[Bug 64718] Re: libglibjni-0.4.so should depend on libgobject

2006-10-21 Thread Gary Coady
Fixed upstream (on September 17), but no new version available yet. Upstream patch was linked in GNOME bugzilla at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350091 -- libglibjni-0.4.so should depend on libgobject https://launchpad.net/bugs/64718 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 57875] Re: Azureus does not start

2006-10-16 Thread Gary Coady
I would expect the upstream version to work. The core of the problem with the Ubuntu package is that one of the branding patches (it tries make certain UI icons fit the current GTK+ theme) makes calls into GTK before the Java GTK libraries have been fully initialized. It does not appear to be in

[Bug 64718] libglibjni-0.4.so should depend on libgobject

2006-10-08 Thread Gary Coady
Public bug reported: If you run $ objdump -x /usr/lib/jni/libglibjni-0.4.so | grep NEEDED NEEDED libglib-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libc.so.6 A practical example (from running azureus when the required modules have been fixed) is: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:

[Bug 57875] Re: Azureus does not start

2006-10-08 Thread Gary Coady
Updated list of things required to get the azureus package to work: 1. In debian/azureus.sh, change glib0.2.jar to glib0.4.jar. 2. In debian/azureus.sh, change gtk2.8.jar to gtk2.10.jar. 3. In debian/azureus.sh, add export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni:/usr/lib. 4. Add a call to org.gtk.Gtk.init

[Bug 64718] Re: libglibjni-0.4.so should depend on libgobject

2006-10-08 Thread Gary Coady
The original bug in azureus is bug 57875. While working out how to fix that, it seems that azureus will work even if this bug isn't fixed (other required libraries already have a DT_NEEDED dependency on libgobject-2.0). So this doesn't need to be fixed for that java package, but I'd still

[Bug 59290] Re: vmplayer doesn't start in edgy

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 47792 *** Marking as a dup of #47792 as it talks about the same issue (or at least it does in the last few posts). It also has some possibly useful information towards fixing the issue. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 47792 vmplayer fails to

[Bug 59002] Re: vmplayer does not start

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 47792 *** Changing to a duplicate of bug 47792 as it has some information which may help to fix the problem. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 58829 vmware player refuse to start ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 47792 vmplayer

[Bug 58829] Re: vmware player refuse to start

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 47792 *** Marking as a duplicate of 47792 as there is some information in that bug which may help to solve the problem. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 47792 vmplayer fails to start -- vmware player refuse to start

[Bug 47792] Re: vmplayer fails to start

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
** Bug 59290 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ** Bug 59002 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ** Bug 58829 has been marked a duplicate of this bug -- vmplayer fails to start https://launchpad.net/bugs/47792 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 59362] Re: unmet dependencies

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
Hi Ernesto, what version of ubuntu are you running? If you run apt-cache policy apache2-mpm-prefork what do you get? Also, what are the contents of /etc/apt/sources.list on your machine? -- unmet dependencies https://launchpad.net/bugs/59362 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 59362] Re: unmet dependencies

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
It's not a software problem anyway. I can't see any problem with the repositories now, so it could be that a package was accidentally added to the main repository, then moved to the security repository (and you updated your dpkg cache in between). If it's okay, I'll close this ticket. However,

[Bug 59362] Re: unmet dependencies

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
Hi Ernesto, I haven't been able to reproduce this yet. You may be able to get more information on why apache2-mpm-prefork cannot be installed, by running the command apt-get install apache2-mpm-prefork Does that give any more informative error messages? -- unmet dependencies

[Bug 59362] Re: unmet dependencies

2006-09-07 Thread Gary Coady
Hm. The ubuntu2.1 version comes from the security repository, you shouldn't see any dependencies for there, since you haven't enabled those sources (but obviously it's picking them up from somewhere in your sources.list). Can you uncomment the following lines and try again? deb

[Bug 57875] Re: Azureus does not start

2006-08-30 Thread Gary Coady
With gcj-4.1 (4.1.1-11ubuntu7), azureus works without any LD_PRELOAD set (but with the other changes to /usr/bin/azureus mentioned above). I also see different behaviour with SUN java: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jni/libglibjni-0.4.so: /usr/lib/jni/libglibjni-0.4.so: undefined

[Bug 57875] Re: Azureus does not start

2006-08-29 Thread Gary Coady
Confirmed, I think. There's more than one problem to fix before azureus will run. Firstly, in /usr/bin/azureus, two of the JAR file references are wrong - there should be references to glib0.4.jar and gtk2.10.jar in $CP. Secondly, once that is changed, I get the backtrace

[Bug 51095] Re: different behavoir based on existence of .jpg extension

2006-06-27 Thread Gary Coady
You can get the behaviour you want by selecting Determine image type from content (slower) in gthumb preferences. The default is for this not to be checked, as it would be a lot slower showing directories with large numbers of images. ** Changed in: gthumb (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed =