[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-23 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
Hello Mauricio, thanks for providing the nova patch. It worked as expected. I installed on a node with xsaves enabled and updated nova.conf # dpkg -l | grep nova ii nova-api-metadata 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3 all OpenStack Compute -

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-16 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
One thing I notice is that the libvirt xml from EPYC at /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map/x86_EPYC-Rome.xml ofc is not updated but also a new one for using -v4 is not rendered. That means I can't instruct nova to use EPYC-Rome-v4 with # grep -i epyc /etc/nova/nova.conf cpu_model = EPYC-Rome-v4 because

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-16 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
Hello Sergio, thanks for providing the patch. I have installed qemu on my test machine. The new epyc-rome-v4 is now listed by qemu ``` # qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu help| grep -i epyc-rome-v x86 EPYC-Rome-v1 AMD EPYC-Rome Processor x86 EPYC-Rome-v2

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-09 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
Hello Sergio, I can help with testing. I have access to EPYC-Rome CPU machines. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048517 Title: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live

[Bug 1950186] Re: Nova doesn't account for hugepages when scheduling VMs

2022-02-18 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
Even using a flavor with hw:mem_page_size='small' I am still able to request more memory of what is physically available. While the update of max_unit seems to be reverted to the original value when the compute node checks its records so can't be used as a valid workaround. -- You received this

[Bug 1950186] Re: Nova doesn't account for hugepages when scheduling VMs

2022-02-18 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
This can be reproduced on Focal/ussuri: Computes: $ os resource provider list +--+-++--+--+ | uuid

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-06-11 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
I can confirm that on Bionic upgrading to 20.03.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fixed this issue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding

[Bug 1931275] [NEW] ovn-controller fails to start

2021-06-08 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
Public bug reported: When using Openstack Ussuri with OVN 20.03 in Bionic and starting an ovn-controller this sometime fails with the following: 2021-06-07T14:13:34.803Z|1|vlog|INFO|opened log file /var/log/ovn/ovn-controller.log

[Bug 1928031] Re: neutron-ovn-metadata-agent AttributeError: 'MetadataProxyHandler' object has no attribute 'sb_idl'

2021-06-04 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
I am seeing same issue once we upgraded to 16.3.2 https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/F6NxGkrBcx/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928031 Title: neutron-ovn-metadata-agent

[Bug 1773765] Re: There is a possibility that 'running' notification will remain

2021-02-18 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
Version in use: dpkg -l | grep masaka ii masakari-api 9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3~cloud0 all Virtual Machine High Availability (VMHA) for OpenStack - API Server ii masakari-common 9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3~cloud0

[Bug 1773765] Re: There is a possibility that 'running' notification will remain

2021-02-18 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
We are still seeing this happening in bionic ussuri $ os notification list | grep running | a5a79aba-c3e3-464e-9b0b-3cedd272fd4d | 2021-02-18T04:57:01.00 | running | COMPUTE_HOST | 88eae267-fabc-48d2-b6cc-4acdb6f9b5e2 | {'event': 'STOPPED', 'cluster_status': 'OFFLINE', 'host_status':

[Bug 1839477] Re: Firewall group stuck in PENDING_UPDATE

2019-08-09 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839477 Title: Firewall group stuck in PENDING_UPDATE To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1839477] [NEW] Firewall group stuck in PENDING_UPDATE

2019-08-08 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
Public bug reported: neutron-common 2:14.0.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 neutron-fwaas-common1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1~cloud0 neutron-plugin-ml2 2:14.0.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 neutron-server 2:14.0.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 python3-neutron

[Bug 1813007] Re: Unable to install new flows on compute nodes when having broken security group rules

2019-01-23 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
** Description changed: - It appears that we have found that neutron-openvswitch-agent appears to have a bug where a security group that has two different port ranges that overlap tied to the same parent security group will cause neutron to not be able to configure networks on the compute