TLDR version, yes it's fixed!
I guess there's only one way to find out!
I've been running kisak PPA so was on 24.1.x on there, but I'm ppa-purge'ing is
now to test. I no longer have that Sandy Bridge notebook, but have an Ivy
Bridge desktop (and I verified based on the plenty of debug info Wine
Sorry about that! I initially filed this bug, but I'm no long-time user
of the bug system. If 1956422 is marked dup and pointed here, it's fine
with me!
Still, as for GCP kernel specifically, a bot auto-generated the request
to test against GCP kernel. I wonder how many drivers GCP kernel is
mi
I don't think this patch is intended to fix suspend/resume bug, that's
not the problem I was seeing at any rate. That said...
Does this bug apply to GCP kernel? I'm assuming GCP is "Google Cloud
Platform", so I'm not sure they are even using affected hardware. AMD
CPUs are fairly power-efficien
I'm assuming the 5.14.15 or 5.14.16 amdgpu and amdkfd has been backported to
the 5.13 Ubuntu kernel. Here's the patch in 5.14.17 that specifically
addresses this.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.14.17&id=7883e13c249461877ea3be7b24a5935fc8946e46
Additional note, I did notice one "un-regression" -- I have a build of rocm
where I've tried enabling "GFX902" support for my card, this is an unsupported
configuration so I don't know if I have it 100% functional but rocminfo (which
as the name suggests dumps info about the rocm install and any
** Attachment added: "Some kernel log showing amdgpu errors and others
resulting from it"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1956401/+attachment/5551255/+files/wow.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Public bug reported:
This does not occur with linux-image-5.13.0-22-generic, but does with
linux-image-5.13.0-33-generic.
On startup, I get about a 60 second hang, with the following in the kernel
dmesg:
Jan 4 15:26:36 inspiron-3505 kernel: [ 34.160572] amdgpu :04:00.0: amdgp
: failed to
Suggested patch.
For now, I've been running mesa 20.0.x on the affected system from (21.0.x is
in ubuntu-updates, 20.0.x in base ubuntu repo, so I downgraded to that and
thank goodness for apt-mark hold...) But I can update it straight away to test
any update that comes out.
Thanks!
--Henry
*
Public bug reported:
A mesa GLX change (somewhere between the 20.0.4 and 21.0.3) causes both
wine and Proton (on an older system that does not have Vulkan..
SandyBridge, OpenGL 3.3..) to exit with GLXBadFBConf when it tries to
fire up OpenGL.
Wine, for Direct3D support it tries to fire up (in ord
Public bug reported:
I "backported" s3ql (built .debs for python3-pyfuse3_3.2.0-2build1,
python3-trio_0.18.0-1, and s3ql_3.7.0+dfsg-2build1-local1 to use in
Ubuntu 20.04), and encountered a fairly quick crash (like under a
minute) when I started writing data to the s3ql filesystem. The log
ends w
"1) Do you actually have superflous key strokes, along with that which is
logged in dmesg?"
Nope, totally asymptomatic.
"2) Could you please test the latest mainline kernel (now 5.9.1) and advise to
the results?"
Here ya go. I can attach entire dmesg if you want, but from 5.9.1 dmesg:
[ 256.70
"1) Do you actually have superflous key strokes, along with that which is
logged in dmesg?"
Nope, totally asymptomatic.
"2) Could you please test the latest mainline kernel (now 5.9.1) and advise to
the results?"
Here ya go. I can attach entire dmesg if you want, but from 5.9.1 dmesg:
[ 256.70
apport information
** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425626/+files/IwConfig.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425632/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425630/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
apport information
** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425634/+files/RfKill.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Title:
In
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425636/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Ti
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425627/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Title:
Inps
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425629/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425628/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Title:
Inps
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425635/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Title:
In
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425631/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190
apport information
** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425633/+files/PulseList.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Titl
(uname -a:
Linux inspiron-1545.local 5.4.0-52-generic #57~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 15
14:04:49 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
)
I've been using 5.7.19 by default, but I'm on 5.4.0-52-generic for this
since it's a supported kernel. (These atkbd messages are identical in
both.)
--
You
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425625/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected staging
** Description changed:
I posted some information on bug #549741 stating that I was getting similar
logs to what people were seeing in there, and was advised to go ahead and file
a bug. I'm on a Dell Inspiron 1541 (this machine is a
apport information
** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083/+attachment/5425624/+files/CRDA.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901083
Title:
Inpsir
** Description changed:
I posted some information on bug #549741 stating that I was getting similar
logs to what people were seeing in there, and was advised to go ahead and file
a bug. In dmesg, I get a pair like:
[ 529.926369] atkbd serio0: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x8
I assumed dmesg would be attached... It is now!
** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.4/+bug/1901083/+attachment/5425615/+files/dmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Public bug reported:
I posted some information on bug #549741 stating that I was getting similar
logs to what people were seeing in there, and was advised to go ahead and file
a bug. In dmesg, I get a pair like:
[ 529.926369] atkbd serio0: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x8d
on i
I have an Inspiron 1545 that's doing this (Ubuntu 18.04.5); mine is
nowhere near every second though. My battery is toast, a while ago it
began (occasionally) having the "0% battery" occasionally drop off then
reappear a few seconds later (both in gkrellm and the battery status on
the top right n
Public bug reported:
I'll start out with saying, this bug is probably priority "invalid" due
to my non-stock configuration (this 18.04.1 install is on an Acer
Chromebook 13, so it has a held back kernel and Xorg for the lovely
nvidia drivers it came with.) But I figure I'll file anyway since the
p
>I haven't verified this yet, but it looks from the XOrg log like these
systems are booting into dual head (with the SVideo out on head 2),
2128x800 total.
Suspicion confirmed, the "phantom" second head was causing causing
compiz to fail due to the 2128 pixel width exceeding the 2048 pixel
texture
I haven't verified this yet, but it looks from the XOrg log like these
systems are booting into dual head (with the SVideo out on head 2),
2128x800 total. That width over 2048 is probably what's causing the
problem. I did "lose the mouse" on one, and suspected a "phantom head."
I went to System S
Public bug reported:
I went to install Ubuntu (via systemback) onto some Dell D620s, and found
"Gnome Flashback (compiz)" crashes back to login prompt, while "Gnome Flashback
(Metacity)" does not. The attached logs reflect booting up, (attempting to)
log in with Flashback (compiz) then logging
I wonder if this is a compiler error? Can anyone tell if Chromium for
Ubuntu 14.04 and Chromium for 16.04 have different build flags, or if
their configure scripts detect something different? To me, it seems
like if they have the same or very similar build flags, 16.04 build
breaks but 14.04 bui
Since the bug's still open, I did have it reoccur but found the cause
and fixed it. I had switched to the mesa libGL.so.1 to build some
software*, and firefox 44.0 runs with this, but did crash when I went
back to tegra libGL. Long story short, the firefox profile's from my
previous portable and
Please go ahead and close this bug. When I ran the updates today it
reinstalled 44.0+build3-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, and today it's working fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539284
Title:
I guess I just wasn't patient enough; the bug reports I said had hung
for like an hour actually completed. But, now they want me to make a
new bug report rather than be able to attach it to an existing one.
Whoops. Here's the URLs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+filebug/437c2
Public bug reported:
(First off, I did try to use ubuntu-bug, as well as collecting info with
apport-cli then submitting with ubuntu-bug. The several automated bug
reports I filed just hung up, launchpad claimed it was processing the
report and refreshed for over an hour.)
Running firefox_43.0.4
Note, I see this bug between my Natty too... between my Natty
netbook and my Gentoo desktop (once the X server upgraded to 1.12.99,
and still with 1.13.0. Not sure why, because this computer just has a
mouse and keyboard, no touch screen or touchpad to provide exciting new
XInput events.) Ins
I know that this is a bug report and not a forum. But my 2
cents... First, it's a damn shame the Pentium M shipped without PAE,
otherwise this would not really be as much of an issue. I don't use my
Pentium M any more but it was a great machine, and I am planning to give
it to someone to use sh
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 725763 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725763
Title is a dup of 725763. Description is not; that build error
occurs for me with gcc-4.6 on my gentoo boxes too, one with -march
=athlon-xp and other -march=k8-sse3. So the "error: uninitialized cons
Public bug reported:
Upgrading from Ubuntu 10.04 to 10.10, I ran update-manager -d and
let 'er rip for the 10.10 upgrade. The window manager crashed (that
is, I still had the gnome menus at top and bottom of the screen, but no
window borders or decorations.). Fair enough, no big deal.
"Me too", also with a GX260. dmesg shows streams of errors such as:
[97544.908019] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed...
GPU hung
[97544.908032] render error detected, EIR: 0x
[97544.908056] [drm:i915_do_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_do_wait_request returns
-5 (awa
Yep. With stock config, just telnetting to localhost 3128 and getting
one item, restart is fine. But the browser, I think it keeps persistent
connections open so squid doesn't immediately quit and the restart
fails.
--
squid restart fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577693
You received thi
"I had two potential Windows-to-Linux converts. Typical home users with
web, email, writing a few documents/letters + home office. The basic
additional requirements for home office environment in these cases is
multipage scanning and fax. Didn't either try the fax as already the
multipage scanning
I am running 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12. Yeah, hadn't realized I had that
3.0RC1 config file (I have another proxy running on a gentoo box, which
probably has 3.0). I will try just dropping in the stock ubuntu
squid.conf to make sure it's not some oddity of my config file
preventing it from restarting
Here's squid.conf, in case there's some configuration option that does
what I need
** Attachment added: "squid.conf"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48101673/squid.conf
--
squid restart fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48100554/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48100555/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48100556/ProcStatus.txt
--
squid
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: squid
Any method of restarting squid fails to restart it. Such as:
u...@scrap:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/squid restart
[sudo] password for user:
Rather
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41058982/Dependencies.txt
--
can't change own password with users-admin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539908
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
Using "System->Admin->Users & Groups" (which runs users-admin),
once I have elevated priveleges, I could change the root password; I
could change the password of other users. However, changing my own
user password *appears* to wo
"Me too". Using Places->either floppy drive, the light blinks for about a
second. Places->Computer then selecting a floppy, the light runs for a second
then "Unable to mount location -- no media in the drive"
Yes, "either floppy drive" -- my parents still have some 5.25s around an
"Me too". Using Places->either floppy drive, the light blinks for about a
second. Places->Computer then selecting a floppy, the light runs for a second
then "Unable to mount location -- no media in the drive"
Yes, "either floppy drive" -- my parents still have some 5.25s around an
A "UNC" style error means a bad hard disk. But, in the mini 9 it'd
actlually be SSD (solid state disk), rather than a rotating disk. Still
though, either the disk didn't get plugged in properly or it's bad.
Dell should cover that under warranty.
--
start up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Well, see bug #272205, there's still *some* problems with this in
some specific cases. Since there's good discussion there I wouldn't
reopen this bug though...
--
No sound in Intrepid alpha 3 using ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB4x0 High
Definition Audio Controller (rev 01)
https://bugs.launc
I have the same problem with a Toshiba Satellite (L35-S2316... thanks
Toshiba, for wiring every single Satellite L35 differently heh..)
What I ended up with was using model=hp instead of model=dallas. The
internal speakers are almost uselessly quiet (I don't recall if they were
louder
I can confirm this is a probelm in 8.10. I updated just now (Nov 13th).
Steps to reproduce:
sudo modprobe aoe
dmesg
...
[85898.044715] aoe: AoE v47 initialised.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aoe-discover
aoe-discover: /dev/etherd/discover does not exist or is no
"Me to." 1.25ghz G5, the 1.5.2-2ubuntu3 xserver-xorg-core and
related xserver-xorg-ubuntu3 packages fixed things up. Nice work!
--
[regression, intrepid] Xorg servers broken "No core keyboard" and "failed to
initialize core devices"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281610
You received
Yeah. inetd.conf, "udp"s should be "udp4"s or an IPV6 connection
is being used I think. Also, I found when running as "nobody" (since
nobody.tty doesn't work), that ytalk would return "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
refusing messages". Running as "root" I get a ytalk request properly.
I suppose this is
So, I pulled the source, commented out the sanity checks that force
talkd to say "talkd[13554]: recvfrom: bogus address length". WIth this
commented out it said "bogus address family". With *this* commented
out, it logs lines such as "Oct 3 23:44:56 voltron talkd[15391]:
::a00:205:0:0 (0.0.
Umm... never mind I guess? The local OpenBSD expert was netbooted
the box into OpenBSD for a few days. When I rebooted into Ubuntu,
without even running any updates since the last time it didn't work, it
now works. Odd. I do have a different Trinitron hooked up..?
--
gnome-session makes
"Me too".
I upgraded from 8.04.1 for PowerPC to 8.10... on a well, it's a
Frankenstein. 1250mhz G4 Windtunnel motherboard, but stuck into a Compaq SP750
case. Yeah.. kind of a prank. (When I was on vacation, my coworkers backed up
my data, pulled the SP750 board, replaced the G4 with an
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 191889 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191889
>Will this just a normal update to Hardy 8.04.1 or will it be a new
release >of Hardy ?
Since the plan is to replace Firefox 3 with 3.0.1, it'll just come as a
regular update via the update manager.
Rock on!
So I've generally just dealt with this, since firefox now at least has the
option to reload it's tabs. My gentoo boxes do not crash with flash though --
now with flash10 or previously with flash9 (even when using libflashsupport, to
get me audio over the network.) I never thought much of
---^ I second Jonathan Blow's idea.. having apps behave differently if
they think they are online or not is just not "UNIXey". IMHO, they
should do what they are told, and just find out they have "no route to
host" if there in fact isn't one.
--
[MASTER] "Offline Mode" feature fails to detect pr
>Do you have more than one login session running when you see this
>issue?
Nope.. just one session. Without my kludge, It's just like what Daniel Newman
etc. have described where the CDMA aircard is a PPP link, and
NetworkManager0.6x apparently doesn't track PPP state. If I use wifi, or
ethern
I've found a kludgy "fix" for this (that doesn't just involve
removing nm, since it's wireless and wired handling are nice). In my
case, I have a Inspiron 2200 with wifi set via ndiswrapper (which works
fine) and an aircard (Verizon PC5740) which worked except for the
"Offline mode" problem.
Maybe this has already been fixed in docs? I probably had gotten
the layoutcode=en_US from some old debian doc, or blog or something,
last year. Now the only URL I can find anywhere that mentions this is:
http://ubuntulinuxhelp.com/ubuntu-linux-plug-n-play-zone-revisited/
Umm.. yeah.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: console-setup
I'm running a preseed install with Ubuntu 8.04, and what I found is
with console-setup/layoutcode=en_US in the isolinux.cfg (for CD) and
pxelinux.cfg/default (for net install), the keyboard layout is set to
"af" (Afghanistan), so I cann
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
I have a bare copy of Ubuntu 7.10 in a qemu disk image that I tried
this on (bare as in I haven't installed extra packages or reconfigured
it at all.) I fired up update-manager to make sure it was up to date
(it was, as of 7 Jan 2008)
72 matches
Mail list logo
