Thanks for the clues! I think I'd seen that URL in my research but the
`rsyslog` filter had escaped me. I'll see about pestering upstream when
time permits, any hints on where or who to pester appreciated.
For the record, for Mint-20 or Ubuntu Focal using stock `rsyslog` this
prevented the log
Public bug reported:
Server: Debian 10 (buster), nagios-nrpe-plugin-3.2.1-2
Node: Linux Mint 20 (Ulyana), using Ubuntu Focal,
nagios-nrpe-server-4.0.0-2ubuntu1
Icinga1 server on Debian monitoring a bunch of LinuxMint-19.3, using protocol
v3, and working just fine since last year. I just built
I just had this problem on a Mint-19.3 XFCE upgraded from 18.3. For me,
the fix was:
* `sudo nvidia-xconfig`
* `sudo vi /etc/X11/xorg.conf`
The 'Section "Files"..EndSection' block already existed but was empty. I added
this:
Section "Files"
ModulePath
Drat, I meant to add this too:
Search keywords: linux mint switch user wrong resolution
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1757202
Title:
xubuntu / bionic / nvidia-driver-390 can only be
The hack-around in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr/+bug/1035045/comments/3
"worked" for me with `etckeeper` + BZR on Mint-18, in that it stopped
the error messages. I don't actually know or care what omitting the
affected snap files in `/etc/` might do later.
Note I needed 2 lines
The hack-around in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr/+bug/1035045/comments/3
"worked" for me with `etckeeper` + BZR on Mint-18, in that it stopped
the error messages. I don't actually know or care what omitting the
affected snap files in `/etc/` might do later.
Note I needed 2 lines
The hack-around in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr/+bug/1035045/comments/3
"worked" for me with `etckeeper` + BZR on Mint-18, in that it stopped
the error messages. I don't actually know or care what omitting the
affected snap files in `/etc/` might do later.
Note I needed 2 lines
Public bug reported:
With either rhythmbox-plugins-3.0.2-0ubuntu2 (Linux Mint 17.3 Cinnamon) or
rhythmbox-plugins-3.3-1ubuntu7 (Linux Mint 18.2 XFCE) when the "Song Lyrics"
plugin is enabled and the following are checked, lyrics are never displayed:
* WinampCN (www.winampcn.com)
* Dark Lyrics
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1568604 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568604
Fresh install of Xubuntu 16.05 on Dell mini9 (32-bit/atom) with Intel graphics
(crash dump details in LP#1619969 if it matters):
1) At install = bug present
2) Fully update and reboot = bug fixed since
Fresh install of Xubuntu 16.05 on Dell mini9 (32-bit/atom) with Intel graphics
(crash dump details in LP#1619969 if it matters):
1) At install = bug present
2) Fully update and reboot = bug fixed since that installed
xserver-xorg-video-intel-2:2.99.917+git20160325-1ubuntu1.1
--
You received
Hard power off and a second install keeping only to the defaults worked.
What I was trying to do the first time was add more swap that was there
by default. I guess if I really want to do that now I can fiddle with
it in LVM.
So I probably goofed something up when manually partitioning, but the
Public bug reported:
Subject says it all, brand new install on a brand new SSD, crashed.
Manual partitioning might have something to do with it.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: ubiquity 2.21.63.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-31.50-generic 4.4.13
Uname: Linux
My use case is a Mint 17.x VM using a VirtualBox vboxsf to a Win8.1
host. I had this same problem in Geany and it was driving me insane
until I found
http://wiki.geany.org/config/all_you_never_wanted_to_know_about_file_saving
and then "Edit > Prefs > Various > use_atomic_file_saving: checked"
My use case is a Mint 17.x VM using a VirtualBox vboxsf to a Win8.1
host. I had this same problem in Geany and it was driving me insane
until I found
http://wiki.geany.org/config/all_you_never_wanted_to_know_about_file_saving
and then "Edit > Prefs > Various > use_atomic_file_saving: checked"
Me too, me too!!! Added comment and subscribed too the new
bug, 3.10.4 on Mint 17 (more-or-less Ubuntu 14.04).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848968
Title:
Google Calendar reminders
Same thing for me on 3.10.4 on Mint 17 (more-or-less Ubuntu 14.04).
