apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743323/UdevLog.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743318/UdevDb.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743299/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743309/ProcModules.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743295/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743288/Lspci.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743290/Lsusb.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
apport information
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743285/Dependencies.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318)
MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. UL30A
Package: udev 151-7
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-18-generic-pae
root=UUID=d51fb0e4-2c6a-4e18-aa5a-10
apport information
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743279/BootDmesg.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42743281/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
In case that the original submission is unclear, here's my situation in
UL30A-A2.
Expected behaviour:
fn+f5 lowers brightness, fn+f6 increases brightness. (worked well in Karmic)
Observed behaviour, in Lucid Beta 1:
Initially, when the computer is first booted, it responds to f5/f6 but in
rando
Attached is a snippet from dmesg that is hopefully useful for the
devs.?field.comment=Attached is a snippet from dmesg that is hopefully
useful for the devs.
** Attachment added: "dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42742791/dmesg.txt
--
brightness hotkeys don't work as expected, asus ul30a
This problem might be caused by not accepting EULA (End User License
Agreement) during the installation.
--
userful-multiplier 323-20090317110251-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Adding onto severity of this situation:
Korean blogosphere is almost overloaded with warning messages telling readers:
"Do NOT update libcairo2!"
The majority of Korean users use Gulim.ttc and Batang.ttc, since using ones
supplied with Ubuntu (Baekmuk) isn't so great with anti-aliasing.
This upda
Same happened here, but I found out that ANY newly font will cause this problem.
For example, I was using anorexia, one of artwiz fonts (available by apt-get)
for Orage Clock in xfce-panel.
(For those who don't know, it's the clock application for Xubuntu, and I
changed the font of time display)
No error on the filesystem, but of course, error would cause the program
to terminate.
I found out that the program doesn't support unicode filenames, so not a bug
but a lack of feature.
The program terminates with "failed to write..." message when it encounters
non-latin directory or filename.
Not everyone wants to index filesystem, and when disabling tracker
should not render Nautilus' search function completely useless.
This should be fixed, back to the old way:
I go to /home/me/music/beatles in nautilus.
I press ctrl+f to search, and type in submarine.
The result should show files wi
sudo fatsort /dev/sdb
FATSort Utility 0.9.7.1 by Boris Leidner
File system: FAT32.
Sorting directory /
Sorting directory /Files/
writeClusterChain: Seek error!
sortClusterChain: Failed to write cluster chain!
sortClusterChain: Failed to sort cluster chain!
sort_fs: Failed to sort cluster chain!
I can confirm this.
I don't even get any "sorting directory" messages..
it just goes into ClusterChain: seek error!
I'm using MPIO Solid HD400, so I guess it's not really irivers that have
problem.
--
fatsort writeClusterChain: Seek error!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128517
You received this
20 matches
Mail list logo
