[Bug 453267] Re: vlc assert failure: vlc: /build/buildd/libdvdnav-4.1.3/src/vm/vm.c:1074: play_Cell: Assertion `0' failed.

2013-05-31 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Just stumbled upon the same issue in raring as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453267 Title: vlc assert failure: vlc: /build/buildd/libdvdnav-4.1.3/src/vm/vm.c:1074: play_Cell:

[Bug 964989] Re: Ganeti initialization fails because PyCurl is linked against GnuTLS

2013-01-14 Thread Guy K. Kloss
An easier option than rebuilding a system package with all kinds of dependencies might be to tell PyCURL what version of SSL to use, like described here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycurl/+bug/926548/comments/24 Hope that helps, Guy -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 926548] Re: add-apt-repository fails with gnutls_handshake error

2013-01-14 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I've just stumbled upon this bug report searching for the evil pycurl.error: (35, 'gnutls_handshake() failed: GnuTLS internal error.') I found a solution by telling cURL what version of SSL to use: connection.setopt(pycurl.SSLVERSION, pycurl.SSLVERSION_SSLv3) This is where I found this gem: http

[Bug 787932] Re: Segmentation Fault in python program using visual-python module after update to Natty Narwhal

2012-09-22 Thread Guy K. Kloss
This problem apparently affects people on (newer) Ubuntu versions, particularly when running proprietary graphics drivers. I can confirm it to affect Ubuntu Precise on 32 and 64 bit with NVIDIA drivers. There has recently been some bug hunting on the Visual Python mailing list and John Zelle has f

[Bug 457688] Re: [SRU, 9.10] libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2010-05-10 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Just retested on another box. Result is positive. Also I've now gone and also reinstalled python-visual, and guess what, it works as well. There must've been some things "wrong" after all the tinkering to get python-visual working under karmic last year. So: Thumbs up for the fix! -- [SRU, 9.10

[Bug 457688] Re: [SRU, 9.10] libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2010-05-10 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Václav, of course, I might have gotten something wrong, but I've just tried it again. I've used the nz.archive.ubuntu.com mirror, and this time I have downloaded the package manually: gkl...@it041227:~$ wget http://nz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/b/boost1.38/libboost-python1.38.0_1.38.0-6u

[Bug 457688] Re: [SRU, 9.10] libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2010-05-09 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I have just tested the libboost-python1.38.0 in version 1.38.0-6ubuntu6.1 from karmic-proposed. (Beware, some mirrors don't have this package, yet. It took some checking first ...) Unfortunately, it seems like the error is still there: $ ipython Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Dec 7 2009, 18:45:15)

[Bug 457688] Re: libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2010-02-07 Thread Guy K. Kloss
It would be interesting to see whether anybody has tested this bug on libboost1.40.0 from lucid, yet. Is it still (going to be) an issue, or is it resolved on 1.40.0? If so, then this bug would just "grow out". If not, then severe action is required in order to prevent another "broken" release on

[Bug 457688] Re: libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2009-11-14 Thread Guy K. Kloss
@teonghan: Two things on that: * This should be a problem of the python-visual package, rather than the boost packages. * python-visual should then probably also depend on libgtkglextmm-x11-1.2-0, it should (AFAIK) *never* depend on a "*-dev" package, which should just contain headers for

[Bug 457688] Re: libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2009-11-11 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I have just given the proposed bug fix a spin by using the packages from ppa:ajmitch. At least all the samples from python-visual that I've tried did work properly, now. Well done! I think we've got a go here! -- libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3 https://bugs.lau

[Bug 457688] Re: libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2009-10-21 Thread Guy K. Kloss
** Changed in: python-visual (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()

2009-10-21 Thread Guy K. Kloss
New bug opened for this in the more suitable area for boost1.38: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost1.38/+bug/457688 -- python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408663 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 457688] Re: libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2009-10-21 Thread Guy K. Kloss
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34119340/Dependencies.txt -- libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 457688] [NEW] libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python >= 2.6.3

2009-10-21 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Public bug reported: Python >= 2.6.3 has changed the way the __doc__ property is implemented. Boost.Python 1.38 does not account for this, yet, leading to many errors executing Python code using the Boost implemented bindings. An example trying to use a sample from python-visual: g...@mountpaku:

[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()

2009-10-21 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Further collaborative investigation has shown that Python >= 2.6.3 has implemented the __doc__ property differently. Many projects that are binding native libraries to Python through Boost.Python are suffering from this. Apparently there is a patch in the SVN version of Boost.Python that addresses

[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()

2009-10-21 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Further collaborative investigation has shown that Python >= 2.6.3 has implemented the __doc__ property differently. Many projects that are binding native libraries to Python through Boost.Python are suffering from this. Apparently there is a patch in the SVN version of Boost.Python that addresses

[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()

