Noticed this in the apport log
** Attachment added: "/var/crash/_usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1015383/+attachment/4123290/+files/_usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
282.927278] traps: rhythmdb-thread[12049] trap
divide error ip:7fe8d207e587 sp:7fe8b4cf1b20 error:0 in
libglib-2.0.so.0.4000.0[7fe8d2046000+106000]
There has been a previous apport dialog.
I tried Ctrl-C to copy the messages but there seemed to be no (GUI) response
John Mills
** Attachment adde
h Ctl-Alt-F7
In the background was the error message. Sorry, the program 'rhythmbox' closed
unexpectedly. Your computer does not have enough free memory to automatically
analyze the problem and send a report to the developers."
Apport was taking 100% cpu but no notification fro
Hello Rainer,
I have to agree with you on this bug report. I have been subscribed to
this for well over a year and as an end user I have not seen any
progress. I advocate Ubuntu to a lot of people and generally I am happy
in the direction Ubuntu is taking. However I feel that this shows a lack
of
Further to this discussion above regarding separating Application / User
land applications from core Ubuntu components I would like to draw the
maintainer of this bug report and colleagues tasked with working on it
to solution Bodhi Linux currently uses.
http://www.bodhilinux.com/about_bodhi.php
I just wanted to add these comments from OMG Ubuntu to this thread as I
really think this shows the degree of frustration that exists around
this bug. The subscribers to this bug repport would obviously like to
see a resolution as this both benefits us and Canonical. How can we now
escalate this to
Hi MPT,
thank you for the update :
'2012-09-05: 376 applications are published in MyApps and 36 in Extras.
So over 10% of Ubuntu applications now be updated without upgrading the
OS.'
So we have now have 10% of applications that can be updated, but more
importantly we still have 90 % that can't
every 6 months to get up to date software, such as GIMP 2.8 and Libre Office
3.6?
Best regards and thank you for your time.
John Mills
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578045
Title
It is just a shame the effort was not made to integrate LO menu bar by
default in Precise. The lack of consistency is truly shocking. For over
a year it has been promised this would be integrated and low and behold
nothing. With an emphasis placed on 'precise' for 12.04 I would have
expected that a
Please consider adding the lo-menubar by default, if only for
consistency. In Ubuntu LO is probably one of the two most important
default applications shipped with Ubuntu. Yet it is looks so out of
place with the rest of the system, it really brings down the look of
Ubuntu as a professional OS to
Please in the interest of user choice allow the option to minimise on
click even if not on by default. It is great to see that there is now a
PPA that can be installed to give the functionality that 221 Ubuntu
users (as a minumum) have asked for.
See:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/03/how-to-min
Hi Michael,
This is a great start but will this mean that more applications are
going to be back ported in the future? If the selection is still very
small then I don't see much of a benefit? If the back ports can be
synced against the newest versions of software in the future releases
of Ubuntu
@ Matthew Paul Thomas: Hi Matt, as this bug is assigned to you can you
provide an update as to where we are? In your experience will there be
any differences in the 12:04 release? I think nerdy_kid is spot on in
his suggestions (although not entirely sure about the review process).
But I think this
Thanks for your reply David. I apologize for it actually, I was just more
than a bit pissed with the Ubuntu upgrade and had spent too long futzing
with it. After I wrote, I calmed down a bit and have it semi-working now
but I am getting kernel panics too frequently and haven't spent too much
time
Public bug reported:
I'm mostly going to vent. 11.04 at least offered panels still and
Unity, with all due respect to the community is the biggest piece of
shit I have EVER experienced (including Windoze). First off, Samba4 did
not install properly but I haven't even taken the time to look at it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874503
Title:
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation
Public bug reported:
Attempted to upgrade from natty to 11.10 and this came up as part of the
upgrade
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic
Hi all,
I completely agree with this bug report, for example, if I started using
Windows XP in 2001 I could still easily install a new build of Firefox,
Open Office, Inkscape etc. But with Ubuntu because the backports are not
great I have to either compile the source myself or look for binaries.
T
Synaptic jumped in and seemed to fix libchm1.
Running "sudo aptitude install gnochm" subsequently succeeded in completing the
install.
So I guess you can close this one.
Should I mark it "Invalid? Not familiar with that.
John Mills
** Changed in: chmlib (Ubuntu)
Status:
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35876406/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package libchm1 2:0.39-9 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/libchm1.list] failed to
install/upgrade: fork failed: Cannot allocate memory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485707
You received this
7872 93548
Total: 486300 390292 96008
So I'm not sure it is a bug. But the crash applet recommended filing, so
I'll continue.
John Mills
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Dependencies:
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage: fork failed: Cannot allocate memory
Pack
Public bug reported:
Hello guys,
I was wondering if any one has experienced the same issue as myself, I have a
Dell Inspiron 630M (Intel 915 chipset/GMA900 graphics) laptop that will not
successfully boot the Alpha 3 of Karmick. The live cd starts I hear the ubuntu
theme but the panels at the
22 matches
Mail list logo