[Bug 2061155] Re: Use-after-close vulnerability in dbus-broker 35. Please upgrade package to 36

2025-06-12 Thread Luca Boccassi
I have re-performed the exact same check as described in the templated description, with the package from -proposed instead of manually built, and verified it still works as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 2110040] Re: dbus-broker: fix compatibility with newer kernel's error code for SO_PEERPIDFD error case

2025-05-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
> Please don't just change the verification tags without showing what testing has been performed. I'm moving the tags back to verification- needed. Sure: I have re-performed the exact same check as described in the templated description, with the package from -proposed instead of manually built, a

[Bug 2061155] Re: Use-after-close vulnerability in dbus-broker 35. Please upgrade package to 36

2025-05-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061155 Title: Use-after-close v

[Bug 2110040] Re: dbus-broker: fix compatibility with newer kernel's error code for SO_PEERPIDFD error case

2025-05-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble verification-needed-oracular verification-needed-plucky ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble verification-done-oracular verification-done-plucky -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 2061155] Re: Use-after-close vulnerability in dbus-broker 35. Please upgrade package to 36

2025-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
A backport is available on Salsa, tested and ready to be source-uploaded by a sponsor: https://salsa.debian.org/bluca/dbus- broker/-/tree/ubuntu/noble?ref_type=heads Note that it also contains a fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus-broker/+bug/2110040 ** Also affects: dbus-brok

[Bug 2110040] Re: dbus-broker: fix compatibility with newer kernel's error code for SO_PEERPIDFD error case

2025-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
Backports are available on Salsa, on branches ready to be source-built and sponsored: Oracular: https://salsa.debian.org/bluca/dbus-broker/-/tree/ubuntu/oracular?ref_type=heads Plucky: https://salsa.debian.org/bluca/dbus-broker/-/tree/ubuntu/plucky?ref_type=heads Noble: https://salsa.debian.org

[Bug 2110040] Re: dbus-broker: fix compatibility with newer kernel's error code for SO_PEERPIDFD error case

2025-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed: [Original Description/Impact] dbus-broker in noble, oracular and plucky only checks for EINVAL when calling the SO_PEERPIDFD getsockopt to check if a process already exited. The kernel in 6.16 is changing the return value from EINVAL to ESRCH so that the p

[Bug 2110040] [NEW] dbus-broker: fix compatibility with newer kernel's error code for SO_PEERPIDFD error case

2025-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: [Original Description/Impact] dbus-broker in noble, oracular and plucky only checks for EINVAL when calling the SO_PEERPIDFD getsockopt to check if a process already exited. The kernel in 6.16 is changing the return value from EINVAL to ESRCH so that the particular case can

[Bug 2091719] Re: btrfs will WARN_ON() in btrfs_remove_qgroup() unnecessarily

2025-04-04 Thread Luca Boccassi
Hi, I've done a few runs with the kernel and modules from proposed and cannot reproduce the issue. Thank you for taking care of this! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091719 Title: btr

[Bug 2102216] Re: mkosi: arm64 autopkgtest fails with '(mcopy) failed with exit status 1.'

2025-03-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
Fixed in unstable, if you sync to plucky it should work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102216 Title: mkosi: arm64 autopkgtest fails with '(mcopy) failed with exit status 1.' To ma

[Bug 2098861] Re: systemd 255.4-1ubuntu8.5 crashing on arm64 (Azure v6 VM sizes)

2025-03-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
That's very bizzarre as the objects appear to be half-initialized. It would be one thing if they were completely corrupted, but this is strange and I've never seen something like it. Are you able to try https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/36659 to see if it at least stops the crashes? -- You

[Bug 2050083] Re: generate and ship vmlinux.h to allow packages to build BPF CO-RE

2025-03-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux-intel verification-needed-noble-linux-nvidia-tegra ** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux-intel verification-done-noble-linux-nvidia-tegra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2098111] Re: arm64: kernel image cannot be booted in UEFI despite EFI stub and ZBOOT

2025-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
No it is not a new issue, the Noble arm64 kernel ships in the the same gzip format: https://ports.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux-signed/linux- image-6.8.0-53-generic_6.8.0-53.55_arm64.deb It's just that I noticed it just now while trying to build Ubuntu UKIs -- You received this bug notification b

