[Bug 649573] Re: Underquoted definition in m4 file

2013-05-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Fixed in 1.2.0-6 in Debian, imported for saucy ** Changed in: gtkglextmm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gtkglextmm (Ubuntu) Assignee: Adrian Petrescu (apetresc) => Frank Lichtenheld (djpig) -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 995263] Re: osc doesn't work at all if it has a config file

2012-05-05 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
I found out that this is related to keyring support. When I disable keyring usage in the config file or with --no-keyring, osc works as expected. Note that I call osc in a ssh session where no keyring is available. So it might be that the detection of available keyrings is what is broken. ** Summ

[Bug 995263] [NEW] osc breaks if no keyring is available

2012-05-05 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Public bug reported: The first call of osc that writes the config file actually works, but on subsequent calls it immeditially crashes: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/osc", line 21, in r = babysitter.run(osccli) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/osc/babysitter.py"

[Bug 252223] [NEW] seems Ubuntu patch is broken

2008-07-26 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dupload According to http://patches.ubuntu.com/d/dupload/dupload_2.6.4ubuntu3.patch the Ubuntu patch actually reverts the 2.6.4 changes... ** Affects: dupload (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- seems Ubuntu patch is broken http

[Bug 122136] Re: Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved

2008-06-30 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
The correspoding Debian bug #428011 was closed with 0.99.10. OTOH some people in this bug report claim to have problems with gutsy, which would contradict this. More information welcome. -- Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122136 You receiv

[Bug 76314] Re: Some -HOWTOs installed on an en-gb system are not in English

2008-06-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
This is a valid bug: See also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=53520 ** Changed in: doc-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Some -HOWTOs installed on an en-gb system are not in English https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76314 You received this bug notification

[Bug 209141] Re: package doc-linux-html 2007.11-1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-06-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Should be fixed in 2008.05-2 -- package doc-linux-html 2007.11-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 218282] Re: Make so you can use apt-url on packages.ubuntu.com

2008-04-27 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
I'm not generally opposed to this idea. Text ideas welcome to make it clear to users that this might not actually install the package version on the page they're seeing if they run another version of Ubuntu (or even another Distribution) and might not work at all if the package in question is not a

Re: [Bug 97615] Re: packages.ubuntu.com does not include the *-updates repositories

2008-02-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
hassle for me. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- packages.ubuntu.com does not include the *-updates repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contac

[Bug 97615] Re: packages.ubuntu.com does not include the *-updates repositories

2008-02-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
packages.ubuntu.com was switched to the new codebase today. It also includes *-updates information now. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- packages.ubuntu.com does not include the *-updates repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97615 You received this bug no