[Bug 1729305] Re: CouchDB service fails to start

2017-11-02 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Also, if you're so inclined, I now have CouchDB 1.7.0 test packages for Artful here: https://launchpad.net/~jderose/+archive/ubuntu/couchdb-1.7.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729305

[Bug 1729305] Re: CouchDB service fails to start

2017-11-02 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Devin, Thanks for the bug report! CouchDB 1.6.x doesn't work with the Erlang 20.0.4 packages in Artful. I've been working on CouchDB 2.1 packages for Artful for internal use at System76, but it's a much different beast in many ways and also has upstream packaging changes that make it very

[Bug 1663299] [NEW] 16.04.2: `linux-signed-image-generic-hwe-16.04` is autoremovable after UEFI install

2017-02-09 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1) Fresh UEFI install using 20170209 16.04.2 daily ISO (sha1sum: 93378778ba193f6fbcac222a8d60a4bae52c94e8) 2) Reboot into install and run `sudo apt-get autoremove` Thanks! ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1621507] Re: initramfs-tools configure_networking() fails to dhcp ipv6 addresses

2016-12-16 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Mathieu, Okay, just finished testing with xenial-proposed, no issues found. Things are working as expected for my use-case (with no adjustments on my end), so at least for the corners that my particular use-cases covers, this proposed package seems regression free. I tested PXE booting into a

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-11-11 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Steve, I'm not sure whether it was a truly representative test, but it works fine with latest Xenial daily desktop ISO under QEMU + OVMF, and these dailies do have xenial-proposed enabled. (I'm testing the 2016 ISO, sha1sum 0ed4db8dad7142837ce9175e2b9617c4dd93a326.) I recall that d-i needed

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-11-09 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Mathieu, I tested your PPA package with Xenial: with no config changes on my end, it's working as expected from my use case. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631474 Title:

[Bug 1637985] Re: Install Fail - Attempt to configure apt to install additional packages from CD

2016-10-31 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
FYI, same thing is happening with the latest Zesty server ISO (see attached). ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2016-10-31 14-32-09.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1637985/+attachment/4770253/+files/Screenshot%20from%202016-10-31%2014-32-09.png -- You

[Bug 1637985] Re: Install Fail - Attempt to configure apt to install additional packages from CD

2016-10-31 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Attaching tarbal of /var/log from lp:1638086 ** Attachment added: "log.tgz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1637985/+attachment/4770249/+files/log.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1638086] Re: Zesty: An attempt to configure apt to install additional packages from the CD failed

2016-10-31 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1637985 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637985 Attaching tarball of /var/log ** Attachment added: "log.tgz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1638086/+attachment/4770250/+files/log.tgz -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1638086] [NEW] Zesty: An attempt to configure apt to install additional packages from the CD failed

2016-10-31 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: The current Zesty daily desktop ISO can't be installed, fails with error message in bug title. Please see attached screenshot. I tried both "Install Ubuntu" and an OEM install, both fail. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-10-14 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Okay, tested 0.122ubuntu8.5 from xenial-proposed, and it fixes the issue for my use-case. But I'm not changing verification-needed to verification-done yet as I don't know if it fixes the use case of the original reporter. @scotte - can you please confirm whether this fixes things for you? --

[Bug 1632767] Re: yakkety: desktop ISO fails to reboot after install: Failed deactivating swap

2016-10-13 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@jbicha hmm, I didn't experience this with the final Ubuntu desktop 16.10 ISOs... what was your experience with the final 16.10 Ubuntu GNOME ISOs? But I also don't think this is happening with perfect determinism either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-10-13 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Oh, and to be clear, I have no problem with this change in Yakkety. It's just starting to feel a bit too invasive in my opinion for Xenial. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631474

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-10-13 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@martin - I tested the proposed package, and it's workable, but there are behavior changes still compared to prior to when this regression was introduced (in particular, the boot is a lot slower when there are mulitple NICs but only one will be configured, even when I use "ip=:eth0:dhcp").

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-10-12 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Attaching a tarbal of everything i have in /var/log, not sure it's useful (not my "ephemeral" environment is read-only with /var/log on a tmpfs, so it's mostly empty). Also here's my exact /proc/cmdline from within the booted ephemeral environment: BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz-4.4.0-42-generic

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-10-12 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@chiluk - I tested the latest package in your PPA, but something seems slightly wonky for my use case. Networking seems to come up correctly, but it takes longer than it should and I see warnings like this repeated several times: ip: ether "dev" is duplicate, or "permanent" is garbage -- You

[Bug 1632767] [NEW] yakkety: desktop ISO fails to reboot after install: Failed deactivating swap

2016-10-12 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: The 20161012.1 yakkety desktop ISO fails to reboot after the install completes (see attached screenshot). Tested on QEMU in BIOS and UEFI mode, which is where the screenshot is from. Same thing is seemingly happening on hardware (reboot hangs), although I don't see this

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-10-10 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@chiluk - the package in your PPA fixes it from my use case, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631474 Title: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot

[Bug 1631474] Re: No networking with initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.3 and ip=dhcp boot option

2016-10-07 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
As asked by chiluk on IRC, here's my PXE boot configuration (well, representative one anyway, the exact kernel version will obviously change): DEFAULT ubuntu LABEL ubuntu LINUX vmlinuz-4.4.0-36-generic APPEND initrd=initrd.img-4.4.0-36-generic root=/dev/nfs

[Bug 1630711] Re: fwupd using 200% CPU, but status of systemd services is "inactive (dead)"

2016-10-06 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
So far I haven't encountered this again... so might have been a fluke with the state of Yakkety for a brief period, phase of the moon, or whatever. But if I do encounter it again, I'll collect as many details as I can. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-10-06 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
I'm back to testing u-s-d started under systemd, and I found some serious wackiness observing `sudo journalctl -f` when I use the brigtness up/down hotkeys. The attached "wacky-journalctl.txt" file has the output of `sudo journalctl -f` during which I used the brightness hotkeys *twice*, and

[Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-10-06 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
`sudo forkstat -D 4` when u-s-d is started under systemd and I press the brightness up hotkey. ** Attachment added: "with-systemd.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1626651/+attachment/4756099/+files/with-systemd.txt -- You received this bug

[Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-10-06 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Okay, an interesting hint is that this problem seems to be fixed if u-s-d is started under the Upstart user session instead of the systemd user session. If anyone wants to try this, just comment out these three lines in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/00upstart: if [ "${1#*.target}" != "$1" ]; then

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
And I sanity checked the server ISO on the same slew of UEFI hardware... no issues found. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624096 Title: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Okay, the 20161005.1 ISOs seem to have done the trick. Tested the desktop and server ISOs under QEMU+OVMF, plus tested the desktop ISO on a slew of UEFI hardware. No issues encountered shim-wise. I'll test the server ISO on UEFI hardware shortly, but there are a few other things I need to finish

[Bug 1630711] Re: fwupd using 200% CPU, but status of systemd services is "inactive (dead)"

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Oops, I attached the wrong screenshot, here's the correct one. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2016-10-05 12-06-26.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1630711/+attachment/4755346/+files/Screenshot%20from%202016-10-05%2012-06-26.png -- You received this bug

[Bug 1630711] Re: fwupd using 200% CPU, but status of systemd services is "inactive (dead)"

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Attachment removed: "Screenshot from 2013-11-11 11:45:50.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1630711/+attachment/4755311/+files/Screenshot%20from%202013-11-11%2011%3A45%3A50.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1630711] Re: fwupd using 200% CPU, but status of systemd services is "inactive (dead)"

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Yeah, I can do this, assuming I can reproduce it again. This is on my work machine, so I had to just kill `fwupd` so I could get on with my work in the meantime :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1630711] Re: fwupd using 200% CPU, but status of systemd services is "inactive (dead)"

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
One other useful detail. There are actually 2 fwupd processes running, both started by PID 1: ps -ef | grep fwupd root 2823 1 99 11:41 ?01:35:03 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd/fwupd root 4712 1 0 11:44 ?00:00:00 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd/fwupd But it's

[Bug 1630711] [NEW] fwupd using 200% CPU, but status of systemd services is "inactive (dead)"

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: Just hit this, haven't yet dug into details or tried to reproduce it. I booted up a nearly up-to-date Yakkety desktop, noticed my fans were running like crazy, and looking at top shows `fwupd` is the culprit (see attached screenshot). I don't know much about fwupd, but I'm

[Bug 1630341] Re: yakkety: behavior change in `qemu-nbd -c $DEV $FILENAME`: doesn't automatically create partion devices

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Thanks for the feedback, Robie! I believe the underlying problem was this kernel bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1628336 The /dev/nbd0p1, etc, partition devices were never getting creating automatically after connecting the device, no matter how long you waited. So you

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Hmmm, today's yakkety-desktop-amd64.iso (sha1:494bc027be3d29c494eb17d057dcc51cdfc6f50b) is seemingly still using the broken shim package? I'm guessing there's something special about how the shim package gets onto the ISO as it doesn't seem to be listed in yakkety-desktop- amd64.manifest? But

[Bug 1630341] [NEW] yakkety: behavior change in `qemu-nbd -c $DEV $FILENAME`: doesn't automatically create partion devices

2016-10-04 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 12.10 through Ubuntu 16.04, something like this worked with 100% reliability in my experience: sudo modprobe nbd sudo qemu-nbd -c /dev/nbd0 /my/vm/image.qcow2 sudo mount /dev/nbd0p1 /mnt But on Yakkety, this *almost* always fails because the /dev/nbd0p1 device

[Bug 1626622] Re: yakkety server: fails to detect and mount CD-ROM

2016-10-03 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Ah, sorry, I forgot to follow up on this. Yes, the bug has been fixed for about a week now (but I was on vacation). Is it better to mark this as Fix Released instead? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-10-03 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@Mathieu - I was on vacation last week, so I wasn't in the loop on IRC. What's the current status of this? Does it seem feasible that the fixed shim package can be signed (and FFE'd) in time for 16.10? Or are we already at the point where reverting to the shim 0.8-0ubuntu2 package from Xenial

[Bug 1626622] Re: yakkety server: fails to detect and mount CD-ROM

2016-09-22 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Summary changed: - yakkety server: fails to detect and mount CD-ROM (QEMU, BIOS mode) + yakkety server: fails to detect and mount CD-ROM ** Description changed: The latest yakkety server amd64 daily (20160921.1, sha1sum b3e9f59397389bf23390f4869d3aef46de5d105c) fails to detect and mount

[Bug 1626622] [NEW] yakkety server: fails to detect and mount CD-ROM (QEMU, BIOS mode)

2016-09-22 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: The latest yakkety server amd64 daily (20160921.1, sha1sum b3e9f59397389bf23390f4869d3aef46de5d105c) fails to detect and mount the CD-ROM. Please see attached screenshot. I found this testing under QEMU (BIOS mode), not yet sure whether it effects hardware. But I'll be

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-09-22 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@@Mathieu yeah, if you can get me a custom ISO with an updated shim package (doesn't need to be signed, I'm not using secure boot), then I'll giving a thorough testing under QEMU and on all the UEFI hardware I have access too (6 different laptops, 3 different desktops). Thanks! -- You received

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-09-21 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@Laszlo - darn, no luck. Following your recommendations, PXE booting is no longer attempted, but I still end up at Shell> and the installer doesn't launch. I'm attaching the isolated test script I'm using ATM. If I try it with the latest Yakkety desktop daily ISO, I hit the above hardware

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-09-21 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Oops, forgot to attach my test script :P ** Attachment added: "test-yakkety-guest.sh" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1624096/+attachment/4745643/+files/test-yakkety-guest.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-09-21 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@Laszlo - thank you very much for the detailed explanation! Sounds like your tips, plus /EFI/BOOT/fallback.efi being present on the ISO, should be enough for me to work-around this issue. I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks again! -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim

2016-09-20 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@Mathieu - I've been doing some quick experiments with fallback.efi on the ISO, and I'm not sure that alone will fix things. The problem is that when fallback.efi is present, the installer isn't launching. Instead, OVMF tries to PXE boot (which in my test environment fails because I don't have

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: desktop and server ISOs wont boot under QEMU in UEFI mode

2016-09-19 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@Laszlo - awesome, thanks! Do you happen to know what version introduced the bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624096 Title: yakkety: desktop and server ISOs wont boot under QEMU

