Bug 919773] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable - part 2

2012-03-14 Thread Fortunato Ventre
@papukaija: no, the 'samsung-laptop' package available on my PPA has no specific fixes for NC10. It's built from the latest sources taken from iksaif's git repository: https://github.com/iksaif/samsung-laptop-dkms Since iksaif is now the maintainer of the samsung-laptop module, his changes will

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-23 Thread Fortunato Ventre
I received a reply from Greg KH: I'm traveling at the moment, and can't see the launchpad bug, but glad to hear that it fixes the issue for you. Hopefully someone forwards the patch to me, in a format that I can apply it in, so that it gets added to the main kernel tree :) -- You received this

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-21 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Sorry for the late answer. I've updated the PPA package, it now includes all the relevant patches and uses your suggested method to change the brightness. So far, it works good here. I've sent an email to Greg Kroah-Hartman. I sent him a link to this bug report, and asked for his opinion on

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-13 Thread Fortunato Ventre
I've tested the patches from Greg Kroah-Hartman git repository on my Samsung NC10. They work most of the time, but randomly they fail. I've written 2 patches that fix the problem and I've already sent them to Greg. I will attach them here too. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-13 Thread Fortunato Ventre
** Patch added: Sometimes, while the function check_for_stepping_quirk() does its job by setting the new levels of brightness, the screen starts flashing, and the quirk ends up to be (wrongly) disabled. This happens randomly and seems to be caused by the number of levels checked; increasing

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-13 Thread Fortunato Ventre
** Patch removed: Sometimes, while the function check_for_stepping_quirk() does its job by setting the new levels of brightness, the screen starts flashing, and the quirk ends up to be (wrongly) disabled. This happens randomly and seems to be caused by the number of levels checked;

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-13 Thread Fortunato Ventre
If the module is loaded when the brightness is initially to level 0, the function check_for_stepping_quirk() fails to detect that quirk is needed. This is because at level 0 the brightness control behaves in a different way. Increasing the brightness level from 0 to 1 before doing the quirk

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-13 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Sometimes, while the function check_for_stepping_quirk() does its job by setting the new levels of brightness, the screen starts flashing, and the quirk ends up to be (wrongly) disabled. This happens randomly and seems to be caused by the number of levels checked; increasing this number from 2 to

[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable

2011-10-13 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Nice idea :) I've tested your solution on my NC10 and it works fine, and I like the simplicity of the fix. For anyone interested to try it, I've built a package called 'samsung- laptop' which contains the patched kernel module in DKMS format, so it can easily be installed on a running kernel.

[Bug 756509] Re: N130 flickering backlight on startup

2011-05-10 Thread Fortunato Ventre
The situation with the brightness control is a complete mess at the moment and it's getting very annoying. Unfortunately, I only have a Samsung NC10 and the brightness control here is working out-of-the-box, with no need to use the samsung-backlight kernel module, and I'm unable to investigate

[Bug 657884] [NEW] pm-utils ships a broken intel-audio-powersave hook

2010-10-10 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pm-utils The current intel-audio-powersave hook shipped with pm-utils-1.4.1 is broken. Attached a patch that fixes it. ** Affects: pm-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- pm-utils ships a broken intel-audio-powersave hook

[Bug 657884] Re: pm-utils ships a broken intel-audio-powersave hook

2010-10-10 Thread Fortunato Ventre
** Patch added: fix_intel-audio-powersave_hook.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657884/+attachment/1682573/+files/fix_intel-audio-powersave_hook.patch -- pm-utils ships a broken intel-audio-powersave hook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657884 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s

2010-06-11 Thread Fortunato Ventre
If this can be of any help, many users have reported the problem is fixed by applying this patch to the kernel: http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=122724081603679w=2 If anyone wants to try it, a kernel is available on my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~voria/+archive/ppa -- ata exception and hang

[Bug 500613] Re: Monitor brightness can not be controlled by hotkeys

2010-04-30 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Exactly the same behaviour here as Hans Bakker, on a Samsung NC10 netbook. -- Monitor brightness can not be controlled by hotkeys https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase in ubuntu. --

