no ! it is not fixed ubuntu 10.04 is LTS 3yrs and that what i am going
to be running . 10.10 is 18 months support . and with the announcement
of unity and wayland being added to 11.04 i want 10.04 . i have tried
unity on my desktop already and don`t like it . wayland is to replace x
org serve
i am using the software center that was installed with ubuntu 10.04 64
bit
On 11/12/2010 10:44 AM, Kiwinote wrote:
> Hi Greg! Thanks for your bug report. Do you mind letting us know which
> version of software-center you are using? I believe to have fixed this
> problem a little while back in soft
i tried all icon themes and they all display the same in software center
. even tried after install of gnome extra icons package . no change .
On 11/11/2010 02:02 PM, tsg1zzn wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could you please post the following information:
> - Which icon theme are you using?
> - A screenshot of t
with gnome the only change i got was in developers and tools i got 8 out
of 16 they all look the same , a box with 2 rulers
On 11/11/2010 02:02 PM, tsg1zzn wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could you please post the following information:
> - Which icon theme are you using?
> - A screenshot of the missing icons or
whenyou open software center the first one is fonts icon ,/ then click
games there are no icons , / click graphics only two out of 7 ,/ under
internet there is none ./ science and engineering 3 out of 10 ./
developer tools 1 out of 15 this is with oxygen theme .. going to send
this and change
Public bug reported:
i have ubuntu 64 bit installed , in the software center some of the
icons are displayed as blank boxes . ask the question at launch pad .
replay was file bug report .
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
missing icons in software center
http
I grabbed the deb from:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/prboom
and it did solve the problem.
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I would like to confirm that AMD64 gnome-pilot_2.0.17-0ubuntu2 from
Karmic will work in Jaunty. So logically the i386 version should work
too.
--
gpilotd running but no panel icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349650
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Is a fix expected out anytime soon? I know there are bigger problems in
the world, but it's unfun to type a password whenever I want to shut
down the PC.
--
Trying to shut down or restart falsely suggests others are logged in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287715
You received this bug notificati
I just tried the Alpha 3 CD, but I'm getting what appears to be the same
problem as before.
--
Hardy alpha 2 CD won't boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
That describes well what I saw (and heard): A lot of thrashing about.
Placing a disk in the floppy drive did no good.
You might want to confirm that you were using the 32-bit i386 CD and
list your motherboard, graphics card, and CD model, and also state
whether you are using any SATA drives (in my
There is an alternative way of installing Gtk2::Sexy, as noted in this
thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=514106
--
Synaptic recommends libsexymm2, which is useless (missing Perl bindings)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151226
You received this bug notification because you are a me
To make matters worse, manual build and installation of Gtk2::Sexy on my
Gutsy (i386) setup fails. The command "sudo perl -MCPAN -e 'install
Gtk2::Sexy'" generates the following error message:
mkdir /usr/local/man: File exists at /usr/share/perl/5.8/ExtUtils/Install.pm
line 112
make: *** [pure_si
I went into my BIOS and enabled the "nVidia RAID Function", and then
enabled RAID capabilities for each of my SATA ports (1-4). No change; I
still received the same error messages before being dropped to BusyBox.
I note messages that rapidly scrolled by to the effect of, "NVIDIA
CK-804: BIOS didn'
I'm using the 32-bit i386 architecture with an Athlon 64 3200+
processor.
Thanks for the information. I have a working floppy drive and I'm sure
that my drives are cabled properly. Each of the drives has a separate
cable and is configured as master. On my mobo, my SATA controllers are
from NVIDIA.
The installation will make some progress if I add all_generic_ide as a
boot option when booting from the CD. This gets me past Busybox.
However, the booting proceeds very slowly, hanging for a time on USB
messages, and when I finally am able to get to the partitioner, I see
that it has listed my Se
Public bug reported:
I've successfully burned the Hardy alpha 2 release (md5 sums match) but
it will not install. After a few moments it drops to Busybox and will
not get beyond the point of loading the kernel.
My Feisty CD works, so this must be a relatively recent issue. I'm
running a A8N32-SLI
I saw this as well using Compize Fusion, but when I disabled "Sync to
VBlank" in CompizConfig Settings Manager -> Display Settings, the visual
noise went away after about five seconds after coming out of suspend,
but usually taking down Compiz in the process. Running Metacity, I've
had no problems.
See bug #55967 for a possible workaround. It worked for me.
--
Booting works with USB set to 1.1 only, but not with USB 2.0 enabled (Asus
K8N-E)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49552
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Bug #62072, #64873, and #66122 all may be duplicates of this bug.
--
Booting works with USB set to 1.1 only, but not with USB 2.0 enabled (Asus
K8N-E)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49552
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49552 ***
Duplicate of #49552.
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49552
Booting works with USB set to 1.1 only, but not with USB 2.0 enabled (Asus
K8N-E)
--
Ed
The "noapic" argument and other variations seem to have no effect with
my setup.
--
Booting works with USB set to 1.1 only, but not with USB 2.0 enabled (Asus
K8N-E)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49552
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49552 ***
The issue in the first comment is a duplicate of bug #49552.
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49552
Booting works with USB set to 1.1 only, but not wi
One other note: I can boot without disabling USB 2.0 if I disconnect
from my computer the USB hub in my monitor. I've got a Dell 2405FPW. If
I do that, nothing is connected to the USB slots on my PC.
--
Booting works with USB set to 1.1 only, but not with USB 2.0 enabled (Asus
K8N-E)
https://lau
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Booting works with USB set to 1.1 only, but not with USB 2.0 enabled (Asus
K8N-E)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49552
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
I'm having the same problem. I did an upgrade tonight and couldn't boot
afterwards. I have a Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe, booting off an SATA drive. If
I turn off USB 2.0 (allowing only USB 1.1), I'm fine. Otherwise, I'm
dead in the water.
This is the same problem I had with Dapper, which caused me to hav
26 matches
Mail list logo