[Bug 1624096] Re: yakkety: desktop and server ISOs wont boot under QEMU in UEFI mode

2016-09-17 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@Laszlo - thanks for the debugging tips! I'm getting the same result that you are. I found a possibly related opensuse bug: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-bugs/2016-01/msg00965.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1624096] [NEW] yakkety: desktop and server ISOs wont boot under QEMU in UEFI mode

2016-09-15 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: Sometime after August 25th (or so) something changed in the Yakkety ISOs that make them no longer boot under QEMU in UEFI mode. However, the ISOs do work fine still on the physical UEFI hardware I've tested (3 different systems). I'm not sure about other VM solutions like

[Bug 1604173] Re: Clicking "Reboot Now" after 14.04-->16.04 upgrade has no effect

2016-07-20 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Brain, Strange. So I just tried the upgrade again, and after the upgrade completed, I: 1) Clicked "Reboot Now" (which did nothing, same as yesterday) 2) Ran `sudo reboot` - it worked, but seemed to hang for some time before doing anything (it hung for maybe 20 seconds or so) I'm not sure how

[Bug 1604173] [NEW] Clicking "Reboot Now" after 14.04-->16.04 upgrade has no effect

2016-07-18 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: After doing a 14.04 to 16.04 upgrade, clicking "Reboot Now" has no effect. update-manager simply closes. However, I could then reboot fine using the indicator or the power button, which kinda suggests the problem is in update-manager rather than in the general state of such

[Bug 1599900] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in ccsObjectGetInterface_()

2016-07-14 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
FYI, I seem to be hitting this same bug (under qemu) with the xenial daily ISO as well (which have xenial-proposed enabled by default). Will this be fixed in Xenial also? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1598770] Re: Unity in low-graphics mode has animations and unneeded redraws

2016-07-13 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@Marco: thanks for the FYI! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598770 Title: Unity in low-graphics mode has animations and unneeded redraws To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1598770] Re: Unity in low-graphics mode has animations and unneeded redraws

2016-07-13 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Here's another screenshot that shows the SegvAnalysis. In my testing thus far, this failure (assuming it's related to this unity/nux change) only seems to happen when trying to install under qemu. I tried -vga qxl, -vga std, and -vga virtio... none of them yield a working installation. Compiz

[Bug 1598770] Re: Unity in low-graphics mode has animations and unneeded redraws

2016-07-13 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Possibly as a result of this change, unity/compiz is failing to start when trying to install from the latest 16.04.1 daily ISO under qemu (xenial-desktop-amd64.iso 20160713, sha1sum c9b1ad9b1044c4e68684395daa3f85e016491c3a). I attached a screenshot as I couldn't file a bug from within the qemu VM

[Bug 1597876] Re: installing/upgrading packages containing systemd services results in prompt for cryptoswap passphrase [xenial]

2016-06-30 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Also attaching a screenshot, just so folks don't think I'm making this up :P ** Attachment added: "screenshot.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1597876/+attachment/4692953/+files/screenshot.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1597876] [NEW] installing/upgrading packages containing systemd services results in prompt for cryptoswap passphrase [xenial]

2016-06-30 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: This is an extremely odd bug that requires a very specific scenario to reproduce: 1) You need to be using an ecryptfs-style cryptoswap partition (as would be setup when you choose "Encrypt my home directory" during the installation) 2) The underlying physical swap partition

[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)

2016-06-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@diwic - I agree, there have been problems in multiple places causing this. Yesterday I sorted out one of them. If you have swap on a GPT partitioned NVMe or MMC drive, ecryptfs-setup-swap isn't correctly marking the partition as non-auto-mounting, which leads the the user erroneously being

[Bug 1588077] Re: Ubiquity crash with Yakkety 20160601 daily amd64 ISO

2016-06-01 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Same result when I use "Try Ubuntu without installing" and "Install Ubuntu". Happens with both UEFI and BIOS installs. A quick glance at `JournalErrors.txt` confirms that the crash is happening during "Configure time zone...": Jun 01 15:59:03 hostname /plugininstall.py[6642]: Exception during