2009-10-17 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Trying to track down the problem further I've hit some leads that seem to indicate that there seem to be quite some problems on Ubuntu Karmic with Boost.Python (version 1.38.0-6ubuntu6). The PySide team has had also some similar problems, as well as someone else. Here's a thread on the Py++ mail

[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()

2009-10-15 Thread Guy K. Kloss
In an attempt to narrow down the problem with the python-visual 5.11 source package I have taken the python-visual 5.12 source package from Debian Sid, modified it's build rules (particularly to use libboost 1.38 rather 1.39) and built a package of it. Unfortunately the effect is the same as descr

[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()

2009-10-14 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I was the one who has backported the 5.11 karmic package to jaunty back then. Now being with one box on a kubuntu karmic beta gives me quite a headache as well. I'm getting the same results, both when I'm installing the distribution provided binary package as well as when I'm using the dpkg-buildp

[Bug 178033] Re: python-liblcms: python bindings defective

2008-12-15 Thread Guy K. Kloss
An easy fix that would be worth putting into the package distribution: Just remove the two Python packages, as all that's needed is found in the module lcms.py anyway. The dualism in the name space (package and module of same name) overshadow each other and hinder a seamless working. So, these dir

[Bug 300157] [NEW] OpenCV and IEEE 1394 (FireWire) fails, libdc1394-13 vs libdc1394-22 conflict

2008-11-19 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Public bug reported: OpenCV 1.0.0-6.1 requires libdc1394-13 (-dev) for the build, however libdc1394-22 (-dev) is required through a chain of dependencies from libavcodec (-dev). Therefore OpenCV's build in Intrepid is configured as following, disabling IEEE 1394 camera capturing: Video I/O -

[Bug 293807] Re: gccxml regression: fails to parse stdio.h

2008-11-18 Thread Guy K. Kloss
another workaround: * Install GCC 4.2 * export GCCXML_COMPILER=gcc-4.2 * now GCCXML should use gcc-4.2 instead, and things should work again -- gccxml regression: fails to parse stdio.h https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 293807] Re: gccxml regression: fails to parse stdio.h

2008-11-17 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Maybe this helps. I have created some instructions on how to patch GCCXML to handle the stdio.h bug, and recompiled a Debian package. More information can be found here, although it is only a workaround: http://www.kloss-familie.de/moin/Root/PatchingGccXml -- gccxml regression: fails to parse st

[Bug 293807] Re: gccxml regression: fails to parse stdio.h

2008-11-14 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I second the motion of getting GCCXML working out of the box with at least the usual libraries as stdio. Adding a dummy is fine as long as it is your "own" code, but it can create bigger problems on third party code. Could a dummy like that one be added to the other macros mentioned? Where would t

[Bug 176652] Re: [Hardy] skencil.py crashed with SIGSEGV in free()

2008-01-05 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I think this is a duplicate/still existent issue of #81567 -- [Hardy] skencil.py crashed with SIGSEGV in free() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 175205] Re: skencil aborted

2008-01-05 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I think this is a duplicate of #81567 -- skencil aborted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail

[Bug 81567] Re: skencil crashes on startup with a SIGSEGV in free()

2008-01-05 Thread Guy K. Kloss
One of the (former) coders of Skencil (Tobias Hilbricht) told me that Skencil depends on execution with Python 2.4, however Python 2.5 is the default for quite a few versions of Ubuntu already. But even executing it with python2.4 does lead to the crash. Apparently Skencil's development is somewhat

[Bug 178033] Re: python-liblcms: python bindings defective

2008-01-05 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Oleksandr Moskalenko (Debian lcms package maintainer) has just uploaded a package into Debian/unstable that has the expected "import lcms" behaviour. This will now have to make it into Ubuntu ... ** Changed in: lcms (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- python-liblcms: python bindings

[Bug 178033] Re: python-liblcms: python bindings defective

2008-01-03 Thread Guy K. Kloss
The import at least works on self compiled binaries "properly" (as in the usual way). And shouldn't imports work homogeneously in the Python language environment. I believe that's one of the reasons why it is so popular. -- python-liblcms: python bindings defective https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 178033] python-liblcms: python bindings defective

2007-12-21 Thread Guy K. Kloss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-liblcms * installing liblcms1 and python-liblcms * the module "lcms" from the python bindings to LittleCMS are available, but they do not seem to contain any bindings to the actual liblcms1 library * try the following in the interactive python int

[Bug 85315] Re: Please reenable CONFIG_PRISM54 again

2007-04-22 Thread Guy K. Kloss
I've also have had problems with the 2.6.20.15.27 (-generic) that came with the now stable Feisty on my laptop. The Prism54 based PCMCIA card (Netgear WG511) just wouldn't work with the modules provided by the kernel (prism54pci, prism54common, and prism54usb). What finally did work was baking my o