Since this bug is marked as "Fix Released", I did not find it in
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bugs
I only found now. 18.04 is still affected, so a "Fix Released" seams
wrong here, at least for 18.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1772705 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772705
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1772705
IKEv2 VPN connections fail to use DNS servers provided by the server
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
With a strongswan server sending a DNS server to the client, a client
running strongswan-nm 5.6.2-1ubuntu2.4 receives random DNS servers. This
could lead to a data leak issue, if one of these random DNS servers
actually _is_ a DNS server and processes the query (or even a secu
The attached patch also links against libmenuw, which provides
set_menu_win.
** Patch added: "Patch for ruby-ncurses to also link libmenuw"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-ncurses/+bug/1775673/+attachment/5232452/+files/ruby-ncurses-menu.patch
--
You received this bug notific
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1775673 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1775673
The attached patch also links against libmenuw, which provides
set_menu_win.
** Patch added: "Patch for ruby-ncurses to also link libmenuw"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-ncurses/+bug/1
A patch for the issue is now in upstream master.
https://github.com/the-tcpdump-
group/libpcap/commit/6a9c2cb19cb7eebdab8d2fa7a592d39130f8bf61.patch
It would be nice to backport this for ubuntu 14.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Public bug reported:
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lipcap 1.6.0 and above
How reproducible:
Open a pcap-ng file with nanosecod resolution. The timestamp fractions returned
by pcap_next_ex() will be bigger than the requested fraction (i.e.
I think this is not a bug of network-manager but of the installer who
creates /etc/network/interfaces ...
This line should not be created in the first place.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Removing vt.handoff=7 from kernel parameters worked for me too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713088
Title:
[natty] plymouth boot screen corrupted with nouveau on Thinkpad T61
To ma
I tried this one but it did not work for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713088
Title:
[natty] plymouth boot screen corrupted with nouveau on Thinkpad T61
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
I cannot see the name of the package or the version change (from, to) in
the table.
Version step is somehow visible via changelog, but package name is completely
missing. Sometimes the descriptions are useless.
Example for these descriptions (and only these are shown in the
Any progress here?
Can someone help to get this into natty (4.5.1, 4.5.2 or the patch?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782984
Title:
strongswan-4.5.0 has known bug: causes charon to c
Public bug reported:
It would be nice to backport the following patch to the 2.6.35 series for an
easier testing of systemd in ubuntu maverick.:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=676db4af043014e852f67ba0349dae0071bd11f3
This is the only kernel patch
updating openssl/libssl with packages from lucid-proposed (see bug
#590639) fixes my crashes.
--
strongswan's charon crashes shortly after authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574664
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
I added some ssl debugging code and get these errors:
140737079842576:error:260B9092:engine routines:ENGINE_get_cipher:unimplemented
cipher:tb_cipher.c:126:
140737079842576:error:0608C086:digital envelope
routines:DO_EVP_ENC_ENGINE:initialization error:enc_min.c:172:
--
strongswan's charon cra
I installed the debug packages for libssl0.9.8 and added some debugging
code.
EVP_CipherInit_ex fails (returns 0)
ctx->cipher is null, which causes the segfault.
(gdb) p *this->cipher
$2 = {nid = 419, block_size = 16, key_len = 16, iv_len = 16, flags = 5122, init
= 0x75cf47b0 , do_cipher = 0
I recompiled the package like suggested in comment #2 (and an additional
change to "-O0" and reran the test:
Here is the data:
0x75cf2c27 in EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length () from
/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
(gdb) bt
#0 0x75cf2c27 in EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length () from
/lib/libcryp
I have the same problem. When starting "/usr/lib/ipsec/starter --nofork
--debug-all" I get the following output :
10[DMN] thread 1005078288 received 11
dumping 12 stack frame addresses:
/lib/libpthread.so.0 @ 0x7fbc48d21000 [0x7fbc48d308f0]
-> ??:0
/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 @ 0x7fbc47021000
Public bug reported:
I think this issue is different from bug #311634, so I report it as a
new bug.
The packet containing libpcap 1.x is called libpcap0.8 - I see no point
in using this name. The API (= dev package) might be the same, but the
implementation is different and the so name also chang
This is karmic-only, sorry
--
make strongswan a container package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523756
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: strongswan
At the moment (karmic, lucid), there is the (not up-to-date) package
"strongswan" on one side and all the strongswan-*/libstrongswan packages on the
other side.
I would like to make strongswan a container package which depends on the
strongs
21 matches
Mail list logo