[Bug 2091719] Re: btrfs will WARN_ON() in btrfs_remove_qgroup() unnecessarily

2025-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
No problem at all, thanks for the update! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091719 Title: btrfs will WARN_ON() in btrfs_remove_qgroup() unnecessarily To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2098111] Re: arm64: kernel image cannot be booted in UEFI despite EFI stub and ZBOOT

2025-02-14 Thread Luca Boccassi
Debian just enabled EFI_ZBOOT and the trick seems to be to install arch/arm64/boot/vmlinuz.efi instead of arch/arm64/boot/Image: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1362/diffs I believe this is what CONFIG_COMPRESSED_INSTALL would enable by default: https://git.kernel.org

[Bug 2098111] [NEW] arm64: kernel image cannot be booted in UEFI despite EFI stub and ZBOOT

2025-02-12 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: The arm64 kernel image enables the EFI stub and ZBOOT options, among others, that should allow booting the kernel in a UEFI environment, as a signed PE binary. But the package ships the kernel image as a compressed gzip file, which UEFI cannot understand. I received a sugg

[Bug 2095168] Re: dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when renaming shared object

2025-01-31 Thread Luca Boccassi
Thanks, can confirm the version in proposed is now packaged correctly and the issue no longer appears ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 2095168] Re: dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when renaming shared object

2025-01-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
Thanks, but this was already uploaded last week, it's in the queue: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libdnf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095168 Titl

[Bug 2091719] Re: btrfs will WARN_ON() in btrfs_remove_qgroup() unnecessarily

2025-01-24 Thread Luca Boccassi
Great news, thank you for taking care of it! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091719 Title: btrfs will WARN_ON() in btrfs_remove_qgroup() unnecessarily To manage notifications about t

[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
Ref. for the backports process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095011 Title: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky To manage not

[Bug 2091719] Re: BTRFS kernel panic on btrfs_remove_qgroup

2025-01-20 Thread Luca Boccassi
Hi, any update on this btfs bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091719 Title: BTRFS kernel panic on btrfs_remove_qgroup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.la

[Bug 2050083] Re: generate and ship vmlinux.h to allow packages to build BPF CO-RE

2025-01-20 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux verification-needed-noble-linux-hwe-6.11 verification-needed-noble-linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11 verification-needed-noble-linux-realtime-6.11 verification-needed-oracular-linux-realtime ** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux verification-done

[Bug 2095168] Re: dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when renaming shared object

2025-01-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
root@noble:/tmp/libdnf-0.69.0# dpkg -c ../python3-libdnf_0.69.0-2.3build3_amd64.deb | grep _module -rw-r--r-- root/root904272 2024-03-31 02:54 ./usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/libdnf/_module.cpython-312-x86_64-linux-gnu.so -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 2095168] Re: dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when renaming shared object

2025-01-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
Yes a workaround in libdnf is possible, in fact I had added one before dh-python was fixed: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm- team/libdnf/-/commit/02de151278a0831d1c5c4c7d47c4a4f46766c666 I have just tested adding the same snippet to d/rules in a Noble chroot, and rebuilt the package, and the pro

[Bug 2095168] Re: dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when renaming shared object

2025-01-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1068255 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068255 ** Also affects: dh-python (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068255 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2095168] [NEW] dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when renaming shared object

2025-01-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: dh-python in Noble, on architectures other than amd64, renames libdnf binary modules and breaks them: I: dh_python3 fs:418: renaming _module.so to _.cpython-312-aarch64-linux-gnu.so https://launchpadlibrarian.net/722671993/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- arm64.libdnf_0.69.0-2.3build3

[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
In my experience SRUs tend to get stonewalled and end up going nowhere, backports are much easier and actually end up happening. It's entirely fine for our use case for this to be in backports, so I'm ok with this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
-2~bpo24.04.1) noble-backports; urgency=medium - * Rebuild for noble-backports. (LP: #) +   * Rebuild for noble-backports. (LP: #2095011) - -- Luca Boccassi Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:12:59 +0000 +  -- Luca Boccassi Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:12:59 + -- You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Attachment added: "sphinxcontrib-globalsubs_0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1.dsc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/+bug/2095011/+attachment/5851903/+files/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs_0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Attachment added: "sphinxcontrib-globalsubs_0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1_source.buildinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/+bug/2095011/+attachment/5851902/+files/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs_0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1_source.buildinfo -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Attachment added: "sphinxcontrib-globalsubs_0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1_source.changes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/+bug/2095011/+attachment/5851901/+files/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs_0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1_source.changes -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 2095011] Re: [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Attachment added: "debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/+bug/2095011/+attachment/5851900/+files/debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20950

[Bug 2095011] [NEW] [BPO] sphinxcontrib-globalsubs/0.1.2-2 from plucky

2025-01-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
a dch --bpo changelog entry with the appropriate version, such as: sphinxcontrib-globalsubs (0.1.2-2~bpo24.04.1) noble-backports; urgency=medium   * Rebuild for noble-backports. (LP: #2095011)  -- Luca Boccassi Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:12:59 + ** Affects: sphinxcontrib-globalsubs (Ubuntu

[Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-12-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
Nice! Will you try and get the same feature added to gold/lld/mold as well, or was this only targeted at bfd? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failu

[Bug 2088268] Re: systemd /tmp cleaning removes files that it shouldn't

2024-12-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
/tmp/ is world writable, so there is no guarantee that one process will be the first to write to a file anyway. The case of "another process replaced it after deletion" is the same as "another process got there first on boot", and cannot be avoided. Anything using /tmp/ needs to be aware of this, a

[Bug 2091719] Re: BTRFS kernel panic on btrfs_remove_qgroup

2024-12-16 Thread Luca Boccassi
Thank you, can confirm the problem cannot be reproduced using the kernel package from the linked PPA -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091719 Title: BTRFS kernel panic on btrfs_remove_q

[Bug 2091719] [NEW] BTRFS kernel panic on btrfs_remove_qgroup

2024-12-13 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: We are able to trigger a kernel oops in the btrfs code from userspace: [ 46.597006] Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ... [ 46.597474] CPU: 0 PID: 1316 Comm: (sd-clean) Not tainted 6.8.0-50-generic #51-Ubuntu [ 46.597660] Hardware name: QEMU Standar

[Bug 2007308] Re: linux-tools-common: bpftool wrapper causes build failure for xdp-tools

2024-11-09 Thread Luca Boccassi
Right now we need to have this ugly workaround in debian/rules whenever we need to use bpftool at build time, which is becoming more and more important as we need to build CO-RE binaries, for example in src:systemd: ifeq ($(DEB_VENDOR),Ubuntu) bpftool_binary := $(shell find /usr/lib/linux-tools/ -

[Bug 2050083] Re: generate and ship vmlinux.h to allow packages to build BPF CO-RE

2024-10-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
It would be great if the new package was backported to Noble too, so that we can use it in the upstream systemd build and CI. I've tested and sent a patch: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel- team/2024-October/154734.html ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 2075505] Re: Add distribution-gpg-keys 1.104+ds-2 to noble

2024-09-04 Thread Luca Boccassi
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2024-September/043098.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075505 Title: Add distribution-gpg-keys 1.104+ds-2 to noble To manage notif

[Bug 2076416] Re: [SRU] Upload latest archlinux-keyring from oracular to noble-proposed

2024-09-04 Thread Luca Boccassi
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2024-September/043098.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076416 Title: [SRU] Upload latest archlinux-keyring from oracular to noble-p

[Bug 2050083] Re: generate and ship vmlinux.h to allow packages to build BPF CO-RE

2024-08-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
New version as requested on the ML at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-August/153061.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2050083 Title: generate and ship vmlinux.h

[Bug 2050083] Re: generate and ship vmlinux.h to allow packages to build BPF CO-RE

2024-08-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
I have sent a follow-up here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel- team/2024-August/153006.html The equivalent debian package ships an empty stub header rather than disabling the package completely, as it's easier to handle for everyone, and can be changed once BTF for armhf starts working:

[Bug 1992178] Re: autopkgtest: upstream tests that run in qemu hang on ppc64el

2024-08-15 Thread Luca Boccassi
There was no fix for the crashes, we just disabled the ppc64el qemu- based tests to avoid hitting these crashes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992178 Title: autopkgtest: upstream tes

[Bug 2075505] Re: Add distribution-gpg-keys 1.104+ds-2 to noble

2024-08-12 Thread Luca Boccassi
> I'm declining to process these without consensus amongst Ubuntu developers that constant SRUs of these packages is the right architecture to use. I don't think "constant" is an accurate description, I don't plan to ask for a backport for every release (there's one once a month on average or so)

[Bug 2076416] Re: [SRU] Upload latest archlinux-keyring from oracular to noble-proposed