Started in 2008, I'm up to 2010 after 20-30 mins...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480446
Title:
Old
2015 and still not fixed... Not too good.
Ugly work-around, hack at '~/.local/share/vinagre/vinagre-bookmarks.xml'
with your favorite editor, but it's XML and all 1 line so it's extremely
ugly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
This bug looks like a dup of Bug #916295.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002267
Title:
[tuxcmd] failed to start, AccessViolation at startup
To manage notifications about this bug
I can confirm this in 12.04 also. The export LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR=0
hack worked for me. And see also Bug #1002267.
You'd think you could do something like Exec=LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR=0
tuxcmd but that won't work for me. There's probably way to wrap it in
a tiny shell script... Yup, that
I had 4 machines affected by this problem, 3x on Ubuntu 10.04 and 1 on
12.04, all with FF 13.0.1. It also seemed like Thunderbird was a
problem, though not as bad as FF. Reboots fixed them all, but that's
very disappointing. Ubuntu/ntp/GNU/Linux should handle time and leap-
seconds more
I disagree with If screen size is smaller than 1024*768, the shortcut
window should not be displayed because I just spent about half an hour
tring to figure out why I don't get the overlay on my Mini9 1024x600
screen.
Also, I have a VM that comes up as 800x600 or something silly because of
a
For what it's worth, this does seem to be fixed for me. The last
several updates and reboots have Just Worked, with no need to do
anything special. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
And as noted it is (still!) happening in the beta of 12.04 LTS! That's
how I got here; mine crashed, I reported it, and all of the attachments
and details disappeared when I said that my bug was the same as this
one. If I see this again, how do I report it so that all the details do
not
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release:12.04
openssh-server-1:5.9p1-4ubuntu1
Not really sure that OpenSSH is the real culprit, but it's what has been
reporting the log spam since I upgraded from 10.10 to 12.04 a day or two
ago:
$ sudo grep
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release:12.04
openssh-server-1:5.9p1-4ubuntu1
Not really sure that OpenSSH is the real culprit, but it's what has been
reporting the log spam since I upgraded from 10.10 to 12.04 a day or two
ago:
$ sudo grep
unity --reset and logging back in seems to have fixed it for me as well,
though the process did scary things to the desktop and on the terminal
where I ran it which adds a bit more newbie unfriendlyness to the whole
issue.
Having said that, I don't think 3d ever worked on this machine before
and
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release:12.04
Package: fcheck-2.7.59-17
I upgraded a pretty stock Ubuntu 11.11 to 12.04, and now I'm getting
cron emails complaining:
Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at /usr/sbin/fcheck line 1366.
This is
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964044
Title:
Ubuntu 11.11 to 12.04 upgrade leaves blank or empty desktop on first
reboot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
I did an 'update-manager -d' upgrade of a pretty stock Ubuntu 11.11 to
12.04. It asked 2-3 questions about overwriting changed config files,
which I allowed, otherwise the upgrade was very smooth. But when I
rebooted and logged in, the desktop is empty. The display is
Thanks assassini! I did think of that, but how to do it wasn't obvious
I got distracted and never really followed up. 2d worked for me two,
and now that we talk about it, I vaugly recall having to go out of my
way to specially install and use 2d on the previous release, so I should
have seen
Yup, that works, thanks.
OTOH, I think the fact that I had to discover all of this via Google
(i.e., the initial '/desktop/unity-2d/launcher/hide_mode= 0') and this
bug report to be a bug itself. /desktop/unity-2d/launcher/use_strut
true could mean anything, is non-intuitive and
Whenever the autohide settings will be made available to end users, a
GUI will be introduced. There it is, that's what I was hoping for...
Perfect.
As far as using Unity-2d, I was forced due to an old graphics card, but
I *like* it. The first thing I do on my other systems is turn off
Compiz;
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: unity-2d
Testing Natty in VMware, host has old graphics and can't run unity so
running unity-2d. But I wanted the launcher on-screen all the time so I
set '/desktop/unity-2d/launcher/hide_mode= 0' That worked, but full-
screen apps still assume that
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737359
Title:
unity-2d in hide_mode 0 covers left side of full-screen windows
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dpkg
Encountered while (finally) upgrading from Mythbuntu 8.04 to Mythbuntu
10.04, 32-bit.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: mythbuntu-control-centre 0.28-0ubuntu1+hardy1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.81-generic
Uname:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695152
Title:
package mythbuntu-control-centre 0.28-0ubuntu1 hardy1 failed to
install/upgrade:
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'm going to guess that there was some odd dependency thing going on,
because after the post-upgrade reboot:
# aptitude full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gcompris
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
gcompris:
Installed: 9.0-0ubuntu7
Candidate: 9.0-0ubuntu7
Version table:
*** 9.0-0ubuntu7 0
500
It doesn't work in 10.04 either. :-( I get one initial screen paint,
and then nothing updates no matter what I do.
I am running a clean and up-to-date install of Lucid 64-bit on a Dell
Latitude D630 laptop, using the NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver
(version current) [Recommended] restricted
UPDATE: I added the work-around in comment 3, and it seemed to have no
effect. Then I had to reboot for other reasons, and since that reboot
I've had the messages only once, as follows, which is a great
improvement.
I did *not* mess with /sbin/hdparm as I mentioned I might in comment 25.
Jun 23
@Jarige, I thought the work-around I applied from comment 3 *was* the
disabling udisks-probe-ata-smart in /lib/udev/rules.d/80-udisks.rules
one in comment 7. I didn't read the file-names carefully enough.
Having said that, '/lib/udev/rules.d/80-udisks.rules' says right at the
top # Do not edit
Ran into this bug on a clean install of Lucid i386 on a Mini9, while
attempting to present at a LUG. Not good. We had literally a room full
of Linux experts and it took us 20 mins to figure out what it was doing
and work around it. (Not online so I didn't find this bug until hours
later.)
We
I tried the one in #3 and it does not seem to have worked either, though
I didn't restart anything or reboot so I'm not 100% sure it took effect.
Different idea: I'm hazy on just what hdparm is needed for. What if I
just rename it, and create a symlink to true in its place. Will that
cause any
@Jarige in comment 21, what work-around, the one in comment 3?
@Tommy Trussell in comment 20, interesting point. I will grep '^... ..
..:3[567]:' /var/log/* and take a good look at the results, when I have
some time to spare.
--
udisks-probe-ata-smart causes HSM violations
Dell Mini9 running clean Lucid install. Fully up-to-date but no work-
arounds attempted. Upgraded RAM and 16G SSD I see messages like this
several times a day:
Jun 17 10:37:02 mini9 kernel: [541557.000145] ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x58)
Jun 17 10:37:02 mini9 kernel: [541557.004104] ata1:
I should have noted in my comment 18 that I noticed this issue via
logcheck, and that I was previously running Ubuntu 9.04 LPIA, with
logcheck and did NOT see this problem. I made 2 attempts to upgrade to
9.10 and both failed utterly, presumably due to the terrible LPIA ports.
So as noted this is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mythtv
Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04
mythtv-common:
Installed: 0.23.0+fixes24158-0ubuntu2
Candidate: 0.23.0+fixes24158-0ubuntu2
Version table:
*** 0.23.0+fixes24158-0ubuntu2 0
500
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50112079/Dependencies.txt
--
pwgen: not found during clean install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592521
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I'm using Gnome.
/etc/default/apport is and was turned off (by default, that seems kind
of bad).
/var/crash/ is empty.
I looked at installing bug-buddy but it wanted about 117 new packages,
which is too insane for words. Now I see why it's not installed by
default.
Anyway, the crash does not
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04
$ apt-cache policy evolution
evolution:
Installed: 2.28.3-0ubuntu9
Candidate: 2.28.3-0ubuntu9
Version table:
*** 2.28.3-0ubuntu9 0
500
roxterm_1.18.0+svn728 (2010-03-05) has been working flawlessly on LPIA
(using i386) Jaunty and AMD-64 Karmic.
I see that Lucid only has: Version: 1.17.1-1, it'd be great to bump this
up ASAP!!!
--
Font/window sizes odd when using zoom + tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531177
You received
roxterm_1.18.0+svn728 (2010-03-05) has been working flawlessly on LPIA
(using i386) Jaunty and AMD-64 Karmic.
I see that Lucid only has: Version: 1.17.1-1, it'd be great to bump this
up ASAP!!!
--
wishlist: add indication of background tab buffer change
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509544
Still present in Lucid Beta 2 (the package version is still 0.31.1)
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch)
Release:10.04
Codename: lucid
$ file /usr/share/backgrounds/warty-final-ubuntu.png
So far have only tried on Jaunty LPIA, but as noted prefs don't save, though
the following dir is created, it's empty:
drwxr-xr-x 2 jp jp 4.0K 2010-04-04 00:47 .FBReader/
But it's wors than that. My install has almost no keys mapped, so the
program IS NOT USABLE out of the box, and since you
You don't have to reboot, you can CTRL-ALT-F1 to switch to a virtual
terminal, log in, and kill the process like: kill $(pgrep fbreader).
But the package in Jaunty, at least, is not usable. The one from
http://www.fbreader.org/desktop/#debian seems to work really well, I'
quite pleased with it.
Up to 0.12.10, and this version is VASTLY better than the unusable stock
package in Jaunty. This should be updated for 10.04 LTS!
--
Please update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
In preliminary testing on the same machine; yup, that worked. That also
fixed a sort-of inverse problem I didn't think to mention, CTRL+0 wasn't
consistent across all tabs. Now it is...
--
Font/window sizes odd when using zoom + tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531177
You received this bug
Window sizing was really odd as well, but I'm not sure if it was a
problem or just that I didn't quite grok the behaviour and was thus
surprised. Either way, the latest version seems much better behaved.
I tried to reproduce the 'roxterm --tab' no-grow thing, but it seems OK to me.
I opened a
With very preliminary testing, that half-works. It seems to fix the
size when creating tabs the normal way though the GUI, but tabs created
by running 'roxterm --tab' are still off. It's odd, because the new
(--tab) tab is kind of synced, but it's off by a few sizes.
To reproduce:
1) Open a new
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: roxterm
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
roxterm:
Installed: 1.18.0+svn13-1
Candidate: 1.18.0+svn13-1
Note this is on the beta I'm testing per wishlist bug 509544. I also
tried testing using stock ROXTerm 1.0.8 on Hardy, but in that case View
Zoom in
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tuxpaint
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
tuxpaint:
Installed: 1:0.9.20-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:0.9.20-2ubuntu1
Problem: if ~/.tuxpaint/saved is a symlink to a directory that does not
exist (e.g. is not mounted), Tuxpaint will seem like it is saving a
First, I installed the version from comment 9 on the i686 machine on
which I build the package that I was using on the LPIA machine, and had
the same problem, so it wasn't *just* the LPIA machine. It's odd that
it was not reproducible on AMD64, but it's also now moot since the
update fixed it.
I
So far it's been perfect on my two main workstations (Karmic 64-bit
Jaunty LPIA)! I'd vote to include in Lucid if possible.
--
wishlist: add indication of background tab buffer change
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Of course I spoke too soon... The Karmic install is still working fine
and as expected.
The Jaunty (i386 on LPIA) version has an odd bug (that I don't see in
Karmic).
To reproduce:
1) Open 3 or more tabs
2) Switch to tab 2 do 'sleep 5; echo test'
3) Switch to some other tab
Results: when tab
Duh! Yes, it works perfectly if you actually turn it on... :-) Never
even occurred to me...
That build process also worked better. I'd seen the Debian module, but
initially didn't want to confuse the issue, then forgot about it when I
went ahead and confused the issue with checkinstall
Thank you for the quick response on this, it's really great to see!
It sort-of works, in that the tab background will now flash if the
background tab beeps, but not if it just changes. I am testing by
opening two tabs, and typing 'sleep 5 ; echo test' in the first then
switching to the second.
Doing a regular 'sudo make install' did not change anything above.
$ sudo make uninstall gave me:
[...]
/bin/bash: line 4: cd: /usr/local/share/roxterm: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [uninstall-nobase_pkgdataDATA] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jp/testing/ROXTerm'
make: ***
So, the official word from Brother product managers is as follows. The
short, over-simplified version is, they think it's a problem in the
Ubuntu PrintManager and have no plans to change anything for my printer
at least. Newer ones will probably not show the bug as they will use a
simpler
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: roxterm
SecureCRT and Multi Gnome Terminal (seems to be adandonware at
http://multignometerm.sourceforge.net/) have a great feature that tell
you when a background tab's status or buffer has changed. As MGT puts
it: Notification that an inactive
Can you get ssh etc to beep at the crucial moment?
Probably, but I think that would be manual. I'd have to remember to add
'|| beep' or '; beep' on the end of the commands, like 'ssh u...@host ||
beep' or 'rsycn stuff u...@host:elsewhere ; beep'. Not a bad work-
around though.
...you want
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tuxpaint
tuxpaint-1:0.9.20-2ubuntu1
tuxpaint-config-0.0.10-1
tuxpaint-data-1:0.9.20-2ubuntu1
tuxpaint-plugins-default-1:0.9.20-2ubuntu1
tuxpaint-stamps-default-2009.06.28-1
On a clean install of Karmic (System76 factory), I tried holding down
the ALT
I should have noted:
Linux 2.6.31-17-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 10 17:01:44 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
--
printer dialog never shows in tuxpaint
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I confirm the same problem using a Brother MFC-9840CDW with the Brother
drivers on 64-bit Karmic (stock System76 factory install).
system-config-printer-common-1.1.12+git20090826-0ubuntu8
system-config-printer-gnome-1.1.12+git20090826-0ubuntu8
Yes. Firefox, OpenOffice Writer, Eye of Gnome and gedit: File, Print
*all* result in printer dialogs as expected.
Note that the default behavior of tuxpaint is to Just Print, using the
defaults, which makes sense given the target audience. The problem here
is that my default is black and white,
Broken *again* in Karmic g-t 2.28.1. And I can't get it to work in g-t
2.22.1 in Hardy either even though bug 284824 says it should work.
2.22.1 Hardy
1.1) Gnome-terminal, edit, Keyboard shortcuts, check DISABLE all menu access
keys
1.2) Set New tab shortcut to Altt, set Edit, Paste to Altv,
Hu... Until Wireless Just Works (which has never been my
experience, even with F/OSS drives and Intel cards), turning off *all*
wpa_supplicant logging to syslog sounds like a really bad idea. I do a
'tail -f /var/log/syslog' when attempting to get wireless cards working
all the time, and no
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 229681 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229681
See bug 229681 for a work-around for Hardy (and probably newer releases
as well).
Short version, the problem is a missing dependency in the package, to fix just
install the dcmtk too.
$ sudo aptitude
I confirm all of the above on Hardy:
$ sudo aptitude install aeskulap
= Fails as noted above: error on opening DICOMDIR, black screen when
manually viewing files, etc.
WORK-AROUND for Hardy, as per Samuel and GT Ducati above (thanks!):
$ sudo aptitude install aeskulap dcmtk
= Works as
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mythtv
On my Ubuntu 9.10 LPIA netbook upgraded from 9.04 running the MythTV
client, the icon in the apps menu, or the one I copied to my launcher
bar is basically invisible due to the new default color scheme in
Karmic. It's *there* but almost
Happening again on Karmic upgraded from Jaunty, but I did not notice
this on Jaunty. Logcheck installed on both.
$ apt-cache policy wpasupplicant
wpasupplicant:
Installed: 0.6.9-3ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.6.9-3ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 0.6.9-3ubuntu1 0
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com
1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter
the problem,
$ man ntptrace
$ ntptrace -v
2. the behavior you expected, and
I expect the man page to be accurate and ideally, useful. Right now
it's mostly neither.
3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much
1. Is this reproducible?
Since the bug was created so long ago, I don't recall any more detail
than above. Sorry...
Running in VMware Server 1.x VMs under some conditions makes time in the
VM run really oddly. Perhaps the above hit a race condition where:
1) ntpd polled and time was OK
2)
1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter
the problem,
$ man ntptrace
$ ntptrace -v
2. the behavior you expected, and
I expect the man page to be accurate and ideally, useful. Right now
it's mostly neither.
3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much
1. Is this reproducible?
Since the bug was created so long ago, I don't recall any more detail
than above. Sorry...
Running in VMware Server 1.x VMs under some conditions makes time in the
VM run really oddly. Perhaps the above hit a race condition where:
1) ntpd polled and time was OK
2)
Colin: point taken. :-) Thanks for fixing this...
--
[jaunty] lpia alternate install does not install linux-lpia
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
FYI, I'm getting logcheck messages from a Dell Mini-9 with the same
error on a clean install of Jaunty via the 2009-04-11
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/daily/current/jaunty-alternate-lpia.iso.
No big deal, everything works as far as I can tell.
I'll suppress it via a custom logcheck pattern:
#
Sweet, never noticed that.
$ ll /var/log/installer/syslog
-rw--- 1 root root 508K 2009-04-11 16:45 /var/log/installer/syslog
You sure you want uncompressed?
$ ll syslog.gz
-rw--- 1 root root 71K 2009-04-15 21:26 syslog.gz
--
[jaunty] lpia alternate install does not install linux-lpia
Evince 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 in Jaunty beta LPIA has a regression to this bug.
And boy is it annoying. But it's tricky too, it doesn't always happen.
Problems:
1) Evince defaults to best fit which is always annoying but even worse on a
Netbook screen.
2) When navigating the document using the
Oh, I forgot, best fit should be renamed Whole Page or something, as
best fit is not a good description.
And I just re-read the section from comment 10 above. Arggg. I see the
point about the spec, but I don't care what the PDF author thought, I
want it to display the way I want it to (so I can
Same for me, using 1 day newer daily...
I used the 2009-04-11 http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/daily/current
/jaunty-alternate-lpia.iso, burned to a DataTraveler 2G USB key, and
everything mostly Just Worked.
I had no network (wired or wireless) during the install, but wired
worked fine after
I have a 16G SSD
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820609413Tpk=FEM16GHDL
and used the 2009-04-11 http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/daily/current
/jaunty-alternate-lpia.iso, burned to a DataTraveler 2G USB key using
Intrepid usb-creator
I used the 2009-04-11 http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/daily/current
/jaunty-alternate-lpia.iso, burned to a DataTraveler 2G USB key using
Intrepid usb-creator
(https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick), and
everything mostly Just Worked.
I had no network (wired or wireless)
Craig, I may be especially dense today (likely), but I'm still not clear
what you want.
Do you mean to boot from the USB key and copy /var/log/syslog someplace?
If so, at waht stage of the boot process? I didn't use a Live
anything, I used the daily build alternate installer, so the only choice
OK, some more, hope this is useful and the right place.
I filtered the noise above out [1] and have now noticed a much small
amount of these:
Mar 31 08:05:05 ubuntu-904 dbus-daemon: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules;
type=method_call, sender=:1.32 (uid=1000 pid=4091
I'm getting tons of these as well, on a clean install, brand new, fully-
updated-as-of yesterday (2009-03-29) Jaunty VM, except they seem to be
cron related. I know nothing about DBus, so I'm not sure if this is a
symptom of the same problem and belongs here, or a related problem that
wants a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
Jaunty, fully up-to-date as of 5 minutes ago. Running in a VMware
Server 1.0.8 VM (so time is erratic).
ntp 4.2.4p4+dfsg-7ubuntu5
ntptrace reports stratum 16 but ntpd reports sync in syslog, thus
ntptrace should report stratum 3 (in the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
Documentation bug, present on Jaunty, Intrepid, Hardy, and upstream in
Lenny and Etch, at least. May be older...
man ntptrace says
[...]
ntptrace [ -vdn ] [ -r retries ] [ -t timeout ] [ server ]
But the only valid options are -n and -m. -m is
Public bug reported:
I thought there was already a bug for this, but now I can't find it, so
sorry if this is a dup.
In Xubuntu Hardy (and previous), when using Apps, Settings, Keyboard,
Shortcuts, you can't assign the Windows SUPER_L key to 'xfce4-popup-
menu'. Instead of the expected Super_L
Agree.
--
WIN key SUPER_L should be mapped to Applications menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: logcheck-database
The Hardy logcheck-database /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/postfix file has this:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/anvil\[[0-9]+\]: statistics:
max (message|recipient|connection) (count|rate) [/[:digit:]s]+ for
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
