jth's approach in #24 looks sensible to me. Why has it gone ignored?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835833
Title:
spurious syslog error message because of use of -w on boot
[rpcbin
I had this problem in 12.04.1. It is resolved with #1012946. Once I
installed parted 2.3-8ubuntu5.1 (which is scheduled for 12.04.2) I was
able to use vmbuilder with a logical volume as a raw device.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Droid Sans Mono only has one style: Regular. Bold or Italic styles are
being programmatically generated by LibreOffice. So the problem isn't
with the Droid Sans Mono font, but rather (arguably) with LibreOffice.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Out of desperation I did a format/reinstall. This problem does not
exist out of the box. While reconfiguring the system to my tastes, I
kept my eye on if/when it would reappear.
One aspect of my configuration is that I have a sandbox user that I run
the browser out of, along with other potential
This bug is plaguing me very regularly in 11.10 on my laptop (Thinkpad
T510). What's interesting is that it doesn't happen on my desktop PC,
also running 11.10. Regardless, I suspect it's going to drive me to
xfce, because it makes the desktop unusable. So far I haven't had a
window lose focus w
Is this a dupe of bug 848115?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865193
Title:
Windows keep losing focus in Ubuntu 11.10
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Thanks Colin and Steve. I can confirm that the problem as reported is
fixed (inasmuch as I am no longer able to reproduce it in my staging VM
with a QA build of the alternate installer).
--
/boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate
installer)
https://bugs.launchpad
Will there be another 10.04 RC to test this? Or is there some other way
we can test the updated installer?
--
/boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate
installer)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I don't think that message means the arrays are overlapping, at least
for useful definitions of "overlapping." It would say this if, for
example, md0 and md1 had separate partitions on the same physical disks.
This is the case for my configuration, where I have 5 disks each with
two partitions (25
Correction: /dev/md0 (/boot) is formatted as ext3, not ext4.
--
/boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate
installer)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Although at first blush this seems to be bug #527401, I don't think it's
related to grub2. It's also a regression from alpha3; whereas #527401
also applies to lucid alpha3, this bug does not. I am using the
alternate installer.
I have an existing server running Hardy with L
linux-image-2.6.28.15.20 and pulseaudio-1:0.9.14-0ubuntu20.2 here, with
the crackling audio (on a Thinkpad T61p).
The fix that seemed to work for me -- and in fact the only one needed at
all -- was Jonathan's suggestion of adding the position_fix=1 option to
snd_hda_intel.
--
Crackling noise af
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver
Occasionally when coming back to my computer after having locked the
screen, I tap the shift key to present the unlock dialog box to enter my
password, and very briefly the contents
In response to Ace Suares, I thought I pipe in and say that this is
fixed in Hardy in mdadm 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3.1, released
2008-11-07.
--
mdadm debconf configuration for boot_degraded=true|false
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259127
You received this bug notification because you
I'm fine with closing this bug report.
This bug no longer applies to Intrepid.
Intrepid's session management is broken beyond all repair anyway. It
doesn't even bother starting gnome-terminal, let alone starting windows
with the wrong geometry.
--
After upgrading to hardy, gnome-terminal window
Just upgraded to Intrepid and am hit with this extraordinarily
irritating problem. 2.6.27-9.19 has CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y. I
assume at some point between 7.12 and 9.19 it was reenabled?
--
[regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26305
I disagree with FredWP that this isn't a bug. This is quite a serious
user interface bug. There is no indication whatsoever that the network
game feature does anything at all unless you happen to know what package
to install and what command to run. Even the manual had no instructions
on what to
Actually, rather than reverting my terminals to 80x25, it swiftly
crashes gnome-terminal. It doesn't do this every time, but if I play
around with various terminal configurations (number of open windows,
sizes, number of tabs), I can eventually make it segfault by editing the
prefs as you suggest.
Thanks Sebastien.
I suppose in some sense that's what I'm asking for, although ensuring
the order shouldn't be my responsibility. It's not reasonable to expect
a user to know when he saves his session that he must reorder things so
that Compiz starts first.
But I suppose software can have config
Public bug reported:
When saving a session with gnome-terminals, it sometimes happens that
gnome-terminal is started on login before the compositing manager
(compiz specifically) is loaded, causing gnome-terminal not to enable
true transparency.
This happens on gutsy as well as hardy.
** Affects
Attached is the file as requested. I will also attach ~/.gnome2/session
for good measure. I removed ~/.metacity/sessions/* and
~/.gnome2/session and ran gnome-session-save. The resulting files are
what was created.
I then logged out and logged back in. The windows weren't restored
properly, al
** Attachment added: "~/.gnome2/session after running gnome-session-save"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13947446/session
--
After upgrading to hardy, gnome-terminal windows are not properly restored on
login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221144
You received this bug notification because yo
** Attachment added: "After logging back in."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13946378/after.jpg
--
After upgrading to hardy, gnome-terminal windows are not properly restored on
login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221144
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Also happens with Compiz.
Here is how to reliably reproduce. I setup the following four gnome-
terminal windows on 1600x1200 screen, each window with 4 tabs.
1. 848x558 at (4,49) (120x40 with LucidaTypewriter 9)
2. 848x558 at (4,638) (120x40 with LucidaTypewriter 9)
3. 729x363 at (867,49) (103x2
This is likely related: if I edit the current profile and change the
level of transparency, it immediately adjusts all terminal windows to
exactly 25 rows.
It also adjusts the number of columns on some, but not all of the
windows, and not all of them get adjusted to the same number of columns.
Be
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
(Package might be more appropriate as gnome-terminal, not sure.)
Using hardy updated as of today (2008-04-23), upgraded from gutsy.
I have several terminal windows of varying sizes and number of tabs,
carefully placed on various workspaces
Backtrace which may or may not be useful
** Attachment added: "bt.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8554618/bt.txt
--
nautilus crash opening directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact f
27 matches
Mail list logo
