[Bug 941968] Re: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers (potential buffer overflow?)

2013-10-28 Thread Joseph W. Breu
Phillipp I am, and it is still not fixed root@breu-prec-jenkins-32675-api:~# apt-cache policy liblockfile1 liblockfile1: Installed: 1.09-3 Candidate: 1.09-3ubuntu0.1 Version table: 1.09-3ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages **

[Bug 941968] Re: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers (potential buffer overflow?)

2013-10-28 Thread Joseph W. Breu
this is also on precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941968 Title: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers (potential buffer overflow?) To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 941968] Re: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers (potential buffer overflow?)

2013-10-28 Thread Joseph W. Breu
never mind - my co-worker let me down and this totally works. my bad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941968 Title: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers (potential buffer ove

[Bug 941968] Re: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers (potential buffer overflow?)

2013-09-23 Thread Joseph W. Breu
I tested this and the bug still exists where lockfile-create segfaults with a long hostname. The problem here is the 23 characters allowed for the system name is still not sufficient. gethostname() can return a hostname up to 256 characters long. on precise with liblockfile-bin 1.09-3ubuntu0.1 i

[Bug 1167421] Re: Upgrading from folsom to grizzly results in all tenants/users being disabled

2013-05-20 Thread Joseph W. Breu
davewalker - can we get this packaged for precise as well? ** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167421 Title: Up

[Bug 1179750] Re: python-glanceclient requires python-keystoneclient <0.2 but 0.2.3 is installed

2013-05-14 Thread Joseph W. Breu
After looking into this a bit more I see that python-glanceclient 0.9.0-0ubuntu1~cloud0 isn't a hard dep on glance so it doesn't get updated when glance is updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 1170828] Re: python-keystoneclient does not depend on python-requeusts>=0.8.8

2013-04-19 Thread Joseph W. Breu
this is a packaging bug and not a keystone related bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170828 Title: python-keystoneclient does not depend on python-requeusts>=0.8.8 To manage notifi

[Bug 1170828] [NEW] python-keystoneclient does not depend on python-requeusts>=0.8.8

2013-04-19 Thread Joseph W. Breu
Public bug reported: python-keystoneclient-1:0.2.3-0ubuntu1~cloud0 requies python-requeusts but does not force an upgrade of python-requests when the python-keystoneclient package is upgraded (i.e. from folsom to grizzly using the grizzly cloud-archive packages) root@breu-swift-infra1:~# keys

[Bug 1167421] Re: Upgrading from folsom to grizzly results in all tenants/users being disabled

2013-04-16 Thread Joseph W. Breu
** Also affects: keystone (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167421 Title: Upgrading from folsom to grizzly results in all tenants/us

[Bug 1130730] Re: debug option broken on cinderclient

2013-04-09 Thread Joseph W. Breu
** Also affects: python-cinderclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1130730 Title: debug option broken on cinderclient To manage

[Bug 1161249] Re: Dashboard error caused by cinderclient TypeError

2013-04-09 Thread Joseph W. Breu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1130730 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1130730 ** Also affects: openstack-dashboard (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1130730 debug option broken on cinderclient -- You received this

[Bug 1081022] Re: logging.SysLogHandler doesn't close UNIX socket when connection failed

2013-02-05 Thread Joseph W. Breu
This bug affects several OpenStack projects https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1101404 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081022 Title: logging.SysLogHandler doesn't close UNIX socket

[Bug 1073956] Re: Scheduler Race Condition at high volume

2012-11-15 Thread Joseph W. Breu
Hey Vish, I'm still seeing the behavior happen when scheduling at least 52 instances nearly simultaneously. I am running with the patch mentioned above. We are running a single instance of the scheduler. The scheduler placed the instances in the following manner: compute-node07 : 4 compute-node

[Bug 1073956] Re: Scheduler Race Condition at high volume

2012-11-15 Thread Joseph W. Breu
I've verified that this affects Folsom as well and the patch does resolve the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073956 Title: Scheduler Race Condition at high volume To manage n

[Bug 1021548] [NEW] nova-network does not contain a dependency on iptables

2012-07-05 Thread Joseph W. Breu
Public bug reported: The nova-network package does not contain a dependency on iptables and on install will throw a python stack trace nova-rootwrap iptables-save fails. tested on 12.04 ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 941968] Re: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers

2012-05-01 Thread Joseph W. Breu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 969299 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969299 I also do not believe that this bug is a duplicate and apparmor is only the culprit in that it is finding a potential overflow somewhere in the ntp code -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 941968] Re: lockfile-create hangs inside lxc containers

2012-05-01 Thread Joseph W. Breu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 969299 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969299 I played around with this a bit and derived that it is due to the length of the hostname (at least in my case). With a hostname of length 40 I can reproduce this error. Setting the hostname to <= 37 produces