[Bug 1588077] Re: Ubiquity crash with Yakkety 20160601 daily amd64 ISO

2016-06-01 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
For me the installer is crashing when the status beneath the progress bar says, "Configuring time zone...". (See attached screenshot.) Note this was a UEFI install in OEM mode. I know this crash is likewise occurring with BIOS installs in OEM mode. Will try a normal install next. ** Attachment

[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)

2016-06-01 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Any chance this can get fixed in Xenial in time for 16.04.1? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-06-01 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
On a whim, I just checked in on this with the 20160601 Xenial daily amd64 ISO (sha1sum e07c8b4df1fc71a487fafb309bd318041a65774f), and everything works great: http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/xenial/daily-live/pending/ So seems things are on track for this not being a problem in the 16.04.1 release.

[Bug 1588077] [NEW] Ubiquity crash with Yakkety 20160601 daily amd64 ISO

2016-06-01 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: No other details at this time, will add more as I have more info. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: ubiquity 16.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-23.41-generic 4.4.10 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu4 Architecture:

[Bug 1583879] Re: apt-get update hangs indefinitely, appstreamcli using 100% CPU

2016-05-19 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Also, the graphical Ubuntu Software Updater is likewise hanging indefinitely. And I've confirmed this on 3 different systems so far. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583879 Title:

[Bug 1583879] [NEW] apt-get update hangs indefinitely, appstreamcli using 100% CPU

2016-05-19 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: Just ran `sudo apt-get update`, which is hanging indefinitely after the downloads complete, the last CLI output from which is: Fetched 733 kB in 1s (399 kB/s) Looking at `top` suggests `appstreamcli` is the culprit as it's pegged at near 100% CPU usage: 100 0.1 18:29.02

[Bug 1580232] Re: "Download updates while installing" does not download updates

2016-05-10 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Description changed: Ubiquity (as shipped on the 16.04 amd64 desktop ISO) does not download updates while installing when you've checked "Download updates while installing". Same result with both BIOS and UEFI installs (although UEFI installs - aways download the latest kernel,

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-05-10 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Okay, seems that "Download updates while installing" has no effect with the Ubiquity version on the 16.04 ISOs. I filed a bug against Ubiquity for this, would appreciate if someone could confirm my findings: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1580232 -- You received this

[Bug 1580232] [NEW] "Download updates while installing" does not download updates

2016-05-10 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: Ubiquity (as shipped on the 16.04 amd64 desktop ISO) does not download updates while installing when you've checked "Download updates while installing". Same result with both BIOS and UEFI installs (although UEFI installs aways download the latest kernel, whether or not

[Bug 1576726] Re: [SRU]network-manager

2016-05-06 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
@seb128... I'll try to get some better debug info soon. Interestingly, it only seem to happen with Intel 7260 WiFi cards (and not, for example, with Intel 8260 WiFi cards). So I'm not sure whether what we're seeing is actually a problem with network-manager. I'm now kinda thinking it's more

[Bug 1576726] Re: [SRU]network-manager

2016-05-05 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
With this proposed package, System76 is seeing network-manager crash upon the first resume from suspend. Anyone else experiencing this? I'll be looking into this more today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1572793] Re: Ubiquity no longer prompts to join available WiFi networks

2016-05-02 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Confirmed this fix in the proposed packaged, everything seems shiny. I confirmed that after an OEM install, enabling proposed, updating, and finally clicking "Prepare for shipping to user", Ubiquity behaves as expected during the first-run user config: 1) When not connected to Ethernet and you

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-25 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Description changed: [Description updated to reflect state of 16.04 release ISO] == In summary == If you have an Intel Skylake (6th gen) CPU and an NVIDIA GPU (or possibly other GPUs that likewise require use of the llvmpipe opengl software fallback), a work-around is needed to

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-25 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Hmm, I just tried this on Skylake hardware, and "Download updates while installing" isn't doing the trick. Could be that "Download updates while installing" is broken on the 16.04 ISOs, or this could be a result of the phased updates done by the Ubuntu Software Updater and related components that

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-25 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Description changed: [Description updated to reflect state of 16.04 release ISO] == In summary == If you have an Intel Skylake (6th gen) CPU and an NVIDIA GPU (or possibly other GPUs that likewise require use of the llvmpipe opengl software fallback), a work-around is needed to

