[Bug 253246] hey~

2009-08-23 Thread JoseLVG
Dear friend, Last week,My relative gives me a website : www.elecls.com http://www.elecls.com。 It mainly sell electronic products。 the website is promoting their products。it is very cheap and I get it in 5 days。Its quality is very good。The promotion only has 45 days。 So , if you are interested in 。

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-06-29 Thread JoseLVG
Last time I tested with last intel, X and kernel 2.6.30 (rc7?) versions available the results were poor and not stable. Has anyone got it working fine? (no render errors and good fps on googleearth and tux racer?) Has anyone got it working fine on a eee 901? Jose 2009/6/28 Bryce Harrington

Re: [Bug 253246] Re: suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt

2009-05-12 Thread JoseLVG
Confirmed, *Jaunty x86_64 with Nvidia driver 180 on a Dell E521+Nvidia 7600GT CANNOT SUSPEND+RESUME* In fact, I think it does not even finish the suspend command correctly, because the power light does not start blinking and the CPU box makes still a lot of noise. Pressing the power button does

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-04 Thread JoseLVG
Jaunty results on a eee 901 with 'out-of-thebox' configuration. *NO COMPIZ: glxgears 600fps+ NO rendering errors, GoogleEarth smooth (sun atmosphere off) ppracer 18fps COMPIZ ON: glxgears 570fps + rendering erros when moving the window, GoogleEarth less smooth (sun atmosphere off) ppracer

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-13 Thread JoseLVG
Tried ForceEnablePipeA + UXA on Juanty beta over an eee 901. Results: - Rendering errors on Compiz went away. - Glxgears FPSs dro from 600 to 150. - GoogleEarth crash due to libssl 0.9.8 error (couldn't test performance) - Planetpenguin racer: not very smooth 3-4 fps at 1024x600 - Tremulous

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-12 Thread JoseLVG
On Jaunty or Ibex? I tried it (ForceEnablePipeA + UXA) on a eee 901 with 8.10 Intrepid Ibex and it did not fix anything. My eee 901 has an Intel 945GME, no one else has this chipset? Jose 2009/4/12 andrehsiqueira andrehsique...@gmail.com On my notebook Toshiba U205 S5034 - with Intel VGA

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
Latest Jaunty tested on an Asus eee901 (945GME I think) Results: - glxgears arround 600fps (not very spectacular) - SAME RENDERING ERRORS as usual when moving the glxgears window arround (compiz effects on) I think Jaunty will still have this problems. (If it takes them so much time to stabilize

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
/19 Ivan Stetsenko stet...@rambler.ru JoseLVG, are you using UXA acceleration? It is not enabled by default, you need to enable it manually by editing your xorg.conf (add Option AccelMethod UXA to the Device section of the xorg.conf).. With UXA your rendering problems should go away

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
With Sync Vblank unchecked... (and AFTER installing a universe or multiverse package NOT enabled by default...) - glxgears 230fps (great!! amazing!) - BUT NO RENDERING ERRORS I am still very unimpressed. If I want to use the full capabilities of this eee 901 graphics hardware the only way

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
I forgot! The system freezes with UXA after a while. Good luck to Ubuntu in the Netbook market, they are going to need it! Jose 2009/3/19 Jose Luis Vazquez josv...@gmail.com With Sync Vblank unchecked... (and AFTER installing a universe or multiverse package NOT enabled by default...) -

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-15 Thread JoseLVG
Have you tried GoogleEarth? Does it work again? Jose 2009/3/15 bingo stefandr...@hotmail.com Finally some good news. I tested ubuntu 9.04 alpha-6, and the results are back to where I would like to see them. Bryce, to reflect your comments, I tested with flightgear and got frame rates

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-01-28 Thread JoseLVG
The problem with this is that you started testing glxgears because, for instance, GoogleEarth started to crown when in the previous Linux version it flyed (my case, good GE performance with Xandros on my eee and unsuable GE on ubuntu 8.10). You end up with some idea of the performance loss when

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: [i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-01-16 Thread JoseLVG
Wow! Luciano: That is backports for Jaunty 9.04or just plain Ibex 8.10? (I guess you need a 2.6.28 kernel anyway) What it your chipset? I wonder if my eee 901 with Intel GME 945 will benefit from this improvement also. Still 700FPS is less than half the 1500FPS this driver achieved in the good

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: [i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-01-12 Thread JoseLVG
I also agree, but there is nothing we can do, this bug report is just a place to complain. Some time ago (probably a year ago), someone or a group of people at intel driver development, decided that they will throw away legacy driver code (that was performing without so much user complaints as

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-12 Thread JoseLVG
I followed MPCs instructions on a eee 901 with an intel 945. It was a complete disaster, it did not fix a thing. FPS seemed slightly higher (600-700 instead of 500-600), but there were the same rendering errors when moving the glxgears window around. I lost array.org's wired and wireless

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-05 Thread JoseLVG
Did you test it over a jaunty or ibex? If you did it on an jaunty, can it be tested on ibex? (I mean, you are recompliling the kernel anyway, can't the 2.6.28rc6 be compiled on Ibex?) -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-05 Thread JoseLVG
Great news! One thing. I am not using an Ubuntu stock kernel but Array.org provided one for and eee 901. Does kcheck build a kernel from the configuration of the kernel you have (like array.org in my case)? or does it do it from well-known distro kernel templates? (Anyway I am giving it a try

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-05 Thread JoseLVG
How do you install the 2.6.28 series kernel on ibex? Is there a repository or just download a vanilla kernel from kernel.org? -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-03 Thread JoseLVG
Great disappointment with Fedora 10 live: - FPS of glxgears are just about the same or worse than in Ubuntu 8.10 (around 350) - Couldn't test googleearth because and permission error. - Rendering errors when compiz is On. -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system,

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-03 Thread JoseLVG
Great disappointment with Fedora 10 live: - FPS of glxgears are just about the same or worse than in Ubuntu 8.10 (around 350) - Couldn't test googleearth because and permission error. - Rendering errors when compiz is On. All this on a eee 901 (VGA Intel 945) -- Poor graphics performance and

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-02 Thread JoseLVG
To Paolo Fidalgo: Can you confirm your FPS and whether in Fedora 10 you have the rendering problems (or not) shown in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT8x_PGRolU -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-02 Thread JoseLVG
Thanks for the Fedora 10 FPS info. I'll start to research eeedora 10 (as I am a eee 901 user) and the ubuntu guys don't seem to care a lot a bout this bug. -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 You received

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-12-02 Thread JoseLVG
Correct me if I am wrong but... Can you do GoogleEarth, Compiz, glxgears, or any 3D in general with the VESA mode? I think you can't, so giving up 3D acceleration because of a crapy driver is not the solution (not for me at least) I prefer to have compiz more or less working and low glxgears

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-29 Thread JoseLVG
This is great! Pre-Hardy (TTM?) 1500FPS Ibex 500FPS (-1000FPS) Jaunty 350FPS (-150FPS) Great progression!!! -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-26 Thread JoseLVG
Kernel 2.6.28 is not stable yet in kernel.org: http://www.kernel.org/ And I guess that Ubuntu 8.10 wiill only come with 2.6.27 kernels packages. To test GEM I presume that one should compile some 2.6.28 on his/her own and try it out. This is quite time consuming, specially guessing the correct

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-25 Thread JoseLVG
The funny thing about this bug is that, at the end of the day, you are better off using closed-source drivers from the 'evil' guys at NVidia that with the open sourced intel ones. -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-25 Thread JoseLVG
Has anybody been able to test a GEM based intel driver? (I guess upgrading to a 2.6.28 kernel) If so, how good is its performance? Does it solve all the problems described here? -- Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-23 Thread JoseLVG
If the performance drop is due to the TTM/GEM migration then It seems that there is NO solution to this for Intrepid as far as I could read on the net. (If someone has more information, please let us all know) The GEM bits are going to the 2.6.28 kernel NOW, and they will be stable when that