2024-08-12 Thread Luca Boccassi
> This doesn't seem like it's practical to maintain via SRUs then? > As I mentioned in bug 2075505, I'm not sure that maintaining and updating > packages in Ubuntu archive is the correct architecture here. I don't think there would be any issue with maintaining these. A couple of updates a year w

[Bug 2076416] Re: [SRU] Upload latest archlinux-keyring from oracular to noble-proposed

2024-08-09 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed: [Impact] archlinux-keyring is a package in Oracular and Noble that provides an archive of signing keys for Archlinux. As stated by the reporter, this package allows users to bootstrap and build Arch, useful for CI and image building purposes. The packag

[Bug 2076416] [NEW] [SRU] Upload latest archlinux-keyring from oracular to noble-proposed

2024-08-09 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: [Impact] archlinux-keyring is a package in Oracular and Noble that provides an archive of signing keys for Archlinux. As stated by the reporter, this package allows users to bootstrap and build Arch, useful for CI and image building purposes. The package should be updated i

[Bug 2075505] Re: Add distribution-gpg-keys 1.104+ds-2 to noble

2024-08-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
It would provide more value in noble proper, however if there are external reasons like a long review queue, I am perfectly ok with having this in noble-backports. I'd like to have it in the archive though rather than out of tree, as this is useful for users of image building tool in general, to p

[Bug 2075505] [NEW] [BPO] distribution-gpg-keys/1.104+ds-2 from oracular

2024-08-01 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: [Impact] This package was introduced in Oracular and is a simple archive of GPG keys for RPM-based distributions like Fedora, CentOS, Azure Linux and many more. It ships nothing but these keys, in a package-specific subdirectory. It is useful to bootstrap and build those di

[Bug 2050083] Re: generate and ship vmlinux.h to allow packages to build BPF CO-RE

2024-07-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
I have sent a patch to kernel-team adding this new package, tested a local build on oracular amd64 and it seems to work: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-July/152477.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 2073502] [NEW] [BPO] package-notes/15 from oracular

2024-07-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
, such as: package-notes (0.15~bpo24.04.1) noble-backports; urgency=medium  * Rebuild for noble-backports. (LP: #2073502)  -- Luca Boccassi Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:54:44 +0100 ** Affects: package-notes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble

[Bug 2050083] Re: generate and ship vmlinux.h to allow packages to build BPF CO-RE

2024-07-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
We have now moved it in Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel- team/linux/-/commit/f52d006f3915ac4358dc8c98aa417477ebee026e New binary package 'linux-bpf-dev' that installs /usr/include/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/linux/bpf/vmlinux.h - it would be great to have the same setup in Ubuntu so that we don

[Bug 2071862] Re: Debootstrap fails for Debian testing/trixie/unstable

2024-07-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
The new package from jammy-proposed works as expected ** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2071862] Re: Debootstrap fails for Debian testing/trixie/unstable

2024-07-05 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071862 Title: Debootstrap fails for Debian testing/trixie/unstable To manage n

[Bug 2071862] Re: Debootstrap fails for Debian testing/trixie/unstable

2024-07-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071862 Tit

[Bug 2071862] [NEW] Debootstrap fails for Debian testing/trixie/unstable

2024-07-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: [Impact] On Jammy debootstrap now fails to create Debian trixie/testing/unstable as the usrmerge symlinks are shipped in base-files, like in Noble, so the debootstrap logic is incompatible. Debootstrap in Jammy was already updated to deal with the same change in Noble via:

[Bug 2071542] [NEW] linux-base: add linux-sysctl-defaults package like in Debian

2024-06-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: Debian recently added a new binary arch: all package in linux-base, linux-sysctl-defaults. This package allows the kernel team to control the default sysctl options (imported from the systemd repository) applied on the system, both in full images and in kernel-less containe

[Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-06-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
> just curious: are there any pointers to these discussions? It seems odd to design a format that has quoting issues from the beginning. Unfortunately I don't have links, it's across various maling lists and bug trackers from 2/3 years ago or so. > I don't like having a 99% solution, and skip stu

[Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-06-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
> Proposed solution: Add support for an `--escaped-package-metadata` parameter to the linkers that takes an URL encoded (RFC 3986) parameter. It took months and a huge amount of fighting to get the option merged in all linkers, it was extremely hard. I am afraid this is just unrealistic. The opt-