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-25 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Abhinav, Sounds like you're encountering a different bug, or perhaps your ISO file is corrupted. Have you verified the checksum of your download? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564156

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-24 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Description changed: [Description updated to reflect state of 16.04 release ISO] == In summary == If you have an Intel Skylake (6th gen) CPU and an NVIDIA GPU (or possibly other GPUs that likewise require use of the llvmpipe opengl software fallback), a work-around is needed to

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-21 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Description changed: - Currently it's impossible to install from xenial-desktop-amd64.iso on a - wide range of hardware with Nvidia GPUs. + [Description updated to reflect state of 16.04 release ISO] - The problem is invalid opcode(s) when using llvmpipe (the software - opengl fallback,

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-21 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Just confirmed on Skylake hardware that llvm-toolchain-3.8 from proposed fixes this issue on Skylake hardware using llvmpipe. Thanks! ** Changed in: system76 Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-20 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
After further investigating, it seems this bug doesn't effect Haswell-E after all, sorry about the confusion. Will continue to report back as we learn more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-20 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
I can confirm that tjaalton's above test packages fix the problem on a Skylake laptop with an i7-6700 CPU and an Nvidia 970m GPU when using the nouveau driver. I installed libllvm3.8_3.8-2ubuntu1.1_amd64.deb from a VT then rebooted, and now I have working Unity again. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1572615] [NEW] xenial 20160419: oem-config-gtk not installed after OEM install

2016-04-20 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572436 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572436 Public bug reported: The `oem-config-gtk` package is not installed after doing an OEM install from the Xenial 20160419 daily desktop ISO (sha1sum 8965fb3673631e1161b4656f2c95b593ac302eb2). This is true on

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-11 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Oh, and another bit of information: our laptops all use embedded Display Port for their connection to the internal screen, and in this case, this bug always manifests. So at least in our testing so far, both eDP and DP seem to be effected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-04-11 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
So there seems to be a curious pattern with this bug (which might provide an important hint): on desktop systems with 970 GTX or 980 GTX cards, this bug always seems to happen when connected to a monitor over DisplayPort, but does *not* seem to happen when connected to a monitor over HDMI. We'll

[Bug 1561685] Re: x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow keys on qemu guest

2016-04-07 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561685 Title: x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow keys on qemu guest

[Bug 1561685] Re: x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow keys on qemu guest

2016-04-07 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Correction: this is fixed as of 1.18.3-1ubuntu2. 1.18.3-1ubuntu1 still had this problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561685 Title: x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow

[Bug 1561685] Re: x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow keys on qemu guest

2016-04-07 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
I'm no longer having this problem as of 1.18.3-1ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561685 Title: x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow keys on qemu guest To manage

[Bug 1563505] Re: unresponsive lemu6 . . . NVMe SSD ( samsung SSD 950 PRO )

2016-03-31 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
David, thanks for providing more information! In terms of looking for issues related to the NVMe driver, this is probably the best approach: dmesg | grep -i nvme And then see if there is anything suspicious in the resulting output. In term of the CPU performance being dramatically different

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-03-30 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Description changed: Currently Unity on Xenial is unusable when the llvmpipe software fallback is used, at least on certain hardware. For example, from dmesg: [ 2092.557913] traps: compiz[10155] trap invalid opcode ip:7efc940030d4 sp:7ffccd914ea0 error:0 [ 2093.109485] traps:

[Bug 1564156] Re: xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-03-30 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
m76 Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: system76 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jason Gerard DeRose (jderose) ** Changed in: system76 Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 1564156] [NEW] xenial: invalid opcode when using llvmpipe

2016-03-30 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: Currently Unity on Xenial is unusable when the llvmpipe software fallback is used, at least on certain hardware. For example, from dmesg: [ 2092.557913] traps: compiz[10155] trap invalid opcode ip:7efc940030d4 sp:7ffccd914ea0 error:0 [ 2093.109485] traps: compiz[10192]

