[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-10-15 Thread Jessica Clarke
(https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- hwe-6.8/tree/debian.hwe-6.8/dkms-versions?h=applied/ubuntu/jammy-devel still references 2.2.2-0ubuntu9, for example) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-10-15 Thread Jessica Clarke
> Changed in linux-hwe-6.8 (Ubuntu): > status: New → Opinion > status: Opinion → Invalid > Changed in linux-hwe-6.8 (Ubuntu Noble): > status: New → Invalid What's the justification behind this? That is where Ubuntu ships a pre- built copy of zfs-dkms and is how the system I encou

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-10-06 Thread Jessica Clarke
That’s the userspace utilities, not the DKMS package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077487 Title: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version) To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-10-05 Thread Jessica Clarke
I can confirm that zfs-dkms 2.2.2-0ubuntu9.1 in noble-proposed fixes this bug, and verified that it was reproducible with zfs-dkms 2.2.2-0ubuntu9, not just the linux-modules binary. ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-10-05 Thread Jessica Clarke
Where is your module coming from though? Normally it’s pre-built in linux-modules or an HWE version thereof, so you need to either use the zfs-linux one or get an updated linux-modules. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-09-25 Thread Jessica Clarke
My testing (for an atime+relatime filesystem) was: ``` $ cd /path/to/zfs $ # Test create $ rm -f foo $ touch foo $ stat foo File: foo Size: 0 Blocks: 2 IO Block: 131072 regular empty file Device: 27h/39d Inode: 81480314Links: 1 Access: (0664/-rw-rw-r--) Uid: ( 3815/

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-08-20 Thread Jessica Clarke
NB: Given the 22.04 HWE kernel is pulling from 24.04, this also affects 24.04 out of the box, as expected, no HWE kernel required to hit it. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2077487] [NEW] Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-08-20 Thread Jessica Clarke
Public bug reported: 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 has the 6.7 compat series, including https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/db4fc559cc1931b9219e62aa505cd5c51a17b232, but does not include the fix for that commit (affects both pre-6.7 and post-6.7), https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/f0bf7a247dbb030d68c7fd

[Bug 1947424] Re: Cannot set pbuilder build locale

2021-10-17 Thread Jessica Clarke
And re being "a serious limitation", I agree it's less than ideal, but it should not be an issue for any policy-conforming package, for which not building under the non-UTF-8 C locale is RC-buggy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 1947424] Re: Cannot set pbuilder build locale

2021-10-17 Thread Jessica Clarke
pbuilder-buildpackage sets LANG and LC_ALL *before* sourcing pbuilder- checkparams, which is what sources the config files, so config files definitely override that. However, pbuilder-buildpackage then sources pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs, which itself sources pbuilder-modules, which then sets LANG/

[Bug 1947424] Re: Cannot set pbuilder build locale

2021-10-15 Thread Jessica Clarke
I don't know about Ubuntu, but FTBFS under a common locale, which would include C, is regarded as a release-critical bug, so there is no "correct" locale, just the one that happens to be standardised across the Debian and Ubuntu buildds (otherwise, would "FTBFS in pbuilder" be a bug in pbuilder? be

[Bug 1936697] Re: Unlisted dependency

2021-07-16 Thread Jessica Clarke
pbuilder-dist is a wrapper provided by ubuntu-dev-tools, not pbuilder itself. Moreover, ubuntu-dev-tools only Suggests: pbuilder, though at the same time python3-distutils is a pretty tiny package (that's also fairly useful) so adding that dependency as Recommends: rather than just Suggests: (to be

[Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-07-02 Thread Jessica Clarke
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => linux-riscv (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934548 Title: RISC-V: Illegal instruction To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 1762890] Re: build fails in multi-arch environment (missing changes file)

2020-07-30 Thread Jessica Clarke
That's not a particularly helpful comment. What's your pbuilder command line? What's your pbuilderrc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762890 Title: build fails in multi-arch environme