[Bug 429351] Re: Samsung N120 Brightness controls don't work (Jaunty+Karmic)

2010-04-20 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Sorry for the late answer, but I was no more subscribed to this bug. You can find fixed kernel and udev packages on my repository (link below), for both karmic and lucid. They fix the FN keys release on these samsung models: N120, N128, N130, N140, N148/N208, NB30, N150/N210/N220, N220, N310,

[Bug 429351] Re: Samsung N120 Brightness controls don't work (Jaunty+Karmic)

2010-01-17 Thread Fortunato Ventre
That's really odd. Are the Fn+up and Fn+down keys recognized by using the 'xev' command line utility? -- Samsung N120 Brightness controls don't work (Jaunty+Karmic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 387875] Re: Samsung N120 Realtek wireless fails in Karmic

2010-01-14 Thread Fortunato Ventre
I've built a new package for karmic, containing the needed kernel module for the realtek 8192e wireless card. It's called 'samsung-wireless' and it's available on my testing ppa: https://launchpad.net/~voria/+archive/archive/ Some users have reported it's working good on Samsung N130/N140, it

[Bug 429351] Re: Samsung N120 Brightness controls don't work (Jaunty+Karmic)

2010-01-12 Thread Fortunato Ventre
To enable the FN keys, you need to edit the file '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules', search for the string 'NC10', then add your model to the list of Samsung models. In other words, modify the line: ENV{DMI_VENDOR}==[sS][aA][mM][sS][uU][nN][gG]*,

[Bug 429351] Re: Samsung N120 Brightness controls don't work (Jaunty+Karmic)

2010-01-11 Thread Fortunato Ventre
I've built a .deb package for the latest stable kernel, containing the kernel module written by Greg Kroah-Hartman (http://github.com/gregkh /samsung-backlight), which enables backlight control on various Samsung netbooks, when KMS is enabled. It's called 'nc10-backlight' and it's available on my

[Bug 441396] Re: Totem hangs while loading a video with .srt (or .txt in MicroDVD format) sub from nautilus

2009-12-07 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Here it is. It applies correctly to the package version '0.10.25-2ubuntu1.1', after all the other patches in 'debian/patches/'. ** Attachment added: Fix subtitles autoload in gst-plugins-base0.10 (0.10.25-2ubuntu1.1) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36527470/protect-subtitle-elements.patch --

[Bug 490302] [NEW] dh_installinit does not install 'package.default' if 'package.upstart' exists

2009-11-30 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debhelper When building a package, if 'debian/package.upstart' and 'debian/package.default' both exist, 'debian/package.default' is ignored and not installed. The attached patch fixes this problem. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 30

[Bug 490302] Re: dh_installinit does not install 'package.default' if 'package.upstart' exists

2009-11-30 Thread Fortunato Ventre
** Attachment added: fix-package.default-installation-when-package.upstart-exists.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36256024/fix-package.default-installation-when-package.upstart-exists.patch ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36256025/Dependencies.txt

[Bug 490302] Re: dh_installinit does not install 'package.default' if 'package.upstart' exists

2009-11-30 Thread Fortunato Ventre
The problem exists even in the latest debhelper (version 7.4.8) available in Debian Sid, so I filed a bug on the debian bug tracking system too: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558782 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #558782

[Bug 490302] Re: dh_installinit does not install 'package.default' if 'package.upstart' exists

2009-11-30 Thread Fortunato Ventre
This bug has been fixed upstream with release 7.4.9. Please backport it to karmic. ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed -- dh_installinit does not install 'package.default' if

[Bug 441396] Re: Totem hangs while loading a video with .srt (or .txt in MicroDVD format) sub from nautilus

2009-11-12 Thread Fortunato Ventre
I've build a new 'gst-plugins-base0.10' package which includes the (adapted) upstream patch. It's based on version '0.10.25-2ubuntu1' (not the proposed '0.10.25-2ubuntu1.1'), and it's available on my testing PPA: https://launchpad.net/~voria/+archive/archive -- Totem hangs while loading a

[Bug 448885] Re: Samsung NC10 screen brightness up/down function keys do not work

2009-10-23 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Updating the NC10 bios to version 11CA fixes the problem. Alternatively, you can use an additional kernel module which enables the backlight control when KMS is enabled. More info at: http://github.com/gregkh/samsung-backlight I've packaged it for karmic, it's available on my repository 'PPA for

[Bug 340014] Re: Samsung NC10 fails suspend/Resume tests

2009-08-08 Thread Fortunato Ventre
The kernel on my NC10 repository is not optimized in any way, it's just a backport to jaunty of the latest kernel available for karmic. -- Samsung NC10 fails suspend/Resume tests https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340014 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 354792] Re: Ctl-Alt-L does not lock screen immediately after startup

2009-05-14 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Done. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582587 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #582587 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582587 -- Ctl-Alt-L does not lock screen immediately after startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354792 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 345318] Re: Brightness control is slow and not costant with 90-Add-guarded-brightness-stepping-functions.patch 91-Using-guarded-and-scaled-stepping-when-dimming.patch

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
I have modified the '90-Add-guarded-brightness-stepping-functions' patch in order to get 12 levels of brightness adjustment, and changed the formulas used to calculate the next step for decreasing/increasing brightness in order to get constant steps. It seems to work good on Samsung NC10.

[Bug 367271] [NEW] Add a gconf key for setting the time delay before to start 'gnome-screensaver' at session startup

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Public bug reported: In Intrepid I was used to enable the autologin feature in gdm, then add the 'gnome-screensaver-command --lock' in Startup Applications to lock the screen immediately after login. This way I was ready to work just inserting my user password. Furthermore, when I started up

[Bug 367271] Re: Add a gconf key for setting the time delay before to start 'gnome-screensaver' at session startup

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
** Attachment added: screensaver_startup_timeout_customizable.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25994427/screensaver_startup_timeout_customizable.patch -- Add a gconf key for setting the time delay before to start 'gnome-screensaver' at session startup

[Bug 345318] Re: Brightness control is slow and not costant with 90-Add-guarded-brightness-stepping-functions.patch 91-Using-guarded-and-scaled-stepping-when-dimming.patch

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
Looking at the code in 'gpm-brightness.c', it seems that xrandr is preferred over hal when both are available. I don't know why but there is certainly a good reason if it's so. -- Brightness control is slow and not costant with 90-Add-guarded-brightness-stepping-functions.patch

[Bug 345318] Re: Brightness control is slow and not costant with 90-Add-guarded-brightness-stepping-functions.patch 91-Using-guarded-and-scaled-stepping-when-dimming.patch

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
No, it's manually set. It was set to 24 in the original patch, I changed it to 12 to get bigger steps. IMHO this is not a good solution, because a fixed value is not good for everyone, as you stated. However, I just modified the original patch, I don't know if there is a more generic way to set

[Bug 345318] Re: Brightness control is slow and not costant with 90-Add-guarded-brightness-stepping-functions.patch 91-Using-guarded-and-scaled-stepping-when-dimming.patch

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
It seems that hal support is not always available. For example, 'lshal' does not report any UDI for backlight on Samsung NC10. Apart from that, it would be a bad idea to use hal in gpm xrandr functions. Looking at the code, there are two distinct way to set brightness, xrandr and hal. --

[Bug 345318] Re: Brightness control is slow and not costant with 90-Add-guarded-brightness-stepping-functions.patch 91-Using-guarded-and-scaled-stepping-when-dimming.patch

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
It seems that hal support is not always available. For example 'lshal' does not report any UDI for backlight on Samsung NC10. Apart from that, it's a bad idea to use hal in xrandr functions. As I said in a previous comment xrandr is preferred over hal when both are available, and hal support

[Bug 354792] Re: Ctl-Alt-L does not lock screen immediately after startup

2009-04-26 Thread Fortunato Ventre
The issue is caused by a recent change in gnome-settings-daemon that adds a 30 sec delay for starting gnome-screensaver. This is the reason for it (directly from source code): /* * We'll start the screensaver after a delay so it doesn't * compete with other processes