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

2024-06-01 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Summary changed: - [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular + [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular ** Description changed: [Impact] The version in oracular introduces a new package, dh-dlopenlibdeps, which is a new build dependency of systemd, that we need to use in the upstream CI whe

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

2024-05-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
I have tested this in a PPA build, and installed it locally in noble, works as expected: https://launchpad.net/~upstream-systemd- ci/+archive/ubuntu/systemd- ci/+packages?field.name_filter=package&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=noble -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

2024-05-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
(0.12~bpo24.04.1) noble-backports; urgency=medium + + * Rebuild for noble-backports. (LP: #2067544) + + -- Luca Boccassi Thu, 30 May 2024 00:57:10 +0100 + package-notes (0.12) unstable; urgency=medium [ Luca Boccassi ] ** Also affects: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 2067544] [NEW] [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

2024-05-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: [Impact] The version in oracular introduces a new package, dh-dlopenlibdeps, which is a new build dependency of systemd, that we need to use in the upstream CI when building systemd in noble images to ensure Ubuntu is covered by the integration tests [Scope] Backport versio

[Bug 2056461] Re: autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

2024-05-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Could this be related? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068363 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1068363 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068363 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 2056461] Re: autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

2024-05-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Can confirm the stat workaround works for me as well -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056461 Title: autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown To manage noti

[Bug 2056461] Re: autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

2024-05-02 Thread Luca Boccassi
I'm hitting this as well, running autopkgtest (from latest main) against an amd64 noble image built with autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud on Debian stable with qemu 7.2. I can confirm that switching the kernel in the noble image to the 6.5 shipped in Mantic fixes the issue, with no other changes

[Bug 2060150] [NEW] openssh sets PAM_RHOST to UNKNOWN causing slow logins

2024-04-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: When using sshd's -i option with stdio that is not a AF_INET/AF_INET6 socket, auth_get_canonical_hostname() returns "UNKNOWN" which is then set as the value of PAM_RHOST, causing pam to try to do a reverse DNS query of "UNKNOWN", which times out multiple times, causing a subst

[Bug 2015538] Re: [MIR] dbus-broker

2024-03-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
IMHO it would be a worthwhile investment to allocate resources to implement that plan, as it would benefit desktop users for all cases, not just with dbus-broker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 2015538] Re: [MIR] dbus-broker

2024-03-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
Errata: I talked with smcv, who explained to me that dbus-run-session is actually a wrapper around dbus-daemon itself, so they are not independent. With user sessions managed by logind&al, what is the use case for dbus- run-session in production? I am aware it is used for self-contained tests and

[Bug 2038777] Re: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds (drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c)

2024-03-13 Thread Luca Boccassi
Github Actions enabled KVM for all open source repositories for free in January: https://github.blog/2024-01-17-github-hosted-runners-double-the-power- for-open-source/ We started using it in systemd, and we hit this bug: https://paste.centos.org/view/411107c8 This will start quickly affecting

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-03-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054741 Title: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-03-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
distribution sid dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Luca Boccassi dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build . debian/rules clean dh clean --without autoreconf --buildsystem=meson debian/rules execute_before_dh_auto_clean make[1]: Entering directory

[Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-03-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
The previous lvm2 upload has now migrated from proposed to noble. cryptsetup 2.7.0 is also now available in noble, which also can make use of this bug fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-02-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
The autopkgtest failures are unrelated, one is some patch fuzz: 15200s == Unapplying the patch == 15200s patching file solenv/gbuild/UITest.mk 15200s Hunk #1 succeeded at 34 with fuzz 1. 15200s Hunk #2 succeeded at 71 with fuzz 2 (offset 6 lines). 15200s Hunk #3 succeeded at 92 (offset -3

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-02-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
Verified that the packages in proposed work and solve the bug. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-02-27 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~bluca/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+git/lvm2/+merge/461372 ** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~bluca/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+git/lvm2/+merge/460984 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-02-27 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed: When libcryptsetup tries to activate a signed dm-verity volume, and the key is not in the kernel keyring, libdevicemapper does not return the appropriate ENOKEY, so the failure cannot be distinguished from other generic issues. + + This is a problem when software l

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-02-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed: + [Impact] + DEB_BUILD_PROFILES= can be used in Debian to specify a build profile to use with dpkg-buildpackage. We want to use it in the systemd project to build the upstream packages for the Ubuntu autopkgtest cloud CI on Github. But in the Ubuntu's fork of dpkg,

[Bug 1897932] Re: systemd-repart not packaged

2022-05-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
Any chance it could be enabled now that Jammy shipped? It's really fine to enable it in 249 for 20.10, there's really no reason to wait for a new version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1921828] Re: Cisco AnyConnect 4.8+ server requires a trivial patch to connect

2022-04-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921828 Title: Cisco AnyConnect 4.8+ server requires a trivial patch to

[Bug 1867184] Re: Cannot connect to Cisco ASA with openconnect

2022-04-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867184 Title: Cannot connect to Cisco ASA with openconnect To manage

[Bug 1959047] Re: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

2022-03-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
Is there a chance to SRU a targeted patch for LXD in Bionic to fix the issue instead? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959047 Title: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service un

[Bug 1959047] Re: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

2022-03-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
This is caused by https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/tree/debian/patches/debian/UBUNTU- Revert-namespace-be-more-careful-when-handling- namespacin.patch?h=ubuntu/jammy From upstream's point of view, ignoring sandboxing options requested by unit owners is quite dangerous. It can resul

[Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2022-03-11 Thread Luca Boccassi
Fixed also in systemd v250.4 and v249.11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538 Title: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm To manage notifications a

[Bug 1961758] Re: Fail to run tpm2 command under ubuntu server 22.04

2022-03-08 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: tpm2-tss-engine (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961758 Title: Fail to run tpm2 command under ubuntu server 22.04 To manage

[Bug 1961758] Re: Fail to run tpm2 command under ubuntu server 22.04

2022-03-05 Thread Luca Boccassi
tpm2-tss has been updated to 3.2 in Jammy a couple of days ago. Also, you should be using tpm2-openssl rather than tpm2-tss-engine, in order to work with OpenSSL 3.0. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1875298] Re: Focal Fossa is missing libfakechroot:i386 package

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fakechroot (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875298 Title: Focal Fossa is missing libfakechroot:i386 package To manage

[Bug 1961610] Re: i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
Bug against fakechroot: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fakechroot/+bug/1875298 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961610 Title: i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot To mana

[Bug 1961610] Re: i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
Note that the only dependency is libjemalloc, whicih already has an i386 build, so there would be no other new i386 builds apart from libfakechroot itself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 1875298] Re: Focal Fossa is missing libfakechroot:i386 package

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
This affects Jammy, and it is stopping the init-system-helpers migration. See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- meta/+bug/1961610 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875298

[Bug 1961771] Re: Enable CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT in Jammy

2022-02-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961771 Title: Enable CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT in Jammy To manage notifi

[Bug 1961771] [NEW] Enable CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT in Jammy

2022-02-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: [Impact] The CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT option allows to support pretimeout actions on device drivers without the hardware capability to support it. It was introduced in Linux 5.14: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/7b7d2fdc8c3e3f9fdb3558d674e1eeddc16c7d9e It

[Bug 1961610] [NEW] i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

2022-02-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: As per instructions on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/i386 fakechroot (arch: all) requires libfakechroot, but this is not built for i386: https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/libfakechroot init-system-helpers, which builds a package allow-listed for i386 builds, now build-depends on f

[Bug 1515759] Re: Python 3 support for python-fabric

2022-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fabric (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515759 Title: Python 3 support for python-fabric To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1653755] Re: Missing python-crypto dependancy

2022-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fabric (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1653755 Title: Missing python-crypto dependancy To manage notifications about this bu

[Bug 1932531] Re: Missing python3-decorator dependency

2022-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fabric (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932531 Title: Missing python3-decorator dependency To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 1959901] Re: [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

2022-02-14 Thread Luca Boccassi
The package just made it through the Debian NEW queue, so it should be available in experimental shortly - which I believe can be synced easily to jammy (but still needs a manual action). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1959901] Re: [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

2022-02-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed: Provides an OpenSSL 3.0 compatible new-style engine (ie, provider). Supersedes https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine which is OpenSSL 1.x specific and has been marked for removal from Jammy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine/+b

[Bug 1959901] [NEW] [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

2022-02-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported: Provides an OpenSSL 3.0 compatible new-style engine (ie, provider). Supersedes https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine which is OpenSSL 1.x specific and has been marked for removal from Jammy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine/+bug/1959414

  1   2   >