[Bug 136549] Re: Powertop make wrong suggest to add usbcore.autosuspend=1

2008-11-17 Thread JoseLVG
Then is broken again in Intrepid, at least in the eee kernel flavour. (eee 901) -- Powertop make wrong suggest to add usbcore.autosuspend=1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 294775] [NEW] Force gnome to open PDFs with acroread (or anyother BUT evince!)

2008-11-06 Thread JoseLVG
Public bug reported: There seems there is no way to FORCE Gnome to open PDFs with other application than evince. I try to force using Acrobat Reader isntead of evince by changinf both: /etc/gnome/defaults.list AND ~/.local/share/applications/defaults.list And the result is that some apps like

[Bug 213776] Re: update-manager does not download all updates in download but do not install mode if interrupted

2008-11-06 Thread JoseLVG
How do you do download but do not install in the update-manager Is there a command line switch? I haven't found the GUI? Shouln't it be there? -- update-manager does not download all updates in download but do not install mode if interrupted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213776 You received

[Bug 294034] [NEW] GoogleEarth unusably-slow on eee 901

2008-11-05 Thread JoseLVG
Public bug reported: I am a EEE 901 user with Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex (v8.10). GoogleEarth was properly working on Xandros, but it goes horribly slow in Ubuntu, and I don't know why. I followed with NO LUCK these instructions (that I think are for a eee 701, a less powerfull machine):

[Bug 294034] Re: GoogleEarth unusably-slow on eee 901

2008-11-05 Thread JoseLVG
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294172 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294172 Can this be a X.org server 1.5 issue? Does it happen to someone using a Ubuntu 8.04 instead of my 8.10? ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294172 GoogleEarth unusable, too slow on eee 901 --

[Bug 261391] [NEW] Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

2008-08-26 Thread JoseLVG
Public bug reported: My system is a Dell Optiplex GX270 connected to a wired 1Gbit network thought the e1000 driver. I am using an up-to-date version of Ubuntu Hardy. I suspend to RAM but Network-Manager is unable to bring back the network. At syslog it complains that no dhcpoffers were received

[Bug 261391] Re: Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

2008-08-26 Thread JoseLVG
More on this... Even sudo /etc/init.d/network start DOES NOT WORK!!! After getting the IP you can drop it succesfully with sudo /etc/init.d/network stop but IT WON'T you it back with sudo /etc/init.d/network start, you HAVE TO DO sudo dhclient Why? Why does dhclient work and dhclient called

[Bug 261391] Re: Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

2008-08-26 Thread JoseLVG
Found it! Still do not know with dhclient works but network ifup does not but... I found out that network manager was NOT really managing my eth0 device due to my /etc/network/interfaces config. I changed it to: auto lo iface lo inet loopback #iface eth0 inet dhcp #auto eth0 So that NOW it

[Bug 261391] Re: Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

2008-08-26 Thread JoseLVG
This was NOT a real bug on NetworkManager but a misconfiguration ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 228621] Re: Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print

2008-08-06 Thread JoseLVG
This bug has disappeared in the latest revisions of firefox 3.0 2008/8/5 Pedro Villavicencio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for. Thanks!. ** Changed in:

Re: [Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-31 Thread JoseLVG
Good, I should have realised that. Anyway I moved to Ubuntu (which does not have this problem once you force it to use its themes instead of the kde inherited ones) myself. Jose 2008/7/31 alastairb [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have just discovered this bug - Kubuntu Hardy with a Firefox binary (3.01)

[Bug 253246] [NEW] suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt

2008-07-30 Thread JoseLVG
Public bug reported: My ubuntu Hardy x86_64 can't suspend a Dell E521 with a NVidia 7600gt. (I mention the NVidia card model because this card is not the ATI that usually comes with a Dell E521 and I know that most suspend problems are caused by ATI or NVidia drivers) When I click on the

[Bug 253246] Re: suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt

2008-07-30 Thread JoseLVG
The NVidia 7600GT is a PCIe (not an AGP) card, maybe the NvAGP option is not correct or needed? -- suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-22 Thread JoseLVG
Definitely it's a widget-set problem on Kubuntu. At work I installed the 32bit version of Firefox 3.0.1 from the Firefox site and the problem persists (the one I tested in my previous comment was the 64bit version at home) The only difference between the 64bit version that works and the 32bit

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-21 Thread JoseLVG
This bug maybe only present at the ubuntu packaged version for KDE (with KDE look feel) In the same machine a version downloaded from Firefox website DOES NOT present this problem and selected items don't get unmarked. It also seems that checkboxes don't get grey when they get the focus in this

Re: [Bug 223055] Re: Focused checkboxes and radio buttons rendered as grey rectangle

2008-07-18 Thread JoseLVG
Does this happen only in Kubuntu and NOT in Ubuntu then? 2008/7/18 Gary W. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I also get this problem. Annoying, isn't it? I don't think it's just in Firefox though, as I've noticed it in the CompizConfig settings manager as well. Running KDE 3.5.9 -- Focused checkboxes and

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-12 Thread JoseLVG
Easier reproduction steps: 1) To see the proper behaviour open this URL with konqueror or firefox 2: http://www.htmlcodetutorial.com/forms/_SELECT_MULTIPLE.html Select for instance mushrooms AND peppers AND onions and click submit, you'll see you selected the 3 vegetables. 2) Now open the same

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-09 Thread JoseLVG
The bug is marked still as incomplete. Couldn't it be reproduced by my previous instructions? What else more do you need to know about this bug? -- Won't select multiple selects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

Re: [Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-04 Thread JoseLVG
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages Thanks for your quick responses, Jose 2008/7/3 Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:20:32AM -, JoseLVG wrote: Confirmed. It does the same

[Bug 245103] [NEW] Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-03 Thread JoseLVG
Public bug reported: A page containing a select with multiple selectable options won't work. The options are selected by clicking on them but they are deselected as soon as you click out of the select widget or do the submit. The result is that NO options are ever selected when the form is

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-03 Thread JoseLVG
I forgot. I user Kubuntu 8.04. -- Won't select multiple selects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-03 Thread JoseLVG
I meant I use Kubuntu 8.04. -- Won't select multiple selects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

2008-07-03 Thread JoseLVG
Confirmed. It does the same in an empty profile. 2008/7/3 Rui Boon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Could you please try to start firefox with a new profile by following the instructions on

[Bug 228621] Re: Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print

2008-05-09 Thread JoseLVG
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14389889/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14389890/pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14389892/profiles.ini.txt

[Bug 228621] [NEW] Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print

2008-05-09 Thread JoseLVG
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 When trying to print (File-Print...) the dialog disables the print button for all printers but the print to file option. No message or reason is given neither in Firefox's GUI nor in the the console (executing it manuallly from konsole).

Re: [Bug 182114] Re: k3b: cdrom not recognized after burning

2008-01-19 Thread JoseLVG
Thanks, At least now I know it's a k3b error and not a weird config in my system. And also the hdparm will be very useful to avoid reset the PC everytime I burn a CD/DVD. (I assume the command lets you use the CD again, even if k3b is still not able to re-burn another one) 2008/1/19, Patrick

[Bug 182114] k3b: cdrom not recognized after burning

2008-01-11 Thread JoseLVG
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: k3b When I need to write a DVD-R: 1) I plug it in and k3b recognizes it as a blank DVD and allows me to burn it with the desired contents. 2) After a succesful burn of teh DVD, the disc is not recognized by the system. Even if I eject it and put it in