[Bug 1508865] Re: oem-config: networking not enabled during user config

2016-03-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Mathieu, Everything seems solid with this fix. I confirmed that: 1. When plugged into Ethernet, the NM applet is show, networking is enabled, and ubi-timezone correctly guesses your timezone 2. When *not* plugged into Ethernet but you have WiFi hardware, the NM applet is shown, oem-config

[Bug 1563505] Re: unresponsive lemu6 . . . NVMe SSD ( samsung SSD 950 PRO )

2016-03-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
One other thing... in the future if you encounter any issues, please use the System76 support system. Log into your System76 account, then go to support and created a ticket. You'll tend to get a much quicker response there. Our engineers do their best to keep tabs on System76 related bugs on

[Bug 1563505] Re: unresponsive lemu6 . . . NVMe SSD ( samsung SSD 950 PRO )

2016-03-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Thanks for the bug report, sorry to hear you're having issues! Sounds like you're having multiple (and perhaps unrelated issues), so let's first focus on the keyboard and mouse not working. If you could please provide a bit more information to help us narrow this down: (1) You used the word

[Bug 1563505] Re: unresponsive lemu6 . . . NVMe SSD ( samsung SSD 950 PRO )

2016-03-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
** Changed in: system76 Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563505 Title: unresponsive lemu6 . . . NVMe SSD ( samsung SSD 950 PRO ) To manage

[Bug 1508865] Re: oem-config: networking not enabled during user config

2016-03-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Mathieu, thanks a million for fixing this! I'll test it ASAP! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508865 Title: oem-config: networking not enabled during user config To manage

[Bug 1561685] Re: x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow keys on qemu guest

2016-03-24 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Okay, I just tried this on an Intel GPU system, and it has the same problem. Arrow keys are broken with 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1, but work fine with 1.18.1-1ubuntu4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1561685] [NEW] x-staging: 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 host breaks arrow keys on qemu guest

2016-03-24 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: This is an odd one. 1.18.2-2ubuntu0.1 (on the host) breaks the arrow keys on qemu guests. Actually, I'm not sure it breaks the arrow keys on the guest in all scenarios, but it at least breaks them in the pre-boot menu when trying to install a qemu VM from an ISO. For

[Bug 1554099] Re: Changing what action for security updates unusable

2016-03-24 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Yup, I can also confirm that it seems fixed in the 20160323 daily ISO. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554099 Title: Changing what action for security updates unusable To manage

[Bug 1554099] Re: Changing what action for security updates unusable

2016-03-24 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Yup, I can also confirm that it seems fixed in the 20160323 daily ISO (tested yesterday). Will test today's shortly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554099 Title: Changing what

[Bug 1554099] Re: Changing what action for security updates unusable

2016-03-21 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
I'm still seeing this bug on a fresh install from today's daily ISO (20160321, sha1sum 4773a2328eb4470761e1c37174d5d3cad5b6219d). But I'm no longer seeing it on my upgraded existing install from a few months back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1554099] Re: Changing what action for security updates unusable

2016-03-07 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Same is happening with latest Ubuntu (Unity) Xenial daily ISO (sha1sum 8e06dd499bfe357ebbad44c827d8428d70baacf4). I attached a screenshot of the same problem under Unity. This bug has been around for a few weeks or so, although I'm not exactly sure when it was introduced. ** Attachment added:

[Bug 1554194] [NEW] /home/oem and oem user are not removed by oem-config-firstboot

2016-03-07 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Public bug reported: Sometime recently during Xenial development, oem-config has become quite broken. It seems the underlying problem is that the "oem" user and the "/home/oem" folder aren't getting removed by oem-config-firstboot. Steps to reproduce: 1) Do an OEM-mode install from the latest

[Bug 1085766] Re: /var/log/upstart/ureadahead.log contains garbage

2016-02-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
This problem seems to exist currently on both 15.10 and Xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085766 Title: /var/log/upstart/ureadahead.log contains garbage To manage notifications

[Bug 1508865] Re: oem-config: networking not enabled during user config

2016-02-29 Thread Jason Gerard DeRose
Just to clarify what the behaviour is with 14.04.4, what the behaviour used to be up till 15.10. After an OEM install and clicking "Prepare for shipping to end user", on the next boot 14.04.4 will: 1. Automatically enabled wired networking when connected over Ethernet, or 2. When not connected

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >