[Bug 1308261]

2020-01-24 Thread Jason-gcc
Fixed for GCC 10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308261 Title: ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured stack-allocated array To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1308261]

2020-01-24 Thread Jason-gcc
*** Bug 86432 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308261 Title: ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured stack-allocated

[Bug 1791425]

2019-02-24 Thread Jason-gcc
The patch for 89285 seems to have fixed this on trunk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791425 Title: Compiler error: constexpr with bitfields. To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 827806]

2011-08-30 Thread Jason-gcc
Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 30 21:27:18 2011 New Revision: 178338 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178338 Log: PR c++/50114 * decl.c (poplevel): Disable for scope compatibility hack in C++11 mode. Added:

[Bug 827806]

2011-08-30 Thread Jason-gcc
Fixed for 4.7. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827806 Title: cc1plus bails can't handle situation To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 721378]

2011-08-05 Thread Jason-gcc
Fixed by Jakub's patch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721378 Title: g++ ICE (segfault in cc1plus) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 721378]

2011-07-19 Thread Jason-gcc
(In reply to comment #1) I can't reproduce the isssue with an unlimited stack with release checking compiled FSF 4.6.1 or 4.5.3 releases. For some reason the C++ compiler nests constructing the members: Jason, can't we do something more optimal here? The nesting is inherent in the

[Bug 721378]

2011-07-19 Thread Jason-gcc
For this testcase, even 30MB isn't enough, but 40MiB is, so I think I'll round up to 64MB. I think it's probably best to raise the limit in both places to avoid confusion when invoking cc1plus directly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 721378]

2011-07-19 Thread Jason-gcc
Created attachment 24789 my patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721378 Title: g++ ICE (segfault in cc1plus) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 541425]

2011-03-14 Thread Jason-gcc
A middle ground would be to fix the bug in unify without adding mangling support, so we get the sorry there. I guess I'll do that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541425 Title:

[Bug 541425]

2011-03-14 Thread Jason-gcc
Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 9 17:57:46 2011 New Revision: 170824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170824 Log: PR c++/44629 * pt.c (unify): An unresolved overload is a nondeduced context. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/nontype22.C Modified:

[Bug 541425]

2011-03-14 Thread Jason-gcc
Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 9 17:57:48 2011 New Revision: 170825 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170825 Log: PR c++/44629 * pt.c (unify): An unresolved overload is a nondeduced context. Added:

[Bug 541425]

2011-03-14 Thread Jason-gcc
Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 9 17:57:51 2011 New Revision: 170826 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170826 Log: PR c++/44629 * pt.c (unify): An unresolved overload is a nondeduced context. Added:

[Bug 541425]

2011-03-14 Thread Jason-gcc
ICE fixed in 4.4, 4.5, 4.6. Not worth applying to 4.3 at this point I think. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541425 Title: [PR44629] internal compiler error in unify -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 541425]

2011-03-14 Thread Jason-gcc
(In reply to comment #12) I'm confused why this would be an overload set. cmp1 is a template so I can't see how this code would even begin to be valid without specifying the template argument in the default argument... Once you know A's T, you have a desired type int (*)(T, T) from which to